4th Circuit Court Sides With a Spammer 154
bulled writes to tell us about coverage on CNet regarding a ruling a couple of weeks back that allows a spamming company to procede with their suit against a spamfighter. The 4th Circuit court ruled that the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act, much derided here, trumps the Oklahoma law under which anti-spam activist Mark Mumma sued Omega World Travel for spamming him. The ruling allows Omega World Travel's countersuit, for defamation, to go forward. From the article: "'There's been a lot of activity in the states to pass laws purportedly to protect their citizens' from spam, said Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University. 'The 4th Circuit may have laid waste to all of those efforts.'"
Re:Mod UP if getting "XXXXXX wrote:" SPAM (Score:3, Funny)
Irony (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Important Because (Score:1, Funny)
Oh, thats easy.
Re:really? (Score:3, Funny)
Many would argue that use of "procede" is perfectly cromulent.
Re:duh (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Mod UP if getting "XXXXXX wrote:" SPAM (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Spam (Score:3, Funny)
Perhaps he got his Un1v3rsi+y d3gRe3 online, too...
Re:May these judges get nothing but v14gr4 spam (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, don't blame me - I sent them an email . . . oh!