Slashdot Log In
What a Botnet Looks Like
Posted by
timothy
on Thursday May 08, @01:51PM
from the when-jerks-are-smart dept.
from the when-jerks-are-smart dept.
Esther Schindler writes "CSO has an annotated, zoomable map of real botnet topologies showing the interconnections between the compromised computers and the command-and-control systems that direct them. The map is based on work by security researcher David Voreland; it has interactive controls so you can zoom in and explore botnets' inner workings. Hackers use botnets for spamming, DDoS attacks and identity theft. One recent example is the Storm botnet, which may have comprised 1 million or more zombie systems at its peak. As with any networking challenge, there are good (resilient) designs and some not-so-good ones. In some cases the topology may be indicative of a particular botnet's purpose, or of a herder on the run."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

Flash site, very funny. (Score:5, Funny)
To get a good look at a botnet they say, "You need to upgrade your Flash Player". How true!
Reply to This
Re:Flash site, very funny. (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What a Botnet Looks Like (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Ob. XKCD reference (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Thanks for posting... (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:Thanks for posting... (Score:5, Insightful)
My current RBL has about 6.5 million entries, and is extremely permissive. It is also updated bi-hourly.
I sure wouldn't want my machine to traverse a hosts table of 7 million hosts every time I tried to look up a name in the DNS.
Same for your firewall, 7 million entries will cripple iptables. Hell, 30,000 entries causes visible slowness on a dual-core opteron system.
Of course, you might get better performance out of iptables with the ipsets kernel patch. But that's still a damned big list.
Reply to This
Parent
reminds of the sexual partners mapping... (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Wow - I can see my house from here! (Score:3, Interesting)
Reply to This
Check out the losers (Score:5, Funny)
But what's hilarious is that there are some ip addresses that are slaves to four or five different botnets. I wonder what the owners of those machines think?
"Man, the internet sure is slow today!"
"I need a new computer, this one's all slow."
"Sweet! Five botnets and counting! I'm part of something! I belong!"
Reply to This
Re:Check out the losers (Score:5, Insightful)
I do know what those users think, and it's very much like you posited: "My computer has become unusably slow, and I don't know why or how to fix it!" Unfortunately that was followed by, "Aunt Esther, can you tell me what's wrong?"—and thus I spent half a day killing enough of the junk that I could install a firewall, antivirus, etc.
People like my nephew aren't unwilling to learn. They're just lost when it comes to their computers. And they don't particularly mind being ignorant as long as the equipment works right (or appears to). Just as most of us don't feel the need to understand how a car works in order to drive one.
Some of us remember the days when we wistfully wanted computers to become easy enough for ordinary people to use them. Alas, we got our wish.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Check out the losers (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, but people are often more familiar with what a car needs. Regular oil changes, maintenance, gas; they might not know (or care) why the car needs these, but they know that if they don't, the car will fail to work.
People don't even know that much about computers, about what they shouldn't do, even if they don't know why.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Check out the losers (Score:4, Insightful)
Not everyone does understand basic maintenance. You'd be amazed. Plenty of people wait until the car breaks down before they think to get it serviced.
And they don't like to gain even basic knowledge. In the gas crisis of the late 1970s, my (then-)mother-in-law waited 40 minutes at a gas station before she got to the pump. When she discovered it was self-serve, she drove away, because she didn't know how to use the pump herself. (Yes, obviously all she had to do was ask the person behind her—who'd be motivated to help—but she didn't.)
Also, even when people take the car in for maintenance, it's something they do out of distrust for the practitioners. That's better than not taking it in, of course, but it's inherently a combative relationship: what's the mechanic gonna tell me I need this time?
The thing is, few of us want to be experts in every technology we use. We just want it to work.
None of which excuses ignorance, mind you, but it does explain it.
Reply to This
Parent
I, for one.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
How it looks like? (Score:3, Funny)
Reply to This
Ha Ha! (Score:3, Funny)
Reply to This
Honeynets seem to be doing their thing (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
127.0.0.1 (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
How does eNom... (Score:3, Funny)
Registrant Contact:
elnopic
elnopic elnopic (elnopic@elnopic.com)
+1.2435543
Fax: +1.5555555555
123 sdhdsa g
asdf, AD 34215
US
Do they not even try to verify this information?
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Coincidence? I think not!
Too many bots! (Score:3, Funny)
Either that or they've rendered the botnet on a white background in apple white with light grey lines.
(i.e. it seems to be Slashdotted
Reply to This
yeah... and (Score:3, Interesting)
Any self-respecting revolutionary knows that you have a distributed network, so that even if a cell goes down, you can still pass messages.
Hell... I wish IRC could learn from this, I've had enough of netsplits. By rights only the server that goes offline should be affected if it goes down, it shouldn't split the network into 2 massive sections.
Yeah the image looks nice, and is all "ooohhhh ahhhh" and lends itself to "Hey... that's me", but really "News"? I think not
Call me when they have an article as to how they got this information
-1 "Cynical Bastard"
Reply to This
Re:Anonymous Coward (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Was it just me, or did anyone else imagine parent as speaking in the voice