Christmas Spam Level Skyrocketing 286
dbolger writes: "ZDNet has this brief, but interesting article about how the amount of spam we recieve in our inboxes has increased 650% since this time last year. Nice to know that that anti-spam legislation passed a while back is having an effect (not)." For PINE users, just remember the magic spell: "m s r f a."
Both sites and advertisers are desperate (Score:5, Interesting)
When will this madness stop? Users may flee sites that harass them too strongly. Then again, the general level of advertising in our environment has been slowly but steadily increasing for decades. I doubt this trend will stop anytime soon.
Re:right.... (Score:2, Interesting)
The cheaper PC parts get, the more new users.
The more new net users (AOLers?), the more spam.
I recall reading something on news.admin.net-abuse.email a while ago about a company that provided webhosting to businesses, and something like 95% of their new customers spammed. I'd imagine that rate could be applied to new members of online services a la AOL, Prodigy, et al, and probably half that rate for new net users connecting via actual ISPs.
Want to incur a LARGE cost on spammers? (Score:4, Interesting)
Filters: Pine and elsewher (Score:2, Interesting)
Here is a suggestion: As a Xmas gift to your fellow
Ho HO HOLD (the SPAM)!
Speaking of SPAM (Score:2, Interesting)
At least there are programs to block spam from your mail box, you can't do that on ICQ. Seems like they generate a new ICQ for each messenge so you can't ban them all.
Really? (Score:4, Interesting)
For those who care to reduce spam and other online (and offline) annoyances, see Junkbusters [junkbusters.com] web site, also home to the free (GPL) filtering proxy by the same name.
Re:the rest of the world... (Score:5, Interesting)
Despite more than 2/3 of the Internet-users beeing non-us-citizens, 90% of all spam originates in the US. This is most likely due to permissive legislature in the US. In Italy for example collecting (e-mail)addresses and other personal data is illegal, unless you have written permission from the user, or you have a business realationship (italian law #675/96, aka privacy law).
IMHO, stopping the increasing number of spam-mails is only possible with legislature forcing opt-in methods for advertisers and huge fines for those who don't conform.
Ciao,
ms
MandrakeSecure (Score:3, Interesting)
A recent article [mandrakesecure.net] posted on MandrakeForum [mandrakeforum.com] talks about ways to handle SPAM using postfix and qmail. Maybe this can be useful to the larger slashdot crowd?
What I really hate is non-spam! (Score:2, Interesting)
"This is not Spam, I'm emailing to let you know that for only 4.99$..."
Help me! They are using our Email! (Score:2, Interesting)
I get several hundred emails per day, either automated replies that tell my, that "your message to iojrf323@yahoo.com could not be delivered" or angry users that accuse us of spamming.
I try to contact the admins of the abused systems and enter their servers into an open-relay list, but that hasn't slowed down the rate of incoming emails.
Any ideas?
The Profit in Spam (Score:4, Interesting)
I emailed 100 verio customers in that net block to explain to them how they would be blackholed and what that meant. They took down the site.
You can set up the very software spammers use to poach email addresses from sites in the same net block.
I fight fire with extreme fire. The only spammers I go after since you can rile people up on it, porn spammers, they don't care if they are sending to a kid or an adult, most of them even have pedophile or zoophile crap. Grab a name from the isp, any name. Contact them on the phone and tell them of the spam and give them 24 hours to have the site removed. If not, you are going to call everyone with their last name in the city the isp is located and let them know they are all for helping pedophiles etc. Does your mom know you send porn to minors?
It is very effective. Use infoseek or similar service, look for business by the ISP. Call the deli downstairs, the church in the neighborhood, then let the person at the ISP know who you talked to.
I am not posting my name since spammers have put me on their lists, they post my name as a spammer in newsgroups. They suck.
I have a job where filtering mail could mean not getting a clients mail, so it is not an option.
If everyone just took one piece of spam, traced it to the source or the host. Attacked that host, with legal threats. Do not make anything up, do not lie. When you call their biggest advertiser to explain how they support pedophiles, be clear, it is because they refuse to take action against pedophiles hosted on their site. That they allow one of their customers to send unsolicted porn to minors. Be very clear. And be very clear your group is about to announce who is helping these scums, since their company is an advertiser or client of the isp, you are going to list them. Don't like it? get another isp or get the isp to stop.
Shame is a great motivator. Use it. If we do not stand up to this crap, we are going to see legislation coming in, they are going to be heavy handed, they are going to snoop. Take back your box.
Do more than report a spammer today, those days are over. Attack,threaten and shame a host today.
Re:Want to incur a LARGE cost on spammers? (Score:3, Interesting)
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
set_time_limit(0);
$agents = array("Mozilla/4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686)",
"Mozilla/4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.10 i686)",
"Mozilla/4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i686)",
"Mozilla/4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686)",
"Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686)",
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010105",
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010105",
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686; en-US; 0.6) Gecko/20001206",
"Mozilla/4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)",
"Mozilla/4.72 [en] (WinNT; U)",
"Mozilla/4.74 [en] (WinNT; U)",
"Mozilla/4.08 [en] (WinNT; U)",
"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:0.8.1+) Gecko/20010426");
srand((double)microtime() * 1000000);
shuffle($agents);
$agentCount = sizeof($agents) - 1;
function HTTPGet($url)
{
global $agents, $agentCount;
if(!($fp = fsockopen("www.overture.com", 80))) return FALSE;
fwrite($fp, "GET $url HTTP/1.0\r\nHost: www.overture.com\r\nUser-Agent: " . $agents[mt_rand(0, $agentCount)] . "\r\n\r\n");
$html = fread($fp, 100000);
fclose($fp);
return $html;
}
mt_srand((double)microtime() * 1000000);
preg_match_all("/<a href=(.*xargs.* ?)>/U", HTTPGet("/d/search/?Keywords=bulk+email"), $urls);
preg_match_all("/<a href=(.*xargs.* ?)>/U", HTTPGet("/d/search/?Keywords=bulk+mail"), $urls2);
$urls = array_merge($urls[1], $urls2[1]);
shuffle($urls);
$linkCount = sizeof($urls) - 1;
while(TRUE)
{
$html = HTTPGet($urls[mt_rand(0, $linkCount)]);
if(strstr($html, "HTTP/1.1 302")) echo preg_replace("/^.*Location: http:\\/\\/(.*?\\r\\n).*$/s", "\\1", $html);
}
?></A></A>
What if YOUR e-mail address is used to spam? (Score:4, Interesting)
At least I gor a copy of the original message, so could trace the sender's IP address and their obfuscated web site address.
I dropped a note to abuse@ISP, who seems to have removed the spammer's web site now. Otherwise I might have asked the Slashdot community to test the spammer's offer (:-)
But what to do about reputational damage? Or going onto known spammer lists?
What about ICQ spam? (Score:1, Interesting)
Every morning when I check my messages I have about 10 spams waiting for me and there are more coming in during the day. It used to be mostly/only icq pager events, so I disabled those. But right now just about every type of icq message is getting used.
ICQ is simply getting rather annoying to use but then again all the people I want to talk to use it. It's not like I could just ask everyone to switch to something else (not to mention I have no doubts that other messaging services are or will be just as bad).
So has anyone been experiencing this problem? And if so, have you been able to correct the situation? I would like to know how people are dealing with this.
Thanks
WarDancer AKA TooLazyToCreateAnAccount
What to look for... (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, look for "send to 10 people" and that will get most chain letters. "make $$$" will get several hundred a week. "to be removed" will get a lot, but be careful as it will also get most legit mailing lists too.
I set these filters and then waited for SPAM to get through. If one did I would look at it and try to determine if there was anything unique that wouldn't be in normal correspondence. My SPAM count is still high, but only about 1 a month gets in.
Spamcop.net seems to have worked for me.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Spamcop takes the headers and fires off Abuse messages to every domain it finds in the trace of the spam.
The results? Well, I check my email and my wife's, and we used to get roughly identicle spams .. After using SpamCop for maybe 2 weeks, my spam count dropped off the map, while her email still gets hit.
I'd say I've gone from 20 spam/day to 1 spam/day.
It's kinda spooky. Don't know why it worked for me.
Re:msrfa for OUTLOOK EXPRESS (Score:2, Interesting)
tools->message rules->mail
New...
check off 'where the to or cc line contains people'
and also check off 'delete it'
then click on the 'contains people' link, enter your e-mail address for the pop account, click add and then 'options'
select the 'does not contain' option and click ok
give the rule a name like 'kill_all' and click ok
this rule needs to be placed at the top of your message rules to work properly as the list behaves the exact opposite as a routing table. (its M$, what do you expect?)
this will delete any e-mail not specifically addressed to you (as most spam is).
you will need to create message rules for any mailing lists you may be on, but you should have already done that to properly organize them into folders.
since using this method i have not had to read one spam e-mail sent to my pop account.
:)
despammed (Score:2, Interesting)