Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Chinese Military Hacked Into Pentagon

Posted by kdawson on Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:25 PM
from the scan-the-port-slowly dept.
iFrated informs us of a successful penetration of US Defense Department computers by the Chinese military last June. From the article: "The Pentagon acknowledged shutting down part of a computer system serving the office of Robert Gates, defense secretary, but declined to say who it believed was behind the attack. Current and former officials have told the Financial Times an internal investigation has revealed that the incursion came from the [Chinese] People's Liberation Army. One senior US official said the Pentagon had pinpointed the exact origins of the attack. Another person familiar with the event said there was a 'very high level of confidence... trending towards total certainty' that the PLA was responsible." The PLA is also accused of breaking into German government computers, including a network in the office of the Chancellor.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Government-Sponsored Cyberattacks on the Rise 96 comments
jbrodkin writes "A new McAfee report finds that 120 countries, notably the United States and China, are regularly launching Web-based espionage campaigns. Government-sponsored cyber attacks against enemy countries are becoming more common, targeting critical systems including electricity, air traffic control, financial markets and government computer networks. This year, Russia allegedly attacked Estonian government news and bank servers, while China was accused of hacking into the Pentagon. A McAfee researcher says this trend will accelerate, noting 'it's easier to attack government X's database than it is to nuke their troops.'"
[+] Pentagon Hid Magnitude of Data Loss From Recent Breach 218 comments
blueton tips us to a brief story about recent revelations from the Pentagon which indicate that the attack on their computer network in June 2007 was more serious than they originally claimed. A DoD official recently remarked that the hackers were able to obtain an "amazing amount" of data. We previously discussed rumors that the Chinese People's Liberation Army was behind the attack. CNN has an article about Chinese hackers who claim to have successfully stolen information from the Pentagon. Quoting Ars Technica: "The intrusion was first detected during an IT restructuring that was underway at the time. By the time it was detected, malicious code had been in the system for at least two months, and was propagating via a known Windows exploit. The bug spread itself by e-mailing malicious payloads from one system on the network to another."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Carte Blanche (Score:4, Insightful)

    What is the US going to do?

    Nothing. Quite frankly China has tested the limits of both the US and UN for years, and neither the Clinton nor Bush administrations were willing or capable of doing anything. With problems in Iran, Syria, North Korea, oh and those two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US does not have the capability to swat a fly elsewhere, let alone threaten the military might of China.

    China knows they can get away with such actions, so they will. If you don't believe me, look up recent actions regarding Taiwan, Tibet and East Timor, amongst other things. China also does nothing to combat the millions of dollars in lost US revenue from stolen IP, yet we give them favored trading partner status, making our trade deficit worse.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 03 2007, @10:34PM (#20458963)
      But they did give us General Tso's chicken, which is worthy of not only favored trading partner status, but worthy of several Nobel prizes.

      • by hasbeard (982620) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:10PM (#20459253)
        I looked at a carton of General Tso's chicken at the supermarket the other day. With all the carbohydrates in it, it should probably be classified as a bio weapon.
    • It cuts both ways (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Nazlfrag (1035012) on Monday September 03 2007, @10:53PM (#20459117) Journal
      You know, America has tested Chinas resolve for years by sending hackers into its systems, yet China isn't willing or capable to do anything. With hundreds of American military bases around the world and a mass of troops in Japan, Taiwan and the rest of the Pacific, they do not have the capability to move an inch outside their borders, let alone threaten the military might of America.
      • I've seen first-hand some of the incredible technology and training we had in the military, but neither China nor the US really wants a piece of each other. That is a conflict that only ends badly pretty much for everyone.
      • Re:It cuts both ways (Score:5, Interesting)

        by TapeCutter (624760) on Tuesday September 04 2007, @12:08AM (#20459765) Journal
        "they do not have the capability to move an inch outside their borders"

        Regardless of who is in power China it has had a "foreign policy" that for 2000yrs has shown little (if any) interest in expanding China's borders.

        US generals have all read and still use Sun Tzu's "art of war", I suggest you read the bit entitled "on the use of spies" before you pick a fight with the guys who turned strategic "games" into an artform.
    • by heretic108 (454817) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:32PM (#20459419)
      Plant a few honeypot boxen around the Pentagon network, and load them up with tasty disinformation, aiming for outcomes like:
      • Making an advanced US capability seem flaky or ineffective
      • Making a flaky or undeveloped US capability seem advanced and devastating
      • Sending the Chinese into fruitless directions in R&D, costing them billions
      • Trick the Cninese into types of action that could yield up some useful intel for the US
      The opportunities are endless.
      • by king-manic (409855) on Tuesday September 04 2007, @01:35AM (#20460439)
        Plant a few honeypot boxen around the Pentagon network, and load them up with tasty disinformation, aiming for outcomes like:

                * Making an advanced US capability seem flaky or ineffective
                * Making a flaky or undeveloped US capability seem advanced and devastating
                * Sending the Chinese into fruitless directions in R&D, costing them billions
                * Trick the Cninese into types of action that could yield up some useful intel for the US

        The opportunities are endless.


        Operation GW commenced January 20th 2001 and has successfully misled the world into thinking we are idiots. We have made it appear we make vast amounts of wealth disappear through military industrial graft and sunk our monetary values 40% relative to other western powers. We've gotten involved in a war we knew we couldn't leave gracefully, and shown corruption at every level. We have given the appearance of crushing our education system with theology, and appeared to have revised the public education curriculum to cater to the dumbest common denominator. We have lulled the entire world into thinking we are a country of backwards mouth breathers.As soon as we devalue our currency to 20% relative value and ensure 99% of all top ivy league school student are foreign we will truly be in a position to surprise the world without awesome cunning and leap forth and conquer the world.
    • Re:Carte Blanche (Score:5, Insightful)

      by demachina (71715) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:39PM (#20459479)
      "Quite frankly China has tested the limits of both the US and UN for years, and neither the Clinton nor Bush administrations were willing or capable of doing anything."

      What exactly do you propose the U.S. do? The Chinese are holding such huge U.S dollar reserves they could ruin the U.S. economy just by dumping them, though they would probably cause a global economic collapse and suffer as much as everyone else if they did.

      The U.S. has transfered so much capital and IP to China, and we are so dependent on the steady stream of container shipping from China you pretty much have to look the other way at anything short of open warfare.

      Besides which China is a Republican businessman's fantasy come true. It has a vast pool of dirt cheap labor, no labor unions, almost no business regulation, no environmental controls, and workers either keep their mouths shut or they are harshly dealt with by the state. They have one party authoritarian rule and as long as that one party is pro business, which they have been for the last couple decades, they are a Republican's wet dream. Why do you think so many big western corporations are rushing to China lock, stock and barrel. Liberal democracies sucks for business, you have to pay people more than a subsistence wage, you can't kill 4000 a year in coal mines like you can in China, you can't lock workers up if they bitch....

      The new Fascist China is pure heaven for Republicans, so their is almost nothing China is going to do they are going to have a problem with including this. Most western businessman and politicians are way more fixated on kissing Chinese ass these days than they are starting some kind of confrontation with them.

      Besides which when it comes to network security if you are stupid enough to put anything important on the Internet, and you can't keep it secure you kind of deserve what you get, doesn't really matter where the attack comes from.
  • Windows to blame? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Orthuberra (1145497) on Monday September 03 2007, @10:35PM (#20458975)
    I know this is gonna sound like a troll to some, but it isn't, imo. But with Microsoft's shared source program with governments (China's included) what if they found an exploit and and simply didn't tell Microsoft, but instead used it to their advantage. Could shared source create problems such as this? I know the military uses Windows for most of its computers (at least when I got out last year). Not sure about the ones attacked, however. Just some musings from me.
  • by Gothmolly (148874) on Monday September 03 2007, @10:46PM (#20459077)
    Questions:
    * were they secured computers? You know, the ones networked via fiber in concrete-filled conduits so that the physical layer can't be compromised?
    * is this even a new thing?

    Assumptions:
    Is everyone so sure that the US hasn't ALREADY hacked the Chinese computers?

    Before everyone gets their panties in an uproar, some context would be nice.
  • by Jafafa Hots (580169) on Monday September 03 2007, @10:54PM (#20459131) Homepage Journal
    This won't escalate into anything. While its true it could be seen as an act of war, we in the U.S. are not going to do anything that might jeopardize our supply of Happy Meal toys.
  • by B5_geek (638928) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:36PM (#20459459)
    Lets make a couple of assumptions..

    (1) That the Pentagon doesn't have a Windows box connected to the Internet with a public IP address.
    (2) That the 'hackers' are smart-enough to actually hack into the Pentagon (ergo they are not script-kiddies).

    Wouldn't these hackers be smart enough to originate these attacks from some-other hacked network via an anonymous proxy? (And then delete any logs that still might point to their activities.)

    At the very least I would expect a simple IP spoofing to have taken place.

    This was too easy, something is up.
    • by Zero__Kelvin (151819) on Tuesday September 04 2007, @12:05AM (#20459731) Homepage

      "Lets make a couple of assumptions..

      (1) That the Pentagon doesn't have a Windows box connected to the Internet with a public IP address.
      Why would you make such an almost certainly erroneous assumption? The U.S. Military uses Micro$hit, as do most (all?) fortune 500 companies. There are an astounding number of incompetant "sysadmins" who think that an M$ certification is an indication that they are computer gurus. There is a reason why there is a joke about Military Intelligence being an oxymoron.

      Are there some super-smart people in the military? Of course. Are there incompetant ones in positions of power as well? I don't know. Let's ask the Commander in Chief ... Oh wait ... I do know ;-)
  • by jollyreaper (513215) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:44PM (#20459511)
    74 posts and no jokes yet about the Pentagon having a chink in their armor? I'm impressed. Honestly, I'm not sure what's scarier, this or all the cheap crap on the shelves at Wal-Mart.
      • Re:Sanctions (Score:4, Insightful)

        by heretic108 (454817) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:19PM (#20459321)

        I don't really see anything coming out of this. It sounds more like a pissing contest to me than anything else, and I'd be more concerned about their other capabilities (e.g. nuclear warheads, lasers that can shoot down satellites ala Cardinal of the Kremlin, Chinese economy) than how well they can hack into some bigwigs computer.


        The problem: if the Chinese military can get enough control over Pentagon computers, then it doesn't really matter what their own hardware capabilities are, they'll be able to deploy some US military hardware for their own objectives.

        • Re:Sanctions (Score:5, Insightful)

          by fluffy99 (870997) on Tuesday September 04 2007, @12:30AM (#20459967)
          Exactly. China doesn't want war, but they want desperately to close the military and technology gap. Stealing the technology instead of developing it themselves is vastly cheaper, quicker and easier. The are not the only country friendly or not who engages in corporate and military espionage against the US. ANd don't think the US isn't spying on the other countries either.
        • Re:Sanctions (Score:4, Insightful)

          by vandan (151516) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:31PM (#20459413) Homepage

          We could secure both Afghanistan or Iraq.

          That's SO far from the truth that I don't know whether you're lying or incredibly deceived. The US army is at breaking point, and the situation is spiraling out of control in both occupations.

          The problem is, that to do it effectivly, we don't get the governments we want put in place. We end up with more of the same to no end.

          There's no such thing as a democracy under military occupation. The UN even says so.

          In the later case, it would be very likely that other countries would come to their aid if more then a minority of citizens wanted the democracy back.

          That statement carries the absurd assumption that some people don't want democracy. EVERYONE wants democracy, apart from the small group of people who currently have control, of course. But the majority of the population will ALWAYS support democracy AND self-determination.

          If we chucked all that out the window and just went for securing the countries, it would be done by now.

          You're obviously under the false impression that our aim there is to create a beautiful, blossoming democracy! It's not. It's to grab resources and set up military bases. Democracy is a word that the ruling class throw around. It's meaning in this context is, "A group of individuals of considerable power who will do our bidding". And they can't even get THAT right. But the main goal is to secure Afghanistan and Iraq, and is slipping further away from us each day.
          • Re:Sanctions (Score:5, Insightful)

            by coaxial (28297) on Tuesday September 04 2007, @04:30AM (#20461377)

            That statement carries the absurd assumption that some people don't want democracy. EVERYONE wants democracy, apart from the small group of people who currently have control, of course. But the majority of the population will ALWAYS support democracy AND self-determination.
            World history is full of dictatorships that rose to power with popular support. And I'm not even talking about bait-and-switch dictatorships (ala communism). To say a majority always wants democracy is absurd. People always want security. They always want a food and shelter. They always want "respect," whatever that means to them. That democracy isn't on the list.
    • Re:Wire up the IDS (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PhreakOfTime (588141) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:24PM (#20459367) Homepage

      Well, if you dont see any difference, I expect to see you in the enlistment line first thing tomorrow morning. And dont make up some BS that youve 'already served' because it will be a lie. NO SINGLE PERSON who has been in war, will make the suggestion to simply to go to war over a PC break-in.

      And if you STILL dont see any difference, try the following links; http://theheretik.typepad.com/the_heretik/images/c hild_of_war_life_in_death_053005.jpg [typepad.com] http://www.videos1.informationclearinghouse.info/i mages/seven.jpg [informatio...house.info]

      Those that modded this 'insightful' I would expect will be in the front of that enlistment line tomorrow, right ahead of you.

    • by Mr. Roadkill (731328) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:50PM (#20459585)
      Yeah, smart move.

      I can see it now. Some wack-job malcontent who would otherwise have loaded up a truck with explosives and taken out half a federal building and its daycare centre will instead penetrate the network of a western company in China. From there, he will penetrate a Chinese low-security network, and launch an attack against the toilet paper inventory system at the Pentagon. This will trigger the IDS, and the next thing we know the United States of America launches a first-strike against the Henan branch of the People's Yak Testicle Grading Board because that's who the attacking IP address belongs to. China retaliates. The U.S.A. retaliates against the retaliation.

      Still look like a good idea?

      (And for fuck's sake, nobody mod this funny. Okay, the People's Yak Testicle Grading board is hilarious, but the thought of *any* automated system being hooked up to launch controls is the stuff of nightmares... especially when there's no real way to tell if the "attack" is from your opponent or someone else who wants to pin the blame on them. Someone massing troops on the border or lobbing nukes your way? Worth a military escalation. Someone probing your network? Not so much.)
    • Re:Ummm... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MightyMartian (840721) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:42PM (#20459495) Journal
      I'm agreeing with most of what you say, but why would anybody be surprised that China is using its hackers to bust in to foreign networks. Everyone, I'm confident does it, including the US trying to break into Chinese state networks.

      Espionage is one of the oldest tools of civilization. Heck, even allies spy on each other. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Brits were doing the same things to the US.

      Espionage, in fact, can be a very good thing for peace. The Soviets and the Americans knew so much about each others' military capacity and arsenals that neither side dreamed of an open, direct conflict. A lack of knowledge of the opposing side's capacity would have been infinitely more dangerous.
    • by Dunbal (464142) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:44PM (#20459509) Homepage
      This is another set up situation

            I agree. Yet another anti-china story, in a long list of anti-china stories over the past few weeks, ever since the chinese threatened to call in the US debt when the US demanded the chinese revaluate the Yuan. More American propaganda being fed to the people, to make sure that China is slowly moved to the "axis of evil" category.
    • by Dunbal (464142) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:47PM (#20459539) Homepage
      Is anyone else nervous that these clowns are armed to the teeth, with enough firepower to destroy the world and make the rubble bounce several times?

            Yes. America makes me very nervous. Oh, isn't that what you meant?

            China has around 200 nuclear weapons, compared to the US's 5000+.
      • Re:Unacceptable (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Dunbal (464142) on Monday September 03 2007, @11:50PM (#20459593) Homepage
        and the rich get richer while the poor get poorer.

              This has been the case since the first man beat up his neighbor and forced him to become his slave. This rich will ALWAYS be richer, but the poor increase their standard of living. Today being "poor" in the West means having a small tv, and a second hand car, a used fridge and electricity, and a menial job. 200 years ago it meant starvation, and it still does in some places. Your point is?