Slashdot Log In
HP Admits Selling Infected Flash-Floppy Drives
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Wednesday April 09, @11:01AM
from the yeah-oops-sorry-our-bad dept.
from the yeah-oops-sorry-our-bad dept.
bergkamp writes "Hewlett-Packard has been selling USB-based hybrid flash-floppy drives that were pre-infected with malware, the company said last week in a security bulletin.
Dubbed "HP USB Floppy Drive Key," the device is a combination flash drive and compact floppy drive, and is designed to work with various models of HP's ProLiant Server line. HP sells two versions of the drive, one with 256MB of flash capacity, the other with 1GB of storage space.
A security analyst with the SANS Institute's Internet Storm Center (ISC) suspects that the infection originated at the factory, and was meant to target ProLiant servers. "I think it's naive to assume that these are not targeted attacks," said John Bambenek, who is also a researcher at the University of Illinois.
Both versions of the flash-floppy drive, confirmed HP in an April 3 advisory, may come with a pair of worms, although the company offered few details. It did not, for instance, say how many of the drives were infected, where in the supply chain the infections occurred or even when they were discovered."
Related Stories
Firehose:HP admits selling infected flash-floppy drives by Anonymous Coward
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

In case anyone wonders (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:4, Interesting)
Because it makes the thing useful when you're not installing windows.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:5, Informative)
OK, I missed something. I don't know if anyone else did because it the summary wasn't clear to me.
This thing is not an actual floppy drive with some flash storage built in, which is what I thought (and a somewhat stupid idea). It's a standard flash drive that is capable of identifying it's self like a floppy drive so that Windows will find it when looking for a floppy drive.
That's actually a very smart idea.
With that detail this this is not a real floppy drive of any kind, this all makes more sense. Question withdrawn.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone's going to reply "blah blah chain of supply blah blah limited liability" but (back in my day) a manufacturer was liable for tainted/poisoned product that originated at the manufacturer. Everyone should be able to demonstrate that a product works before selling it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:4, Interesting)
Reminded me of Slackware back in the mid 90s. It's just as well most Windows users get the OS preloaded by the PC manufacturer. If they all had to install it themselves, surely most would give up and install Linux instead. The installer boots from the CD and includes all the drivers? What crazy person thought of that insane idea.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:In case anyone wonders (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Security improvements (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Security improvements (Score:5, Informative)
Start --> Run --> gpedit.msc
Computer Configuration --> System --> Turn of Autoplay
Enable on all drives
You're right, this should be default, but at least there's a fix.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Security improvements (Score:4, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Security improvements (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Strange (as insider activity?) (Score:4, Insightful)
If you are going to get your malcode onto this, why do something old and crufty when you could do something new.
IIRC, this is used for BIOS updating as well as windows driver schlepping. So why use old-n-crufty known malcode when you could get a clean rootkit (no existing signature) and install it that way.
Reply to This
Software on these drives? Use Linux to format. (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
So where's the recall? (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the HP HP security notice. [hp.com] This was discovered in January/February, according to HP, but not announced by them until April.
Where's the recall notice? HP should be recalling these items. Failure to do so immediately is willful negligence.
Here are the part numbers:
They're still for sale on Amazon [amazon.com], for example.
In a situation like this, HP should recall the product and reissue a replacement product with a new part number to distinguish old product from new product.
Reply to This
Because... (Score:5, Interesting)
(Where do you think recalled Dell batteries went?)
Anonymous for a reason.
Reply to This
Parent
Corporate Response Missing (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Advisory's recommendion is braindead (Score:5, Interesting)
From the advisory:
Does HP actually think that a potentially worm-infected server should be a/v scanned and (possibly) cleaned, and that's the end of it? That's beyond dumb; any production server so exposed requires a bare-metal rebuild. In the absence of a tripwire-esque delta, you have no understanding of the state of the server installation after undergoing an infect/clean cycle, and there's no way that box should be left in production in that state.
Reply to This
This is an ugly situation (Score:4, Interesting)
They should have clean and isolated systems in place for development and manufacture that isn't connected to the public internet in any way. Furthermore, anything that reaches the public should first be inspected through tight QA standards. The public expects that of high profile manufacturers... worse, the public presumes high QA standards.
This takes me back to a point I was attempting to make in another discussion about the differences that often exist between public expectations and what a company actually delivers. Often times the public never notices the difference, but some times, those differences slap people in the face rather rudely at inopportune times.
I'm not sure when it started to become more common practice to move away from fulfilling public consumer expectations occurred. But the public consumer isn't aware that this shift has occurred yet. But evidence of the quiet shift has been placed in every EULA as far back as anyone can remember that contains disclaimers that their product is suitable for any purpose at all. The laws of some countries and states of the U.S. do not permit the enforcement of some of these disclaimers, but it never stops them from trying to put it past the consumer just the same. But the ugly reality is that 'legal standards' trump quality standards every day that appears on the calendar.
Reply to This
Who made them? What country? What are HP QCs? (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Coincidence? (Score:4, Insightful)
Now I see this story about HP accidentally selling branded keys with worms pre-installed. Darn, selling malware is so sucky, especially when you sell it to your favorite customers, for example server customers.
Any chance not just Hannaford, but other HP customers are nailed by this?
The takeaway from this episode, for those of you who aren't quite getting this:
- When you buy a USB key, be sure your machine(s) have functional antivirus and antispyware running,and it's updated.
- Look around for instructions on keeping stuff like USB keys from autorunning. Make it so.
- Format that rascal USB key immediately. Immediately. IMMEDIATELY.
- Don't buy USB keys cause they have cool software preloaded. Pointless to CHOOSE to risk infection. make the manufacturers pay for this by avoiding/refusing this crap. Just sell me a simple key, ok? Sheesh...
And trust no one and no thing.
Amazing, is all I can say. And yes, I wonder if these were manufactured and loaded in China. Bet they are.
We are in so much trouble. Mark my words, soon, 'Made in China' will really mean 'Pwned by China'. If ti doesn't already.
Reply to This
HP software is malware *anyway* (Score:5, Informative)
So I don't see what the big deal with shipping some more malware is. It's HP. *shrug*
Reply to This
While we're talking naïvety (Score:4, Insightful)
From the summary:
I think it's also pretty naïve to assume that it is a targeted attack, as such an assumption shifts the blame enormously. While a targeted attack is arguably more dangerous and more worrisome for a certain group of people, such an attack could happen at any number of stages of fabrication, so the fabrication process itself isn't to blame. Reversely, if a random infection makes it to a device sold as a server accessory, that puts both fabrication and quality assurance at fault, the former allowing the infection, the latter for not detecting it. If that's what happens to enterprise products, one has to wonder how much crud gets through in consumer stuff.
Reply to This
Re:Dear Smart People, (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent