Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam

Virginia Anti-Spam Law; FTC Forum on Spam 186

kiwimate writes "According to this press release, the state of Virginia has just passed a statute making 'the worst, most egregious and fraudulent kinds of spam' legally actionable. And yes, this includes header forging. The article reads like a big AOL PR piece in some places -- the VA governor led the signing at the AOL HQ in Dulles. The story also states this comes on the eve of the first-ever FTC forum on spam in Washington D.C." The FTC also made the insightful discovery that most spam is fraudulent in some fashion.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Virginia Anti-Spam Law; FTC Forum on Spam

Comments Filter:
  • by Corvaith ( 538529 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @06:55PM (#5838653) Homepage
    This is the one that's always gotten me. It's obviously one of the worst possible things in spam. But how do you then track down who happens to be sending it and punish them for it?
  • by AlphaSys ( 613947 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @06:57PM (#5838671)
    And better yet, do I have to live in Va. to benefit, or does my inconvenient mail just need to make a hop there?
  • by 0WaitState ( 231806 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @06:59PM (#5838690)
    And in further news, a minimum of two-thirds of all types of intrusive advertising contain false claims--telephone cold-calls, loud tv commercials, the crap that hides the funnies in the sunday newspaper, the daily pound of paper cluttering your mailbox, you name it. The more intrusive the advertising, the more fraudulent the content.
  • by bgeiger ( 42769 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @07:15PM (#5838792) Homepage Journal
    I don't mind legitimate advertising. Spam that clearly shows itself as such isn't a problem; I can just delete it without a second thought, like tossing out the fliers in my mailbox.

    It's the bullshit that these scumbags pull that bothers me. Header forging is fraud. Making invalid claims is fraud. Sending spam and making it look like legitimate mail is fraud. Spammers should be prosecuted under existing anti-fraud laws.

    (And by the way, at least the VA representatives have the balls to address the problem, unlike most states.)
  • I live in Virginia! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Tuzy2k ( 523973 ) <spam@tuz w o r ld.com> on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @07:20PM (#5838827) Homepage
    I hate to say it, but if AOL can throw their weight around to rid me of spam then I'll stop bitching every time I get an AOL cd in the mail :)

    I wonder though- is there a place that we could report spam to the virginia prosecutors? Perhaps our state attorney general could setup a spam email and state residents could forward their spam there for the prosecutors to go after :)

  • Just for Ralsky (Score:3, Interesting)

    by amber_lux ( 630446 ) <{amber_lux} {at} {emailaccount.com}> on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @07:25PM (#5838861) Homepage Journal

    B: A person is guilty of a Class 6 felony if he commits a violation of subsection A and:
    1. The volume of UBE transmitted exceeded 10,000 attempted recipients in any 24-hour period, 100,000 attempted recipients in any 30-day time period, or one million attempted recipients in any one-year time period;

    I think Ralsky would get that many bounces in an hour, if he did not forge headers, and hijack mail servers.

    Penalty is only $10.00 per email or $25K, whichever is less.

    Not enough financial damage to spammers, but it is a start. If the statutory damages were higher, it might have a legitimate claim to being the toughest in the country.

    Wind under Thy Wings

    Amber

  • by Pieroxy ( 222434 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @07:43PM (#5838973) Homepage
    You don't need to find who is behind the scene. Here are the steps to punish spammers without knowing them:

    1. Write a small program that every user can run at home, on the seti model. Let's call it spammerSucker.
    2. Identify an email as spam (this part is easy)
    3. Find the website of the spammer (The email is generally full of http links)
    4. Add the URL in the centralized DB of spammerSucker.
    5. In minutes, millons of DSL/Cable users running spammerSucker are downloading every byte out of their server, initiating millions of sockets per second.
    6. Their server is "slashdotted", and no one can access it.

    Such a campaign would just result in destroying your website when you send a spam and so would make it a lot more dangerous for a company to send spam.

    The danger is actually in step 2, because you don't want to blinbly suck any website...
  • by mao che minh ( 611166 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @08:32PM (#5839274) Journal
    As a lifelong Virginian, I never saw this coming. This state's government is usually so in bed with the money hounds, nothing (and I mean nothing) gets done "legistlative-wise" until some big company lobbies for it.

    I forgot that AOL has a huge datacenter up North from here. Hmm.....

  • Re:FTC & FDA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @08:37PM (#5839307) Homepage Journal
    They were forced to by Congress, which under pressure from the dietary supplement ("health food") industry banned the FDA from regulating such as drugs. It's a real scandal.

    Unfortunately you're probably closer to the truth than they would have us believe. While the manufacturers, at least a chunk of them, could claim these do no harm (unless taken in absurd quantities, which nobody really knows how much as they aren't regulated or adequately tested), it's hard to disprove whether or not they do no good. So, it's like selling sugar pills, which can be very profitable, hence so much spam regarding all these great meds and supplements.

    Spammers, of course, have used far from ethical tactics so they don't go to capitals very well armed to defend themselves, even if they could tote in some 'campaign contributions.'

  • by Bendy Chief ( 633679 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @08:38PM (#5839312) Homepage Journal
    Tell me, do you see ads for "Doctor Approved!" penis enlargment in any of the media listed? Those media all advertise for identifiable, accountable corporate entities; scammers can't afford a huge publication of fliers in the Daily Rag, nor could they avoid a law-enforcement backlash after their scam is exposed.

    It's due to the anonymous nature of electronic communication that these types are able to sell anything. Regulatory agencies would come down, BLAMMO, on a telemarketer phoning you and screaming pornographic lines at you. Spammers don't ask questions when taking jobs. Newspaper editors and TV commercial producers do.

  • Virginia and the Law (Score:5, Interesting)

    by The Ape With No Name ( 213531 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @08:44PM (#5839359) Homepage
    As a gennilman raised in Vehjenya, I can tell you this, they do not fuck around. Illegal gun: 5 years. Use a firearm in commission of a felony: 5 years on top of 20 years for whatever you did. Simple pot possession: 12 months. Radar detector: fat fine, car searched and mucho points on the license. It goes on and on. The old joke is that Virginia has a law against everything and two laws against most things, and never get busted in a state where the flag has a woman standing on a man's chest wielding a spear.


    If any spammers are reading this, let me tell you about the Virginia correctional system. If you are lucky you will go to the big house. If they put you on the farm you are fucked. Most penal farms in Va grow their own food and cut their own fire wood, etc. You will come out tan and fit, my friend. I taught literacy in Wise County at the facility there. No slack for misdemeanors and light felonies. They also operate road gangs (no chains. Work is time off from your sentence with good behavior) with the Boss standing over you with a 12-gauge full of rocksalt if you decide to make like Cool Hand Luke. Also, the Virginia State Police are ruthlessly efficient and will get you. This was the best state to implement anti-spam legislation if we want spammers to hurt.


    PS. It is "The Commonwealth of Virginia" not the "State of Virginia." I didn't get my hands whacked with a ruler by Mrs. Underwood to have y'all malign my beloved home with the lowly name of "state."

  • by NewtonsLaw ( 409638 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @08:54PM (#5839425)
    An interesting debate arose from a story [aardvark.co.nz] I wrote earlier this week in which I published screenshots from a spammer's mailboxes.

    One reader complained [aardvark.co.nz] that this was "hacking" and that it was an unjustifiable action.

    In response to that complaint I asked my readers [aardvark.co.nz] (part-way down the page) whether there was any difference between a spammer trespassing on someone's mailbox with their crap and someone trespassing on the spammer's mailbox to expose their mis-deeds.

    Gathering by the responses [aardvark.co.nz] it appears that the rule of "do unto others" can reasonably applied to spammers and their mailboxes.

  • Don't encourage them (Score:3, Interesting)

    by billd ( 11997 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @11:03PM (#5840101) Journal
    If nobody ever replied to spam, there'd be no point to it, so maybe it would dry up eventually. People who react to spam are providing the feedback that encourages the spammers to spam on.
  • by OpieTaylor ( 144173 ) on Tuesday April 29, 2003 @11:28PM (#5840217)
    Ironically, I once wrote to the Delegate who introduced this bill (my local representative), asking her to support a state-wide "do not call" list for phone-spam.

    She wrote back, basically saying the bill was bad for business.

    Maybe I should send campaign contributions to AOL, since they seem to get the job done.

If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

Working...