Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Upgrades Hardware

Firmware Upgrades For Everything 285

eggoeater writes "Forbes Magazine has an article discussing how more portable electronics are not only suggesting firmware upgrades, but requiring them in order to get all the features! Apparently the new Lyra A/V Jukebox will sometimes display a message stating that 'this feature will be available in future upgrades.' In addition, the article states that some patches are difficult and dangerous depending on the component. Some cell phone patches require a proprietary cable ($25) that will then wipe out your phone book. This raises concerns over alienating users that aren't tech-savvy and how this could affect perceptions of portable electronics as a whole."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Firmware Upgrades For Everything

Comments Filter:
  • Wow (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Pingular ( 670773 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @05:56PM (#8412116)
    Sounds like an extension of the registering thingy in XP (where you have to register to use it). Nice.
  • You know what? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by grasshoppa ( 657393 ) * on Friday February 27, 2004 @05:56PM (#8412121) Homepage
    I wouldn't have much of a problem with this if it weren't for the fact that updates tend to break stuff as often as it fixes them.

    Even mobo manufactures say to upgrade only if the update fixes a specific problem you are having.
  • Kinda sad, really... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cgranade ( 702534 ) <cgranade@gma i l . c om> on Friday February 27, 2004 @05:59PM (#8412148) Homepage Journal
    I think that this is kind of sad... I like upgradable firmware- witness the iRiver line of products- and hate to see it misused to sell cables. If we could come up with a standard cable scheme for portable device to PC interfacing... oh, wait... it's called USB A to USB Mini-B. Now, if only more manufacturers would implement it.
  • Router (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 27, 2004 @05:59PM (#8412156)
    I have a Belkin Wireless 802.11g router that runs a nucleus plus based firmeware. I attempted to modify the firmware and reupload it. However, it went completely dead - not even the "bad firmware fix" thing works. Anyone know what type of flash memory these things include? Why can't they just use CF cards? That way, my free after rebate $10 CF reader could fix it in a flash (no pun intended)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:00PM (#8412167)
    The concept is called time to market, the price you pay is quality.
    No, that concept is called "vaporware," and in general, it's the company that pays the price.

    1) Announce Product with features X, Y and Z
    2) Ship Product with feature X
    3) ???
    4) Go bankrupt.

    About the only industry where people have tolerated the missing Step 3 ("Make people pay, then pay again for the features they wanted in the first place") is MMORPGs. I don't think it's going to work with hardware.
  • by Cryptnotic ( 154382 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:00PM (#8412171)
    You ship the product when marketing decides it needs to be shipped, not when it's done. You make all the required features exist so that the bullet points are covered in the specifications, even if they don't work right all the time. The fixes come later, in the order of the number of complalints.

    It sucks, but that's the way it is. Your product is either first, or it needs to be 10 times better than the other guy's product.

  • Alienating Users? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Zedek ( 746741 ) * on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:02PM (#8412193)
    Meh, as user friendly as things are getting now-a-days, flashing is gonna be a matter of a message appearing on the screen that says "new bios downloaded, press yes to flash". Either that or just get your neighboorhood 8 year old to come and do it for you. Granted, this could open up a whole new can of worms for the industry as far as exploits/virii/trojans. I predict we will soon see Anti-Virus software for cellphones/pdas/ect at this rate.
  • by psxotaku ( 324786 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:04PM (#8412217)
    features listed on the box, that are not avilable for months later. I'd say that false advertising. Forced updates, wow, how much more wrong is that. I don't mind bug fixes for minor things, but don't test this stuff at all. So glad my pod has work perfect from day one... I'd flipout if a firmware update trashed it.
  • Missing step 3... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Cryptnotic ( 154382 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:04PM (#8412218)
    3. Make enough money on Product so that they can stay in businness and produce product "V2" that actually does have features X, Y, and Z (or maybe just X and Y).

    Hopefully that staves off 4 for a while.

    Worked for TiVo, sort of.

  • by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:06PM (#8412237) Homepage Journal
    "... to profit from everyone else's technophobia."

    I take it you decided to get into technology during the bubble.

    I, and many people I know, would be very happy if technology was easier to use for the average user.
  • Research it. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by irokitt ( 663593 ) <archimandrites-iaur@@@yahoo...com> on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:07PM (#8412243)
    The lesson to all of us is to carefully research anything we buy to find out if we will need proprietary cables or if features aren't available 'yet'.

    None of us are forced into these purchases, with the exception of gift items. And if you recieved a techie gift, do the research before opening the package-you can stil return it, and I just recently found myself wishing I had when I recieved an mp3 player for christmas.

    Guffaws aside, companies should theoretically respect users more when people refuse to buy badly implemented products.
  • by Frank T. Lofaro Jr. ( 142215 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:08PM (#8412251) Homepage
    Like the wonderful quality control that went into Linux 2.4.20. Where it would not sync on umount when using ext3 with data=journal mode, and thus corrupting the filesystem. Ugh.
  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:09PM (#8412256)
    Something tells me these firmware fixes will soon become mandatory when lax manufacturers decide that it easier to require a firmware update than design the product correctly in the first place. But I wonder how many of these firmware updating utilties will be OS-agnostic? I'd bet most will require Windows to fix the broken firmware of many new products.

    Soon a new microwave oven will require Windows and an Internet connection. ARGH!

    Are there any OSS projects or standards creation efforts for universal, OS-independent, product firmware updaters?
  • lovely. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by chrisopherpace ( 756918 ) <cpace@@@hnsg...net> on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:09PM (#8412265) Homepage
    all this means is that crappier, broken products can be shipped out on the market, resulting in a general loss of quality on the market. What will consumers do? Buy the products that *DONT* require you to flash the firmware in order to use the features on the box! Normally, flashes work as they are supposed to, but I've met a few firmware upgrades that didn't work, and ended up ordering an RMA for the device, only to be told that they don't support firmware upgrades, and damage caused because of them. What's a comsumer to do?
  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:11PM (#8412281) Homepage Journal
    Actually, I consider myself tech-savvy, but I've just got too damn many things I'm trying to remember how to use, let alone keep a calendar of upgrades and latest versions. Don't get me wrong, it's better to get a bug fix or upgrade (where reasonably necessary), but, like keeping plug-ins up to date (Adobe Acrobat, Real, Flash, to name a few) I'm generally disposed to keep plodding along with what I have until I reach the pain threshold (either it's unusable or the constant upgrading ticks me off and I cast it aside, like Real.)

    Now I've found my telescope (Meade ETX-125AC) Autostar computer can be upgraded, but with a special cable for my purchasing pleasure. Hm.

  • by Akai ( 11434 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:15PM (#8412316) Homepage Journal
    The thing is, outside the US (europe), mobile phone shops will do the upgrades for you. Inside the US it's harder to find a shop to do that in the US (I found a place in San Francisco that does it, but that's the exception).

    That's probably one of the reasons why companies like Nokia and SonyEricsson release their phones in Asia and Europe before the US.

  • by bluekanoodle ( 672900 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:16PM (#8412329)
    Funny this should come up. I just spent the last day trying to wrestle with setting up a 54g bridge. If a promised feature doesn't work right out of the box, it should't be advertised on the box! First I went with d-link, because the box promised 108 mb speeds, using Super G. Only after I bought 2 of these bridges did I find on their Website in the small print that 108 speeds were not available until I downloaded the firmware upgrade, which was due out in the 3RD QUARTER of 2004!!! This seems like a pretty clear cut case of false advertising. I returned those items and bought 2 netgear 54g bridges, only to find out their was a flaw in the firmware and I needed to upgrade it. No problem, except that their upgrade utility for this bridge only works in Windows. This from a device that promises on the box thats it (and I quote) "works under any OS and any platform." I used one of my servers to run the upgrade and it fried the first one bridge. If this is the future of electronics, I'm very worried.
  • by kburkhardt ( 664593 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:19PM (#8412354)
    Consider this: most items that require firmware updates attach in some way to a PC, and get those updates through the PC.

    What if there were some kind of a standardized firmware upgrade protocol (kind of like the windows automatic updater service-thingy) that kept track of your devices, notified you when updates were available, and flashed the updates for you?

    End user no longer has to be very savvy, but rather just has to have the firmware updater software installed. Updater reaches out to product web services (provided by manufacturers) for each product it is aware of, and checks for updates, and downloads 'em.

    Network devices (such as wireless routers) could find their own manufacturer, and update themselves (or not, of course, depending on user prefs)
  • Re:Crap (Score:5, Interesting)

    by canajin56 ( 660655 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:34PM (#8412474)

    Exactly. When the first Creative Jukeboxes came out, before the iPod, a big selling point was that they were firmware upgradeable. Right on the box it promised that they would update it to play "all future digital music formats" but it still only plays MP3 and WMA files. If you ask them when they are coding firmware to play Ogg Vorbis files they say "We do not support other music formats." If you point out they promised to support all future formats, they say "I already said, we do not support other formats" and then stop responding.

    I'll never buy a Creative product again, because they lied about their features in order to sell them.

  • Nokia did it to me (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dekker ( 44510 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:36PM (#8412485) Homepage
    Whether it's necessary or not, the manufacturers should make it easier. I own a Nokia 3560 cell phone and have been having problems with it shutting down randomly on it's own.

    After searching newsgroups and web sites, I came to find out that it's a somewhat common problem that may or may not be fixed with a firmware upgrade. I decided that I'd like to give it a try and prepared to backup my phone only to find that I couldn't get the upgrade anywhere on my own. A check on Nokia's site shows that I can either send it in to them at my own expense or call them and try to use a local authorized dealer. Not wanting to lose the phone for 10 days and pay shipping, I called and got two locations here in Austin. I called the first who informed me that they had the firmware, but didn't have the special cable required. The second told me flatly that they couldn't do it.

    So, why are these two places listed with Nokia if they won't perform the service and what the hell is the deal with needing a special cable? Why can't I just transfer the firmware upgrade to my phone via IR or bluetooth, run it and have it restart and apply the upgrade?

    After all this, I've decided to live with the problem. Not very satisfying at all.
  • Re:Alienating Users? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by dasmegabyte ( 267018 ) <das@OHNOWHATSTHISdasmegabyte.org> on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:37PM (#8412499) Homepage Journal
    They already have it. anti-virus [avast.com] for PDAs, despite there being no really worthwhile vectors for viruses to spread over the PDA format. After all, you never really sync more than one PDA to the same computer (though you likely sync multiple computers to the same PDA).

    I especially enjoy the sales verbage..."The importance of PDAs is growing every day and it is quite likely that these devices will soon become a target for new virus attacks." In other words, "there's currently nothing for the this product to do, but if it ever does become worthwhile, it'll do it after you download something else." Begs the question: why not wait until it becomes an issue, THEN download it? Seems you'd save some money that way, eh?

    Oh, and the cost? $20 for a year of nothing. Tell you what, guys...if you're in the market for PDA antivirus protection, I'll beat that price. I'll do nothing for only $10 a year.
  • Re:firm or soft? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Aero Leviathan ( 698882 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:43PM (#8412547) Journal
    Firmware was thought to be halfway between 'soft'-ware and 'hard'-ware; hence its name. (...Get it?) It isn't meant to be installed and uninstalled as much as software, but it's not meant to be unchangeable either.
  • by rMortyH ( 40227 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:49PM (#8412582)
    This is an interesting trend.

    If you buy something at a store in cash, the can put those 'by opening this you agree' contracts on them, but those don't mean much and they still can't identify you.

    By making you get an update they can collect information on you, which has dollar value, and more importantly, get you to click and EULA on the firmware which extends to other things as well as saying that it can be ammended at any time and remain binding.

    This is creeping into everything. I just sent away for my credit reports today. If you get your credit report from a credit agency through the web, they make you click an agreement which covers all sorts of things in addition to making you waive certain rights under the FCRA in some cases, as well as asking for all sorts of information in order to give it to you which is not required. If you send for it by mail, you only have to give the information required by law and you waive no rights.

    If you make enough noise, you can probably get them to send you the update in the mail, but you still must identify yourself to them and the effort is not worth it.

    The article doesn't mention it, but it's not about time to market, or cutting corners or anything. They want to 1) identify the customer 2) get them to enter into some sort of agreement.

  • by thrill12 ( 711899 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:52PM (#8412611) Journal
    ...for some devices is what makes me not buy those devices in the first place. Forget the less technical: they won't ask for the features most of us ask for (or when they do, they can find out about updating on the net).
    The main type of devices I am unpleased about are the mainstream DVD-players. Lack of features, wrongly implemented features, plain old hangups.... Who ever invented a DVD-player that can't do MP3 in random order ? Why should I want to see a JPEG building up on the screen while you could double-buffer it ?
    Sure, sometimes it's just lack of hardware support. But it's also just lazyness I guess.
    I have a Yamada DV-6000 now (divx-capable), which has regular firmware updates. Simply burn a CD-Rom and stuff it in the drive. If you are careful (and don't go updating your drive in the middle of a lightning storm or anything) you will gain more functionality for the same price. Easy as that.

    Big companies still have this lesson to learn.
  • by sprior ( 249994 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:52PM (#8412617) Homepage
    Something I learned a long time ago. Don't EVER make a purchase you'd find useless if a promised future feature/accessory/upgrade doesn't actually happen! I've seen companies promise accessories down the road that don't actually happen. Features that should only require a firmware upgrade turn out not to be possible without a hardware change. My personal favorite for a while not has been HDTV upgradable TVs - a couple of years after you buy that new TV, are you SURE that company would be happy developing new accessories for "last years model" or do you think they'd MUCH
    rather sell you this years model... Are you sure that new DRM standards aren't going to cripple the possibility of that future accessory upgrade you were promised?
  • Hiptop (Score:5, Interesting)

    by RzUpAnmsCwrds ( 262647 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @06:57PM (#8412660)
    The Danger Hiptop (T-Mobile Sidekick) has a particularly good way of doing updates. Updates are downloaded over-the air (using the GPRS connection) in the background. Because the device is always-on, a 2 megabyte update can be recieved over an otherwise slow GPRS connection without disrupting the user. When the update is finished downloading, the user is prompted and can choose to apply the upgrade or wait until later. If they choose to install, the update is verified (signed hash) and installed, and the device reboots. All data is left intact.
  • by Lemmy Caution ( 8378 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:03PM (#8412698) Homepage
    Corporations aren't evil. They're simple. They will do anything they legally can get away with to increase their profits and the value of their shares. Most will not break the law. But if they don't pursue the most straightforward legal avenue to near-term profit, they will incur the wrath of shareholders and lose out to competitors.

    Shipping vapor with promises is the best way to make profits in the long term. People have short memories. At least enough of them do. The ones who don't ship until they have all the features they promised will suffer in the marketplace against those who ship with vapor, and the fact that there's a handful of discriminating consumers out there won't change that.

    The answer, then, is sensible regulation, so that even those corporations who would act ethically do not work under a competitive disadvantage against the others. One of these sensible regulations would be insisting that any manufacturer that ships a product with extensible functionality, when that functionality is not yet available, be committed to providing that functionality for free *if the product was marketed with that extensible functionality as a differentiator*. No more bait and switch.

    It's why we have regulation in, for example, the food industry - we don't want a situation where producers are "playing chicken" with standards in order to reduce costs. Consumers could very well drive down the quality of food that way by being too willing to take risks in order to save money: I'd rather the law of supply and demand *not* work so well in that case.
  • Re:You know what? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by afidel ( 530433 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:23PM (#8412850)
    Yes and some of the time things don't go so well. I bought the first CDRW drive available (Ricoh MP 2600A) and when the Multiplay standard was finalized there was an incompatibility between the standard and something the Ricoh did. So they put out a firmware upgrade. Well being a person who likes my equipment to conform to standards I upgraded the firmware, only when I rebooted the unit couldn't be found, not by windows, not by linux, not by the SCSI card's firmware and not by Ricoh's diagnostics. Of course this was 13 months after I purchased the unit so no waranty support. I lucked out and found a hack on a support site, you needed to unplug the power connector and replug it before the SCSI bus was finished initializing. This wiped the firmware update area and put the unit back to origional factory code. Turns out even Ricoh's senior support engineer didn't know about this! That was NOT something a normal person would have done but the power didn't frighten me in the least and I figured I had nothing to lose.
  • by hamsterboy ( 218246 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:26PM (#8412869)
    Where's the criminal act? Say I make an electronic gadget, and you buy it. Even if my gadget doesn't work very well, I haven't committed a crime. You chose to buy my gadget; I didn't make you, and you probably should have done more research.

    There's also the issue of how to send a corporation to prison. Jail all the employees? (Is the front-desk receptionist responsible for a product defect?) Or just those responsible? (Of course, every product has an engineering team, etc. etc.) If we're punishing a corporation for an incomplete product, how do we define "incomplete"?

    Yes, the ignorant masses are being duped by the marketing dollars of large corporations. This has happened throughout history (ask any woman if Victoria's Secret underwear is actually comfortable), and it's not likely to stop.

    I've got to admit that I'm a bit awed at the sheer volume of ire aroused about firmware upgrades. Aren't there better things to be angry about?

    -- Hamster

  • by TheLinuxSRC ( 683475 ) <slashdot@pag[ ]sh.com ['ewa' in gap]> on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:41PM (#8412966) Homepage
    OK, false advertising could be argued as being a civil matter. Maybe I should have said fraud, which is a criminal matter. And isn't that what false advertising is?
  • by cryptyk ( 757256 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:49PM (#8413033)
    People can use a computer to get from point A to point B. Same thing with a car. You don't need to know how to change your oil to simply drive to the store. When something goes wrong, in either case, the average person can't fix the problem. I don't know why people are willing to pay to have their cars fixed but expect their computers to be fixed for free. As for adding new features? Give me a break. If you bought the thing with a certain feature set installed, and then the manufacturer supplies a new flash that enables more features, its your problem if you can't install it. Be happy they are providing it for free.
  • by dschl ( 57168 ) on Friday February 27, 2004 @07:51PM (#8413047) Homepage
    I avoid firmware upgrades unless I really want the feature, or can add enough new functions to avoid buying more hardware. Last thing I want is turn a working digicam into a dead one. I wish manufacturers would follow a few simple rules, as I would be more willing to update firmware:
    1. Always make the original firmware / bios available. Keep in in some form of ROM if possible.
    2. Always permit a fallback to the original firmware / bios (because the original should be available, as noted above). You almost need a pin or switch to do it, similar to the dip switch on some motherboards which restored default settings. Ideally, it would be nice to see a firmware loader in ROM, which could then manage and select among different firmware versions on a device, accessed through some key sequence, available for a second or two on power-up.
    3. No extra tools or hardware should be required. I don't even have a floppy drive hooked up anymore.
    4. No special operating system should be required (Windows-only firmware upgrades, anyone?). For firmware upgrades to be robust enough to make me feel all warm and fuzzy, all that should matter is getting the new firmware file into the device, over an industry-standard protocol, and you then automatically load the new firmware the next time you boot (including a check for corruption in the firmware upgrade file).
    5. User data and settings should be maintained through the upgrades. If new settings are available / old options are removed, then it is the manufacturers job to avoid screwing things up, not the device owners job to reset / reload everything.
    Oughta cover it. In a perfect world.
  • Criminal Act? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Sleetan ( 679171 ) * on Friday February 27, 2004 @08:22PM (#8413281)
    Not if someone was just ignorant and thought "Oh that looks pretty, maybe it will work well".

    However, advertising that a product does X Y and Z, when it only does X is a form of what we call "Fraud" specifically "False Advertising" that *is* a crime [state.mo.us] most places.

    I do however agree that companies get blamed more than they should because more often than not problems people have with products are from assumptions they've made about the product without investigating to see if their assumptions prove true.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 27, 2004 @09:54PM (#8413841)
    This raises concerns over alienating users that aren't tech-savvy and how this could affect perceptions of portable electronics as a whole.

    Personally, I'm more concerned with everything being `fixable'. At least in the olden days when you bought _hardware_ it was assumed to be `bug-free', but the more firmware upgradable hardware I see, the more of it seems to have stupid bugs.
  • by Reece400 ( 584378 ) <Reece400@hotmail.com> on Friday February 27, 2004 @10:26PM (#8413983)
    That's interesting.. I live in Canada, and my cell phone service actually sent me a letter in the mail saying there was an important upgrade available (didn't say what it was, but phone was still working good..) and gave a list of it's stores that would upgrade it for me for free...

    Reece,

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...