Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Upgrades

USA Busted Trying to Bug China's Presidential 767 510

morcheeba writes "A new Boeing 767-300ER was refitted to become China's presidental aircraft. What goes into a plane like this? Besides the bedroom, sitting room, bath with a shower, there was a 48" TV, satellite communications, anti-missile defense systems and advanced avionics. And oh yeah, numerous high-tech listening devices. Wonder how those got in. Read the article at washingtonpost.com." CD: The question is, what was the bug in the headboard for?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

USA Busted Trying to Bug China's Presidential 767

Comments Filter:
  • And Bush lives as well as an average American?

    That is an odd thing to complain about when there are so many other glaring human rights problems that are much more serious in china.

  • Yup (Score:2, Interesting)

    by J4 ( 449 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @02:39AM (#2867128) Homepage
    Is this a surprise? Gotta wonder how much of the tech China bought during the Clinton administration is booby-trapped
  • by kenneth_martens ( 320269 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @03:03AM (#2867225)
    This is not suprising: the US spies on everyone, including allies (yes, even Britain.) (In fact, I saw a documentary the other day about how we bugged the Xerox machine at the Soviet embassy, and got snapshots of all their documents for years.) So while it may be a little embarrassing to get caught, it isn't a revelation. China shouldn't take it personally--we spy on everyone.

    Of course, that doesn't mean spying is moral or ethical--that is another discussion entirely.
  • by Goonie ( 8651 ) <robert.merkel@be ... g ['ra.' in gap]> on Saturday January 19, 2002 @03:10AM (#2867249) Homepage
    When the new Chinese embassy was built in Canberra, Australia, the Australian intelligence agencies attempted to riddle the building with bugs. Unfortunately, they got caught and it made the national papers. However, the Chinese barely made a squeak about it in public. I think we can safely assume they try to do the same things to us.
  • China gives communism a bad name....

    Nah, communism did that for itself. Come on - Marx wrote books to pay for his kids education, travel, etc. then on to Lenin, Stalin, and everything that made russia what it is today (which is: not a communist country).

    Communism is a really interesting idea, and a very noble set of ideals. But what it comes down to is controlling people, and all it takes when you have power is one person to use it and all those lofty goals are subverted.

    Final note: in business or in government, don't trust 5 year plans that don't have month-by-month goals. 'Cause no-one can procrastinate that much and still do the work.

    -Peter

  • by Ardias ( 544478 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @04:11AM (#2867372) Homepage
    Way back when Xerox sold copiers to the Soviets, they installed little microfilm cameras in them. The Soviets paid Xerox for maintenance contracts. The field technicians who serviced the copiers would secretly replace the microfilm cannisters when they changed the ink cartridges. The film cannisters were given to the US government as part of a separate service contract with the US.

    Eventually, the Soviets figured out the ruse.

    Obviously, the US government has taken advantage of US technology to bug the Chinese plane also. Just shows there is a benefit to being the world's technological leader. All your enemies have to come to the US for parts and service.
  • by dadragon ( 177695 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @04:26AM (#2867412) Homepage
    The US spys on its allies, just as Canada spys on her allies. We spy on each other, it's the price of being friends.

    Canada doesn't fear US spying in the lower levels of government, like I said, it's a price of being friends. What we fear is the US trying to control our Cabinet by knowing what its issues are and how dicisions are made.

    Remember the level of government of Canada go (Top to bottom)

    Governor-General (Effectivly Canada's president, but she represents the Queen)
    Prime Minister (Real Power)
    Cabinet (Federal Minsitries)
    Commons/Senate (Representatives of the population/provinces respectivly)
    Lieutenant Governors (Governor's of the Provinces)
    Premiers (Prime Minsiter of the Province)
    Provincial Cabinet
    Provincial Legislature/Provincial Parliament
  • by Dr. Spork ( 142693 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @05:13AM (#2867502)
    Finally, a post with a little thought behind it. I also think we should consider the possibility that the USA was deliberately looking for an incident, and here's why: Everybody in the Bush administration whose voice matters (Bush is not one of these) is a fossil of the cold war. They can't understand foreign policy without a cold war structure.

    There is plenty of evidence the US took active steps to reawaken a cold war, this time with China as the enemy. For a while we were doing absolutely everything we could to piss them off: We bombed their embassy "by mistake," we made it obvious that our spy planes are over their country (one of them crashed), Rumsfeld canceled the decades-long practice of mutual military inspections with China, we are building SDI again, and a bunch of other stuff. All of this shows a clear pattern: we were trying to provoke China to do something that we could point at and say: Hey, look at how evil China is! Then we'd have a "justification" to retaliate with something totally disproportionate, pissing them off even more, and that's all it takes to have a cold war! Fortunately, China appears to have a much more civilized foreign policy than the US and they didn't take the bait.

    Remember that the microphones were planted before September 2001, and the order to plant them is older still. Fortunately for our warmongering administration, bin Laden handed them a kinder present than anything they could have imagined. Now they have a new enemy that they can indiscriminately call "evil" and the world makes sense to them again. This takes the heat off China, but we can't debug the plane by remote control.

  • Re:A matter of trust (Score:2, Interesting)

    by cheezehead ( 167366 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @05:44AM (#2867564)
    In any case I don't imagine that a "killswitch" would be a big dashboard LED, but rather it'd be subtle -> Gosh darnit the amraam just refuses to get a lock for some reason! Why is the radar cluttered and incapable of separating targets?

    I don't think it's as simple as you think. First of all, when the US delivers (say) jet fighters to an allied country, they deliver all the technical information as well (note that if this stuff is too advanced, the plane does not get exported, period. See for example the F-22). The technical information is needed so that maintenance personnel can be trained. There may be exceptions, but usually maintenance and repair are done by local mechanics and engineers. Despite what some people may think, these guys are usually not morons. There is a substantial risk that a trojan horse device will eventually be found. If that happens, all hell breaks loose, and US exports will suffer, to say the least.
    Also, consider that a lot of the equipment like radars, etc. are supplied by sub-contractors. With so many (often hundreds) of companies contributing, the risk of leaks becomes rather big.
    Last, consider that an ally turning into an enemy overnight doesn't happen all that often. The only case I can think of is Iran.
  • by fgk ( 552217 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @06:07AM (#2867603)

    Actually, word has it that the DOD does not use any NIC's produced in China, because of possible off-network data streams, ie it is possible to have a nic duplicate a stream of data packets oubound from a targets system, after sending a command to that NIC, remotely. One of the ideas was that the Chinese military is one of the biggest manf's of electronics (dual-use purposes also), and quite possibly could 'bug' almost any system.

    No, this isn't the X-Files.
  • by Fantastic Lad ( 198284 ) on Saturday January 19, 2002 @02:49PM (#2868937)
    Oooh, bugs. Yeah, no shit!

    There are always bugs in the residences of diplomats and the various cubby holes of mid-range political activity. But at the higher end of the scale. . . That is, if there are bugs on the Chinese version of Air Force One, then you can safely bet that they WILL be found.

    Which means that they were meant to be found.

    Bugs aren't interesting.

    The interesting thing is that it made high profile 'real' news (i.e., the Washington Post).

    Why? Easy. -To further the programming of public awareness on both sides of the Atlantic.

    -See stories about how China now filters Email. Look for similar material over the next few months.

    The highschool play unfolding on the world stage is clearly being performed in order to cast China in the role of the next big bad guy.

    Why?

    So that when the curtain finally goes up on 'act 2' (-That'd be the whole plot development between Pakistan, India and China, each with nukes, BTW), the U.S. will have paved the way for public sympathy in supporting the country most able to provide, um, oil. And general fear.

    I'm betting on concentration camps being open for business in the U.S. in another ten years. Maybe sooner.

    Why?

    Cuz Fear is Food. Solution? Refuse to play. Fear is a choice. Laugh a lot. Love your friends. Stay healthy. Learn how to avoid the bullshit, in the air, in your food, in the programming. The end of the world, (beginning of the new), only happens once in a very long while; Try to enjoy it!


    -Fantastic Lad

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...