Flushing the Net Down the Tubes 329
netcetra writes "From a post by on CircleID by Phillip J. Windley: 'Doc Searls has written a brilliant piece framing the battle for the Net at Linux Journal. ... if you take the time to read just one essay on the Net and the politics surround it this year, read this one.' Quote from Doc himself: 'This is a long essay. There is, however, no limit to how long I could have made it. The subjects covered here are no less enormous than the Net and its future. Even optimists agree that the Net's future as a free and open environment for business and culture is facing many threats. We can't begin to cover them all or cover all the ways we can fight them. I believe, however, that there is one sure way to fight all of these threats at once, and without doing it the bad guys will win. That's what this essay is about.' Also see additional background on the piece on Doc Searls blog."
I sense a great disturbance in the force (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Timing? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Getting rid of the trash. (Score:2, Funny)
Not to mention TWO, TOO and TO.
Don't forget about YOU'RE, YOUR and YORE.
Oops, almost forgot ITS and IT'S.
Re:Greed... (Score:2, Funny)
And those scholars will be in what future scholars will call the mauve ages.
Re:Getting rid of the trash. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Searls overstates his case (Score:1, Funny)
This guy is a hack! (Score:3, Funny)
I mean, he loses credibility in the first sentence.. "This is a long essay. There is, however, no limit to how long I could have made it.". Of course there is a limit!
We all know that the number of computer bits that man could ever possibly compute [physicsweb.org] is 1.35x(10^20), so his essay could *never* be more than that long, or else it would neve rbe completed.
Foolish!
Re:When I meet a single person... (Score:3, Funny)