Solaris 10 Released 478
AusG4 writes "Sun Microsystems has released Solaris 10 for both SPARC and Intel/Opteron. Downloading it is the usual 'register and get your free license' meandering; the Intel/Opteron version is 4 CDs and an optional language and companion disc (a bunch of pre-compiled GNU software in pkgadd format, I'm assuming, same as Solaris 8 and 9)."
Cheap Sun hardware (Score:2, Informative)
Don't mislead people (Score:5, Informative)
Re:UNIX vs. LINUX? (Score:4, Informative)
And if you really, seriously want to do it, for the love of God check the hardware compatibility list [sun.com] and save the rest of us a million questions about why Solaris won't work on your PC. Simple - if the hardware's not on the list, Solaris won't work with it! Really! Sun's not lying in their document.
Solaris Zones vs User Mode Linux (Score:4, Informative)
Don't fall for the trap (Score:3, Informative)
Nobody who intends to contribute to glibc must look at anything but the public header files of the Solaris libc and related libraries.
(Emph. mine) Don't fall for the Solaris trap!
Re:License summary anyone? (Score:5, Informative)
ENTITLEMENT for
SOLARIS 10 3/05 OPERATING SYSTEM
THIS ENTITLEMENT EVIDENCES YOUR AUTHORIZED SCOPE OF USE UNDER THE TERMS
OF THE SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE SUN SOFTWARE
INDICATED BELOW (THE SLA) UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED IN WRITING BETWEEN YOU AND
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. (SUN). Capitalized terms not defined in this document
have the meanings ascribed to them in the SLA. These terms will
supersede any inconsistent or conflicting terms in the SLA.
Licensee/Company: Entity in receipt of Software from an authorized source
Beginning Date of License Term: the date of receipt of this Entitlement
Software: Solaris 10 3/05
Permitted Use: Commercial Use
License Term: Perpetual (subject to termination under the SLA)
Licensed Unit: Registered Computer System
Licensed unit Count: Unlimited
Additional Terms:
1.0 License to Develop. You are authorized to develop software programs
utilizing Software. If you desire to develop software programs which
incorporate portions of Software ("Developed Programs"), the following
provisions apply: (i) you may not modify or add to application programming
interfaces associated with Software; (ii) you are not licensed to use fonts
within Software to develop printing applications unless you have secured valid
licenses from the appropriate font suppliers; (iii) incorporation of portions of
Motif in Developed Programs may require reporting of copies of Developed
Programs to Sun;
and (iv) you will indemnify and defend Sun and its licensors from any
claims, including attorneys' fees, which arise from or relate to distribution or
use of Developed Programs to the extent these claims arise from or relate to the
development performed by you. This Section 1.0 does not apply to the Sun Java
System Application Server Platform Edition 8, Sun Java System Message
Queue 3.5, Sun Java System Directory Server 5, and Java 2 Platform, Standard
Edition (J2SE) included in or bundled with the Software.
2.0 Sun Java Studio Enterprise for Evaluation Only. You may only use the Java
Studio Enterprise (Studio) bundled or embedded with the Sun Java System
Application Server Standard Edition portions of Software for Evaluation Use
unless you purchase a separate license from Sun. Studio may contain a time out
mechanism.
3.0 Sun Java System Directory Server 5. This Section 3.0 applies only
to the Sun Java System Directory Server 5 portion of the Software.
3.1. Definitions.
(a) "Directory Instance(s)" means an instance of the Sun Java System
Directory Server process, slapd, running on a server.
(b) "Entry(ies)" means a single Distinguished Name ("DN") and its
associated attributes.
(c) "Enterprise Wide" means your entire enterprise network.
3.2 License Grant. Sun grants you a non-exclusive and non-transferable
license
for the internal use only of Sun Java System Directory Server 5 (Directory
Server) (where you control, manage, configure and otherwise use the software)
for your internal business use and not for resale or redistribution in any
manner and only for the number of Entries for which the corresponding
fee has been paid. Subject to the limitations of the previous sentence, you may
provide services with Directory Server to users outside of your commercial legal
entity, if any; provided that you may not permit any such user to control, manage or
configure Directory Server.
3.3 Additional Use Conditions.
(a) Directory Server may contain, at no charge, up to an aggregate maximum of
200,000 Entries, across any and all Directory Instances running
Enterprise Wide.
For the purposes of this Section 3.3(a) only, Entries exclude Solaris 10
operating system entries that do not define users.
(b) You may install and run multiple instances of the Sun Java System
Directory Server Console client on multiple computers and platforms for remote
and distributed administration of servers and applications.
Re:Free Software (Score:2, Informative)
I don't think KDE was ever included with Solaris. CDE, OpenWindows, and eventually GNOME are the only environments that have ever shipped with Solaris, AFAIK.
Re:Free Software (Score:3, Informative)
I use the KDE packages from blastwave.org and haven't had any problems.
Cheers,
Roger
Re:Solaris Zones vs User Mode Linux (Score:3, Informative)
I am currently using UML for running multiple servers on one host, and a collegue runs multiple linuces with XEN [cam.ac.uk] (he runs it on his desktop, too!), and he says it performs near to native. He demonstrated it to me, very impressive. Easier to administrate than UML. I'll switch to xen. And ISPs will, too.
I'll check opensolaris when it's ported to the xen-arch like netbsd and -soon- freebsd.
Re:Multiple OS support? (Score:5, Informative)
It's also surprisingly easy to kill your other operating systems when you install though, so do your homework. (Google "dual-boot" "Solaris 10" etc. and keep reading till you're sure you've filled in all the gaps, and back up just in case). Also of course have a copy of Knoppix and your bootloader configuration around.
Additional infos (Score:1, Informative)
They have released sol10 with really nice features [sun.com], cool.
They set it not hardcore-GPL, but at least Sun-defined opensource [opensolaris.org]. Alright.
But what the hell is this about giving the 1600 patents only for CDDL projects [groklaw.net]?
They show supporting Linux, support the opensource-community, but they cannot/dont't want to move? Could someone explain pls?
I tried x86 Solaris 9.. didn't like it. (Score:1, Informative)
Driver support (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Solaris Zones vs User Mode Linux (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Solaris Zones vs User Mode Linux (Score:2, Informative)
whilst everyone is bashing Sun..... (Score:3, Informative)
I installed it on VMware GSX 3.1 as a guest on Gentoo Linux Host OS with little trouble.
I gave the system 128 megs of ram to play with - I'm running 4 other VMs at the moment for development purposes so my development server needs a bit more RAM.
I got to say, the new Java desktop is dead sexy, uses a lot of Gnome applets and programs. They have borrowed a lot from that gear, and also some the GNU tools now come standardly installed.
A full install didnt seem to install SSH as a service, nor Telnet but that could be for my setup and selection process. I didnt select a fine tune, just install-all.
I couldnt get the GUI setup to work, although this could be for my setup, the GUI setup requires 96megs of ram or more, and I did provide 128 meg in the VM so not sure whats going on there. However, the text install works fine. I am exporting the Vmware Console over an X client running on my Windows workstation so maybe it doesnt like something there - not sure. My other VM's havent complained thus far.
Oh yeah I told a friend about Sol 10 is now ready so he downloaded it also, he was able to get the GUI install to work and said its awesome. Mentioned that you can browse the Internet whilst the OS is installing. Reminds me some Linux installs that let you play games whilst its chugging away.
I was a bit disappointed that cc compiler doesnt work straight out of the box with the 'full install', it needed some other program or library it was whinging about and I havent bothered to look it up.
The default shell is csh (?), but amazingly enough bash is installed by default.
For some reason I couldnt create a home directory under
Well I only installed it 2 days and I havent really given it a run for its money. But do hope to start playing with it more soon.
Re:Free Software (Score:2, Informative)
Ultra60 with a GB of ram and WindowMaker makes a nice quick workstation
Re:Cheap Sun hardware (Score:1, Informative)
Pc's go for insane prices at auctions, Sun hardware they cant give away.
I have a crapload of fully loaded 30's that I was able to snage WITH the 19 inch sun monitors for $25.00 each.
400 mhz and it kicks the crap out of any P4 Intel I see.
This story is 3 months old (Score:0, Informative)
See this slashdot story of November 15th [slashdot.org]
Re:Don't mislead people (Score:2, Informative)
The machine you are refering to is an Ultra 2 and by the sounds of it has UltraSPARC-I CPUs, which if you check the release notes for Solaris 10 you will see that that the UltraSPARC-I (less than 200Mhz, 64-bit but not quite) is not supported, while the US-II is (200Mhz fully 64bit and above).
Re:where is x86_64 version? x86 is not x86_64! (Score:2, Informative)
Solaris 10 x86 supports 64 bit in the same way that SPARC does, with architecture specific modules depending what kernel you boot. If you boot "kernel/unix" you get generic 32-bit x86 architecture kernel. If you boot "kernel/amd64/unix" you get 64 bit goodness on Opteron and EMT64.
I have been running it 64 bit on an Athlon 64 notebook for some weeks now.
Sparc hardware list? Supports E450s? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Solaris 10 on Sun Ultra 5/Ultra 10 questions (Score:2, Informative)
With 128Mb RAM, you'll be sorry and regardless of how much RAM you might be willing to upgrade it to, the IDE controller in the 5/10 sucks, baddly, so file serving won't be fun either.
I bought a Sun Ultra 10 333 (from memory) with 128Mb with the intention of using it as a learning tool and it is slow with Solaris 9. It is also slow with OpenBSD (I have not tried NetBSD). I get less than half the transfer rate performance under either Solaris 9 or OpenBSD 3.4 from a particular disk in the U10, than the same disk on a PIII-550 under OpenBSD 3.4.
RAM upgrades for these boxes are expensive to say the least. Even if you do opt to upgrade the memory it will not be worth it. I would suggest selling it and putting that money and any upgrade money you may have been willing to spend, towards something more worthwhile. Start at Sun Ultra 30 and don't go below that, if you want to run Solaris as a desktop and for learning. A second hand U30 is typically going to have more than 128Mb RAM anyway.
A U5/U10 makes a fantastic firewall however. Or even a small web server for a home DSL connection with the added security which comes with the UltraSPARC CPU's page protection, etc. I use my U10 as an OpenBSD firewall which boots of a CF card in a CF-IDE adaptor.
I've come to the conclusion that, Sun has some awesome hardware and technologies at the very high end, but for the low to mid range, NetBSD is incredible (especially on something like AMD64). Sun makes a lot of nice hardware, but the Ultra 5 and 10 I would like put in that category. They are practically baddly performing PC's with UltraSPARC processors.
Re:This story is 3 months old (Score:2, Informative)
No, that was theat was the "express" release - a preview or release candidate. This is the full release.
Re:Don't fall for the trap (Score:3, Informative)
Nobody who intends to contribute to glibc must look at anything but the public header files of the Solaris libc and related libraries.
As usual I see the FUD trolls are out in full force this morning. I'll bite...
In case you aren't already aware, there is a difference between OpenSolaris (free as in speech) and Solaris 10 (free as in beer). The first OS, OpenSolaris, is an open-source based OS. While the CDDL prohibits you from directly lifting code and releasing it under a GPL license, I've read the license agreement and I don't see anything that would taint a glibc developer. Obviously you shouldn't have Solaris libc code open in one Window and try to recreate functionality in glibc by reformatting things... that would be wrong, but if someone studied OpenSolaris at University, then went on to contribute to Linux later in life, I don't see any problem with that.
Having said all that, Solaris 10 is Sun's commercial version of Unix. The source code is NOT publically available, but Sun has decided to give it away (free as in beer).
So, if you're an open-source enthusiast, and want to compile everything from source, and possibly tweak your system or modify code, wait for OpenSolaris to be released. If you're more of a practical "I just want a solid commercial Unix that doesn't cost anything" type of guy, then download a free copy of Solaris 10 and be happy that Sun has decided to give it away.
Re:Sparc hardware list? Supports E450s? (Score:1, Informative)
SPARC: Older Firmware Might Need Boot Flash PROM Update [sun.com]
about a third of the way down the page.
Re:Sparc hardware list? Supports E450s? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:This story is 3 months old (Score:3, Informative)
I read your lips and you were still wrong.
Hell yeah! I've been waiting (Score:2, Informative)
Specifically ZFS (Bad ass journaling FS, capable of multiple TB's), Grid Containers (think quasi-VMWare for resource partitioning), and of course the nice TCP/IP enhancements.
IF YOU'VE DOWNLOADED "SOLARIS 10" before late late last night, you got a RELEASE CANDIDATE, and not the full RELEASE. Go download the release.
I'm downloading the dtrace source from OpenSolaris [opensolaris.org] and havin fun today.
Re:ZFS??? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Don't mislead people (Score:3, Informative)
You can still use Solaris 8 or Solaris 9. Besides, sun4m is already more than a decade old, and sun4u (UltraSPARC) is binary compatible with sun4m for applications.
Of course, there's always OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, or Linux for your older SPARC systems.
Re:Compilers (Score:2, Informative)
Re:SLOWARIS (Score:2, Informative)