The Microsoft Protection Racket 539
bonch writes "Dvorak writes about the 'Microsoft protection racket' in his latest column--'charging real money for any sort of add-on, service, or new product that protects clients against flaws in its own operating system.' Dvorak argues that someone took a look at the expense of Microsoft's monthly 'Patch Tuesday' and decided to find a way to make money from it instead of fix the code (e.g., abandoning the use of the registry)." I enjoy salt with my Dvorak, but that's just me.
I enjoy calling Dvorak a blohward with my Dvorak (Score:5, Funny)
Oh noes, Dvorak! (Score:5, Funny)
And yes, I know he isn't the same as the keyboard guy.
That's a nice enterprise network you have there... (Score:5, Funny)
from the article:
I can see it now.... (Score:5, Funny)
Funny ending (Score:2, Funny)
Vista - Preloaded with Viruses and Spyware Edition... $39.95
Vista - Initially Clean but Use at Your Own Risk Edition... $49.95
Vista - Clean with Firewall and Weekly Protection Update Edition... $200
From TFA.
Re:A Little Creative thinking maybe....?!?! (Score:5, Funny)
Also why is this retard writing about Security??
He's not writing about security, he's writing about Microsoft security. He's obviously fully qualified.
Re:Amen, brother (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Pfft. (Score:3, Funny)
LOL (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I enjoy calling Dvorak a blohward with my Dvora (Score:5, Funny)
I think you need more practice.
Re:Pfft. (Score:4, Funny)
I'm sorry, but did you just use the words "UNIX" and "it just works" in the same sentence? With a straight face?
Thank you Bill May I have another!? (Score:5, Funny)
I encourage this type of arrogance on the part of Microsoft, I would suspect that they would find themselves tied up in another legal battle. In addition, this may be exactly the type of thing that Linux needs.
"Exactly how anything manages to worm in through the open port and place items in the Registry is beyond me.."
This is one of those "features" brought about by the "tight integration" that Microsoft oh-so likes to spout off, the same goes for their "feature rich", "Tightly Integrated" Office Suite!
[regarding the Registry]"Why does Microsoft insist on continuing its use? There has to be a better way."
Another "tightly integrated" feature of the Windows OS, Surely there is a way, maybe when they receive the money for the patch management services, they will fix the problems with the registry.
I really don't know why Microsoft is even worried about it, Isn't it the Coders Fault anyway? [slashdot.org]
"Why doesn't the company just bite the bullet and bring out various exploitable versions?"
Vista - Wont't Install (BSOD) Edition
Vista - Phisermans Dream Editition (Code Named CHUM)
Vista - Cleaned and Optimized (Linux , Gnome w/Vista Skin)
Re:Conflict of interest (Score:2, Funny)
How to solve the "conflict of interest" (Score:2, Funny)
2. One division for OS (MicroSoft), one division for "security" (MicroHardened)
3. ????
4. PROFIT!
Re:Pfft. (Score:5, Funny)
Son, I got a .emacs file that's older than you and most of your friends.
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh noes, Dvorak! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Pfft. (Score:1, Funny)
As someone who writes so much, perhaps you should familiarize yourself with proper use of the english language.
Crawl back into your cubby, cubicle boy.
Re:The Registry is a single point of failure. (Score:2, Funny)
Well.. there's your problem. You shouldn't be using 'enterprise database software'. You should be doing everything in flat text files!
Re:I enjoy calling Dvorak a blohward with my Dvora (Score:5, Funny)
He was probably using definition 1.
Re:I enjoy calling Dvorak a blohward with my Dvora (Score:2, Funny)
You've got the same kind of keyboard, huh?