Opera Browser Beta Adds Voice, More 369
An anonymous reader writes "According to an article at DesktopLinux.com, the first public beta of Opera 8 is available for free download. It adds voice input/output and a host of other niceties. Key new features include improved RSS handling, fit to window or paper width, a start-bar for easy access to the most commonly used functions, and automatic update checks. The beta release supports Windows only, but a general release is scheduled for early 2005. Opera and IBM have partnered on XHTML+Voice (X+V) technology for several years, co-announcing a Multimodal Browser and Toolkit early in 2003."
More coverage (Score:2, Informative)
ZDNet [zdnet.co.uk]
News.com.com.com.com [com.com]
Original Opera press release [opera.com]
Changelog [opera.com]
Link says Opera 7.54u1 (Score:5, Informative)
Opera 8.00 Beta 1 - ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/win/800b1/en/std/ow
Opera 8.00 Beta 1 w/o Java - ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/win/800b1/en/std/ow
Re:The new beta is awesome. (Score:1, Informative)
The browser is worth the 39 dollars in my opinion.
Re:Major Version Upgrade Again (Score:3, Informative)
I get a bit tired of paying again just to get a browser that crashes less.
Actually, this update is free for paying Opera 7 customers, and the final version will be too. See this article [programmer.no].
Face it (Score:1, Informative)
Gmail Support (Score:5, Informative)
Support for XMLHttpRequest; Gmail Web mail is fully supported.
Now that should get the attention of slashdotters
Re:The new beta is awesome. (Score:3, Informative)
One of things I love about Opera is how configurable its interface is. For example, Explorer could learn a thing or two from the way Opera allows buttons to be easily dropped onto toolbars.
Plus the email client (M2) rules.
New and improved Licence as well (Score:5, Informative)
What also needs to be mentioned is that the Licence has changed [opera.com] for paid customers. Quoting:
Your feedback welcome! (Score:5, Informative)
I'm the IBM program director over this product, working in partnership w/ Opera. Some quick comments: The X+V spec unifies HTML & VoiceXML and is currently undergoing the W3C process for standardization. We wrote it together w/ Motorola & Opera and have made it open. We also have an Eclipse-based SDK available at http://www.ibm.com/pvc/multimodal and a prototype one at http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/mmtplus that allows you to visually build these multimodal apps.
Some of you may wonder why you should voice enable your Web content. First of all, one of my lead researchers is blind, and it's quite amazing to see how much he can accomplish today. Given that, in the future, I'm hoping a lot more content will be open to people with various disabilities.
Secondly, how useful is your cellphone for accessing the Web? It has a small screen & limited input. Now imagine just speaking into a multimodal portal: "weather forecast", "my portfolio", "eBay bids", "any high priority mail?", "am I free tomorrow at noon?", etc. The portal understands your input & fetches relevant info, which may also be tied into location based services. 50% of you will use multimodal services by 2010; this is intended as the replacement to WAP.
Warm regards!
Igor Jablokov
Changed licence conditions (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Summary, Opera vs. Firefox (Score:2, Informative)
Opera - $$$
Firefox - Free beer, Free speech
Firefox: 1 Opera: 0
Opera - Fast
Firefox - Not as fast
Firefox: 2 Opera: 1
Opera - Very small footprint
Firefox - Tiny footprint as well
Firefox: 3 Opera: 2
Opera - Sometimes a long wait between major updates, but always major features added.
Firefox - Updated more often since they load all of the features off onto people writing extensions.
Firefox: 3 Opera: 2
Opera - Little setup required on first install
Firefox - Plugins and configuration needs to be done before you get all the functionality you want
Firefox: 3 Opera: 3
Opera - Blocks popups and with adblock css file, everything else you don't want to see
Firefox - Blocks popups and with adblock plugin, everything else you don't want to see
Firefox: 4 Opera: 4
Opera - Rendering problems on some pages
Firefox - Fewer rendering problems than Opera but more than IE (bad microsoft), and more support for IE's propietary non-standard code
Firefox: 4 Opera: 4
Opera - 3.5MB download size!
Firefox - 4.7MB before extensions
Firefox: 4 Opera: 5
Re:And the countdown begins (Score:2, Informative)
Ive used Opera for years without paying a dime. You don't have to pay if you don't want to, you just have a small ad at the top (which I have set to play google relavent text adds on mine). As for bloated, thats a bunch or crap. For a few megs I have a complete browser/email/chat package with wonderful features like popup blocker (WHICH ITS HAD FOR YEARS!).
Re:Summary, Opera vs. Firefox (Score:2, Informative)
Opera - Closed Source
Firefox - Open Source
Firefox: 1 Opera: 0
Opera - $$$
Firefox - Free beer, Free speech
Firefox: 2 Opera: 0
Opera - Fast
Firefox - Not as fast
Firefox: 2 Opera: 1
Opera - Very large initial footprint (> 11MB inc Java)
Firefox - Tiny footprint
Firefox: 3 Opera: 1
Opera - Very long time between updates and releases
Firefox - Fixed and updated with the speed of the open source communities non-sleeping programming hordes
Firefox: 4 Opera: 1
Opera - Little setup required on first install
Firefox - Plugins and configuration needs to be done before you get all the functionality you want
Firefox: 4 Opera: 2
Opera - Blocks popups
Firefox - Blocks popups and with adblock plugin, everything else you don't want to see
Firefox: 5 Opera: 2
Opera - Rendering problems on some pages
Firefox - Fewer rendering problems than Opera but more than IE (bad microsoft)
Firefox: 6 Opera: 2
Opera - You must have Suns Java installed for it to work
Firefox - Doesn't need Java at all, on Windows or Linux or anything else you might install it on.
Firefox: 7 Opera: 2
Re:Gmail Support (Score:1, Informative)
GMail under Opera 8 is okay. Some small display artifacts will need to be worked out, but it's 100% usable and working.
As for the rest, new RSS is very good, some new goodies are okay, some other are a bit weird and/or buggy (fit to width...), but all in all, it should have been called 7.6. It seems to be a bit slower, but I suspect it comes from the beta release.
Conclusion : Opera is and remain my browser of choice.
Re:Your feedback welcome! (Score:4, Informative)
Be sure to post your questions to Opera here:
http://my.opera.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=e
or to IBM here:
nntp://news.software.ibm.com/ibm.software.speec
Thanks!
Igor Jablokov
Re:The new beta is awesome. (Score:4, Informative)
I paid for the full version not because the ads were annoying (I never noticed them), but because I wanted to support what I thought was a great browser. Opera ads are about the least intrusive ads I have ever seen.
Re:And the countdown begins (Score:4, Informative)
Shouldn't be feeding the trolls, but... (Score:4, Informative)
Opera 8.0 doesn't offer Java anyway, since it's installed only when needed.
Your FUD and lies are typical of certain Firefox zealots, and that is why I am more and more hesitant to use Firefox. I simply can't stand many of the users that keep trying to shove Firefox down people's throats with misleading statements, FUD and lies.Rendering problems - Firefox can't even render Slashdot correctly. How's that for "rendering problems"?
Re:And the countdown begins (Score:4, Informative)
Opera 7.54u1 (Java/None): 16.7/3.6MB
Opera 8.00b1 (None/Voice): 3.5MB/6.0MB (note: voice is a download AFTER the beta is installed)
Firefox 1.0: 4.7MB
Mozilla Suite 1.7.5: 11.0MB
Functionality of the above:
Opera: Web, mail, news, RSS, notetaking, chat, (8.00b1) voice
Firefox: Web, RSS
Mozilla Suite: Web, mail, news, chat(?), web development
Re:The new beta is awesome. (Score:3, Informative)
I think rather that you may not understand how some of us feel about open source. It's not the pragmatism of the always availability of my data that makes me use open source. Not by a long shot. It's simply that the software is better.
And after a while, you start to think that so much closed source software has a better, free, open source counterpart. And this evolves into the belief that all code should be open. Many sets of eyes and many people collaberating can make software better.
The one trap of open source is the deisre to be too many things to too many people. There are a handfull of opensource projects out there that have pretty much peaked with a perfect or near-perfect product, and then gone back and started adding everything that anyone and everyone suggests. This leads to bloated software.
But, hey, Opera is already there, and it costs $39 and isn't free. Plus not enough people are using it to justify serious security audits, and since it's closed, who knows what's wrong with it. Firefox is open and has millions of users, so people are constantly looking at it's code and finding / fixing problems. IE at least has 86% of the internet's users using it, so the holes in it eventually come out by sheer dumb luck. But, I wonder how many holes go unpatched in Opera?
Also, aside from the philosophy of open-ness, there is my version of pragmatism. The time for paying for browsers has come and past. Oh, wait. That time was never. From gopher to lynx to mosaic to netscape to IE to mozilla to firefox, web browsers have always been free.
And the ad-supported version that you can get... does not have "text based, unobtrusive ads". Here's a screenshot [skytopia.com] from a fellow slashdotter. Here are the facts about the ads:
1.) not text based. That's an image up there.
Text based would be like google i-frame ads.
2.) the full size of that browser window is 800x535 pixles. The ad is 312x60 pixels. Thus -
full browser = 428000 pixles
ad in browser = 18720 pixles
Percentage of ad as part of browser window = 4.37%.
BUT WAIT, when you add in the portion of the browser window that is now unusable because of the ad's existance (the blank spot to the left)...
Unusable space: 488x29 = 14152 pixles.
So. Unusable space + ad space = 32872 pixles
Percentage of opera wasted with ad? 7.68%
I'm not going to give up 7.68% of my browser to an ad! And I'm damn sure not going to pay $40 for a browser.
There's your answer on Opera.
~Will
Re:The new beta is awesome. (Score:5, Informative)
2) I tried to switch from Opera to Firefox more than once but was back after a few days because Firefox clearly is inferior, the integration of the plugins is far worse than the corresponding features in Opera and the Browser is often unresponsive for several seconds.
3) I use Closed Source Software when it is clearly better and at the Moment Opera is although I use Open Source Software for anything else
4) I started with the Ad-Supported version, then I cracked it for a few months but since it is the Software I use most and I now earn money I thought it was worth to buy it so I did even though I did not get any advantages over the cracked version simply because I wanted to support the Development of my favorite Browser
5) Opera uses very little Screen Real Estate now as I use a minimal theme, deactivated the big button bar and the Panel Selector on the left. the only things I have left are the Tab Bar, the Address Bar, the Menu Bar and one bar with my favorite Bookmarks (and the Scroll Bar on the right). Combined with the Ratpoison Window Manager that does not use a Window Bar I can use over 90% of the Screen for the current Webpage.
Opera is available elsewhere for free? Where? (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, you meant completely free, without ads? Is there an Opera version which is free and without ads? News to me.
Oh, I get it! You think anything else can compare? Like Firefox? Sorry, Firefox doesn't cut it. It's a bigger download with far less functionality. To get more functionality, you have to wade through buggy and untested extensions, and it takes forever to even remotely resemble Opera functionality. I'll gladly play money for the convenience of a tiny download with smooth integration between everything, in a well tested package, rather than a basic browser which is tested well, and then a bunch of hobbyist extensions that break every time I upgrade.
And the Mozilla suite? Please. It's slow and bloated, and isn't even half as elegant as Opera. Sorry, it simply can't compare.
So the bottom line is that you can't get the equivalent of Opera for free. Opera is a unique product. Remember, Firefox is a stripped down browser, while Opera is a full Internet suite, with mail and all that. And Opera offers everything fine-tuned and smoothly integrated, and that is very convenient.
I don't want to build my own browser. I just want something that works. Opera works out of the box. Firefox requires hours of tinkering to even approach Opera's level of integration, functionality and polish.