Open Office 2.0 Beta Candidate Released 415
JPyObjC Dude writes "The
OpenOffice.org 2.0 beta candidate has been released. You can find the feature guide that covers the wide array of improvements over the current 1.1 release. There are a bunch of problematic UI quirks in 1.1 that have been fixed in 2.0." Feature categories include increased interoperability with Microsoft Office, Asian Language Features, Developer-Specific Features, and new Internet based features. Commentary and an interview with Colm Smyth available at NewsForge.com.
OO.o for OS X? (Score:2, Informative)
Has this (yet to be remembered by me) group made any announcement on using the new 2.0 code in their OS X implementation?
Re:WP? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:OO.o for OS X? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:OO.o for OS X? (Score:1, Informative)
StarOffice 8 (beta) (Score:2, Informative)
A month ago I installed a pre-relase build of OpenOffice.org (not the RC) and run very very slowly and buggy. Then, i download and try StarOffice 8 and it run beautiful.
I assume OO.org RC must be at the same stability/maturity level as Sun beta is.
Torrent link here! (Score:5, Informative)
OOo_2.0bc_Win32Intel_install.zip [utwente.nl]
OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz [utwente.nl]
these are direct links to the windows and linux installers.
Re:Corel Suite (Score:5, Informative)
"the filter needs continuous development to arrest bit-rot, and to improve it's capabilities. Many such developments have already taken place, but are not merged/proposed due to the voracious demands of bureaucratic process, and the commensurate stifling of the will-to-live."
I know the feeling
Re:Corel Suite (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Corel Suite (Score:3, Informative)
I've slowly started a switch to Open Office, but opening old documents and spreadsheet is impossible with Open Office, if they are any of the Corel Formats.
While conversion might take a good few days, have you tried using Corel's own (slightly older) conversion tool [corel.com]? Would a simple WP -> Word -> OO.o conversion work? Of course, this wouldn't help you with the Quattro files.
After the initial conversion pains, you should be good to go in OO.o's sxw format.
Re:Corel Suite (Score:5, Informative)
Not a single vector graphics import format works properly.
The ones that barely work (Autocad for example) lose colors and most of the formatting. So if you want to draw a half decent diagram using DIA and import it into an OO presentation you might as well forget it. Your only chance is to export it as a raster image and import it in OO. The result is horrible by all means. Horrible size, horrible visually, horrible in a print form and horrible to edit.
And OO 2.0 does not fix a single one of this issues. Instead of that we get visual candy - KDE widget support. Excuse me, but can we actually get the basic functionality fixed first before we get into Clippy land.
Re:Maximum row number (Score:2, Informative)
Re:One day it'll be as good as MS Office! (Score:1, Informative)
Hopefully the OpenOffice team has incorperated support for Clippy (finally!!).
And hopefully they'll remove it soon after! Clippy isn't in Office anymore; stop using outdated arguments against Office.
Re:track changes? (Score:3, Informative)
It has even worked with the MSWord track changes the few times I have tried it.
Re:Maximum row number (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Native Widgets! (Score:5, Informative)
No engineering work has been performed on Quartz or Aqua development within the OpenOffice.org project since mid 2003. For the last year and a half all engineering work focusing on a native Mac OS X OpenOffice.org version has been concentrated in the NeoOffice/J project, using a combination of Java and Carbon technologies to replace X11.
Due to various licensing, political, and fundamental engineering difficulties it is likely, for the near future, that native Aqua porting work will be based off of the NeoOffice.org project and not under the direct aegis of OpenOffice.org. (from http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/timeline.html [openoffice.org])
This was reported on Slashdot [slashdot.org] a couple of weeks ago.
Re:But I just got done compiling OpenOffice 1.0 . (Score:3, Informative)
Yay! Multi-lingual! (Score:4, Informative)
One thing that was an annoyance about OO.o 1.x was that you needed a complete new installation if you wanted a different language. I have users who have different language preferences using the same system, and while the desktop software (KDE in this case) can be switched, OO.o couldn't.
Well, that's now fixed in 2.0! You can add language packs to an existing installation! spec link [openoffice.org]
Yay!
-- Steve
PS. Anyone know if Firefox can/will support this functionality?
Re:How's the database? (Score:4, Informative)
Regardless, I definitely agree with everyone - I would LOVE, SUPPORT and CONTRIBUTE to a 100% open source "generic" database interface. I think it would be a huge hit with open source advocates and corporations because that way, end users could have any easy way to interface with open source databases!
-6d
Re:One day it'll be as good as MS Office! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Corel Suite (Score:2, Informative)
Office Standard Student and Teacher Edition (Score:3, Informative)
Amazon lists MS Office Standard Student and Teacher Edition 2003 for $125.
Installs on three PCs, no student-teacher ID required. Ranks #3 on the Amazon software sales chart. Student-Teacher Office 2004 for the Mac is $136. Ranks #18.
On Moving NeoOffice to 2.0 (Score:5, Informative)
I don't mean to be a curmudgeon, but NeoOffice/J won't be available in a 2.0 beta anytime soon. There are a number of reasons:
We're intending to backport the major feature of 2.0 that is required...OpenDocument format support. There are plans for an OpenOffice.org 1.1.5 release on other platforms that provides OpenDocument support which we hope to incorporate.
What's most likely going to happen is that we'll try doing a NeoOffice/J 1.5 release with Aqua widgets and other Mac-specific features and technical enhancements. Our #1 goal isn't to keep up with the most up to date OOo release, but rather, to make a great Mac OS X office suite. NeoOffice/J 1.1 is the most solid foundation upon which to build it since it's the most bug free.
Without substantial assistance (e.g. perfecting
Re:Let's just hope (Score:3, Informative)
The OO.o equation editor syntax is amazing, but it's useless for all but the most simplest of documents until they get the equations properly aligned [openoffice.org]. Manually aligning fives pages of equations is no fun, I can assure you.
Oh well, back to MathType and Word.
Re:How's the database? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:How's the database? (Score:3, Informative)
Now get to work, they need help
Re:Native Widgets! (Score:2, Informative)
maybe you should try to express your opinion in mailing lists (users@openoffice.org, for example)
Re:One day it'll be as good as MS Office! (Score:3, Informative)
Because it's a large application (it includes lots of cross-platform portability toolkit functions), written in C++. This affects Mozilla and KDE too. More info here [www.suse.de].
If you're not using a distro that includes prelinking, you should upgrade. If you are, you should make sure that the prelink process runs regularly.