The Neurological Basis of Con Games 218
Hugh Pickens writes "If we humans have such big brains, how can we get conned? Neuroeconomist Paul J. Zak has an interesting post on Psychology Today in which he recounts how he was the victim of a classic con called 'The Pigeon Drop' when he was a teenager and explains how con men take advantage of the Human Oxytocin Mediated Attachment System, called THOMAS, a powerful brain circuit that releases the neurochemical oxytocin when we are trusted and induces a desire to reciprocate the trust we have been shown. 'The key to a con is not that you trust the con man, but that he shows he trusts you. Con men ply their trade by appearing fragile or needing help, by seeming vulnerable,' writes Zak. 'Because of THOMAS, the human brain makes us feel good when we help others — this is the basis for attachment to family and friends and cooperation with strangers.' Zak's laboratory studies have shown that two percent of the college students he tested are 'unconditional nonreciprocators' who have learned how to simulate trustworthiness and would make good con men. Watch a video of Skeptics Society founder Michael Shermer running the classic pigeon drop on an unsuspecting victim and see if you wouldn't be taken in by a professional con man yourself."
Uh... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Just be careful before you reach for the MDMA as repeated use may experience a collection of symptoms involving diminished emotions, colloquially known as being an "E-Tard ism".
Re:Uh... (Score:5, Funny)
caused spontaneous erections after being injected in rats.
For the rats, right? Please say yes.
Re: (Score:2)
How we can we know this article is truthful? Can we really trust the author? He's a con man, after all.
You're right, nothing said above is valid...
Say... did you drop your wallet?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"If we humans have such big brains, how can we get conned?"
Ummm... if god is so powerful can he make a rock so big he can't move it?
There is a spectrum of intelligence. Some of the more intelligent people are coming up with cons. People of lower intelligence fall for them. No magic here.
Re:Uh... (Score:5, Insightful)
At the same time, people can be over confident and what they know can deceive them. I would bet there is a set of cons that hit smart people harder.
On that note, I have meet some very smart but very stupid people.
Re:Uh... (Score:5, Informative)
I would bet there is a set of cons that hit smart people harder.
You mean something like this stuff? [wikipedia.org]. Richard Feynman once observed that some smart people get taken because they don't want to believe they can be fooled. He was referring to people fooled by Uri Geller. He said he was different because "I'm smart enough to know that I'm dumb". Which is one of my favorite quotes of anything.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Smart people fall for cons too. I knew a guy back in graduate school, finishing up his PhD in CS, smart fellow. He fell for the Three Card Monte [wikipedia.org] the first time he went to New York City.
Smart != street smart.
Re: (Score:2)
Smart people fall for cons too.
Smart or not smart has little to do with it, but many people seem to think "lazy" and "greedy" people are also generally less smart.
Greedy people fall for cons, while people who believe that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is don't get conned. "Greedy" doesn't have to mean they'd steal money, or run cons themselves. "Greedy" means that if they think they can make a quick buck with no work involved, they will.
In the first linked article, the guy fell for the con because he saw he could get a
Re:Uh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Since GP used the word 'spectrum', your hypothesis is full of fail.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And the first AC posted about a "black and white perspective", an idiom indicating two discrete extremes, no middle ground, which runs directly counter to the concept of a "spectrum"
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The concept of a spectrum is not "directly counter" to a black-and-white perspective. The spectrum exists independent of his point of view. He's cut the spectrum into discrete blocks (i.e, "more intelligent" and "less intelligent"). That's what people with a black-and-white perspective do. It doesn't matter if they acknowledge a spectrum if they don't actually view it as a spectrum.
Re: (Score:2)
"More" and "less" are relative measures. Where does that become "discrete?"
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Also, there are various kinds of smartness. A savvy con man can con a Nobel prize-awarded genius whil
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Answer: You ask the question "Did you know they're giving away free beer in Shelbyville?"
A truth teller will answer "No" and head down the road to Shelbyville.
A liar will answer "Yes" and head down the road to Shelbyville.
Re: (Score:2)
point to either road and ask the man, "if i were to ask you if this road goes to Shelbyville, what would you say?"
if you pointed to the correct road the man will say "yes" regardless of whether he's a habitual truth-teller or a habitual liar.
if you pointed to the Ogdenville path, the man will say "no" whether he's a habitual truth-teller or a habitual liar.
I'd make a good one (Score:4, Insightful)
I think most fairly successful people in business have to have a little con man in them to some degree.
Re:I'd make a good one (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I think most fairly successful people in /the pr0n/ business have to have some man in them to some degree.
FTFY
Please stand up ... (Score:4, Funny)
If you know you would be taken in by a profession con man ... I'll trust you to let me know ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey guys, I have a bridge I need selling... (Score:2, Insightful)
The trouble is, I have to get to a job interview. I have a client coming around right now with the cash. Can you do me a favour? I'll split the proceeds of the sale with you, but because I have to go, I'll grab my share now. That fine with you?
Cool.
---
I was trying to think of something serious to say, but honestly, I couldn't. I even read the first article and loaded up the video and second article. I guess I could make a random attack on capitalism as an economic system, but that would probably be unsubsta
Unsurprising find? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
2% probably depends on the college. They should sample politicians and inmates.
Explanation (Score:4, Interesting)
J.R. "Bob" Dobbs explains it eloquently: "You know how dumb the average person is? Well, by definition, half of 'em are even dumber than THAT."
Re:Explanation (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, that's originally a George Carlin joke.
And when most people retell it, they inevitably get into a geek debate about mean vs. average.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You say tomato, I say potato. I call upon my license to fail I paid "Bob" 30 bucks for.
Re: (Score:2)
Assume normal distribution of IQ (as most do), and mean and median are the same. The joke is the truth.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, man. I just love the old "assume a normal distribution" con. Do you have any idea how much money I have made with that one?
How does that one work? I'll show you.
Let's play a game. Assuming I have a fair coin, I flip the coin and it comes up heads 9 times in a row. What is the probability of the coin coming up heads on the 10th flip?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What is the probability of the coin coming up heads on the 10th flip?
0%, since of course you switched out the coin with a two-tailed coin after flip 9.
Re: (Score:2)
No. No. No.
That is the old "shell game" con. And while I just love that con, it isn't the one I was playing. If you were watching for the switch you would be deeply disappointed.
Also, you obviously don't fall for the old "assume a normal distribution" scam. I would have to play the old "inverted pyramid" scam with you. I just love the old "inverted pyramid" scam. It works especially well with stock newsletters. You can play this game as an inverted pyramid scam, but it only pays off once every 1024 times.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you understand the term "distribution" very well.
It can't be applied to a single trial.
Also, (honest) coin flips aren't a normal distribution...you'll get 50% heads and 50% tails with no outliers.
Or, perhaps you are thinking of the fact that in the combinations of heads and tails for a given number of flips, each number of heads (or tails) generates a normal distribution. But, your first 9 flips are an outlier for either 9 or 10 flips. So logic says the next flip would be heads because despi
Re: (Score:2)
The fairness of a coin can be modelled by a binomial distribution. If you take the Taylor series expansion of a binomial distribution and then use the first two elements of the expansion to model the binomial you get a normal distribution.
"Assume a normal distribution" is close enough for confidence work.
Re: (Score:2)
You caught onto the heart of the old "assume a normal distribution" scam quite quickly for an anonymous coward.
But how well do you hold up against an "independence assumption" scam?
Re: (Score:2)
geek debate about mean vs. average
You just had to bring that up didn't you...
Re: (Score:2)
And someone always points out that the distinction is immaterial based on their claim that it's a normal distribution.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, man. I just love the old "mean vs. average" con.
Intresing (Score:2)
"My research has demonstrated that they have highly dysregulated THOMASes." ;)
so in otherwods if you are bastard it is because you have brain damage
Seriouly though, does anyone know if this kind of research argues for better or an inborn train as opposed to one the 'grew' later on within a person enviourment. ( otherwise known as raised that way?)
Re: (Score:2)
Feeling good about hurting (Score:5, Insightful)
If cons work by making us feel good about helping the con man, then how come so many are based on the mark trying to rip off someone? In the pigeon drop, the mark is trying to rip off the con man. In insider-knowledge scams, the mark is trying to rip off honest traders or gamblers. With "white van" scams, the mark thinks he's buying stolen goods.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Someone else said it as well. It is all about "I want." It always has been and it always will be. This is why TV commercials work -- you want whatever they say you want and they do their best to make it look as good as possible. This is why spam works -- they know they are offering something that some people want more than their good senses can control. This is why religion works as well.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
You're missing a choice:
5) "We're not splitting the money. That's stealing, and if you try it with the other guy I'm calling the cops. Now, let's find a phone book and call the owner."
And before you say nobody would ever do that, I've done exactly that in the past. I'm not sure if it was going to be a con, but it worked out well enough in the end.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
5) "We're not splitting the money. That's stealing, and if you try it with the other guy I'm calling the cops. Now, let's find a phone book and call the owner."
The con generally involves a wallet that has no ID in it so that it's impossible to call the owner. The con works in part because option #5 has been removed.
Re:Feeling good about hurting (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
With "white van" scams, the mark thinks he's buying stolen goods.
Interesting. I didn't realize this was such a well known scam. About 10 years ago in College while walking from my car to class I would occasionally get stopped by slimy looking guys driving around in a van saying they were from "Sound Design", and repeated some ridiculous story about "extra" speakers being ordered, etc. This happened more than once, so I knew there was some form of scam here but didn't find out exactly what until later.
One
Re: (Score:2)
Not me. (Score:5, Funny)
I don't easily trust strangers who inexplicably trust me. I'm not easily conned. I guess I have a doubting THOMAS.
Re:Not me. (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds like you have an inherent understanding of Thoreau. "If a man comes to you with the obvious intention of doing you good, run for your life."
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't easily trust strangers who inexplicably trust me. I'm not easily conned. I guess I have a doubting THOMAS.
I wouldn't have fallen for it for one reason only: I would not have touched the money or the envelope with the money in it. Or the envelope I thought it had the money in it. If there is no personal information in the wallet, yet it seems loaded with money, my paranoia kicks in. If there is personal information inside, then I'd rather find the owner and hand it over.
Somehow, I'd rather earn $300 than steal $1000, though I'd give it back even without the finder's fee.
Besides, I remember American Gods and two
Paging David Brin (Score:2)
We feel good when we help others?
"You just stay the hell away from me, ALAS [davidbrin.com]. I won't be your patsy. I won't be your vector."
Greed (Score:2)
I suggest this guy needs to read Dostoevsky as a matter of urgency. He clearly has limited experience with actual members of the human race. Greed is the primary motivation for most of the species.
Fragile, needing help, seeming vulnerable... (Score:5, Insightful)
Con men ply their trade by appearing fragile or needing help, by seeming vulnerable...
Sounds like a few women I've dated. Sometimes, love and romance is also a con game, now isn't it?
two percent are bastards? (Score:4, Funny)
So about 6 million in America alone.
Say, isn't that about the population of Los Angeles and Manhattan (just the island, not the rest of NYC) combined? That would explain a lot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pointless conclusions (Score:2)
The point was to win someone's trust. Betraying him afterward is an afterthought, and completely irrelevant.
Being a jerk... (Score:2)
It takes a certain amount of 'nad to appear weak and helpless, get people to help you, and then rob them blind and walk way.
I certainly don't have the stomach for it...
Adman
Obligatory, I suppose (Score:2)
Request for urgent business relationship
First, I must solicit your strictest confidence in this transaction. This is by virtue of its nature as being utterly confidential and 'top secret'. I am sure and have confidence of your ability and reliability to prosecute a transaction of this great magnitude involving a pending transaction requiring maxiimum confidence.
We are top official of the federal government contract review panel who are interested in imporation of goods into our country with funds which are
When you get conned... (Score:5, Insightful)
...it's because you're a gullible fool. When I get conned, it's because someone "took advantage of the human oxytocin-mediated attachment system". Well, who wouldn't fall for that?
"Vote for me" (Score:2)
Invest in me = invest in YOURSELF!
That explains charity cons (Score:2, Funny)
That explains all the suspicious "please help me" posts on Craigslist.
One of these days I'm going to open CL and see this:
Dear Esteemed Sir;
I represent mYself, a poor Nigerian pe asant with FIVE MILLION CHILDREN to feed. I beg of you please do not send food or it will be STOLEN by corrupt officials. Instead please wire THE SUM OF 10 MILLIION US DOLLARS to [Western Union recipient information deleted for posting to Slashdot] so that I may buy food for my fAamily and pay off the police so they don't rape my
You can't con an honest man (Score:5, Insightful)
When dealing with $3,000 a light has to go off in your head that says "there are procedures for dealing with this". Go to the police. Tell the guy you'll walk to the nearest police station with him, or that you'll call the non-emergency number with your cel phone. The police will hold the money for a statutory limit, and if nobody claims it, THEN you might get it. YMMV on the laws in your jurisdiction and how honest the cops are.
Now, if you're not a totally honest man a different light goes off in your head. That light says "How can I get this money, nevermind the victim or due process".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A successful con needs only a single lapse in judgment, regardless of the mark's character. Anyone can be a victim, and most everyone is at one point in time or another.
Ponzi Scheme In Colombia (Score:2, Interesting)
A huge Ponzi network just fell in Colombia, encompassing many cities and more than a billion dollars in loses:
http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=320773&CategoryId=12393 [laht.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_JZL9pC6-8 [youtube.com]
I've heard somthing similar also happened in Bolivia. I think it's all about greed/dreams of easy money.
Beware of modern neurophrenology (Score:5, Insightful)
We cannot view the brain as a simple modular system, which merely needs a circuit diagram drawn to discover its mysteries. Functional specialization no doubt exists, but in an interconnected and complex way that resists simple explanations of "oh, this part of the brain lit up during this therefore this". Localization alone tells us little, it is only in complement with studies of neurotransmitter mechanisms, single cell recordings, computational theories, and numerous other techniques of brain exploration that any real answers are going to be found. THOMAS doesn't explain anything, its just a piece in the puzzle.
Re: (Score:2)
Because even smart people do stupid things (Score:4, Insightful)
Germany during World War II, for example, most believed and followed Hitler. Germany had some smart people, but they made stupid decisions and fell for Hitler's scam.
The same is true of Democratic and Republican US citizens falling for their candidate's scams. Once elected into office, do you really think they will keep every promise they made and do what they told their supporters they would do?
If it sounds too good to be true, most of the time it isn't true at all, it is a scam.
If, for example, you get an email saying you won the UK lottery chances are it is a scam, or Bill Gates giving out millions if you forward this email to 20 of your friends and family, it is a scam, or someone dying in Nigeria with your last name and has $10 million waiting to be wired to you and need your contact info and banking numbers etc, it is a scam.
Truth (or trust) serum? (Score:4, Interesting)
If, as the article claims, oxytocin "induces a desire to reciprocate [trust]", whether it could form the basis of some sort of truth serum? Inject some oxytocin into somebody who has something to hide, and introduce this person to an actor who pretends to be very trusting. I wonder if this would encourage the oxytocin-induced person to reveal secrets once sufficient trust is gained by the actor...
Re: (Score:2)
You have just discovered jailhouse snitches.
The first rule of the con... (Score:2)
I'd fundamentally like to believe this. . . (Score:3, Insightful)
But I don't. --It doesn't stop me from endeavoring to be honest, but there are certain types of cons which honest people fall for, perhaps more easily than the corrupt.
Like this whole sham economy we have running around us. Ideas like, paying back the bank interest feels natural because an honest man doesn't want something for nothing. And yet it's arguably one of the biggest, most willfully destructive scams currently going.
Just a thought.
-FL
Con games - my personal experience (Score:4, Interesting)
Someone tried to con me over the chat (initially via OKStupid) a while back. It wasn't the usual brand of 419 scam (email full of hilarious malapropisms, bizarrely pompous status claims, heavily reliance on affiliation with God, et cetera).
It was personal.
The person put time into it. I'll use 'she' because she presented as a woman, a Dutch woman in her mid 50s. I can usually tell when a guy is trying to pass as a woman in chat as the conversation devolves to sex within about two minutes and thirty seconds; there's zero emotional content.
She was dying of cancer. She was straight. I'm not, but in any case, and in all truth, she wasn't the kind of person I'd choose as a partner. No matter, she seemed like a sweet and decent person. Not overly smart, not stupid. Good at connecting; she liked talking about emotions and the people in her life. So do I. She told me about her husband and how much she'd loved and missed him (he'd died not long before). We talked about all sorts of inconsequential trivia. She talked, off and on, for about three months. She told me about her faith. How sweet - I'm an atheist, but I honestly find the nicer Christians to be good and sincere company (not *you*, you dribbling neocon fuckwits). About half-way through the three months, she said she wanted to arrange a will, and that she had no-one left that she could trust to act as executor. She wanted *me* to play that role. I was surprised and flattered, and not so certain of my own moral compass (I was really down on cash and a student at the time) that I felt comfortable with the idea. I told her I was an atheist (I hadn't brought it up until then - I don't tend to preach). She said it didn't matter; she said that she trusted me. I told her I'd think about it.
She didn't press the issue, until about six weeks later. This time ostensibly from her hospital bed in London (she'd been mobile and functional up until that point).
She underlined her desperation. She talked about practical mechanisms by means of which I could accomplish my role. She made one mistake: she asked for my bank account details. I asked her why she couldn't open a new account on which I would have signing powers. After all, it would keep the finances clean and separate and allow for proof that I'd fulfilled my duties correctly, should need arise. She didn't give a satisfactory answer, and at *that* point, the penny dropped. I felt hurt and stupid. I voiced my feelings. I stopped talking to her.
There was still the nagging doubt that she might have been for-real, so I did nothing beyond this. I continued to feel guilty about the possibility that her story was true until time, and continual analysis of the event, satisfied me that she was full of shit.
Why, though, did she target *me*? I was a *poor* physics student at the time. And why did she spend so much time on it? We probably chatted a total of maybe 16-20 hours. In that time she could have made more money working at McDonalds than she'd have made out of *my* account...
Unless there are other identity-theft related uses for a genuine bank account belonging to a real human. With history.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Insightful)
Forget all the babble about neurochemicals.
Forget all that scientific evidence...what, because you say so?
If you aren't greedy, if you aren't looking to get something for nothing, it will be nearly impossible for you to be conned.
So explain how a person is greedy without using the brain as a part of that explanation.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure his original answer wasn't using his brain, so there you go. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
In what sense is something like "greed" explained by talking about brain chemicals? What sort of "explanation" is this? How does it clear things up? What is it that you didn't understand about greed before that you do understand after you listen to a guy talk about brain chemicals?
Not everything that is scientific is also relevant.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:4, Insightful)
I remember from the early parts of the book Influence: the Science and Practice (awesome book, by the way) that the author pointed out that we're wired to participate in society as efficiently as possible... well, by "we" I don't necessarily mean slashdotters.
Anyway, our brain takes shortcuts to make our interaction with those around us be mostly smooth and beneficial for everyone. These shortcuts can be taken advantage of by bad people to gain our compliance to things we shouldn't comply with. We get conned.
But the author makes a point that these shortcuts are generally a good thing and mostly necessary... we should just beware when something seems fishy.
That's why it bothers me when people use some poor sap that gets taken advantage of to prove that you need to be greedy or a jerk or self-centered to make it through life without being screwed. To hell with that, continue to be kind, self-less, helpful, and trusting... but also listen to those warning bells in the back of your mind that might appear from time to time.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Insightful)
No, those are just the obvious con men. The ones 'everyone' knows about because after it's over 'everyone' goes "How stupid would you have to have been to fall for that."
Believe me, there are plenty of other people out there who are willing to con you that don't rely on your greed.
Ever been the fall guy? The one left holding the bag?
Ever get suckered into buying a lemon car from used car salemen.
Ever been suckered into being 'friend' that gets the 'ugly one' on a double date?
Ever donate to a charity because the guy on the TV asked you too and said "Your dollars can help".
Greed is a tool to catch the greedy. Compasion is the tool used to catch the compasionate. Pride is the tool used to catch the prideful (as in "You are too smart to ever fall for such an obvious con...)
There are plenty of clay feet out there to aim at, greed is just one of them.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever vote for %POLITICIAN%?
Wait... Let's just make that, "Ever vote?" I still vote, but... wow.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cheese.
Or a card with "How do you trick a jaded pessimist, turn me over to find out" printed on both sides. They fall for that every time.
Re: (Score:2)
What do you use to catch a jaded pessimist?
That's easy enough. Make them think everything is their idea.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Interesting)
And a confidence game is a scam that involves gaining someone's confidence and then using it to defraud them, which is exactly what every one of the examples above are.
Thanks for the unecessary condescendation though. Look! Another con word.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the unecessary condescendation though. Look! Another con word.
Misfortunately, that isn't a word. Perhaps you meaned condescension?
Re: (Score:2)
It's still a "con" word!!!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No, I meant condensation, he was drooling.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Informative)
Believe me, there are plenty of other people out there who are willing to con you that don't rely on your greed.
Care to point some of them out?
The Craigslist Bad Check scam [consumeraffairs.com], where the con sends a check for several thousand more than the asking price. They'll email you saying that their secretary made a mistake, but they trust you, so go ahead and cash it and send back the difference. It's a bad check, of course, but your bank won't notice for a few days, and then they'll hold you responsible for the difference, plus the check you just sent back.
The mark isn't working on greed. They don't expect to get anything more than the original asking price. The con works purely on feelings of trust.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, it's greed, too:
Not con-man: Hey, my secretary made a mistake on that check and wrote it for too much...can you cash it and send me the difference?
Seller: No, I really need you to send me another check for the correct amount.
Not con-man: Well, then, screw you...I'm gonna stop payment on that check and you don't have to send me the stuff.
See...if you don't agree to these extra terms, even a completely honest buyer might just cost you some profit. Of course, a real con man would say exactly the same
The difference between a mark and being kind? (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't see how your definition of being a mark to a con-man because of greed and just being kind to a liar is any different.
The action(s) performed are done in both cases are generally under your own free will.
The perceived harm is in the eye of the beholder (it's either charity or the sting of being conned).
If the only difference is in the "heart" of the mark before it happens, perhaps there is something objective. But that isn't something you can be always sure you know about you need to just trust some
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Interesting)
They're not all stupid...
A friend of mine is a finance manager at a car dealership. Two women and a man came in about two months ago with a rather elaborate story. The first woman was married to the man, then fell in love with the second woman. The first woman wanted to buy a car, but had no credit history, although the social security number (and matching drivers license) she had provided was clean. Neither the other woman, or the husband, was willing to cosign. The woman also had all of the appropriate documentation for a credit less customer, addressed bills, paystubs, bank account balances, etc...
That night, the woman left my friend with a hefty down payment check, and the three left in a brand new, $30,000 car. The very next morning, the dealership was faxed the remainder of the information they needed to close out the deal. About two weeks later, when they were verifying the check and logging the deal, the bank let them know that the name on the check didn't match the name on the account. My friend did some digging, left the woman a message, and asked her to get back to him.
At this point, he called me, and told me the story. He hadn't put it together yet, but I couldn't stop laughing. The last thing he said to me, before I broke the news to him, was that the dealership probably wouldn't lose too much since they'd be able to repossess the car before they could put too many miles on it. I explained that they were long gone, and so was the car. It wasn't coming back, it was all a show, none of it was real. He checked out the cell phone, prepaid, checked out the paystub (manager said, "Another one! Have no idea who that is"), checked out the bills, fake account numbers. Everything was fake, the whole deal was a very elaborate hoax.
It's not hard to see why they succeeded. They came in with an elaborate story to distract and disarm. The more you're thinking about lesbians, the less you're thinking about proof. They were able to argue amongst themselves to great effect the entire time to further distract (e.g. "You left me for her, its not my problem, I had all you needed right here"). They also had all the answers and all the right explanations, there was no need to come back, they had all the information they required with them, and as they could see from the credit report, they knew what to bring because they'd already hit many other dealerships in the area.
The con artists also sweetened the deal for the dealership. My friend tried to reject the deal, but when the general manager found out that they were buying the car for sticker price with a maintenance plan, a very high profit deal, he told him to go ahead with it. They also took away the ability to verify the deal, and the incentive to verify the next day. They came in late in the day, when the banks were closed, and her job would have been closed, so they would have to take most of the information presented at face value. In addition, the additional information they requested was faxed over the next day to relieve suspicion.
The last thing they relied on was the most important, and that is the reluctance of those who have been scammed to report it. My dad uncovered a scam several years ago, where 21 people were taken for between $100k and $1M each over the course of a year, by a boat dealer. The dealer was never convicted, not because of the evidence, but because not a single person was willing to testify, publicly admitting their mistake. And before you think it couldn't happen to you, consider that even Al Capone was taken for $5,000 in the 1920s. Viktor Lustig approached Capone and offered to double his investment of $50,000 in 60 days. In 60 days, Lustig returned all $50,000 to Capone, and apologized that it didn't work, although he very much needed the money. Capone decided to give Lustig $5,000. What Capone didn't know, was that this is what Lustig had planned all along, he had never done anything but deposit the money in a bank account. In another case, Lustig sold the Eiffel Tower to
Re: (Score:2)
Minor nitpick. At least according to the Wikipedia article, Lustig kept the money in a safe deposit box, not a bank account.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Lustig [wikipedia.org]
Inadvertent reverse pigeon drop (Score:4, Interesting)
After finishing, I sat down at a bus shelter bench (with glass at my back) and my left hand on my briefcase. I hear a knock on the glasss behind me and to the right and turn my head just in time to see a hand pointing at a pile of bills on the sidewalk behind me.
I look around, and seeing nobody there, I turn around and bend down to reach for the cash, releasing my hold on my briefcase. After collecting the bills, I put my hand back on my briefcase and then I look at it... it had been switched.
Luckily, my briefcase contained only a pen and some pieces of ID. In exchange I got around 100 bucks and a new briefcase.
I admit I've been tempted to intentionally replicate this reverse pigeon drop.
Re:It's all about greed (Score:5, Funny)
Trust in paper documents seems to be lagging way behind the ability to forge them. How hard is it to scan/photoshop/print a utility bill these days?
I would say very hard.
Let me present to you, the HP PSC 2355, combined printer/scanner/hairdrier.
It won't scan unless I have toner in the printer. In addition, some errors present themselves, requiring you to press the ok button. Once you do this, it presents the same info again, requiring you to press the ok button...
The HP PSC 2355: "you just can't reason with it, and it simply will not stop until you are dead"
Re: (Score:2)
This is why you need to differentiate between "intelligent" and "clever". They are really two different kinds of smart people, the "clever" people are good at answering quickly, mostly tackle simple problems and can rapidly adapt to changes in their environment. These are the fast talkers and charismatic types and include the con artists and businessmen.
The "intelligent" type are good at solving complex problems, st
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I feel I must apologize for the truth. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
JP Morgan has AIG beat by a long shot. Check out what they did/are doing to Wamu and be amazed.