Second Life Hit By Massive In-Game Worm 249
An anonymous reader writes, "At 2:46 CST today, the game Second Life was hit by a massive attack by a rogue programmer. Spinning gold rings began to appear in the air and on the ground, and as users interacted with them they began to chase and replicate. Apparently, most people are willing to touch an object they've never seen before and this invoked a worm script that was designed to multiply and spread across the 2,700+ servers run by Linden Labs in California, the game's owner. Many of the six hundred thousand active users experienced serious lag and lost connectivity to the servers, making it one of the largest known denial-of-service attacks in an online game. Linden Labs had to invoke martial law and lock out all logins by users except their staff as they began the task of cleaning the servers of what they began to term 'the grey goo.'" Comments in the SL blog entry indicate that Linden Labs had already deployed a "grey goo fence" before this worm struck, but someone found a hole in it.
Neat! (Score:5, Funny)
Ha (Score:5, Funny)
Bad soap opera... (Score:5, Funny)
Second Life slowed down? (Score:5, Funny)
Like a snake around the brainstem (Score:5, Funny)
users thought it was a cock ring (Score:0, Funny)
Mum nailed it! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Second Life needs a new name (Score:1, Funny)
Idiot.
Giant worm??? You know what that means... (Score:2, Funny)
Well, look on the bright side... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Neat! (Score:3, Funny)
This sounds like a job for... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Second Life needs a new name (Score:5, Funny)
I submit that anybody who posts to Slashdot about the other people's need to "get a life" should spontaneously explode from sheer force of concentrated hypocrisy.
Re:Who dun it? (Score:5, Funny)
- Shadow
One ring... (Score:3, Funny)
Say it ain't so! (Score:4, Funny)
Uh oh, I think SkyNet just became self-aware... of its Second Life account.
Re:Not just misleading, but factually inaccurate t (Score:2, Funny)
"...Linden Labs in California, the game's owner."
Do Second Life users also grab at modifiers that are dangled [wikipedia.org] in front of them?
- RG>
Re:Ha ha (Score:3, Funny)
Swi
Playing Doctor. (Score:2, Funny)
You should be so lucky.
Re:Ha (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Neat! (Score:3, Funny)
Or hey, you go kiss another character
>>
Kissing another character is not the most likely vector for an infection in Second Life. We'll leave it at that.
Second Life = Snow Crash (Score:5, Funny)
Ah but the big question is... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Someone please explain (Score:5, Funny)
In that same vein, I would mind this WWW thing a lot less, if people remember that it's really just a glorified Gopher program with scripts...
Re:Oh NOOO! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Not just misleading, but factually inaccurate t (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Someone please explain (Score:3, Funny)
Genitals are objects in Second Life (Score:2, Funny)
Genitals are manufactured objects in Second Life, but your normal face's lips are not, so genitals will almost always carry scripts of their own.
This means that kissing another character is unlikely to be a vector for viral infection, but there's a related activity that could easily do this.
Incidentally, waxing your carrot can of course trigger any scripted action in the object, so climax can be rather more visually impressive in Second Life than in your first one.
Re:And it was just getting good (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Second Life = Snow Crash (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Second Life = Snow Crash (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Someone please explain (Score:3, Funny)
Layne