Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Cyberwar on NASA Websites

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:18 AM
from the politics-and-cybercrime dept.
Vexorian writes "Two NASA websites were hacked today by a group of Chilean activist hackers. The reason was to protest against the war on Lebanon. The mirror of the defaced site contains an image of an injured child and claims that the sites were running MacOSX."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • I, for one... (Score:2, Funny)

    by metasecure (946666) * on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:27AM (#15811269)
    I, for one, welcome our new Chilean activist overlords.
    • Re:I, for one... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by acoster (812556) <acoster.gmail@com> on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:36AM (#15811322)
      (http://acoster.net/)
      Right... and defacing a NASA website for sure is a good way to "do some good".

      Although some say that only active protesting works, I'm sure they didn't mean to sit on your chair and "h4x0r" some sites. Actually it's pretty sad to see one defacing websites in name of "peace and justice". It also concerns when someone say thats hacktivism, as it can create a bad impression about legit hacktivism activities (such as providing privacy for people in China, etc.).
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:I, for one... by DesertWolf0132 (Score:2) Monday July 31 2006, @09:26AM
      • WRONG by pallmall1 (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:16PM
        • Then Again by Lord Balto (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:32PM
          • Re:Then Again by pallmall1 (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:00PM
          • Re:Then Again by Lord Balto (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:57PM
            • Re:Then Again by pallmall1 (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @06:10PM
              • Re:Then Again by Lord Balto (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @07:55PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:Then Again by deceased comrade (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:39PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:WRONG by MillionthMonkey (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:22PM
          • Re:WRONG by tigga (Score:2) Monday July 31 2006, @12:18AM
            • Re:WRONG by BorgCopyeditor (Score:2) Monday July 31 2006, @04:45AM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Really do something. by brianthesmurf (Score:1) Monday July 31 2006, @06:43AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • And now... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Billosaur (927319) * <wgrother&optonline,net> on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:29AM (#15811278)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday November 07, @10:09AM)
    This group goes with the others that in last days carried out attacks against governmental and commercial websites both from America and Israel, whereas other blackhat groups attacked Israeli websites provoking a denial of service (DDoS) of that particular webpage.

    On the one hand, this is news; NASA is a big target. On the other hand, why are we posting a link to the defacement? We don't need to see it -- just report the story.

    Look, I seriously doubt you're going to find that many people who think the war in Lebanon is a good thing, besides anyone with a vendetta against the Lebanese or the people selling bombs and rockets. You want to protest the war, fine -- but don't exepct me to care what you have to say when you can't make your voice heard in a public and legal forum. Defacing a website, any web site, is not the way to make me feel sympathy for your point of view.

  • Why is this news? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Aaron England (681534) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:29AM (#15811283)
    Hacktivist hacks happen all the time. Is someone trolling for an Israeli-Lebanon Conflict discussion?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:32AM (#15811299)

    what with the shooting of Jews in chicago yesterday and now the Lebanon debacle that the US refuses to condemm even though 24 lebanese children died in a bombing in Quana this disaster of an administration have sown seeds of hate that will come back to haunt the US for years to come

    staggering that in such a short time the US has gone from loved to hated , the conclusion is Bush and his cronies have put the US populace in a lot more danger than they where 5 years ago, and it is the populace that will suffer the consequences while the administrations operatives relax on their ranches in absolute luxury laughing
  • OS X hacked or the Web Application (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mitchell_pgh (536538) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:32AM (#15811301)
    What is not clear is... did they hack OS X or simply hack a web application running on OS X. I wouldn't say "Linux was hacked" if I was running an insecure forum or blog. The information is VERY thin, but I'm interested to see if OS really was hacked.
  • NASA (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ramble (940291) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:33AM (#15811303)
    (http://62.254.139.162/)
    Yeah! That'll show those NASA warlords.
    • Re:NASA set us up the bomb by cloricus (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:11AM
    • Whoosh by magetoo (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:02PM
    • Nice blanket statement by Infonaut (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:32PM
    • Re:NASA by Mr. Underbridge (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @03:13PM
      • Re:NASA by Mr. Underbridge (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @08:22PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:NASA by _Sprocket_ (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @04:28PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • I don't get it.. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by plasmacutter (901737) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:33AM (#15811304)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday November 06, @02:39PM)
    When last I looked into this it was a unilateral isreali action.

    since when did NASA of all government agencies have to do with a war in lebanon.

    It seems to me like theyre doing the cyber equivalent to nasa that isrealis are doing to lebanese civillian centers.

    stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid....
    • Re: I don't get it.. by Black Parrot (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:39AM
      • Re: I don't get it.. by plasmacutter (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:46AM
        • Re: I don't get it.. by antifoidulus (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:51AM
        • Re: I don't get it.. by cmorriss (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:55AM
          • Re: I don't get it.. by plasmacutter (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:59AM
            • Re: I don't get it.. by amliebsch (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:30AM
              • Re: I don't get it.. by plasmacutter (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:33AM
              • Chicago, this ain't. (Score:5, Insightful)

                by ScentCone (795499) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:59AM (#15811800)
                Then maybe we should have done the same to the chicago mafia in the 30's...

                just shelled their places of business and damn the consequences...


                Again, a non-workable analogy. The people smuggling whiskey and evading taxes in the 30's weren't launching missles from Chicago into Toledo, or proclaiming that only the destruction of Illinois is acceptable to them. They didn't randomly kill women and children, year after year, just to stoke things up (they just killed each other in a turf war over the smuggling market and related "industries").

                The mafia wasn't a militant front for an oil-rich retrograde fascist theocracy that was shipping them millions of bucks and thousands of missiles.

                It doesnt make sense to use millitary weaponry when surgical strikes on the ground would get things done.

                If the Israelis stopped using precision weapons, you'd see the civilian deaths in the areas where Hezbollah keeps parking their weapons and launchers go from a few hundred to thousands and thousands over night. You do understand that you can't just march Israeli troops back into all of Lebanon and surgically remove Hezbollah weapons and infrastructure from the middle of the civilian presence in which they hide without an enormous invasion, right? It takes a gigantic supply chain, tons of armour, and thousands of soldiers - and it would take months and months, and many more Israeli deaths, which is exactly what Hezbollah would like to force them to have to do.

                Hezbollah has had an uninterrupted six years to build bunkers, to booby-trap and mine their weapons storage sites, and to make sure that their personnel are woven completely into the fabric of the civilian population of Lebanon. Israel is being smart, and taking out the tools Hezbollah will need to re-supply themselves with weapons. Eventually they will run out, or Iran will have to more clearly show their hand by visibly pushing new weapons into the area by air - and they don't want to have that light shown on them just now. In the meantime, when Hezbollah pops out of a basement with a missle launcher, Israel hits that spot immediately, to destroy the cache that's there. They have no choice, other than to just tolerate more missles raining down on Haifa and beyond.
                [ Parent ]
              • Re: I don't get it.. by IanHurst (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:32PM
              • Re: I don't get it.. by Lars T. (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:43PM
              • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
            • Re: I don't get it.. by gfxguy (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:13PM
          • Re: I don't get it.. by Black Parrot (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:32AM
          • Re: I don't get it.. by Sal Zeta (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:28PM
        • Re: I don't get it.. by Black Parrot (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:03AM
        • Re: I don't get it.. by fimbulvetr (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:23AM
        • Re: I don't get it.. by Metasquares (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:58AM
      • Re: I don't get it.. by Solandri (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:48PM
    • Re:I don't get it.. by lawpoop (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:51AM
    • Re:I don't get it.. by lymond01 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:59AM
    • Re:I don't get it.. by rmpotter (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:06AM
    • Re:I don't get it.. by Oligonicella (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:12AM
    • Re:I don't get it.. by frdmfghtr (Score:3) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:43PM
    • 6 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Way to go ... (Score:1)

    by ubrkl (310861) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:36AM (#15811325)
    ... totally targeting the wrong people. Why target NASA, apart from it being a U.S. institution? It is non-military and seems an odd choice to attack.
  • Stupid activists (not a flame here.) (Score:5, Insightful)

    by roman_mir (125474) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:38AM (#15811337)
    (http://booktextmark.mozdev.org/)
    It is so easy to protest something that is right in your face on TV, isn't it? How about years and years of killing that have been going on in Israel by Hizballah and Hamas terrorist organizations? How about all those rockets that were launched at Israel from Lebanon within the past two decades? Maybe a UN server should be hacked, after all after 2000 UN and Lebanon was responsible for keeping Hizballah from amassing rockets and other weapons. Do these activists care when during the 'peace times' Israeli kids and adults get blown up?

    If anything, these protestors should thank Israel for taking action now and preventing more carnage later. One cannot constantly procrastinate in this kind of a situation, because it is only getting worse.

    Oh yes, and how about protesting where it actually makes sense: at Hizballah, at Lebanese, Iranian and Syrian governments. Protesting against regimes that allow terrorists to do what they do: use civilians AND UN folks as living shields on the battlefield. Not only are civilians used as shields, they are a great propaganda tool. When a terrorist launches a rocket at civilian targets in Israel from a busy market place in Lebanon, and Israeli army answers with fire at that place, is it the responsibility of Israel to make sure that Lebanese civilians do not suffer or is it responsibility of those, who used the civilians for their political gain around the world?

    Here are a couple [apazhe.net] of caricatures [solomonia.com] that do tell something about the reality of this war.
  • Am I missing something? (Score:1, Flamebait)

    by amightywind (691887) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:39AM (#15811344)
    (Last Journal: Friday December 08 2006, @04:42PM)
    The reason was to protest against the war on Lebanon

    Hezbullah kidnaps and kills Israelis on their own territory. Israelis try to get them back. Hezbullah fires 100's of rockets into Israel to terrorise the civilian population. Israel wages war to exterminate Hezbullah. Chilean hacker defaces NASA website. Am I missing something?

  • They did NOT hack OS X (Score:5, Informative)

    by mitchell_pgh (536538) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:43AM (#15811367)
    They did NOT hack OS X. They simply hacked the application database running on those platforms. Why would the author indicate OS X was hacked when really, it looks like a large number of the servers hacked were in fact running Linux.

    I'm not saying OS X is unhackable, but leaving ANY insecure server software running is asking to be hacked.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Spiral of Escalating Violence (Score:5, Insightful)

    When Martin Luther King led the nonviolent marches that pulled off a second American Revolution without a second Civil War, the marchers didn't trespass or tear down signs. That's why they changed the attitude and culture of America, which is the victory everyone needs in these conflicts. The victory that others who accepted or embraced violence lost, like Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, and all the hundreds of forgotten "freedom fighters". Even when their agenda and goals included important results that would be good for practically everyone, they polarized, alienated and pushed people into defensive positions on even indefensible parts of the status quo.

    Chileans vandalizing America when Israel attacks Lebanon doesn't change anyone's minds for the better. It just escalates by a little bit the spiral of violence:

    Ignorance -> Fear -> Anger -> Violence -> Alienation -> Ignorance

    The central front in the Terror War is in our own minds, where that well-worn cycle can send us all to our doom.
  • Wow what logic (Score:2)

    by Guysmiley777 (880063) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:56AM (#15811448)
    Hacking NASA's site to protest a conflict between Israel and Lebanon? Wow, why did't I think of that? Maybe if we bombed Chile we could defeat all hackers too!
  • by plaidhacker (950067) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:06AM (#15811510)

    The real news here is that Slashdot articles continue to decline in quality. Hacktivism sounds exciting, but these guys are just script kiddies with a No War sig. Yesterday alone they defaced 296 sites, none of which had any political significance. They happened to find an old PHP application on a backwater NASA website (the Aura Validation Data Center), and they took the opportunity to step up their normal text sig to include a graphic picture.

    The only reason that this is newsworthy is because Slashdot made it newsworthy. The greatest impact came not from the script kiddies or their vaguely political scribbles, but the deluge of the Slashdot effect on some poor iMac in Alaska.

  • Morons (Score:1, Flamebait)

    by tetromino (807969) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:11AM (#15811543)
    See, the first website you should be hacking is Hizbullah. They are the terrorist fuckers whose little cross-border kidnapping raid led to the deaths of hundreds of their fellow Lebanese.
    Second, you should be hacking Ehud Olmert's site -- the first non-military Israeli prime minister in ages, who decides to prove his miltary virility by bombing Lebanese children.
    Then, the IDF, the Knesset, the Mossad.
    Then, the Arab League, for being pussies and not helping Lebanon.
    Then, the White House and US Congress, for not pressuring Israel to stop. Maybe the Pentagon if you are so inclined
    Then, don't forget to hack your own government's site, for not sending humanitarian aid to Lebanese refugees.


    And you do NOT hack NASA, not unless a space shuttle fuel tank falls on Beirut.
    • Re:Morons by ems2 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @05:13PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Hmmm... (Score:2)

    by Jugalator (259273) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:13AM (#15811556)
    (Last Journal: Monday February 13 2006, @07:11PM)
    These hackers need to be taught how much involved NASA is in killing Libanese people. :-p
    • Re:Hmmm... by in2mind (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:21PM
  • Here goes... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by AlXtreme (223728) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:20AM (#15811593)
    (http://www.aperte.nl/ | Last Journal: Monday July 07 2003, @05:11AM)
    Mod me troll if you want to, but having read all the pro-israeli comments just makes my stomach turn. Only this morning over 50 Lebanon civilians, many of them children, were killed by Israeli bombs.

    Yes yes, Hesbulla has been lobbing rockets at Haifa, but this was only after Israel flattened half of Beirut.

    Oh sure, they kidnapped 2 Israeli soldiers, how could I forget! But is that reason enough to slaughter 450+ civilians? If a para-military group in Canada kidnaps 2 people, do you start bombing Toronto?

    And now back to why the rest of the world really hates the US right now: because they could have easily supported UN resolutions or stopped Israel but they didn't. They are just letting the bloodshed continue, angering millions of muslims even more. Israel is firing US-arms in a unilateral war against a sovereign nation. Doing so, they are only strengthening the ranks of Hesbulla and isolating themselves even more. I am no Hesbulla-fan, but think about what you all are cheering for: supporting Israel at this point is no better than supporting Bin Laden when he struck New York: an unilateral, unprovoked attack on a civilian population.

    And if hacking US websites is a way to get that into American heads, so be it.

    • Re:Here goes... by madcow_bg (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:24AM
    • Re:Here goes... by thelost (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:31AM
    • Re:Here goes... (Score:4, Insightful)

      Keep in mind not a single civillian would have had to die if their heroic freedom fighters in Hezbolla didn't insist on setting up operations in the center of residential neighborhoods, launching rockets from their cities, and overall using the civillians as human shields.

      You're an idiot who has been thoroughly taken by the terrorist propaganda. As someone previously mentioned, an IDF general put it best: "Israelis are sleeping in bomb shelters. Lebanese are sleeping with bombs."
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Here goes... by miketheanimal (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:53AM
      • Re:Here goes... by AlXtreme (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:15PM
        • Re:Here goes... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by evil agent (918566) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:46PM (#15812426)
          Again, I'm no fan of Hezbulla, but please try to keep objective and look at the facts.
          I'm sorry, but you make it sound like this war just started a week ago. Did you just start reading the news? Do a little research and see how many people Hezbollah has killed. They've been attacking Isreal for over 20 years now. Open your mind for a second and try to put yourself in Isreal's position. What would you do? There's really no good answer here, but would you just sit back and let your people be killed and kidnapped?
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Here goes... by Detritus (Score:3) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:20PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Here goes... by Fuzzums (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:08PM
      • Same... by Fuzzums (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:13PM
      • Re:Here goes... by russint (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:34PM
      • Re:Here goes... by ronabop (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:32PM
      • Re:You're taking the word of an *IDF* General?!? by Spazntwich (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:23PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Here goes... by Chris Pimlott (Score:3) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:48AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Here goes... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by sponga (739683) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:49AM (#15811744)
      You make a strong point. Except Israel just released video of that strike that they did on that building that killed the 50+ people and sure enough it looks like from the video that the missles are being fired right from behind the main large 4 story building on top of the hill. Yes that is truly sad so many woman and children were killed/crushed to death and I have compassion; but as some news agency have been reporting is 'where are all the young and older men casualties at in the building?'. Could they have been firing from the building from behind or somewhere else at dead night? Argument that they could not get out because of roads/bridges blown were false because the news crews have been reporting they got there with their big news vans easily.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Here goes... (Score:4, Interesting)

      The Bush administration does not understand the Arab community. The Middle East has a long tradition of successful military campaigns. The culture in the Arab world demands military success and takes pride in that. When the Arab world was unable to defeat Israel on multiple occasions the collective Arab world was humiliated. They are unwilling to forgive Israel but also their own leaders for their military failures.

      When a foreign nation like the USA takes down an Arab government like Iraq there is the same sense of humiliation. That the Arab world was itself unable to take down a brutal dictator but also in the post-war occupation they are unable to govern its people. However when a group like Hezbollah is able to stand up to Israel, even though Hezbollah is a Shiite group, the Arab street is overwhelming in favor of those who they perceive as standing up to foreign aggression. At the same time they criticize their leaders for not taking a similar stand.

      The Arab world is desperate for some sort of success, be it military or political and are willing to cheer on even the most insidious of organizations. The longer this conflict goes on, the more civilians who die and the more Hezbollah holds out the more radicalized the Arab world will become.

      I think the Bush administration is right in that we should invest in democracy, freedom and economic prosperity in the Middle East. This is the long term strategy that will provide peace in the region. However it can only come through political action. A military strategy will only be ferociously resisted by the Arab world.
       
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Here goes... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Vidar Leathershod (41663) on Sunday July 30 2006, @12:06PM (#15811829)
      Of course in your reasonable-sounding comment, you leave out the fact that Hezbollah has never ceased hostilities towards a nation whose existence it denies. They have continually engaged in terrorist attacks, kidnappings, and have refused to disband according to the Taif agreement. They are also not a native Lebanese force. They are originally based in Iran, comprised of Iranian military forces. It's nice to see your balanced view completely ignore this, and jump on Israel as if they have been anything but attacked and harassed over the past 50 years by their neighbors.

      I feel sorry for the Lebanese, as they are not really responsible for Hezbollah attacks (besides not taking action against them, anyway). However, the Israelis have leafletted the areas in question, and any civilians who remain in the area after that are either supporting the terrorists themselves, or willing to risk the lives of their own families to stay. In fact, the children who have been injured or killed are victims of their parents and Hezbollah, not Israel.

      A nation should not have to endure endless kidnappings of their soldiers/citizens without taking action. Your attempt to compare Israel to the U.S. above shows your ignorance of the situation. A true comparison would be if Ontario was hosting a terrorist group which *regularly* fired rockets, employed suicide bombers, and kidnapped people from the border area and demanded the release of known murderers in exchange for the lives of the kidnapped people. Then, after the exchange (Israel at one point did exchange prisoners, for as little as the remains of the dead) continued to fire rockets, bomb, and kidnap more U.S. citizens. Meanwhile, Canada showed no interest in taking care of the problem themselves, and in fact were terrorized by the same group, but unable to oust them.

      That would be apples to apples, except that there would be no Jews to blame. Don't worry though, I'm sure you could come up with some way to justify the terrorist actions, and oh the poor children, what are we doing to the children!

      Vidar
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Here goes... by AxemRed (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:56PM
    • Re:Here goes... by ems2 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:57PM
    • Ah an apologist by SmallFurryCreature (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:14PM
    • Re:Here goes... by maxume (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @05:23PM
    • Re:Here goes... by xenobyte (Score:1) Monday July 31 2006, @03:05AM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by damburger (981828) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:26AM (#15811630)

    It makes perfect sense that the hackers came from south america and not an arab country. My own government (the UK) is way ahead in removing that particular distinction [wikipedia.org]

    Seriously though, the reason they hit NASA was because they could. They almost certainly scanned through all US government sites for a vunerability they could exploit, and NASA just happened to have one.

    Also, you should be thanking them for this. This form of protest hurts exactly nobody. A sysadmin gets some extra overtime, thats all. If you guys didn't have contempt for peaceful forms of protest like this, perhaps people wouldn't feel the need to murder thousands of you just to get your attention.

  • by QX-Mat (460729) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:28AM (#15811639)
    A good protest for a mass defacement, but the title is missleading.

    While MacOS X (appparently), they didnt "target" NASA computers.

    Matt
  • Photos you did not see on CNN (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2006, @12:48PM (#15812066)
    http://209.67.212.138/~lebanon/ [209.67.212.138]

    It hurts. Sure, you can find similar photos from Israel too, but these are a small group of extremists vs. a government who really should know better.

    Fuck Hizbollah, and fuck the Israeli government.
    • Shocking photos by NigelJohnstone (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @01:40PM
      • Re:Shocking photos by JWallyR (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:59PM
        • Lessons from Northern Irish IRA (Score:4, Insightful)

          by NigelJohnstone (242811) on Sunday July 30 2006, @03:27PM (#15812927)
          "As many prior posters have quoted, the difference between Israeli citizens and Lebanese citizens is that "Israeli citizens are sleeping in bomb shelters; Lebanese citizens are sleeping with bombs."

          Nice soundbite, it makes it sound like the children are complicit in missle launches, but of course they were just innocent victims. Did they choose or even know who was next door? You are using the vague phrase 'Lebanese citizens' to try to blanket transfer blame from SOME terrorists to A WHOLE COUNTRIES POPULATION.

          This strategy can never work. Consider the case of the IRA in Northern Ireland. We faced their bombs regularly in Britain, yet we never did anything so foolish as to bomb huge sections of ireland in the hope of flushing them out. It would be counter productive, it would simply create more terrorism.
          In the same way this strategy can't possibly ever fix the problem Israel has with its northern border. It will simply increase the terrorism, and decrease their security.

          [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by OrangeTide (124937) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:02PM (#15812158)
    What is funny is that the kinds of people who would visit a website like NASA are the kinds of people who probably are against the conflict in Lebanon. Also I wonder why people would blame the US for this war. The US has an army of diplomats trying to encourage all sides to agree to a ceasefire. Do they think the US enjoyed evacuating it's people from Lebanon? Everything is the US's fault, unless it was something positive.

    Lebanon has the best looking flag, it's like the Canadian flag only better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Lebanon .svg [wikipedia.org]
  • other defacements? (Score:1)

    by slack_prad (942084) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:40PM (#15812385)
    (Last Journal: Saturday March 03 2007, @04:33AM)
    Other defacements [zone-h.org] by the same group
  • Why do we assume that an attack on a US 'target' (NASA) is protesting a war between israel and lebanon?
    Last time I checked, iraq was still at war..
  • NASA? (Score:1)

    by ultramrw21 (889103) on Sunday July 30 2006, @05:28PM (#15813503)
    Am I the only one that finds it stupid that these "cyber terrorists" attacked sites associated with NASA? Sure, it's a .gov, but why not hit a site that will get more notice or is at least somewhat related to what is happening in the middle-east. Not like something like this matters, america backs isreal no matter what they do, some momentary annoyance isnt gonna stop that.
    • Re:NASA? by DarkProphet (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @08:42PM
  • by wjeff (161644) on Sunday July 30 2006, @06:42PM (#15813824)
    (http://www.sailorfej.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 17, @04:40PM)
    That stupid lazy "hacktivist" attack NASA websites, to protest the atrocities in Lebanon, because they are easier targets than say for example cia.gov, while Israel pummels Lebanon, because they are easier to make war with than the real villians behind Hizbollah, i.e. Syria and Iran.
  • by theolein (316044) on Sunday July 30 2006, @06:46PM (#15813838)
    First off, I want to add my voice to those that say: Fuck Israel and Fuck Hizbollah. Fuck Hizbollah for dragging Lebanese civillians into a war where they are utterly defenseless. Fuck Israel for so utterly disregarding civillian lives (accidents my fucking arse).

    Fuck Israel for being so fucking dumb as to not have learnt its lesson from the last time they invaded Lebanon. Hizbollah won then and Hizbollah is no weaker now. Fuck Israel for being so stupid as to always make disgustingly bad excuses for the wholesale slaughter of civillians. Fuck Israel again for being so numbingly stupid as to not realise that every bomb that falls on Lebanon makes Hizbollah more popular in the Arab world. And again, fuck Israel for achieving what no Iranian Mullah or politician could: unifying the Shia and Sunni sects against Israel and the west.

    You think Israel can disarm Hizbollah? You must have also thought that the US could pacify Iraq. Look how well that turned out and how "disarmed" they are.

    And Fuck Bush and his cabal of poodles in the UK who are too stupid to see where this is going: Destroying whatever miniscule amount of credibility the US and the UK had in the Arab world and dragging us one step closer to World war 3.

    And you know who must be laughing so hard at all of this that they must be pissing themselves: The Russians and the Chinese.
  • Rover Over (Score:2, Funny)

    by Tablizer (95088) on Sunday July 30 2006, @07:44PM (#15814105)
    (http://www.geocities.com/tablizer | Last Journal: Saturday March 15 2003, @01:22PM)
    And the hacked rover wrote "I dig Osama" in the Martian sand.
  • by iogan (943605) on Monday July 31 2006, @02:47AM (#15815517)
    (http://annonsbevakaren.com/)
    Something like this [karantan.org]?

    Anything less graphic is Israeli propaganda. This is what their so called self-defence looks like.
  • by Krojack (575051) on Monday July 31 2006, @09:54AM (#15817228)
    Seems the leet hackers got what they wanted.. media coverage.. If everyone just said "fuck it" and didn't report on this stupid crap then it wouldn't happen.

    -- A snip of some moron on IRC a while back that I had the pleasure of meeting --

    Dec 12 16:44:13 <Hollyweed> do u know to use cc's?
    Dec 12 16:45:28 <Rez> card?
    Dec 12 16:45:31 <Rez> credit cards?
    Dec 12 16:45:34 <Hollyweed> yes
    Dec 12 16:45:41 <Rez> why?
    Dec 12 16:45:50 <Hollyweed> im a big carder
    Dec 12 16:45:53 <Rez> ahh
    Dec 12 16:45:57 <Hollyweed> wanna join our server
    Dec 12 16:46:03 <Rez> well i don't do illegal things
    Dec 12 16:46:10 <Hollyweed> you can make scriptsd
    Dec 12 16:46:14 <Hollyweed> scripts*
    Dec 12 16:46:15 <Hollyweed> for users
    Dec 12 16:46:18 <Hollyweed> that they need
    Dec 12 16:46:20 <Hollyweed> if u want
    Dec 12 16:46:31 <Rez> nope
    Dec 12 16:46:38 <Rez> its illegal stuff
    Dec 12 16:46:41 <Hollyweed> ok its ur choice
    Dec 12 16:46:44 <Hollyweed> ;)
    Dec 12 16:46:50 <Hollyweed> u r afraid
    Dec 12 16:46:51 <Hollyweed> ?
    Dec 12 16:46:54 <Hollyweed> of CIA FBI?
    Dec 12 16:47:58 <Rez> no i'm not
    Dec 12 16:48:02 <Rez> i have morals
    Dec 12 16:48:08 <Hollyweed> ok !
    Dec 12 16:48:09 <Hollyweed> :D
    Dec 12 16:48:10 <Rez> and i work for my living
    Dec 12 16:48:15 <Rez> i don't need to steal things
    Dec 12 16:48:19 <Hollyweed> sorry for inconvinience
    Dec 12 16:48:21 <Rez> get a job and make money
    Dec 12 16:48:32 <Rez> and stop rippin people of
    Dec 12 16:48:50 <Hollyweed> its not for money
    Dec 12 16:48:53 <Hollyweed> its for fame
    Dec 12 16:49:38 <Rez> yeah
    Dec 12 16:49:44 <Rez> get fame from rippin people off
    Dec 12 16:49:58 <Hollyweed> did u see the news from CNN
    Dec 12 16:50:03 <Hollyweed> we got in news
    Dec 12 16:50:28 <Hollyweed> look bro
    Dec 12 16:50:39 <Rez> i don't watch cnn
    Dec 12 16:50:41 <Hollyweed> we do that for Fame to show the world that isnt secure
    Dec 12 16:50:48 <Rez> so
    Dec 12 16:50:48 <Hollyweed> we will always get trough them

    <snip him talking about killing chickens>

    Dec 12 16:53:02 <Rez> just to become famous
    Dec 12 16:53:08 <Hollyweed> yea
    Dec 12 16:53:10 <Hollyweed> to show the world
    Dec 12 16:53:13 <Hollyweed> that isnt secure
    Dec 12 16:53:23 <Rez> sorry to burst your bubble
    Dec 12 16:53:32 <Rez> but everyone knows there are bugs
    Dec 12 16:53:48 <Rez> its created by man then it can be hacked
    Dec 12 16:53:50 <Hollyweed> yea of cours
    Dec 12 16:54:03 <Rez> so all you're doing it making peoples lives hell
    Dec 12 16:54:17 <Rez> and thats what terrorist enjoy doing
    Dec 12 16:54:26 <Hollyweed> heh
    Dec 12 16:54:30 <Hollyweed> no its not what u thing
    Dec 12 16:55:05 <Hollyweed> what u think*
    Dec 12 17:02:01 <Rez> either way its people like you that make the world a shithole all becuase you want to be on the news
    Dec 12 17:02:49 <Rez> if it wasn't for the communist news network (cnn) reporting it all then you wouldn't get anything
    Dec 12 17:02:49 <Hollyweed> we wanna show them asses that they arent the best theres out somewhere always will be someone better
    Dec 12 17:03:23 <Hollyweed> lool
    Dec 12 17:03:37 <Rez> why not stop cracking the code and put your coding to good use and make something better?
    Dec 12 17:03:41 <Rez> everthing about that?
    Dec 12 17:03:46 <Rez> dout it
    Dec 12 17:03:55 <Rez> becuase that wouldn't get your name all over the news
    Dec 12 17:04:05 <Hollyweed> yea of course!

    - - - - -

    A
  • Why are they defacing a NASA website? Different government agency, different government, different continent. We are over there trying to broker a peace deal. If some hacker has a beef with Lebanon then take it out on Israel.

    Both sides are wrong.

    The guys firing rockets into Israel are wearing plain clothes and firing from residential neighborhoods. They know Israel is going to immediately retaliate, and they know that when they do, that residential neighborhood is going to become a smoking wreck full of dead bodies. This will in turn make Israel look like they are baby killers and soul less and re-inforce the muslim sentiments that Israel needs to be destroyed. They know that Israel doesn't have the troops to fight a ground war and that the only response they can make is with their airforce. And they exploit this to force Israel to kill innocent people. If anybody should be pissed it should be the people of Lebanon. If I saw a rocket truck parking in front of my apartment I would be telling them where to fuck off to. And the terrorists certainly know that Israel will strike back yet they continue to attack from residential areas. The reason is they are fighting the only way they can. If they wore uniforms and attacked on the open battlefield they wouldn't stand a chance. So they are using the devils logic and fighting the only fight they can, knowing full well that innocent people are going to be killed because of their actions.

    And Israel has equiped their armed forces in such a way that they use small groups of special forces backed up by overwhelming air power to defend themselves. They don't have enough people to go in on the ground and in any case they are fighting an enemy who dresses in street clothes and can blend into the wood work. The rules of Geneva don't apply here and it's not a conventional war. The enemy could be anybody because they don't wear uniforms and attack from everywhere. So Israel does the only thing it can and they attack back, even knowing that they are going to kill innocent people because it's the only thing that Israel can do.

    You can comment on who's right and who's wrong from the safety of the USA all you want. But the fact of the matter is that if someone were firing rockets at US cities from Mexico or Cuba you can be sure that people would be up in arms demanding retaliation. You can't expect the Israelis to just stand back and take it!

    I'm so sick of hearing about cease fires that are broken, and a new peace process that ultimately falls to shit, and suicide bombers, and tanks rolling through Gaza. Even when they weren't at war it was still a daily war. I'm so sick of it that I wish they would just get it over with. Get the fight out of your system, go to war, re-learn how truly horrible and inhumane it is to kill your neighbors. And maybe when enough people have died, and the site of blood is everywhere, maybe then the offers of peace will be real.

    War sucks, people die, the innocent always suffer the most. But is living a civil life with daily bombings and rocket attacks any better?

    Get it over with.
  • Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Eudial (590661) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:31AM (#15811289)
    Arabs? Chile is in South America for crying out loud!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Doesn't make sense (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Hampe (665242) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:33AM (#15811308)
    I think you need to look at some other news channels apart from Fox!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Doesn't make sense (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bcat24 (914105) on Sunday July 30 2006, @10:36AM (#15811323)
    (http://jrascher.wordpress.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 22 2006, @10:09PM)
    Let's see... an Israeli plane blows up a building in Lebanon after warning the people to leave.
    So if the 9/11 hijackers had warned us they were going to destroy the WTC, it would have been OK? That's absurd. Whatever you think about the conflict in the Middle East, don't forget to look at it from both sides. We're all humans, right?
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by Hangin10 (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:44AM
    • right? by SilentGhost (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:50AM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by voss (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:53AM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by Simonetta (Score:3) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:01AM
      • Re:Doesn't make sense by TubeSteak (Score:3) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:21PM
      • Re:Doesn't make sense (Score:5, Insightful)

        I'm sorry but when you try to justify the killing of innocent civilians you have already lost the argument. Surely war is war and civilians becoming victims of "collateral damage" can be explained. But it can never be justified. Once you claim that killing innocent lives is morally right you have lost all moral authority.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Doesn't make sense (Score:4, Insightful)

        by A beautiful mind (821714) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:42PM (#15812402)
        All this anti-Israeli and 'anti-Zionism' talk around the world is just anti-semitism resurfacing and trying to pretend not to be. The Israelis are great people that are surrounded by millions of people who have surrendered their minds to a death cult. The Israelis do what they must. They don't get any pleasure from it. But they don't shrink from it, either.
        I'm greatly saddened to see your comment modded up to +5, Insightful, given it is a fairy tale trying to pose as reality.

        So, in your mind, anything critical of the policies of Israel is anti-semitism. Because that is what you have written. The Israeli people are no different from the palestine or lebanese people: Mother Theresa and that serial killer Manson belong to the same human race. There is of course ideology flung around, but labeling all arabs as being part of a death cult is "anti-arabicanism". If you think that anti-semitism is bad, then why do you exercise "anti-arabicanism"? The sole reason I put quote marks around that phrase, is because it is not even in common use to describe a behaviour that is exhibited in your own post.

        I don't think the Israelis are doing what they must. I think they keep voting in politicians that act as if they and only they could protect them from a not lifethreatening (on a national scale) enemy (doesn't that sound familiar?). What the Israelis need to do is vote for less comforting, less "black-and-white" world viewed politicians, who can do their best to solve the problems on the middle east. While it might not look so good, because there are many compromises to be reached, both the israelis and palestinian/lebanese people would end up safer. If history ended up teaching something, is that unilaterialism end up in empires, and that empires fall.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Doesn't make sense by mpcooke3 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @02:08PM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by TheRagingTowel (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:18AM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by farble1670 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @11:22AM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by rbannon (Score:1) Sunday July 30 2006, @12:49PM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by capologist (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @04:04PM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by ems2 (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @05:24PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by corbettw (Score:2) Sunday July 30 2006, @10:55PM
    • Re:Doesn't make sense by RagingFuryBlack (Score:1) Monday July 31 2006, @07:57AM
  • Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by metaltoad (954564) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:06AM (#15811514)
    The Hezbollah army builds their bases on the ground floor of civilian apartments. They are literally hiding behind women and children. Both sides (Hezbolah and Israel) are equally to blame for the civilian deaths. And since the Syrian and Iranian government are funding the rocket attacks, shouldn't these hackers be hacking Syrian and Iranian sites as well? Could it be that hacking US sites just provides bigger bragging rights?
    [ Parent ]
  • Please tell me you are being sarcastic. There have been plenty of vulnerabilities and patches for OS X. http://secunia.com/product/96/ [secunia.com] . I'm so sick and tired of the myth that OS X is the "most secure" and "unhackable". It's an Operating System just like Windows and Linux and it's not perfect either. You can love OS X for various reasons but NOT because it's "unhackable".
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! (Score:3, Funny)

    by FhnuZoag (875558) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:18AM (#15811579)
    Actually, it's Chileans, so, it's more friend of my friend's enemy's friend is my enemy.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Eideewt (603267) on Sunday July 30 2006, @11:22AM (#15811599)
    Did you just feel a breeze over your head? From a low-flying joke perhaps?
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Um, military sattelites (Score:2, Informative)

    by richdun (672214) on Sunday July 30 2006, @12:02PM (#15811816)

    Even more than that, NASA has put up every single US military sattelite

    Wrong. Military satelites are launched by the Air Force, not NASA, at Vandenburg AFB or Cape Canaveral AFB. NASA is strictly civilian launches, even if many astronauts (especially commanders and pilots) are former Navy or Air Force.

    [ Parent ]
  • by blueflash2o (931322) <blueflash2o@gmail.com> on Sunday July 30 2006, @12:23PM (#15811929)
    NASA has put up every single US military sattelite.
    Do you have proof for that because i think the military contracts to many different companies like Boeing and Lockeed Martin. Those companies may use NASA or military launch sites to launch it.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Lead Butthead (321013) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:26PM (#15812298)
    So what you're saying is that hypothetically if I am going to bomb the s**t out of your house, by giving you an advance warning makes it okay? What the f**k have you been smoking?
    [ Parent ]
  • by cunina (986893) on Sunday July 30 2006, @01:26PM (#15812301)
    See, posts like this are why we need a "-1, Wrong" mod option.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Aaron England (681534) on Sunday July 30 2006, @02:14PM (#15812568)
    Let's not play your game. Your commentary is so one-sided, lacking both accuracy and context, that it's laughable.

    Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? Answer: Israel. (Ignore this, lameness filter bypass)

    Yeah, except for that one nation called Pakistan. Oh and Iran in 10 years if we let them.

    Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?

    Except for that country called Iran. Yeah, they signed it, but they certainly haven't lived up to the treaty. Not to mention that Syria has not signed the CWC or BTWC.

    You know I was intending of going line by line on your commentary, but it's obvious from your first two "points" that you did not intend to add a well-researched comment to this discussion and I know better ways of spending a Sunday afternoon than exposing trolls.

    [ Parent ]
  • MacOS = BSD based = 'nix.

    It's unfortunate that the world is full of so many morons who (a) cannot tell propaganda from bullshit, and (b) can't creatively channel their frustrations. Hacking a NASA website won't stop a single Israel bomb or Hezbollah rocket from falling on civilians.
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Well... (Score:1)

    by Admiral-Bell (992130) on Sunday July 30 2006, @06:28PM (#15813748)
    I am sure that the NASA websites are well traveled and poorly defended government website. What website would you have them hack instead?
    [ Parent ]
  • Still, I don't get it.

    Hacking a site dedicated to exploration of space in order to protest a war they have no interest in or concerns over (when was the last time you saw NASA troops deployed anywhere?)

    I suppose it was an easy target. That doesn't make it right, clever, effective, or help anyone become sympathetic. It, instead, gives the impression of a bunch of chilean script kiddies who found an exploit and were using it just as the news releases about lebanon came out.
    [ Parent ]
  • 15 replies beneath your current threshold.