We're Open enough, Says Microsoft 660
An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft Australia has come under fire from rival vendors and open-source advocates for keeping its Office document standards proprietary.
Greg Stone, Microsoft's national technology officer for Australia and New Zealand, faced criticism during his presentation at the Australian Unix User Group conference in Canberra yesterday. However, he stood firm on the company's policy of making the XML schemas for its Office 2003 document standard publicly available provided interested parties sign an agreement with the software heavyweight. "Why should I have to sign an agreement?" one audience member demanded to know."
How right they are (Score:5, Funny)
Can one piece of software possibly be more open to exploits and viruses?
So... (Score:4, Funny)
So Microsoft can own your soul, your offsprings' souls, their retroactive grandparents' souls, and the souls of everyone they come in contact with.
In the form of a nice law suit.
big blunder man... (Score:2, Funny)
Open enough meaning (Score:3, Funny)
But that's open enough to suit Microsoft perfectly fine.
Open source is Evil! (Score:2, Funny)
Ask Linus. [theregister.com] Proprietary is the way to go.
And you all knew this was coming.
What a day... (Score:4, Funny)
and... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:eeehmm (Score:2, Funny)
Swaaaaannieeee - ohhhhhh how I love ya, how I love ya, Swaaaannnniiiiiieeeeeeeee!
Oh you meant "sign" an agreement... my bad. please spellcheck in the future,
plskthx
AC
"We are open enough" (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Why shoud I have to sign... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A better response to this (Score:5, Funny)
Ok. I'll make a few phone calls and see what I can do.
Makes sense... (Score:5, Funny)
yah ... right .... (Score:3, Funny)
From the makers of (Score:5, Funny)
Advantage as in same thing later
We are proud to present
Open as in closed
Open? (Score:2, Funny)
More than enough! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why shoud I have to sign... (Score:2, Funny)
Uh (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why shoud I have to sign... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Worked before (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Madness (Score:4, Funny)
That sound you just heard was 10,000 Microsoft lawyers, all getting a boner.
Re:Why do you spread it ? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Good riddance smoking (Score:3, Funny)
Bullshit. A pub is private property that allows the public to enter.
Microsoft = pub
If a pub owner would like to allow smoking, the customers have the choice to enter or not.
Smoking = access to document standards.
If a pub owner would like to allow smoking, the customers have the choice to enter or not.
I get it now... so all this fight for open standards is actually a cleverly disguised campaign to remove smoking bans! It all makes sense now!!!