Web 3.0

SpunOne writes "Apparently Jeffrey Zeldman is as sick of Web 2.0 as many of us have become. In his latest article, titled "Web 3.0," he really sticks it to the Web 2.0 fan boys, and dispels a lot of the hype generated by our young new friends. It's easy to grow apathetic when a new idea gains so much traction so quickly, but his points are clear and accurate, and deserve consideration."

pfft..

[tont0r]

Web 4.0 will kick his Web 3.0's ass. He needs to get with the times.

Just In Case...

[millahtime]

Just In Case I make My websites with Web 8.0. This should keep me good for at least 2 or 3 more months.

That's all well and good. . .

[igibo]

. . .but here is an indisputable rebuttal.

http://www.parm.net/web2.0/ [parm.net]

Come on people, we're all sick of buzzwords, but you can't deny the reality of Web 2.0!

Igi

start thinking about usability and design

[digitaldc]

more often than not, big teams have slowly and expensively labored to produce overly complex web applications whose usability was near nil on behalf of clients with at best vague goals.

We need to immediately have a meeting to discuss reducing complexity, increasing usability and clarifying our goals.

Web XP is where it is at!

[Anonymous Coward]

This will beam web content right into your brain! Then.. to enable the DRM, a thug will come to your location and give you a hit or two upside the head with a sledge hammer.

Only problem I am having is getting people to access Web XP a second time :(

Big Deal

[Give Me a T, Give me]

I was surfing the web 2.0 on my Commodore 64

hold on a bit longer

[gEvil (beta)]

Everyone knows that it won't reallty be usable until it hits Web 3.1.

Re:start thinking about usability and design

[ladyKae]

But... Meetings are bad for you [slashdot.org]

Re:Oh boy.

[LiquidCoooled]

Slashdot should jump the bandwagon and incorporate Web 4.0

(its just like Web 2.0 but duped)

Re:Oh boy.

[MountainMan101]

Web 3.0 is for Fedora fan-boys. Debian users will continue with Web 1.0 (or rather 1.1), which has the same interface as 1.0 but all of the security fixes of 2.0 backported.

Re:More like 0.2 than 2.0

[click2005]

"WWW:The Next Generation"... Aren't you a bit ahead of yourself there?

WWW : The Markup Protocol
WWW 2.0 The Wrath of Kazaa
WWW 3 The Search for Social Networks
WWW 4 The VRML Homepage
WWW 5 The Final Flickr
WWW 6 The Undocumented Context

then we get to WWW:TNG

Re:start thinking about usability and design

[TheRealMindChild]

More to the point, our potential to leverage dynamic interfaces and drive seamless infrastructures leaves us needing disintermediate clicks-and-mortar methodologies to synergize back-end metrics. We are then able to synthesize e-business infomediaries while maintaining a aggregate efficient convergence.

Brought to you by the fine people at http://www.robietherobot.com/buzzword.htm [robietherobot.com]

Patented business methods -- find me some VC!

[wild_berry]

I have replaced you with a shell script. You are no longer needed.

However, I have just replaced myself with two shell scripts: the one above and one taking my venture-lent millions and IPO'ing. Further, I have a patent to the business method of replacing employees with shell scripts and will IPO it to make millions. Then I'll write a shell script -- most likely in a different language, Ruby, Haskell, PHP, perhaps -- to do the same as a Web 2.0 thing before reinventing myself for Web 3.0 (there exists a business method patent for reinventing the same business methods again and again, but it's being contested by religions and crime syndicates).

P.S. Word to the wise about Web 3.0: it won't be stable until 3.1 and then 3.11 will bring real connectivity to the Web...

Re:Just In Case...

[infomagic]

That's not cool. The cool thing these days is Web 3.1415926....

Re:hold on a bit longer

[phuked]

Just wait for Web for Workgroups (WfW) 3.11, it'll have networking!!11!

Re:Web 2.0: Hype or Real??

[Jesus_666]

We clearly need 2.0 2.0. It's just like 2.0 1.0, but it's totally interactive ans dynamic and socially collaborative with Ruby tags all over the place. It also has rounded corners.

In other news...

[NardofDoom]

In other news: Only a very few people will get rich and everyone else will continue to have to work for a living, many of them in jobs they don't like.

Since when has not being a multi-millionaire been a bad thing?

Re:Paul Graham

[MuValas]

Why can I not have moderation points at a time like this to help others see the genius in your statements?

Although, I would have stated your post more like ... "Fuck Paul Graham with a red hot fork".

I think your way is a bit more diplomatic though.

Re:Patented business methods -- find me some VC!

[The-Bus]

You mean Web 3.11 for Workgroups? After all, it's e-robustness gives it a best-of-breed i-enterprise synergy.

Re:Screw that, I wrote about Web 4.0

[mooingyak]

ahem... but it turns out that the real use is...


Web 1.0 is about allowing individuals to create and share porn.
Web 2.0 is about allowing groups to create and share porn.
Web 3.0 is about allowing societies to create and share porn.


Or more succintly, since the above distinctions seem pretty meaningless (in both my and your versions), web = porn (or ideas, or whatever you think really happens on the web).

Re:Screw that, I wrote about Web 4.0

[Murmer]

You're clearly incorrect.

Web 1.0 is about gathering underpants.
Web 2.0 is a whole bunch of question marks, and
Web 3.0 is about rolling in cash.

This could not be more obvious.

Isn't

[DulcetTone]

Isn't XML the CSV of Y2K?

tone

We Got Jay Allard! WOOO!

[wild_berry]

Watch it, you! I'm working on replacing you with a blooming shell script too! All those buzzwords and you don't really know what you're talking about. Web 3.11 for Workgroups isn't best-of-breed i-enterprise synergy, it's long-view market leader innovation for maximised return on investment across a multi-disciplinary workflow of uncompromising fruity goodness. Please don't undersell the vision, man. And, man, am I buzzed about that vision. Woo!

Re:More like 0.2 than 2.0

[njchick]

Web 1.0: The Flash Menace
Web 2.0: Attack of the AJAX
Web 3.0: Revenge of the Blog
Web 4.0: A New Dope
Web 5.0: The E-commerce Strikes Back
Web 6.0: Return of the Geek

Re:what's

[srpatterson]

Despatch war rocket AJAX to bring back his webserver.