Microsoft Won't Offer Patch Before Worm Strikes? 274
techmuse writes "According to an article in Information Week, Microsoft is aware that the 'Kama Sutra/Blackworm/MyWife' worm will hit on Friday, overwriting office documents, but will not release a patch until its regular monthly patch release on February 14th. Unless, that is, you subscribe to one of Microsoft's pay security services, in which case your machine will have the worm removed in advance." From the article: "The blog offered no explanation why the tool wouldn't be updated earlier, nor did Microsoft immediately respond to questions. Each month, Microsoft pushes a revised tool to Windows users who have Automatic Update enabled for Windows Update or Microsoft Update. The Redmond, Wash.-based company has released the Malicious Software Removal Tool off-schedule once before, in August 2005, shortly after the Zotob worm began striking Windows 2000 systems."
All should not be lost... (Score:5, Interesting)
Incorrect Story (Score:5, Interesting)
Windows Live site uses a cookie exploit (Score:1, Interesting)
if you goto the Windows Live.com site (hxtp://safety.live.com) to stop this malicious program/worm the MS site uses a malicious [pc-help.org] cookie [neohapsis.com] exploit [techweb.com] against you, if you deny the exploit you cant get to the site to get help
its like a Hospital saying "we have to break your leg so we can fix your arm"
they should be ashamed
Re:All should not be lost... (Score:3, Interesting)
Not hard.
How hard is it to not run software mailed to you from a (forged) sender you do know?
Apparantly much harder.
Re:All should not be lost... (Score:5, Interesting)
Well, experience has told us that not all of these Microsoft vulnerabilities have anything to do with 'stupid and irresponsible' users.
Thanks to Microsoft, there's so many viruses that don't even require user intervention; some products will simply decide that it should both hide the extension and automatically run it for you.
I don't know the specifics of this worm, but times have come a long way from where you'd have to click on at attachment, select save, and then run. Nowadays the infection can happen automatically, instantly, and completely unobserved -- all because Microsoft figures it should automatically execute anything that looks executable (or that you're not really mature enough to see the extension of this file, so it looks like a JPG, or just simply because it's fun.)
I think it's far more irresponsible of Microsoft to effectively say "Well, between now and when we release the patch, you could lose all of your data. But if you've paid extra, you can have the patch now."
Time was when someone would send you an e-mail warning you that should shouldn't even click on an attachment since it could be a virus, you would politely tell them it was impossible. Nowadays, that's simply not true any more.
I think blaming the users 100% for this is absurd.
Even people who should know better make mistakes (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:TROLL???? (Score:5, Interesting)
At least CBS News pointed out in their report on the worm that Mac users were unaffected.