Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Security

No Anti-Virus in Vista 444

truthsearch writes "Microsoft will omit anti-virus protection in Vista, the next version of Windows. Redmond is promoting Vista as a landmark improvement in Windows security. Yet Jim Allchin also told CRN in a recent interview that there will be no anti-virus software. For unspecified business (not technical) reasons, Microsoft will sell anti-virus protection to consumers through its OneCare online backup and security service."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

No Anti-Virus in Vista

Comments Filter:
  • by Avohir ( 889832 ) on Monday January 30, 2006 @04:58PM (#14601415)
    about 4 months ago... [com.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:21PM (#14601656)
    If you are going to try and sound smart, at least spell correctly: du jour
  • Re:Sure (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:23PM (#14601672)
    Actually, after playing with Norton for a little while, I tried to go back to *anything* else, but failed, because Norton has so thorougly infected my system that my only respite was wipe and reinstall.
  • by jacksonj04 ( 800021 ) <nick@nickjackson.me> on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:29PM (#14601748) Homepage
    Umm... used Windows lately? As in a properly configured Windows?

    The security model does that one already.
  • by Kalecomm ( 926735 ) <klindsey@kalecomm.com> on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:30PM (#14601755)
    I spend, unfortunately a large amount of my time in DimWoes because of school, however, I have gotten Broadcom Wireless to work with the ndiswrapper and it seems to work very well. You should check the Ubuntu forums for specifics: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=31926 [ubuntuforums.org] Best Regards, Kalecomm
  • by zippthorne ( 748122 ) on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:40PM (#14601882) Journal
    It isn't enough just to sandbox the viruses. It must also run the programs you DO want to run. A "properly" configured Windows box won't do that. There is plenty of blame to go around for that little feature.
  • by RzUpAnmsCwrds ( 262647 ) on Monday January 30, 2006 @05:46PM (#14601950)
    First of all, I don't know how you can call WVDDM + WPF + DCE 'not a new graphics engine'. New driver model, new GUI system, and a new window manager - seems new enough to me.

    Second, Vista has a number of big new features:
    - Brand new networking stack that is 100% IPv6 internally
    - New ACPI subsystem including a hybrid STR/STD support, faster suspend/resume, and a more robust mechanism for dealing with bad drivers
    - New audio subsystem with per-application mixing
    - UAP support (not running as admin all the time) with automatic privelage elevation (with user approval) for installers and other programs that need admin access
    - Major memory manager tweaks
    - Kernel tweaks to improve streaming performance
    - New programming framework (WinFX) based on .NET 2.0, WPF, and a host of other new technologies
    - 3D accelerated UI / window manager
    - New Media Center and Tablet PC features
    - Fast User Switching on AD Domains
    - Integrated AntiSpyware
    - Integrated indexing / search (ala Spotlight) including extensive metadata and tagging support
    - New Windows Media Player
    - New version of IE with CSS fixes, phishing filter, tabbed browsing, native XMLHTTP, freform resize (ala Opera), and many security enhancements
    - Support for auxiliry LCD displays (windows SideShow)
    - New, faster install system (no more text-mode 'copying files')
    - New Windows Installer version
    - New printing system / PDF alternative (Metro)

    So, in response to your question, basically everything.
  • by value_added ( 719364 ) on Monday January 30, 2006 @06:33PM (#14602444)
    Umm... used Windows lately? As in a properly configured Windows?

    The security model does that one already.


    Ever administered a Windows system? It's as easy as setting a umask of 022 and using chmod where needed, isn't it? And no issues with file ownership, right? By the time you've set group policies, right-clicked your way through the file system and mucked about in the registry, do find time to tell us more about this security model.

    Or are you suggesting that a Windows user needs a security expert to reconfigure the default installation on their new Dell box to make it properly configured?

    Sorry, but the parent comment about a sane security model is perfectly valid. My guess is that it'll take a few more tries for Windows to reinvent itself and resolve the tortured directory system with the concept of a path and give up on inventing new models. Chances are it'll resemble Unix.

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...