Trojan Horse Caused A Siberian Explosion 1183
An anonymous reader writes "William Safire of the nytimes [nytimes.com] has an interesting column this week describing how the Soviets purchased bogus computer chips from the West in the 1970's. These chips caused what "was the most monumental non-nuclear explosion and fire ever seen from space." Fascinating story."
Google Link (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:5, Informative)
Because voltage levels tend to drift a bit (especially with time and erosion) a system that's set up to read as either one state or another has quite a bit more built in tolerance for drift than one that's built to sense more than two states. It's been a LONG ass time since I took any compsci however so I'm probably missing a few things. Basically what I'm saying is that it's not only possible, such a system "could" be faster and more compact but it would also be horribly prone to errors in the long run.
Re:Pentium I bug. (Score:4, Informative)
I wonder if the editor RTFA.
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:5, Informative)
In addition to TRUE and FALSE, you have another state, which represents "I don't know". It's conventionally called FAIL (well, at least it is in Maple).
How do the truth tables work? The basic idea is that if you have a function f(x) where x is TRUE or FALSE, then you can define f for FAIL with this rule:
IF f(TRUE) = f(FALSE) THEN
f(FAIL)
ELSE
f(FAIL)
END IF
So this means you have TRUE AND FAIL = FAIL, but TRUE OR FAIL = TRUE (because TRUE OR TRUE = TRUE OR FALSE = TRUE).
Converting ternary logic to arithmetic modulo 3 is a little more complicated, but once when I was bored I worked out the rules for myself [forrest.cx].
Re:I doubt it... (Score:2, Informative)
Maybe Safire is getting senile and confusing the time when worked for Teddy Roosevelt......
Comment removed (Score:1, Informative)
Farewell, CIA, DGSE and other rants... (Score:5, Informative)
From the article:
President Francois Mitterrand of France also opposed the gas pipeline. He took President Reagan aside at a conference in Ottawa on July 19, 1981, to reveal that France had recruited a key K.G.B. officer in Moscow Center. Col. Vladimir Vetrov provided what French intelligence called the Farewell dossier.
This little bit of information is more or less correct. "Farewell" was the code name assigned to Col. Vetrov by his French DGSE (French CIA) handlers.
The next time you are tempted to say that France is not an ally of the USA, just remember that little bit of transatlantic cooperation. I personally think Mitterand was a crook, a thief and a sleazeball -- and I am trying to stay polite, here... But, ultimately, he may have done the right thing here.
But Safire glosses over the saddest part of the Farewell history (emphasis mine):
Vetrov was caught and executed in 1983. A year later, Bill Casey ordered the K.G.B. collection network rolled up, closing the Farewell dossier. [...] Now is a time to remember that sometimes our spooks get it right in a big way.
What Safire does not says is that:
In short: every good intelligence in this story was supplied by the French, and the USA made a mess of it, an important source was killed and years of hard work were wasted.
A little bit like the recent situation with a middle-east country with vast oil reserves, but I digress... You can mod me down now. End of Rant mode.
For the non Tin Foil among us (Score:1, Informative)
From the NY Times Biography of William Safire (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm seriously skeptical (Score:5, Informative)
Though there is no information about the explosion.
Gus Weiss' Account in 1996 (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/96unclass/farewell. htm [cia.gov]
Re:Google Link (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:4, Informative)
Not Exactly... (Score:5, Informative)
Not precisely true. The Americans sold technology to the Canadians, but wouldn't sell it to the Soviets. Soviet agents posed as Canadian defense contractors to get purchasing rights. The Americans knew they were doing it, and fed poisoned devices to those agents. The agents took the tech home to Russia and BOOM!
Virg
Re:It's not terrorism if Americans cause it (Score:3, Informative)
We also knew the WMD existed because the U.N. oversaw their destruction after Persian Gulf War I.
Isn't it funny that, after getting the green light from the U.S. [hartford-hwp.com] to become a mass murderer [whitehouse.gov], the U.S. spun that knowledge to begin their own campaign of death and destruction in Iraq [iraqbodycount.net]? You don't know who to believe anymore.
BUSH IS LEAVING TOWN IN 2004!
Re:Farewell, CIA, DGSE and other rants... (Score:3, Informative)
Google Search: 'Farewell DGSE' [google.fr]
Search for 'Farewell' on the following pages:
Some successes of the DGSE. [hfk-city.com]
French/English analysis of the DGSE. [sandstaff.com]
DST/DGSE comparison. [fortunecity.fr]
And I'll add one of my own:
dgse.org [dgse.org] (unofficial French fan club).
Sheesh...
Re:Disinformation (Score:2, Informative)
Man, do some research before you blow your tinfoil-hatted top. Sure, if you call the news media an "intelligence service." But if you don't call it that, he was just a reporter. Then he was a news producer, then he ran a PR firm, then he worked in the Nixon White House as a speechwriter. Sure, if you believe that PR and writing speeches for Nixon is "disinformation." Ok, you're "right" on this one, but not really. It's just crazy, the access that regular Op/Ed writers for the New York Times get to the pages of the New York Times. And how did I get access to my employer's office? Oh, yeah, I work there and it's part of the job. "Who is this guy Maureen Dowd, and how does he get his stuff in the Times so much more than I do?" It's not an article, it's an Op/Ed, so that's fine, more or less. It's also how Safire does business quite frequently. I love a good, well-informed tin-foil hat rant as much as the next guy. It's interesting how much I don't love uninformed ones.
Safire got his dates mixed up? (Score:3, Informative)
Did Safire get his dates mixed up? There was a huge petroleum gas explosion in the trans-Siberian pipeline in June 1989.
From this site: [junglesnafus.com]
At the time, magnetic corrosion was suspected (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Who Has (Score:2, Informative)
Well, can you show me a successful communist regime that is not a highly-centralised government with a strongman at the top? Laos and Vietnam don't count, since they both have private sectors.
I forget who it was who said that a common misperception on communism is that it's a good idea that's just implemented poorly - every single time it's ever been tried. Communism is a fundamentally bad idea.
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Farewell, CIA, DGSE and other rants... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Let me get this straight.... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:2, Informative)
You can kind of think of DNA as a quaternary data format. ATCG for each base position in a codon. 01 for binary. 012 for ternary.
One of the problems for designing a ternary computer is designing cheap circuits that could reliably switch and maintain 3 states. The voltage tolerances are tougher compared to the binary all or nothing approach. (be it 0 or +5V or something.)
Re:Meanwhile in Russia (Score:3, Informative)
That said, a jump from positive to negative voltage could increase the delay, which means slower clocked logic.
Could anyone realy identify a useful aspect of this kind of logic? I mean, MAYBE you could get faster branch handling with an if...else...unknown three-way branch instead of the traditional if...else, but would the extra complexity be worth it?
More info from the CIA (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Pentium I bug. (Score:5, Informative)
kremvax [astrian.net] was an April Fool's joke.
Re:Oh (Score:3, Informative)
This is one common misconception. In fact, the probability that the next strike is tommorow is as high as if its in the year 3000.
Re:Pentium I bug. (Score:5, Informative)
There were EPROMS with software on in the telemetry boards but they didn't have the control software. Hell, there was no control automation, all the kit did was to report on instruments, collect operator adjustments and send them to actuators.
As for the VAX 11/780, actually thanks to VMS it could give about 20 people some degree of word-processing, so a little better than the PC even though smaller and slower. I later at a chemical company used VAXen to run above the basic PDP-11 based telemetry systems to provide plant-level supervision.
The usual with a hot-standby system was that both would be active and one would follow the state of the other (we did something similar for the telemtry system). There would have been two PSUs definitely.
Re:Let me get this straight.... (Score:2, Informative)
We don't count civilian casualties [indymedia.org]
Re:Chile dawgs. (Score:4, Informative)
Mosadegh nationalized the oil fields after Anglo-Persian refused to allow him to even have the books audited. It was well known that the Iranians were being cheated of the megre share they were allowed of the oil revenues. Even the US administration thought that Anglo-Persian had brought the crisis on themselves. Had they offered a 50:50 split they would have kept their place.
No, they were not. The Shah, secular whatever his faults, kept their power down.
The installation of the shah as dictator was never going to be very stable for very long. The Shah was only the second of his line, his father had replaced the previous monarchy only 40 years earlier. The way the Shah was installed meant that he would never be seen as anything more than a foreign puppet and his eventual fall was inevitable. It was highly unlikely that the mullahs would ever have gained control if operation Ajax had never taken place.
What are you smoking? Saddam's involvement with the CIA was brief, and long after he put himself in power.
Saddam came to power in a party coup with US support. The CIA provided him with lists of opponents to liquidate. The US supported Saddam from the very beginning of his rule, all the way through to the invasion of Kewait. Even that would have been allowed if he had only kept the northern oil fields where the Kewaitis had been under-drilling Iraq's oil fields which was the original agreement.
Iran did have CIA involvement. However, Saddam put himself in power, and the CIA only helped him (along with many others) during a brief part of his long reign.
The CIA was mucking about in Iraqi politics ever since the British left.
This story is not "fascinating" at all... (Score:2, Informative)
The article is a shame for NYT.
Re:What helped "us" "win" the Cold War (Score:3, Informative)
I remember the life in USSR in 70's and 80's pretty well, and it certainly was far from "poverty". Certainly far from poverty compared to US in 70's and early 80's unless one judges the life in US based on Hollywood movies, and life in USSR based on American propaganda's horror stories. Of course, someone who left USSR in 80's most likely has an ax to grind against Communists, and there could be valid reasons for this -- USSR Communists at that time were almost as corrupt as US Republicans are now. However it's a poor reason for inventing stuff or being a parrot for his new American "leaders" and "masters".
Re:Chile dawgs. (Score:3, Informative)
You have so far failled to back any of your own allegations, folk can judge you by your posts. You like dictators, you like Bush, you peddle the type of conspiracy stories spun by Wolfowitz and Perle.
The infamous statement by the then US ambassador to Iraq on the Iraq dispute over the Kewaiti oil fields is well established "Washington has no stake in this local dispute".
Equally beyond dispute is the assistence given to Saddam during the war he started against Iran and in which he used the chemical weapons.
You would have to read a history of CIA operations in the middle east to verify the other claims, these are not online but easy enough to get hold of.