Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Technology

$1.5 Million Bar-code Scheme Bilks Wal-Mart Stores 618

nomrniceguy writes "Two couples have been charged in a price-switching scheme that allegedly defrauded Wal-Mart stores in 19 states of $1.5 million over the last decade. Authorities said the scheme involved using a home computer to produce UPC bar codes for cheaper products and slipping them over the real codes on high-priced items. The suspects then allegedly sold the merchandise, or returned it for refunds or store gift cards that also were sold."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

$1.5 Million Bar-code Scheme Bilks Wal-Mart Stores

Comments Filter:
  • Doesn't add up (Score:4, Interesting)

    by jardin ( 778043 ) * on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:00AM (#11226129)
    If they were rung up as lower priced items, then wouldn't it show the wrong items on the cash register/receipts? I don't understand how the cashiers didn't catch on. And how did they go about returning these items when the wrong items (and prices) were printed on the receipts?
  • Im guilty too (Score:0, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:06AM (#11226153)
    I have done this at home depot on electrical and plumbing items but I use the upc's off other cheaper items.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by petecarlson ( 457202 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:07AM (#11226166) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps they printed their own recipts with the right item and price. I did this once at best Buy when I needed a recipt for a cell phone that I had bought the stupid insurance for. The reciept had faded to the point where it was hardly legible. They told me it wasn't valid because they couldn't read it. I went home and printed a new recipt with a thermal printer and took it to another store where they replaced my phone.
  • by Nikker ( 749551 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:10AM (#11226174)
    Now with all the contreversy will they be safe once it all runs on RFID?

    Or will we all be able to do the same just from outside the store ??
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by BinaryOpty ( 736955 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:13AM (#11226185)
    The possible reasons why the cashiers probably didn't notice are: 1. they don't care enough to name-match things they're scanning, 2. they didn't speak/read english well enough to know the difference, 3. the couple selected objects that had multiple versions spanning a price range (like buying a 512MB flash card with the price of a 128MB one), and 4. they used self checkouts (once Wal-mart implemented them). If they did bilk Wal-mart out of 1.5 million, then I'd say at least one of the four above were true at some point in their spree.

    On the returns side, if they returned it for refunds sans reciept (like most stores will allow around Christmastime) then they could possibly do return them to make money.
  • by cdf12345 ( 412812 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:20AM (#11226208) Homepage Journal
    I saw the guys who did Re-code.com at 2600's 5th hope this summer in NYC. Basically you could create a barcode for any item, and print them.

    Finally they closed down because of pressure from walmart and huge legal fees needed to fight them.

    But they got their point across, so I could see someone doing this quite easily. Now I'm wondering how they got caught.

    I think the best thing to do it go to a walmart and just sticker random items, so that random people are buying the altered items.

    There's a 10 min video on Re-code.com about the case. It's worth a quick viewing.
    Seems like a way to say "I didnt put the sticker there!"
  • by turtlboy ( 845018 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:22AM (#11226214)
    I worked at a Wal-Mart for a while as a cashier. Our store had 4 self-checkout machines where you ring up the items yourself. One cashier was assigned to "Paystation" where people could pay with checks, and other assorted stuff the machines couldn't handle. When working at the Paystation, you were given a barcode card which when scanned would bring up an admin-like menu with price override options and other assorted "cashier" tasks. At one point, I scanned that barcode at my register, printed a receipt to show the number it represented, took that home and recreated it on my computer and printed a new version. I taped it on the back of my name tag, and it worked like a charm. Here's the scary thing: Cash Office also used a barcode for those machines to refund money, etc. They could literally empty the machine of cash with their card. If one took a picture of their card (which usually was worn around the neck in plain sight), it wouldn't be hard to recreate the bar code without knowing the numbers. Talk about fraud potential... I almost wanted to do it as a proof-of-concept, but thought that just being caught with the barcode would get me in big trouble, so I didn't end up trying.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TrentC ( 11023 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:30AM (#11226236) Homepage
    I used to work at Fry's Electronics, and we had a pair of thieves who did this.

    They'd paste the UPC of a lower-priced item over the sticker of a higher-priced item of similar make (handhelds were good for this). Even if the checker was looking at the display, you might not catch the fact that the model numbers on the PDAs didn't match. The guys at the door didn't always catch it either.

    Basically, they took advantage of two things at my location: the fact that relabelling items that had price changes did not always happen 100% (the result being that sometimes an item scanned at a different price than was ont he sticker; and believe me, I handled plenty of customers who complained that the CD/DVD/software that said $19.99 on the sticker rang up at $29.99) and the fact that many items Fry's purchased were often bought at clearance or through a special arrangement, so oftentimes the items had custom stickers over the original barcode.

    So you have A) items that legitimately had UPC stickers on them, and B) items that scanned at different prices. It was a recipe for disaster; we only caught them when someone noticed them sticking a label on a product.

    Jay (=
  • by Homer's Donuts ( 838704 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:34AM (#11226249)
    Reminds me of the stories in the early 70's of people changing their utility bills. Bills came printed on punch (IBM, Hollerith) cards. [wikipedia.org]

    "Enterprising" students would run them thru keypunch machines [wikipedia.org] and make the number negative or add a decimal point.

    These machines are also the origin of the "hanging chad". [wikipedia.org] Always check your input. Like the state of Florida, Walmart could have caught this by auditing returns.

  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by shufler ( 262955 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:40AM (#11226269) Homepage
    It should be pointed out that this is in fact, honest to goodness Wal*Mart policy. The official Wal*Mart literature and training clearly states it's their policy to take back ANYTHING. The reasoning they give is that a happy customer is a returning customer.

    Ask anyone who's worked there long enough, and they'll tell you all sorts of stories about people returning things which they don't even carry. Inventory time becomes hilarious in a very unhilarious way.

    The policy doesn't extend to everything though. I belive things like CDs and DVDs can only be exchanged for the same item. It should also be noted that opened murchandise isn't resold, and that stores will donate a certain amount to charity. The rest is thrown in the trash compactor.
  • by H0NGK0NGPH00EY ( 210370 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:41AM (#11226274) Homepage
    It's even simpler than that. One summer about 8 years ago when I was in high school, I sat down and decoded the UPCs of a few products in an afternoon. Once you know what the codes are, it's trivial to draw your own bar codes using MS Paint. You can then print them off using any old ink-jet printer. Don't believe me? This [timandjeni.com] is the page that I wrote up after figuring it all out. I made the UPC graphics on that page using just Paint. I also printed off some test barcodes using the cheapo inkjet we had, and ran them by the "price checker" thingys in the local Target. They scanned no problem.

    I've wondered for years whether it would really be that easy to get away with switching UPCs just like this. I guess the answer is "pretty easy." Of course, if you get as greedy as these people did, you're obviously going to get caught before too long.
  • by Swampfeet ( 758961 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @04:43AM (#11226284)
    There is a usenet posting [google.com] on this very subject from 1995.
  • GOOD policy (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @05:09AM (#11226364)
    I love that about walmart. It's because of that that I am a returning customer.

    I remember when they tried to force me to use a TI graphing calculator in middle school. I used my HP for the most part, just as long as I had the TI with me the school didn't complain. But I've never had an item break as much as that TI, and each time it broke I just brough it back to Walmart. Seriously, a little bump on part of the screen and the thing would shatter. One broke when I slid the case on at an odd angle. Fuck you TI! I love you Walmart!
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NevermindPhreak ( 568683 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @05:30AM (#11226431)
    1.5 million / 10 years / 365 days / 4 people

    an average of just over a hundred bucks a day per person. shouldnt be too hard, espically once you get your shit together, to keep up that type of scam rate.

    also, you have to figure in the fact that any loss prevention team is going to quote any damage estimate at as high as possible. when i was younger, me and some friends tried to rip off walmart in the same way, except we just cut the UPC from one product and put it on another. trust me when i say the cashiers could really care less. however, we were busted by some undercover shoppers in the process. we put a $20 UPC on a $30 product, but the police report quoted $50 worth of stolen property.

  • by Basje ( 26968 ) <bas@bloemsaat.org> on Friday December 31, 2004 @06:15AM (#11226554) Homepage
    The pricing on the goods can be constituted as an offer. On accepting the offer, a contract is entered. The new pricing (bar code) can be viewed as a counter-offer. If the cashier accepts, the counter-offer is accepted and a contract is entered, making it a legal sale.

    Of course, ethically it is wrong, but legally, it's not done yet.
  • by fataugie ( 89032 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @06:17AM (#11226558) Homepage
    I think Johnny Cash sang a song about it...where the utility company kept hounding a guy for a penny or something, so he took the card and took his pocket knife to it, mailed it back and the utility called to aplolgize, it owed him $300 or something.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:1, Interesting)

    by shufler ( 262955 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @06:17AM (#11226560) Homepage
    you have to figure in the fact that any loss prevention team is going to quote any damage estimate at as high as possible ... we just cut the UPC from one product and put it on another ... we put a $20 UPC on a $30 product, but the police report quoted $50 worth of stolen property

    Actually, $50 is correct. You took the UPC from a $20 product, and used it to (try to) steal a $30 product. By removing the UPC, you damaged the $20 product, which resulted in a loss for Wal-Mart. For the sake of completeness, $20 + $30 = $50. It seems that the Loss Prevention Team claimed a very accurate amount.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:3, Interesting)

    by roie_m ( 260122 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @06:39AM (#11226612)
    No, because they didn't try to steal the $30 product, they tried to pay $20 for it. By your calculations, they stole $20+$10=$30.
    But, when someone else went to buy the original $20 item, they probably just looked up the price and charged them $20. The real value of the steal was $10+(five minutes of some cashier's time at minimum wage)
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @06:41AM (#11226614)
    Oh, ya... because that UPC sticker on the first product is certinaly worth $20 bucks. He didn't even mention where they 'snaged' him. If he didn't check out, could they prove he was trying to comit fraud or such? I know I've put things in my pocket when shoping without a cart because I needed an extra hand but couldn't just 'grow' one... as long as I pay for it before leaving the store I havn't stolen a thing. But then again I'm sure their is some a-hole out there that would try to charge me with a crime. Fortunatly I've got a few people I can call, and a little money... so if they did try and charge me it would 'disapear' shortly after my phone call. unfortunatly not everyone has the same means to defend their rights. Obviously he was commiting a crime... he admited it. But you with out knowing all the facts, jumped to conclusions. =) "The Man" isn't always 'right'.
  • by switzer ( 244132 ) <scott@switzer.org> on Friday December 31, 2004 @07:06AM (#11226685)
    This method is used to obtain competitive pricing all the time. For example, if Half Life 2 is going on sale at the beginning of the month, and Joe Retailer wants to know how much his competitors are going to charge:

    Just print off the UPC code onto a sticker, and go into a competitor (like Walmart) a week before it goes on sale. Put the sticker onto another game, and ask the cashier for a price check. The scanner computer already has the pricing information in it, so the price that they are going to charge shows up on the register!

  • Old News (Score:3, Interesting)

    by salesgeek ( 263995 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @07:35AM (#11226773) Homepage
    Back in the day to do this you needed Corel Draw (it had a neat little tool called the Corel BarCode) and a decent 24 pin dot matrix printer with a fresh ribbon and a pack of labels.

  • Re:it can be done... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lehk228 ( 705449 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @08:12AM (#11226892) Journal
    walmart does not barcode their products, the manufacturer does, and UPC's do not encode any data other than error correction data for the UPC number, which serves as a unique identifier for each product, anything beyond that is done by the backend database.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Jah-Wren Ryel ( 80510 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @08:15AM (#11226904)
    The policy doesn't extend to everything though. I belive things like CDs and DVDs can only be exchanged for the same item.

    Yeah, they've got all their employees brainwashed into believing that accepting returns on opened DVDs is a violation of federal law! Literally, I've heard that at two different stores. A few months back I bought a DVD (for all of $5.50) that was labeled widescreen/full-screen but when opened, the actual disc was only full-screen.

    They had no more copies of that disc in stock (and even if they did, I had learned that they were all defectively full-screen only). It was the most amazingly difficult experience trying to get my money back. Had to escalate it three levels, ultimately to someone who was not forced to wear a wal-mart uniform.

    And then they wouldn't give me the tax back -- I didn't have the receipt and they claimed I could be working a scam of buying it in some other state that did not have sales tax.

    Jesus Fucking Christ were they morons.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:5, Interesting)

    by drawfour ( 791912 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @08:32AM (#11226962)
    I worked at Wal-mart during college. I worked in the Sporting Goods department -- so I sold ammunition and guns. Ammunition is something that you are NOT allowed to resell once it has been returned -- it's an explosive, after all. Well, wouldn't you know it, but we would accept returned ammunition with a smile on our face. Luckily we never restocked it... instead we donated it to the local police department. It was a tax write-off, and the local PD got plenty of ammo for target practice and stuff. But it was plain stupid to accept a return on an item that we knew we would not be able to sell again and that we couldn't return to the manufacturer (defective items are returned with usually no problems). But we did it to keep people happy...
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Nogami_Saeko ( 466595 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @08:44AM (#11227003)
    Ya, I had a similar problem with a DVD that I got as a gift - opened it up and discovered it was infact fullscreen.

    Brought it back to Walmart where I waited in line for 20 min at the returns counter to find out that "they had to process it at the DVD counter", so off to the DVD counter.

    Give it to the guy at the DVD counter who says "no problem", gets the widescreen version, and proceeds to whip out a big knife to cut the package open (store policy! if you bring back an opened DVD, they have to cut-open the replacement they give you!). Bozo's knife slips into the DVD case as he's hacking away, and scratches the disc (which I don't discover 'till I get home - fortunately it still plays OK).

    Then it's back to the original line I waited in to wait for another 20 min so they can "process the return". I was about ready to kill...

    N.
  • Wondering aloud (Score:3, Interesting)

    by anon*127.0.0.1 ( 637224 ) <slashdot@baudkaM ... om minus painter> on Friday December 31, 2004 @09:11AM (#11227086) Journal
    Does this explain Wal-Marts big hurry to get RFID on all their products? These people got caught because they got greedy, and involved someone not quite as clever as themselves. Not quite as clever person got caught and squealed. I assume that there are quite a few clever, not so greedy people who have homes very nicely furnished and extremely low prices from Wal-Mart.

    And where the hell did that 1.5 million come from? Did the crooks still have 1.5 million worth of stolen stuff in their home? Did the have a nice detailed spreadsheet of everything they'd ripped off since day one? Or did somebody at Wal-Mart just pull a number out of the air?

  • by Create an Account ( 841457 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @10:08AM (#11227348)
    Actually, I just read that several of their suppliers have started to resist the rfid implementation because of cost and poor performance. I think they said that the rfids were only getting about 60% accuracy.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bryanp ( 160522 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @10:24AM (#11227427)
    I wish you were at my Wal-Mart. I bought 5 boxes of .45ACP earlier this year, and when I got home one box had magically transformed into .40S&W. (IOW, the clerk stuck the wrong box in the bag and I didn't notice) I took it back and was told that they couldn't accept ammo for a return or exchange and that it was a "federal law" (translation: we don't want to do it).

    I argued for a bit and eventually gave up and just gave the box to a friend of mine who owns a .40. I wasn't going to get into a huge argument over $10. Now I don't buy ammo at WM anymore - I'd rather spend a few extra $ at the local independantly owned gunstore and get decent service.
  • Re:Doesn't add up (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @10:46AM (#11227543)
    i dont know if i would say something if i saw someone say... opening a video card box at best buy and shoving a raedon down thier pants (or putting it in a bag). but if someone is poor and can't afford food i'm not saying its right to steal however its more of a problem with our poverty situation and less about "people stealing". inventory shrinkage is a fact and people who work in retail know that.
  • The Decay of Trust (Score:3, Interesting)

    by hburch ( 98908 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @11:12AM (#11227699)
    Which gets us to the meta-hack: take the typewriter box back to OfficeMax with a bag of potting soil, and complain that the soil was in the box.

    The return system would not be difficult to game at small scales, if you were untrustworthy. It's unfortunate, but true. The truly unfortunate fact is that a small set of people can game the system so much that companies are disuaded from offering returns, except as required by law, and making them as painful as possible. This has already happened, to a large extent, with data copies (software, music, and movies).

  • by jdludlow ( 316515 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @11:40AM (#11227886)

    You probably don't even have to get an employee involved, since a lot of larger stores (Target for instance) have barcode scanners set out specifically for the customers to do their own price checks.

    Print off a list of all the products you want to check, and take care of it in one trip.

  • by Dogtanian ( 588974 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @12:52PM (#11228375) Homepage
    Though, the cash does display items using abreviations and other weird short forms to fit it on the line. I've seen items scan simply as "12 pack" or "toy", which isn't descriptive in the least.

    Check this classic out from "The Devil's DP Dictionary", via the Linux fortune cookie program:-

    curtation, n.:

    The enforced compression of a string in the fixed-length field environment.

    The problem of fitting extremely variable-length strings such as names, addresses, and item descriptions into fixed-length records is no trivial matter. Neglect of the subtle art of curtation has probably alienated more people than any other aspect of data processing. You order Mozart's "Don Giovanni" from your record club, and they invoice you $24.95 for MOZ DONG. The witless mapping of the sublime onto the ridiculous! Equally puzzling is the curtation that produces the same eight characters, THE BEST, whether you order "The Best of Wagner", "The Best of Schubert", or "The Best of the Turds". Similarly, wine lovers buying from computerized wineries twirl their glasses, check their delivery notes, and inform their friends, "A rather innocent, possibly overtruncated CAB SAUV 69 TAL." The squeezing of fruit into 10 columns has yielded such memorable obscenities as COX OR PIP. The examples cited are real, and the curtational methodology which produced them is still with us.

    MOZ DONG n.
    Curtation of Don Giovanni by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Lorenzo da Ponte, as performed by the computerized billing ensemble of the Internat'l Preview Society, Great Neck (sic), N.Y.
    -- Stan Kelly-Bootle, "The Devil's DP Dictionary"
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @01:13PM (#11228502)
    I used to do the same sort of thing during my Questionable Youth.

    Purchase C64 game cartridges at Target, take them home and unscrew the cartridge casing and remove the "guts" of the cartridge. Screw it back together and return everything except the guts for a refund... or a different cartridge. Sometimes, if I was bored with a game, I'd put the boring game cartridge guts into a case and return that.

    So, someone would purchase "Jumpman" only to come home and plug in the cartridge to get "pinball" or something.

    The unfortunate (for me) downside to all this was that it led steadily to more and grander schemes, eventually leading to a felony burglary conviction. The fortunate outcome was that I did Learn My Lesson (tm) and now I wouldn't consider stealing anything.
  • by rusty0101 ( 565565 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @03:01PM (#11229132) Homepage Journal
    I look at most of those posts and think of them in the same sense as posts on how to make a nuclear bomb. There are actually a lot of people who have access to a large percentage of the material as well as the technical knowledge and resources necesary to construct one. You or I may not have ready access to fisionable materials in the quantities and purety necessary, but even if you or I did, that would not make it at all likely that we would create a nuclear bomb.

    Do I have the resources to do UPC label creation and swaping. What I don't already have at home I can easily pick up at a local office max, or office Depot. Possibly even at the very stores mentioned in the article.

    I look at the responses earlier in the listing as "Idiots, if you are going to do this, you need to do it this way..."

    If I were to decide to use UPC relabling at Best Buy to get that great new 42" LCD HDTV, I would visit first, find a manufacture with both a 42" LCD HDTV, and a 35" LCD HDTV, write down the UPC for that 35" edition, go home print up an approprieate sized copy of that to overlay the UPC on the 42" edition, then during a busy time at Best Buy, go in, put the 42" set on a cart, go stand in line, and while waiting in line discreatly overlay the UPC.

    Now note I began that with 'If I were to decide..' I honestly have no interest in doing this. I may like the idea of having a 42" LCD HDTV, but I happen to have worked for the stuff I own, and I have no interest in changing that.

    I don't have a justification for such an action, as I have no interest in performing the action. That doesn't mean that I can't participate in the thought experiment, or write about what I know about the topic in question.

    -Rusty
  • Re: Answer is simple (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @09:41PM (#11231516)
    Some people just don't give a fuck.

    When your economy is crap and getting worse and inflation is out of control and you are discriminated against because you cannot buy pieces of paper that proove you can memorize you start to get desperate. Desperation leads to all sorts of things not normally done much less considered. Look at suicide bombers/attackers, they come from predominatly poor and historically impoverished areas and don't have much to look forward to. Never underestimate what a cornered animal will do, or one that is perceived they are cornered.
  • by OldManAndTheC++ ( 723450 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @11:06PM (#11231841)
    Self-justification of stealing is still just stealing and it makes me sick.

    You see, there's this thing called the Social Contract. It isn't written anywhere, but we all ascribe to it, not because we want to, but because society would fall apart without it.

    Of course, we are not perfect, so we bend the Contract on occasion. People do it by shoplifting, or pilfering, or swapping barcode labels. Companies do it by outsourcing, or denying valid insurance claims, or bullying employees into voting against unionization, just to name a few.

    Our behavior is a natural consequence of our primal desire to get ahead by whatever means necessary. Without getting caught. That doesn't make it right, I know.

    It's a war of sorts. A cold war, between producers and consumers. You can fight, or you can surrender, or you can continue the low-intensity conflict ad infinitum, which appears to be the choice of many consumers.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 01, 2005 @01:24AM (#11232244)

    I think the point they were trying to say is Wal-Mart has a bad karma. You may have noticed manufacturers now make one model they sell exclusively to one chain and another for other store(s) in the competing markets, I think Walmart is a major reason why. Wal-Mart has caused many people to lose their jobs and ironically not be able to afford to buy goods at other places that treat the workers better, so they have to shop at places like Walmart. Walmart forces manufacturers to sell the products at cheaper prices to them. An example is Huffy bikes used to be made in the USA and are now made in another country with cheaper labor.

    Since Walmart is the biggest store chain in the country (USA) and has a presence in outside of the country, many manufacturers will cut corners and/or go for the cheaper labor costs in another country. Sadly, I hear manufacturing plants in China are now bringing in workers from Vietnam, because of the working conditions/wages aren't appealing to enough Chinese workers.

    If I thought the displaced workers in the USA were being replaced by people who had a good chance to huge increase in better living conditions, it won't be a completely bad thing. People could get items for a cheaper price and someone in another country would have a better chance to buy things from a country with a much higher exchange rate. When you can support the little guys, who don't have the purchasing power of Walmart and you will do a better job keeping your community connected. A while back their was a story about Walmart putting in a Mega store in California that included groceries http://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/10/89674.php and http://www.valleyadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?o id=oid:68043. All of the competing stores gave the workers health insurance (cashiers, stock people,...), but Walmart typically doesn't (the TV account). Also the news article said Walmart employees were more likely to be on public support while working at Walmart than other people in the community. A article from 2003 in Denver about Walmart not being good is at http://www.temple-news.com/news/2003/10/02/Opinion /Walmart.Rolling.Back.Prices.For.Welfare.Benefits- 511233.shtml

This restaurant was advertising breakfast any time. So I ordered french toast in the renaissance. - Steven Wright, comedian

Working...