Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

IT Workers Cushioned From US Economic Downturn

Posted by timothy on Sun Sep 21, 2008 04:22 PM
from the employment-tends-to-be-binary-though dept.
DontLickJesus writes "According to the AP, technology has been the least hardest hit by the U.S.'s recent economic downturn. Quote: '"Overall technology employment is up in America and the wages associated with it are up," said John McCarthy, a vice president with Forrester Research.' The article goes on to say that companies realize the worth of their [IT] staff. This paired along with a recent article regarding the value of data centers when selling a company leads one to believe that the business world, while historically not fond of IT workers, is showing its true opinion of the sector."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Ask Slashdot: Tech Vs. Business? 607 comments
An anonymous reader writes "I've recently found a spot in a large company, and I'm noticing that here a lot of people on the technology side are very anti-business. Tech makes up about 40% of the total line of business staff, but the whole LOB is only a tiny percentage of the larger company in the financial industry. I personally haven't seen this before in prior jobs, but I'm told that this animosity is commonplace. So I come to Slashdot to find out if others have experienced this adversarial relationship between business and tech, and if so, what was the effect on the overall success of the business?"
[+] News: Data Centers Crucial To Lehman Sale 301 comments
miller60 writes "What assets retain value in the midst of a financial panic? Data centers. When assets of bankrupt Lehman Brothers were sold to Barclays Tuesday for $1.75 billion, Lehman's data centers and headquarters accounted for $1.5 billion of the value in the deal. That echoes the JPMorgan-Bear Stearns fire sale, in which Bear's two data centers and HQ represented much of the sale price. Amidst financial turmoil, Wall Street's high-tech data centers become the crown jewels for buyers of distressed assets."
[+] News: Unemployment Hits New High In Silicon Valley 338 comments
Though there may be some degree of cushion for IT workers in the US generally, Slatterz writes "The steadily climbing unemployment rate in Silicon Valley has reached a shocking four-year high of 6.6 per cent. Recent statistics indicate that the percentage of unemployed workers in the sunny state of California has increased to 7.7 in August — up from 7.4 per cent in July. Jeffrey Lindsay of Bernstein Research explained that a number of Internet firms were chronically overstaffed."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Tablizer (95088) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:28PM (#25096269) Homepage Journal

    Perhaps because during 2001-2003 they sliced back so much IT staff that they still have not finished catching up? Also many IT people went into other fields or back to school during that time, reducing the supply, meaning there is less chance of oversupply this time around.

      • by vitaflo (20507) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:46PM (#25096439) Homepage

        Most likely because in a downturn*, 'IT' is the cheapeast way to increase productivity, especially if you have to fire people.

        *Because there is increased pressure to create/find efficiencies, not because IT is somehow cheaper during a downturn than during an upturn.

        I think it's a bit of both. Obviously people are looking for efficiencies when times get tight. Investing in technical solutions is one way to do that.

        But I also think the dot-com bust helped as well. There are far fewer people in tech jobs than there used to be. Those that survived the bust are most likely more qualified as well (at least compared to those who were only in it to make a buck in the late 90's).

        So, it comes down to supply and demand. At least, I've noticed this where I live. Business is very good right now, and doesn't seem to be slowing up.

      • by Tablizer (95088) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:50PM (#25096487) Homepage Journal

        Most likely because in a downturn*, 'IT' is the cheapeast way to increase productivity, especially if you have to fire people.

        During the dot-com downturn, most businesses just let the existing software run as-is, without adding features. Thus, they only had to pay for skeleton-crew maintenance, not new features. Whether this is the best strategy or not profit-wise, I couldn't say. But it's what companies actually did regardless of merit.

        Note that new features generally takes some up-front investment, and if you are in financial hot-water, you don't spend for such projects because the company may not survive long enough to see the up-front investment pay off.

        Smarter companies would sock some cash away so that they could get new technology while techies are cheaper. Instead they usually wait until the middle of a boom and then whine to congress that they need H1B's.
             

  • by Wansu (846) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:44PM (#25096423)

    This is just the start of it. It's way too early to crow.

    Our end of the boat may not be taking on water yet but the ship is sinking, the brass band is playing and politicians are fighting over the deck chairs.

  • Bailout (Score:5, Insightful)

    by QuoteMstr (55051) <dan.colascione@gmail.com> on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:14PM (#25096737)

    We must not allow the Treasure Secretary to receive $700 billion to spend with no oversight whatsoever. The current plan creates a gigantic moral hazard, is inflationary, rewards reckless risk-taking by CEOs, and still results in common people being foreclosed upon. We need to re-institute the Glass-Steagall act, allow highly leveraged firms to fail, insulate common people from the effects of these failing institutions, and regulate the market to prevent this catastrophe from happening again.

    • Re:Bailout (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PeeAitchPee (712652) on Sunday September 21 2008, @06:43PM (#25097461)

      and still results in common people being foreclosed upon.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but no one put a gun to anyone's head and made them sign a mortgage they couldn't afford. I'm sick of paying for the mistakes of the stupid / greedy, whether they're Wall Street execs or "common people" who can't / won't pay their mortgage. The "common people" you refer to are just as guilty as the Wall Streeters, and that it's even being considered to *reset* their mortgage principals is blatantly shocking. Where's the handout for those of us who follow the rules and live within our means?

  • by Skapare (16644) on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:25PM (#25096833) Homepage

    Just because technology companies are not hit as hard by this economic downturn, that does not mean technology workers (programmers, engineers, network admins, system admins) are equivalently immune. One problem here is the Labor department is classifying things badly. When the payroll of a technology company goes up, they interpret it as benefiting technology workers. It could be they are just hiring more sales people (I've seen it done). And a huge amount of IT is done in non-technology companies, including financial companies. And even if these companies consider their data centers to be of value, the IT workers own none of it, and few of them would be considered vital employees.

    • Bubblenomics (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Tablizer (95088) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:32PM (#25096311) Homepage Journal

      Spare a thought for us who don't work in IT though, we're still feeling the pinch. My company is laying off an entire 10% of the employee base over the next few months.

      Because our economy appears to be driven by bubbles after the 1970's, different recessions seem to sock different professions. Programmers got hit in the 2001-2003 poppage. This time finance people are getting smacked by bubblenomics.

      We all get our turn.
                 

    • Re:I disagree (Score:5, Insightful)

      by realmolo (574068) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:41PM (#25096401)

      Well, help desk technicians are worth about $12/hour, honestly.

      "Help Desk" is the low-end of the IT totem pole. It's a job that requires few qualifications beyond "Knows how to install software and update drivers".

      I think the bigger fear that people with IT careers (myself included) is the inevitable deployment of high-speed fiber networks. For MANY businesses, having nothing but "terminals" that run apps on remote servers (which would probably be running under VMs) would be a huge cost savings, and probably more reliable, too.

      It costs a lot of money to have a really reliable network, and the staff to maintain it. Why not pay some other company to do all that, and enjoy the economies of scale that they can offer?

      • Re:I disagree (Score:5, Informative)

        by syousef (465911) on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:23PM (#25096821) Journal

        It costs a lot of money to have a really reliable network, and the staff to maintain it. Why not pay some other company to do all that, and enjoy the economies of scale that they can offer?

        Because inevitably when you take something that your business relies on and outsource to the lowest bidder, it gets done badly and your business suffers (sometimes irreparably). Take it from someone who works on a system that was outsourced, then insourced again long before outsourcing became trendy.

    • Re:I disagree (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TubeSteak (669689) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:42PM (#25096413) Journal

      IT professionals have been hit very hard and nowhere is this more evident than in Phoenix, where I live.

      That's a great anecdote.
      Now how about you show us some information which proves your one data point reflects the entire US economy.
      You know, something tangible to refute the Labor Dept and TFA's quote from the VP & Principal Analyst of Forrester Research.

    • by thetoadwarrior (1268702) on Sunday September 21 2008, @04:49PM (#25096473) Homepage
      To be fair that is only one area out of a huge country and it might not even be true of that whole area as I assume you don't go door to door and poll ever IT worker.

      Secondly, working the help desk is fairly easily stuff. Anyone can do it. In fact, the latest trend in IT is to train monkeys to do help desk work. It's even cheaper than out sourcing, keeps wages in the country and there is little difference between the monkey's performance and any other help desk technician.
        • Re:I disagree (Score:5, Insightful)

          by E IS mC(Square) (721736) on Sunday September 21 2008, @10:12PM (#25099015) Journal
          I think they are not looking for much, except for:
          10 years of Guru level Java expert experience with AJAX, Java Beans, Hibernate, Spring, SCJP
          With Minimum 10 years of Oracle 10g (yes) experience with DBA skills to match the development skills working on Oracle RAC, Data warehousing and ETL
          with great Linux/Unix skills with 15 years of socket programming, general admin knowledge, backup expertise with strong emphasis on korn, bash and C shell scripting
          at least 8 years of Perl, Python and 5 (yes) years of Ruby on Rails

          Yes, this is a made up requirement, but not too far from what I have seen in last 4 months on job boards when I was looking for a decent mid level development job.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:06PM (#25096643)

      ...I am still blowing $300 a week on weed...
      I've been wondering why I feel insulated from this thing...

      Maybe because you're HIGH, moron.

      • Re:Cusioned? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Glonoinha (587375) on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:11PM (#25096693) Journal

        It's not that other people are getting 'free money' that's on his nerves. It's where this 'free money' is coming from - guess what, it's coming out of his ass in the form of an extra $5,000 worth of income taxes next April 15th. Mine too. Yours too.

        If the government gives me $100 in 'free money' - as you say that really doesn't concern you personally. Unless they dip right into your checking account and take it right out of your pocket to give it to me. Then it's something for you to get pissed about.

        Make sense now?

      • by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:43PM (#25096985) Homepage Journal

        McCain tried to warn us all about four of five years ago that the two FM's were headed for disaster but many Democrats and Republicans headed him off at the pass.

        That is an absolute lie.

        John McCain has been nothing but a cheerleader for the Reaganomics that has caused this debacle. He's been for privatization, deregulation and tax cuts. In fact, there's a video going around on YouTube the last few days where John McCain is giving very energetic (as much as he can be energetic) support for the privatization of Social Security.

        Even someone as far conservative as George Will today has said that John McCain has just been an utter failure on economic issues and has done nothing but sputter and froth when we really need someone who's going to be a little more thoughtful. If you don't believe me, go watch the video of today's This Week on ABC. Listen closely to what George Will says.

        Sarah Palin has become little more than a circus sideshow. She's actually become the candidate (out of the main four) with the LEAST approval. She slid 10 points in public approval in just three days last week. There is evidence that having her on the ticket is losing votes for McCain in more than one swing state. His Hail Mary Pass has fallen incomplete. Now that the convention "bump" after the RNC Crystal Night has passed, all the polls are trending Obama, including the most important electoral college numbers.

        My only fear is that the only Hail Mary pass that the GOP has left requires a body count.

        By the way, did you know that on Sept 18, just a few days ago, George Bush extended the national state of emergency that he put in place on Sept 23, 2001 for another year? Go to whitehouse.gov and look at the daily press releases and executive orders for Sept 18. There it is, big as life. Who even knew that we have been under a state of emergency since 9/11?

        • by uassholes (1179143) on Sunday September 21 2008, @08:08PM (#25098091)
          It took a few minutes to find but I found what the previous poster is rabid about and pasted it here. It is a bit disconcerting that while most Americans consider the U.S.A. to be a stable country, unlike the ones that are constantly declaring states of emergency in order to keep their autocratic, dictatorial, fucktards in power, now we discover that we (yes, U.S. citizen here) are doing the same thing.
          Not to keep George "Fucktard" Bush in power longer, of course, since the Constitution does not allow that, but just to give him more power while he's there. I'm not necessarily in favor of it, unless it is necessary in helping certain parties to understand (such as with a bullet to the brain) that it is not considered socially acceptable to blow up Mariotts in Pakistan.

          Anyway, here it is.

          For Immediate Release
          Office of the Press Secretary
          September 18, 2008

          Notice: Continuation Of The National Emergency With Respect To Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, Or Support Terrorism

          RSS Feed White House News

          On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, I declared a national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks in New York, in Pennsylvania, and against the Pentagon committed on September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks against United States nationals or the United States. Because the actions of these persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States, the national emergency declared on September 23, 2001, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 23, 2008. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.

          This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

          GEORGE W. BUSH

          THE WHITE HOUSE,

          September 18, 2008.

        • by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Sunday September 21 2008, @05:55PM (#25097103) Homepage Journal

          A few phrases that should never be uttered again in American public life:

          "Free Markets"

          "Deregulation"

          "Privatization"

          And the name "Milton Friedman" should be never be spoken in business schools again, except to show just how wrong someone can be. Turns out "Free Markets" were nothing more than a mechanism for squeezing wealth out of the lower 95% of the population and pouring it into the pockets of the top 5%.

          It's amazing how suddenly socialism looks good when rich guys are looking at losing a lot of money.

          I truly hope that whatever bailout package gets approved includes some very punitive measures for the Wall Street CEOs and CFOs who got into this mess. Anybody who stands to gain from this bailout should be forced to go to the same credit counseling classes that regular people who file bankruptcy must attend. Also, several hundred hours of community service would also be appropriate.

          Do you know that the executives from Lehman Brothers and AIG are still going to take home multi-million dollar bonus packages this year?

          Yes, I'm talking about Class Warfare. As Warren Buffet famously said: "There's Class Warfare, and my side is winning." In fact, it was the rich and the GOP who declared class war on the rest of us back when Ronald Reagan took office. Well, now it's time to show them what it feels like to be in a war.

          • Bullshit..... (Score:5, Informative)

            by King_TJ (85913) on Sunday September 21 2008, @08:47PM (#25098395) Homepage Journal

            The problems we're experiencing today are NOT because of "free markets" at all.

            The problems are because of govt. interference and manipulation of the markets for their own motives!

            The USA has spent decades in a scenario people keep labeling a "free market", yet in reality, we REALLY have a situation that's just a bastardized version of the concept. A truly free marketplace requires a government that won't pass legislation simply because congressmen or senators have been "bought out" by big corporations.

            Certain businesses have gotten ahead of the competition NOT through any normal means as defined by a "free market economy", but rather, by influencing government to give them a guaranteed legal advantage!

            As we move more and more to a "global economy", it's also becoming clear that our government's standard tactics to control inflation and regulate economic growth are failing to work as well as they used to. There are probably just too many variables to the equations now. I believe Alan Greenspan made some comments to that effect right after he retired. He admitted that near the end, govt. was really just taking a lot of chances, hoping raising or lowering the interest rates or printing a little more or less money would have the desired effect. They felt they were slowly losing their ability to get a desired result from a specific action.

          • by db32 (862117) on Sunday September 21 2008, @08:09PM (#25098105) Journal
            What debate? Here on this side we have science, and over on this side, unfounded conjecture based on a 2000yr old book that is little more than a documented game of telephone because i heard it from a guy who heard it from a guy who was there I swear. There is no debate, one is science, one is not. Pure and simple.

            There is a british scientist that has a video floating around that shows the progression from light sensing to eyeball very well with example critters all along the way. So that irreducible complexity bullshit is a complete joke. In fact, Ken Miller has an amazing 2hr presentation on the whole Intellitent Design where he absolutely eviscerates their silly arguments, and is a Roman Catholic, so it science and intelligence goes beyond religion.

            The God discussion belongs in religion and philosophy classes, not science classes. The evidence for "poof magic" is 0, so even though evolution can't trace the exact path for every critter that walks the earth, it at least has evidence.

            What she and every other creationist wants is creationist bullshit treated like it is even remotely equal to scientific theory. They tout the "its just a theory" crap because they don't understand the definition of a scientific theory. Even if most kids laugh it off, the fact that they put that shit in the class causes the assumption that there is anything more to it than silly superstition and intellectual laziness.

            I'm sorry, but my version of "God" is a hell of a lot more complex than rolling up some playdough snakes and saying "Bamf" its done.