Reuters: 80% of Chinese Computers Virus Infected 362
Alien54 writes "A rueters news report says that 80% of computers in China have been touched by a computer virus. They quote a a six-week survey conducted by the [Chinese] National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center cited in the official China Daily newspaper."
goldmine for software publishers (Score:5, Insightful)
Incorrect (Score:5, Insightful)
Here is the source for my observation:
"Only 16 percent of computer users we sampled this year reported they were free from any virus attack, while last year nearly one in three users said they suffered no computer infections," the newspaper quoted the center's chief engineer, Zhang Jian, as saying.
Misleading headline (Score:5, Insightful)
Typical Slashdot journalism. "touched by a virus" is far different than "infected by a virus". My computer gets touched by viruses all the time, but it never actually gets infected, because I keep my apache (the only service running) up-to-date.
Not very surprising, Language barrier plays a role (Score:3, Insightful)
Because of the poor grasp of English, emails with attached 'cute wallpaper', 'nude pics of Brittney', and 'Figures you please review' will be opened 8 our of 10 times.
Without a big flashing strobe light on top of monitors that would alarm when an infected email appears, most asian users will continue to open infected email without a second thought.
what about in US? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hrm (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Incorrect (Score:5, Insightful)
These people think that mail sent by the viruses that are being returned to them are actually others accessing their computer and emailing from it. They have no idea that they have contracted a virus at all.
"I have a virus scanner!"
Re:goldmine for software publishers (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:government propaganda (Score:3, Insightful)
Touched = Infected? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:In Other news (Score:4, Insightful)
Easily believeable (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem with these CDs is that they have been cracked (so people can use them) by who-knows-who and frequently have other 'things' floating around on the CDs and i'm sure there huge numbers of virii that are being distributed in this way. It's really easy to picture an 80% infection rate. It's kinda like a high school computer lab where all the kids trade floppy disks and there is no anti-virus protection.... everyone has it before long.
Re:Incorrect (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll believe in this belief. Years ago, maybe 1989 or 1990, I had a conversation with an engineer at then-major aerospace company Martin Marietta. He was no dummy, but he carried the misbelief that a computer virus was something that occurred naturally, like an influenza virus, or herpes.
In conjunction with the "if anything's wrong with my computer, it's a virus" phenomena you see every day amongst business types, an 80% belief rate isn't unlikely, even in the USA.
I blame the Anti-Virus industry at least partially for this. Members of the AV community are so tight-lipped about viruses that they end up being almost mystical. AV people seem to believe that any real information about a virus or worm will foster further virus and/or worm writing. So they don't give out any real information (like "Using Outlook will inevitably cause you to get infected. Switch to something else"). They even seem to have helped the trend of calling any malware a "virus" because of this.
Survey methodology? (Score:5, Insightful)
Try this, ask 10 computer users (users, not geeks) these two questions:
1). Have you ever had a strange computer problem?
2). Think it could have been a virus?
I would lay money that you can find an 80% 'touched by a virus' rating on any group of people you like.
Anyone familar with the social sciences and / or statistics realizes that corrolation does not equal causation. However, if you're a gov't agencey (as one reader posted previously) in need of funding, corollation = causation is a very useful tool. Even more so when you engineer the corollation part.
This article is a waste of time.
Cheers,
-- RLJ
Re:goldmine for software publishers (Score:2, Insightful)
But the point I tried to make was that for anti-virus software to be effective, you need frequent (daily, for corporate systems) updates from the vendor. While I don't know this for a fact, I would assume that you need a registration or an original serial number to get the latest update.
Generally speaking, the more interaction between a vendor and a user, the more dificult it is to pirate. Where there is no interaction, like music, it is completely impossible for a company to stop pirated copies.
Tor
Re:Incorrect (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe they just want to keep themselves in business. If everybody fled from Outlook, there would not be as strong a need for virus checking software, now would there?
Re:10,000 lbs per acer (Score:2, Insightful)
I just wonder what would China have to gain by saying all their computers are 0w3d?
Reuters:
Computer viruses are small programs often sent via e-mail or hidden in other software. Once inside a computer, they can do malicious tasks like erase data or reproduce and send copies to other machines over the Internet.
You + Reuters = The Great Firewall [wired.com]
You + Reuters = Software Piracy [newsfactor.com]
Re:goldmine for software publishers (Score:1, Insightful)
Infected or exposed to? 80% isn't a high number (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:works both ways? (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow! You know, the english word for computer translates to "computer", which is a person who does arithmetic computations all day.
And the english word for mother board translates to "mother board", which should be enough to give anyone pause about those very strange westerners...