Vista Service Pack 1 Is Out
Posted by
kdawson
on Tuesday March 18, @02:49PM
from the prepare-to-be-serviced dept.
from the prepare-to-be-serviced dept.
superglaze writes "What's to say? After much prevaricating and slipping out then pulling back, the first service pack for Windows Vista has actually been released. It's available for download now via Microsoft's sites, with an auto-update rollout scheduled for next month, and it should hit Amazon's virtual shelves on Wednesday."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

"Clippy" is back . . . (Score:5, Funny)
Um. Seriously. I'm glad there's a service pack out. But I'm going to wait a few weeks and see if it causes USB drives to melt, or sends your life history to the Ministry of Total Information Awareness.
Re:"Clippy" is back . . . (Score:5, Funny)
hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
OR
I feel a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
Poor Vista. (Score:5, Funny)
sounds like an awful lover.
Re:Poor Vista. (Score:5, Insightful)
Awful or no, somebody will most certainly be getting screwed.
adoption rate (Score:5, Insightful)
List of issues with Vista SP1 (Score:5, Informative)
Service Pack 1... Not impressed so far. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Service Pack 1... Not impressed so far. (Score:5, Informative)
Windows XP Professional 'Direct OEM and Retail License Availability' ends June 30, 2008. And 'System Builder License Availability' ends January 31, 2009.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx [microsoft.com]
So, Microsoft isn't going to offer Windows XP in a few months. As far as an OEM license goes.
I've been using it for a few weeks (Score:5, Informative)
First off, SP1 is a massive improvement. It installs a lot of bugfixes (including ones not released publicly before)... and it improves other stuff quite a bit. Disk performance is much better- you could argue that copy and paste tasks should not be slowed down by the speed of the OS, but it's improvement.
Overall, my Vista install rarely runs into errors- maybe one or two non-system apps are hanging a week. UAC got less annoying (it wasn't that bad to begin with).
It took an hour to install on my PC, and I didn't run into any issues. I think it helps Vista a lot. Honestly, I prefer Vista on newer machines; it's RAM heavy requiring 2GB+ to run well but RAM is very cheap nowadays and the x64 version works quite well; I had no driver issues personally.
(I still recommend backing up though. I always back up before a major update, whether it's XP, Vista, OS X or Ubuntu).
Re:I've been using it for a few weeks (Score:5, Insightful)
No matter how many times I see this it blows me away. This isn't an anti Microsoft bash - this is a serious efficiency issue - we have gone from a suggested 8Mb for WFWG 3.11 (1992/93 UK) to 2Gb in a generation. That's a massive jump considering that most users are still muddling about with a web browser and a word processor. I know that processor speeds etc have also increased exponentially but I can't help this nagging feeling that it's down to lazy coding.
Slow install (Score:5, Informative)
At least my mac is up.
With apologies to Slayer... (Score:5, Funny)
Bugs by Category (Score:5, Insightful)
Shock Horror (Score:5, Informative)
The system feels more responsive, and stuff happens as it should. This is the Vista that should've shipped, but where Vista has suffered Windows Server 2008 has gained; all the initial frustrations have been fixed in SP1 for Vista and Windows Server 2008, so consider Vista RTM a beta kernel for Win2k8. It is after all, the server market Windows isn't 95% prevalent in after all.
Re:So how long do I wait? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:So how long do I wait? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So how long do I wait? (Score:5, Funny)
You know, the usual Microsoft software update cycle.
Re:So how long do I wait? (Score:5, Informative)
If your reason for installing is only for performance, Vista SP1 will probably disappoint you. On the other hand I have installed it on 2 laptops and one desktop and the only problem I had was with an HP Printer driver that stopped working. All I had to do was to go to Control Panel, remove the printer, then add the printer back again and that fixed the problem.
Honestly, I did not find any major improvement performance-wise nor stability-wise as my machines were already running relatively smoothly pre-SP1. There appears to be minor improvements in boot times, shutdown times (though I do this maybe once a week per PC/laptop on average); plus getting in and out of sleep, especially for the laptops, appears to go smoother.
Re:Possible Tags (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Auto upbreak. (Score:5, Informative)
I snagged SP1, the latest pre release build and it has been fine.
Things seem 'faster', copying files, something that use to take weeks now takes as long as it should.
I still get the random spoolsv crashing for no reason but that was there before SP1.
None of my applications break although I don't use anything custom or home grown or vertical.
The install took a while - three stages with I believe a few stages each. I made a backup of my data prior just in case it went blue. No problems with the install/patch.
captch: robbed
Re:Auto upbreak. (Score:5, Funny)
Does Internet Explorer feel 'snappier'?
Re:Auto upbreak. (Score:5, Insightful)
To hell with 'seem' - post benchmarks.
Re:Auto upbreak. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Auto upbreak. (Score:5, Informative)
SP1 installed very easily for me. Everything the GP says agrees with my own experience, except for the spoolsv crashing. The only issue I had at all was having to change the screen resolution back. As an added bonus, Bioshock now runs without crashing every 5-10 minutes.