White Lies Help Stressed Computer Users 333
An anonymous reader writes "Simple tricks allow one to appear to be hard at work in the office while actually forwarding calls, e-mails and instant messages to your mobile phone. One can backdate e-mails through rolling back a computer's built-in clock or use background phone noises to concoct convincing excuses not to go to work."
Backdate e-mails (Score:5, Informative)
Unfortunately "Received:" headers add their own date e.g.
Received: from mta02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.42]) by mx2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id xxxxxxxxxxxx for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 03:56:09 -0400 (EDT)
Re:Why?!!! (Score:5, Informative)
Why aren't the message times marked by the SMTP server itself?
They are, just look for the Received: header. Some software (Outlook) makes it hard to look at these headers, but they are there.
Even then, why does the SMTP server accept e-mails from the past?
Because of the store-and-forward nature of SMTP. In a typical situation, your mail is first delivered to your local SMTP server and then sent to the remote SMTP server. And some sites have complicated setups with multiple servers even within their own organization forwarding the messages a few times. Since delays and downtime can creep in a few places, there's no good reason to deny "old" messages. Although unlikely dates are usually flagges by anti-spam software as being suspicious.
More generally, SMTP doesn't try to check the authenticity of message headers or content in any way. Which is why you can also "forge" the From-address, etc.
Tricks (Score:5, Informative)
One I discovered is that you can take a full-sized screenshot and use Windows XP's built-in slideshow screensaver to display that as a locked screensaver. Hide your clock, take a shot of a Word document, and your locked, idle PC looks like you're in the middle of work.
Re:How to use this to make workers look bad (Score:4, Informative)
Superman 3 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086393/ [imdb.com]
American workers are already being called the laziest in the world (by conservatives, mind you) while statistics show them to be among the most productive (overall, if not per hour). If we're such collective goof offs then why are we so productive?
Because:
Another ad on /. (Score:2, Informative)
Tip for mobiles in the UK (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How to use this to make workers look bad (Score:3, Informative)
Or actually... (Score:3, Informative)