Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Malware In Quantum Computing?

Posted by kdawson on Tue Oct 24, 2006 01:32 PM
from the not-too-early-to-think-about-it dept.
MattSparkes writes, "Today's quantum computers are not sophisticated enough to do anything malicious to your online bank account; the field is in its infancy. However, there are in theory more ways to attack quantum computers than classical ones. As quantum networking takes off, this is going to become a larger and more immediate problem." The Wikipedia article correctly identifies as an unsolved problem in physics the question of whether it is possible to construct a practical computer that performs calculations on qubits.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Science: Teleportation Gets a Boost 405 comments
saavyone writes to tell us Yahoo! News is reporting that while teleportation may not quite be a reality yet a team of Danish scientists have raised the bar on this line of research. From the article: "The experiment involved for the first time a macroscopic atomic object containing thousands of billions of atoms. They also teleported the information a distance of half a meter but believe it can be extended further. 'Teleportation between two single atoms had been done two years ago by two teams but this was done at a distance of a fraction of a millimeter,' Polzik, of the Danish National Research Foundation Center for Quantum Optics, explained. 'Our method allows teleportation to be taken over longer distances because it involves light as the carrier of entanglement,' he added."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Links (Score:3, Funny)

    by MyLongNickName (822545) on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:37PM (#16563068) Journal
    Anyone want to post the correct links?

    (must post anonymously so people don't figure out I RTFA)
  • Does that mean by not looking at it it will cease to exist?
  • by neuro.slug (628600) <neuro__@h[ ]ail.com ['otm' in gap]> on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:37PM (#16563080)
    Just don't install Windows Vista XP Pro, which, ironically, requires a quantum computer to run.
    • Just don't install Windows Vista Pro

      As long as you don't put all 32 qubits into a superposition, you'll be fine. Otherwise you may be forced to pay the licensing fee to run it on 4,294,967,296 CPUs.

  • by fahrbot-bot (874524) on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:39PM (#16563100)
    I'm a little uncertain, but I think that you can either know what's been infected, or how fast it's being infected, but not both...
  • ...There are wormholes.
    These are normally found where there is an abundance of tachyon emissions.

    Make a sensor for those and we can remove the wormholes and finally get rid of the worms.

    QED
  • by Lurker2288 (995635) on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:46PM (#16563232)
    Quantum malware will be a huge threat...as soon as we have the widespread adoption of quantum computers performing sensitive tasks. And people who understand how to program viruses for them. And quantum computers for the virus programmers.

    Is this really even a story? We may as well be worrying about where to buy reliable crossbows once the atomic wars destroy civilization.
  • by Quadraginta (902985) on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:47PM (#16563256)
    I'd like to point out, vice Larry Niven, that when teleportation and faster-than-light drives are invented they will make new types of crime possible.

    Not only that, but when immortality becomes possible, just think of the new pressures on the Earth's resources. Yet I'm going to bet those irresponsible doctor and medical researcher types haven't thought at all about this as they try to cure cancer and so forth.
      • Depends. Age/Disease immortality doesn't mean we're immune to starvation, getting smooshed or suffocated. So we'd still need to build a ship that can propel itself between stars, and carry enough fuel and energy to generate the food and work reliably for the hundreds and thousands of years a trip would take yet still spend fewer resources than such a mission could realistically bring back. Plenty of hurdles left methinks.
      • Oh, great. Those doctors haven't thought of what will happen when the immortal, ravenous human hordes hit the fragile galactic ecosystem either. Well, the one that will exist in a few billion years that is. How irresponsible.
  • IANAPhysist. In fact, when the article began to spew forth quantum mechanics info, my eye began to develop a twitch and I started to drool.

    However, I am a self proclaimed computer geek. The main benefit of quantum computers, as I understand it, is an exponential leap in computing power and storage of such systems. If I understand correctly, a qubit can be altered by it's environment and change it's state, thus ruining it's data. I fail to see how this differs from computers today. Run a magnet over a hard drive enough times and good by data. Hard drives fail and lose data all the time, but we have sophisticated data checking algorythms designed to catch this kind of thing so that it doesn't get out of hand. It looks like they are doing something similar here.

    I don't understand how one creates a worm with this either. If you know qubit for qubit, what data you want to change, then perhaps, but that requires knowing the qubits ahead of time, doesn't it? Same way with bits today. People create worms due to vulnerabilities within the hardware and software that they can program in. I know of no viruses which rewrite data specifically on their knowledge of ones and zeros.

    Could a worm try to attack the physical nature of a quantum computer and run the data by physically attacking it? I don't know in quantum computers, but maybe that's what they are saying. The article is sufficiently arcane that it's difficult to see if it's just an attempt at fear mongering among us lessers, by saying "ooooo quantum computers are vulnerable to worms!" or if there is any real value to this article.

    A quantum to english translator is needed :)
  • by Rufty (37223) on Tuesday October 24 2006, @01:58PM (#16563484) Homepage
    If I *know* it's got malware, I can't be sure if it's dead or alive...
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Actually, a quantum Norton Antivirus would be easy. Just write a quantum application that doesn't do anything.
  • Can anyone point me to some resources for me to learn more about quantum computing and especially quantum computational theory and algorithms?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    My pr0n-collection has wormholed itself to another dimension :(

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition [wikipedia.org]

    I kinda wondered how somthing can be in two positions at once, then I thought about how the water in a toilet spins in different directions on either side of the earth.

    So in a sense, we're basicly looking for a way to get smaller versions of us to flush their toilets when we want them to.
    I guess looking at it like that, malware in quantum computing would be the turds in our toilets that clog them up.

    We must ask the cats, as they have been observin
  • Simply find a parallel universe in which the quantum computer has already been rooted, and use that system to launch DDOU (Distributed Denial of Universe) attacks against the un-compromised quantum-entangled systems residing in nearby parallel universes.

    How are you going to defend against that?