SplunkBase Brings IT Troubleshooting Wiki to the Masses 128
OSS_ilation writes "IT troubleshooting firm Splunk is using LinuxWorld Boston as a platform to formally launch Splunk Base, a global wiki that will offer IT pros a free-of-charge venue to exchange troubleshooting information, tools and fixes. Splunk is promising that the wiki is completely vendor neutral, and can be compared to Wikipedia, the online open encyclopedia that is regulated and updated by the community-at-large. Users don't even have to have a copy of Splunk Professional to use it. From the article: 'If you believe the research from firms like Framingham, Mass.-based IDC, then Splunk Base has arrived at a key moment. According to IDC, companies will spend more than $100 billion this year on managing the world's data centers. And with virtualization quickly becoming an IT buzzword in 2006, the complexity and costs could increase.'"
splunk base (Score:4, Funny)
Re:splunk base (Score:1, Funny)
Re:splunk base (Score:1)
Worst slashvertizement as well (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:splunk base (Score:3, Funny)
Re:splunk base (Score:2)
Same goes for Sequoia ERP - opentaps just won't stick in my puny brain.
Re:splunk base (Score:2)
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Eww....
-m
You miss the point. (Score:3, Informative)
how long until (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:how long until (Score:1)
Re:how long until (Score:2)
Only if you use Microsoft Windows ;-) However, a planned rebooting is a good thing to do after you've made configuration changes, just to make sure that the machine will boot after a power outage. Shit happens.
Re:how long until (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:how long until (Score:2)
I ALWAYS reboot (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:how long until (Score:2)
RTFA - it says it's vendor neutral, not MS only.
Re:how long until (Score:2, Interesting)
Now in XP however if the network stops working a reboot seldom fixes it. When you install programs, with the exception of Windows updates and anti-viruses, you need not reboot. Th
A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:3, Interesting)
What does this tool offer that's better in any way?
Move along. There's nothing to see.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:3, Informative)
Google, as great as it is with other shit, usually returns Expert Exchange as the first couple of hits on any search for help. Boo.
I welcome any open and free wiki competitor to EE.
Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess you weren't of the ones who simply scrolled down to see the answer.
See:
[Question]
[lame subscription button]
[ads]
[more ads]
[answers here, doh
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:1)
Google Cache (Score:1)
Re:Google Cache (Score:2)
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:1, Troll)
Simple Google Search [google.com] for "access VB experts exchange"
I got this [experts-exchange.com] result first from Google.
I then clicked the first link on the result (under Experts Exchange) and was given this [experts-exchange.com] gem.
Right there, see that BIG orange circle with, "View Solution" in the middle? What does it link to? Yeah, register [experts-exchange.com].
Nice troll though!
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:4, Informative)
Nice troll though!
"View Solution" would be what the OP called [lame subscription button].
If you had bothered to read the OP you would have scrolled down past the lame View Solution button. There you will find all answers to the question. I've just checked it for the link you gave and they are there.
Nice troll though!
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:2)
one [geostud.org]
two [geostud.org]
three [geostud.org]
Looks like you are either registered or have some funky access that I do not. Either way, EE still sucks. Even if I *could* see it, e-mailing some guy for the answers isn't what I consider acceptable.
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:1)
Google's cache will still show them though.
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:1)
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:2)
No really! No clicking involved!
Re:Experts Exchange - scroll down! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
EE cookies (Score:2)
If I find a question that I want the answer to, I'll make note of the submittor name, keywords, and then do a google search on those to bring up the most helpful page on EE. I clear all my EE cookies (now I've not been to their site yet today) and voila, I can view the proposed soluti
Re:EE cookies (Score:2)
There's a facility for doing this in Chris Pederick's excellent Web Developer extension. [chrispederick.com] It lets you view cookies for where you currently are by both domain and path, clear them, add them, disable cookies from third-party domains like advertisers, etc.
If you don't want the whole Web Developer toolbar (which may have a lot of stuff you
Re:EE cookies (Score:2)
Or you -could- just view the google cache.
Brilliant!
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
Unregistered EE usage (Score:5, Informative)
I will say that the unregistered EE is heavy on the advertising, and they make it fairly difficult to register for a free account [experts-exchange.com]. This signs you up as an "expert," although any registered user, paid or not, can answer questions.
You get a limited number of points per month to ask questions with, and need to earn 10,000 expert points (answer a question for 500 points with an 'A' grade, and you get 2000 expert points) to get free premium membership, then 3000 pts/mo to maintain that membership. If you are knowledgeable about anything tech, you can do it easy.
The tech forums are extremely well moderated, and the caliber of people who answer questions is fairly high.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
I second the opinion that Expert's Exchange is a real pain. Giving the hint of a solution to what might be your problem but requiring registration to find out if it is right or even applies. I can see no reason to register for results vi
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hardly. This looks promising.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
I disagree. As and applications developer, If this is a good as I think it will be, there could be huge value in a system like this. I wish the article had some screen shots. I can see it as if all of the useful information from a discussion board is digested and cleanly written up in one document. This one document could then be updated, extended by the comunity.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:2)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:2)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
For the noob, Expert's Exchange isn't free. You have to either answer questions to get awarded points, or buy them outright. It started off free, but then progressed to its current model.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:1)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:5, Insightful)
Expert's Exchange requires you to scroll three screens past advertisements from the actual question to the answers (when they're actually available without registering, that is). Not to mention the disgusting IntelliTXT ads they insert into the actual text...
Google can be frustrating, especaially if your search terms center around things like "C++".
Thus, I'm open to better ways of doing things, and I'll be looking at this to see if it is one.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:2)
> from the actual question to the answers (when they're actually available without
> registering, that is). Not to mention the disgusting IntelliTXT ads they insert
> into the actual text...
So true. They've gotten to the point that when I google a problem, I immediately scroll past the experts-exchange.com links to try to find a real solution.
And I'd never post anything there; if I figure out anything interesting about Ra
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:5, Informative)
Or do what I do, add "-site:experts-exchange.com" to my search criteria. The search won't include links from that domain.
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:2)
Google seems to be giving me quite nice results for some random terms i tried. Exactly how is searching for "C++" stuff a problem? (Didn't even need to quote it)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:2)
Re:A little late to the party, don't you think? (Score:3, Insightful)
Wikipedia: is an encyclopedia, not a help forum for computer problems.
Expert's Exchange: just plain sucks.
Google: is a good resource, but does not allow collaboration and two-way communication.
Page Rank + Old Information = Annoying (Score:2)
What does this tool offer that's better in any way?
Google, for one, has some issues that make it a very poor resource for looking up materials relating to coding.
One of Google's biggest weaknesses is that the Web is littered with sites that have tons of old information mixed in with new info. The longer they've been around, and the more content they have, the higher their Page Rank. So a site that has buckets of info from seven years ago can show up at the top of a search. Some of this can be cured b
Sir, can I interest you in some Splunk? (Score:4, Interesting)
Have a look at their demo - I was not impressed. Plenty of tools do the same thing. Both Open Source and proprietary.
A troubleshooting Wiki would be nice, though. Give ExpertsExchange some competition when it comes to IT peer questions and answers.
Re:Sir, can I interest you in some Splunk? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not that bad, probably a play on the word 'spelunk', cave exploring. Not an inappropriate reference...
they are a very frequent advertiser here on Slashdot which should have been mentioned.
Why? Unless you've been browsing
Plenty of tools do the same thing. Both Open Source and proprietary.
Care to list a few of the better ones? I'm in dire need of just such a tool right now.
Give ExpertsExchange some competi
Re:Sir, can I interest you in some Splunk? (Score:2)
Why? Unless you've been browsing
Huh? I've been reading
Of course, it may have something to do with the fact that I told mozilla to ignore all images from slashdot.org. I do occasionally try other browsers, but I keep coming back to the ones that can turn off images on a per-site basis.
So much for the effectivene
The URL is splunk.org (Score:2, Informative)
Am I the only one that noticed? (Score:1)
Great Concept (Score:3, Insightful)
Being an IT professional, it is hard to track down solutions to difficult problems using Google alone. If you Google a problem, odds are you are going to wind up finding a message board where someone has the same issue, but no solution has been posted.
How will the content be licensed? Who will own it? (Score:4, Insightful)
How does a person know, when they're contributing, that Splunk isn't going to take the site's content at some point down the road, and turn it into some steaming pile of ads and subscription fees like Experts Exchange?
If it's a wiki, it's difficult to separate individual contributions, so a Slashdot-style "Comments are owned by the Poster" probably wouldn't work. The actual work has to be owned by somebody, and frankly I don't know Splunk from Adam and I'd certainly question whether I wanted to spend a lot of time writing an article if at some point it might just become part of their "Premium Membership" service, or if they won't let other people mirror it as a backup in case they decide that being 'community oriented' isn't paying the bills in the way they thought it would.
Re:Great Concept (Score:1)
ummm. Yeah... (Score:2)
traffic LEAK... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:traffic LEAK... (Score:2)
What's the point of a press release if none of the press do anything with it? This product is marketed at the kind of people who read slashdot, and Splunk looks like it might be useful. Since when did everything useful have to be free?
Who's going to proofread? (Score:4, Insightful)
I've also worked with some excellent techs that I've tried to learn from as much as possible, and I try to emulate as I work with customers. These are the ones that see a problem and dig in and try and solve it. Yeah, it takes time but the knowledge base built up can be helpful.
So.. on a database like this.. who's to watch the submissions to select if it's a real tested and found solution, versus something else that doesn't really work? And who's to say the solution provided is from an actual PC tech and not an armchair one? If I had a dime for every time a "friend that knows lots about computers" screws one up..
Re:Who's going to proofread? (Score:1)
Missing from the article summary (Score:3, Informative)
So come on editors, it's the announcement for the release of a new wiki, which despite the $DIETY-awful name, might be a useful resource. How about, you know, linking to it? I hear the web is good for that.
Re:Missing from the article summary (Score:1, Informative)
Eh, this may be good ... (Score:3, Insightful)
I would love (and avidly use) such a beast with the capabilities they are talking about. If I am not mistaken, I could search for something like
VT Enabled Xen Windows 2003 Server
And get what I need out of it quickly. I've also got a laundry list of very odd cryptic errors in openSSI I'd love to find the causes of
Looks like experts exchange is about to be selling cheap ad space
How long... (Score:2, Interesting)
Already exists (Score:5, Interesting)
i don't know about that (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:i don't know about that (Score:2)
I suspect it has something to do with the cultures involved.
Re:i don't know about that (Score:1)
Re:Already exists (Score:2)
You should look at splunk (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's where they shine: finding data lost in a log file. Picture if you will a log file with free-form text in parts and XML in other parts. With no training about what the log looked like, their tool could do a great job of identifying patterns in the free-form text - essentially blocks or "records" of data there, and pulling out the XML sections.
You can search for patterns in the data, and splunk will help identify them for you. The data import and pattern-matching parts of their code are platform agnostic. There are no adapters to buy, and no "training" to find useful data patterns. I think that they are doing a good job on the technologyside of things, and it's definitely worth the time to look at this tool.
Please note: I have no affiliation with Splunk. I'm not even one of their customers. I have no reason to promote their product. I've looked at it and they do a good job of finding obscure data.
Respectfully,
Anomaly
Re:You should look at splunk (Score:1)
Did you guys look at it? (Score:4, Insightful)
This is nothing like wikipedia. It is a log file aggregator. It's a program that transmits and indexes log files on your UNIX/LINUX machine(s). How is that like wikipedia in the slightest? Granted, users can comment on log entries and create a knowledge base, but that doesn't make it wikipedia at all.
I think they've made a cool tool here. I can see it being useful. But the fact that they are targeting businesses and yet it trasmits all log data to a remote location will make most businesses uneasy. If the application could be setup to keep all data internal, this could be a neat tool for system administrators. But in its current form, it's only really good for hobbyists and other people who don't mind having the guts of their servers on the web ready to be searched by strangers.
Re:Did you guys look at it? (Score:2)
Re:Did you guys look at it? (Score:2)
By their description I was expecting an encyclopedia of IT knowledge, where you could look up any tool, for instance, to find out its parameters and clever uses. Somewhere that people can post all the cool stuff that you normally have to buy a Tips and Traps book to get to, or be on the development team. Somewhere that I can type in an executable name from my Windows Services window and find out what it does, if it's necessary, and most importantly how to get rid of it. Something with concrete tuning sugge
Re:Did you guys look at it? (Score:1)
It's more like the Google search appliance. It simply indexes your log files locally allowing you to search through them locally. The log files are never sent to splunk. When you need to look up what a possible logged error means, and how to solve it, it looks it up using fingerprints, with machine name and times stripped out. No different than searching for the same error using Google or Usenet. I can see this as being extremely useful since you don't have to sift through endless garbage
Re:Did you guys look at it? (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.splunk.com/ [splunk.com]
Re:Did you guys look at it? (Score:4, Informative)
Splunk = the log file aggregator you looked at, that you have to pay for, and is not a wiki.
Splunk Base = the free wiki that the
PS - Splunk is not intended for displaying your logfiles to the world, it is only intended to provide a nicer, Ajax-based website interface for grepping your log files. Ideally it will be used only on the corporate intranet, not the public internet. If SysAdmins or Developers need access to it from outside the internet, they can VPN into the intranet and access it that way. There's no reason to make this available publicly through the firewall.
spunk base? (Score:2, Funny)
homepage title (Score:1, Informative)
Google groups (Score:3, Insightful)
Not a point in it's favor (Score:2)
Information that is at best incorrect or misleading, and at worst outright wrong lingers for months in the 'pedia, as do articles that are incomplete. Hardly what I want in a tech resource.
Splunk base is a good idea (Score:4, Funny)
Possible suggestions for new SplunkBase names:
DeadPCBase
FixItYerself
FindOutWTFHappened
YouCanDoIT
WherestheNEkey
IsThisThingOn
MyPuterBroke
DamnYouBillGates
Nagios is on board (Score:1)
Splunk and SplunkBase (Score:2, Informative)
Splunk is a log aggregation server that classifies and tags events found in your logs making it easy to grep through them.
SplunkBase is an extension of Splunk, a web based service that you can lookup events (linked from the Splunk application) and (perhaps) get more information about them.
Another big problem with this (Score:2)
Splunk? (Score:2, Funny)
As I read this... (Score:2)
Re:As I read this... (Score:1)
Poor name (Score:1, Redundant)
Your average person would probably not be doing that willingly, even with a guide.
Is your computer plugged in? (Score:2, Insightful)
It Would Be My Luck.... (Score:1)
Re:Terrible all around!!! (Score:1)