Slashdot Log In
Gates 'World's Most-Spammed Man'
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:44 AM
from the and-you-thought-you-had-it-rought dept.
from the and-you-thought-you-had-it-rought dept.
acehole writes "Bill Gates receives up to four million emails a day, and is probably the most spammed person in the world. But unlike ordinary users, he has an entire department to filter unsolicited " At least now I know why he never replies to my requests for an interview ;)
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Gates 'World's Most-Spammed Man'
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 424 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
Why not release it? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.marotti.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 15 2007, @01:48PM)
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.frugle.co.uk/)
Of over 30 billion e-mails being sent daily, some experts estimate that over 40% is Spam.
Google informs me that 40% of 30 billion = 12 000 000 000
and (4 000 000 / 12 000 000 000) * 100 = 0.0333333333
That gives Bill Gates a measly 0.03% Market share of Spam. I think we should help Microsoft grow by forwarding all our unwanted spam to Bill.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, in the same manner of speaking that Microsoft Word is open source. Let's face it, raw DNA is not the preferred way to modify the human genome. Neither is a binary executable the preferred way to modify a word-processor.
It's just that reading the source (i.e. the DNA) is something we haven't quite mastered yet.
Ok, that's a possibility too. But I can't really see any plausible reason for nature to make it easy for us to decode DNA. It's meant for execution by cells, not for easy comprehension (or modification) by genetic engineers.
And just like open-source software the human being is constantly being developed upon, albeit so very slowly that we cannot see it for ourselves. But each new baby that's born (the nightlies, hahaha) is a little different than the previous generation. Sometimes this backfires on the whole community *cough*georgewbush*cough* but in general there's improvement.
Actually, there's no good reason to believe human evolution is for the better. Ever since humans discovered farming, we no longer need to be intelligent enough to outwit our prey, or strong enough to kill it, or fast enough to catch it, or having a good enough immune system to eat rotten food, or being able to care for our children in this environment for umpteen years, etc...
In fact, in modern society it's even worse. Due to the fact that the state will take care of you and your children even if you can't do it yourself, the only skill you need to create surviving offspring is to have low enough demands to get laid by someone (no matter how stupid, annoying, ugly, etc), and to be stupid enough not to wear condoms.
Humans have probably "devolved" ever since the neanderthals, and as the society gets "better", the individuals detoriate at an ever increasing rate.
An interesting side-note (just to be politically correct), is that those who advocate racial purity (e.g. nazis), seems to prefer those who have lived in modern society for the longest period of time. They probably should prefer bushmen instead.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday August 20 2001, @01:45PM)
In his case, I suspect the filters are human.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Wednesday November 21, @10:04AM)
By the way, note that the top three stories in the Australian news are "Wallaby escapes police action", "Bat swoops to bite woman" and "Passengers save bus from plunge". Gotta love Australia!
Re:Why not release it? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why not release it? (Score:4, Informative)
4e6 / 60 = 66.6e3 mins
66e3 mins / 60 = 1111hrs
1111hrs / 24 = 46 days.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Funny)
Or possibly Morlocks.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
They have a whole office chanting, "It is by will alone that I set my mind in motion."
It's not a question of spam (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/~yog/journal | Last Journal: Sunday March 26 2006, @01:57AM)
It does sound like an excellent opportunity to leverage some of that computer brainpower they have and create some first class spam filtering technology. With a test base of 4 million spams a day they have all the sample data they will ever need.
Re:It's not a question of spam (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.lpcollier.net/vitalsigns)
He'll have any number of different e-mail addresses for different purposes, inluding ones that only friends and family know - I'm sure he's not shut off from a part of the internet just because every idiot puts billg@microsoft.com in forms when they don't want to give their own address.
Re:Why not release it? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.starttalkingideas.org/)
I think I see the problem (Score:5, Funny)
Here's a tip:
When asking for an interview, do not also offer to enlarge his penis. Mox
Re:I think I see the problem (Score:5, Funny)
(http://nermal.org/)
What did the leper say to the prostitute?
You can keep the tip..
Re:I think I see the problem (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.cowlark.com/ | Last Journal: Friday March 18 2005, @05:12AM)
This is obviously some strange new meaning of the word 'good' that I wasn't previously aware of...
Email Required (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.nickpadley.com/)
Re:Email Required (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Email Required (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://nermal.org/)
Re:Email Required (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.hyperlogos.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday July 18, @08:19PM)
developersdevelopersdevelopersdevelopers@microsoft .com
Re:Email Required (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.mattbelcher.com/)
Only 4 million per day? (Score:5, Funny)
XP OEM CH33p!\@ (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.the-collective.net/~rechlin)
Or ... This is NOT a joke! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://knoppixquake.webhop.net/)
I wonder if he gets any of those "Bill Gates will send you money" chain letters.
Well.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Funny)
My earlier (rejected) story submission... (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/~GillBates0 | Last Journal: Tuesday July 10, @04:36PM)
CNN [cnn.com] and Rediff [rediff.com] are reporting that Bill Gates [mailto] gets 4 million e-mails a day, making him world's most spammed person. However, unlike lesser mortals, he has an entire department dedicated to filter unsolicited e-mails and only a few of them actually get through to his inbox, said Steve Ballmer [mailto] at a Microsoft Research event in Singapore. Other sources are also reporting [google.com] the breaking news story.
Re:My earlier (rejected) story submission... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://csilo.com/)
In other words, "We pay two kids $5/hr to sit in the basement and sift through this crap."
Or more likely, "We've got a couple network admins that implemented SpamAssassin for us."
Thank you spammers (Score:5, Funny)
Now any chance on taking on SCO?
Exchange (Score:5, Funny)
(http://nermal.org/)
I didn't even know exchange could handle that amount of traffic. And thats just for him..
Re:Exchange (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.livejournal.com/~tassach/)
Hotmail (Score:3, Funny)
Huh... (Score:3, Funny)
most spammed man (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.bengarvey.com/)
Test suite... (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday April 12 2005, @11:12PM)
Re:Test suite... (Score:5, Interesting)
Right, and he could also forward his daily mail to the DOJ [usdoj.gov], so there aren't any more losses of that pesky incriminating evidence [pcworld.com]...
Story a weak troll. (Score:5, Informative)
(http://nojailforpot.com/)
And to all of this, I say "big deal". I would say "nice M$ troll" but it's actually kind of weak.
Hate Mail (Score:4, Funny)
(http://datadrivendesign.com/)
News for Nerds indeed. (Score:5, Funny)
I had no answer.
Until now.
Thank you slashdot.
Your Job Sucks When (Score:5, Funny)
(http://nuintari.net/)
I can see it now, job description:
Must be able to sort legitimate email from mass unsolicited email. Ability to tolerate apes a plus, as you will be working a team of them. In fact, your department manager is a chimp. Requires opposable thumbs and general image recognition abilities.
Fascinating! (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.littleblur.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday June 27, @07:32PM)
And what do you call this special technology? What a brilliant new development. Please, Mr. Balmer, you must share this invention with the rest of us. Or, perhaps, is it "sendmail" on "linux" running "spamassassin"? Ah, yes, perhaps so.
Maybe the admins at my work are just braindead, but apparently everyone's so nervous about Exchange 2000 that they won't run any other mail related software on the Exchange server. So if we want to filter email with other software, it goes on a separate box, and they all get chained together. Which means that if they ever want to find out where an email came from, they have to go through three different sets of logs. This is all black magic to me. I code VBA for a living.
Is there a right way on Exchange 2000? We'd do all kinds of better spam filtration if implementation was completely better.
640 emails.... (Score:5, Funny)
Another incomplete article (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Saturday December 09 2006, @10:46PM)
For example, how much spam does the Whitehouse get?
Do they cite the number of spams the average person gets? There is nothing other than the obvious in that article.
The article might have well said it is probably cold in Antartica too.
Gates: use Mozilla Thunderbird's Junk Mail feature (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.simpy.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 15 2003, @12:58PM)
Unfiltered (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://shanem.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday July 05, @09:12PM)
That said, after going to an intern dinner at his house I wrote him afterwards asking a question I was sure no one else care about if I acked it at the dinner, I got a relatively quick if not short response.
Another intern friend of mine emailed him asking if he wanted to go to lunch sometime and never got a response.
I've also had some other funny run ins with Bill Gates while interning at MS that I wrote up a while ago in my journal [slashdot.org]
Re:Unfiltered (Score:5, Funny)
Oracle internal email system used to be so crap that it got confused if people had the same first name and sent them each others email. I shared the same first name with the VP of Consulting for EMEA (I was working in Hamburg at the time). I once received an email from Big Man's secretary to him asking if he wanted to confirm his meeting with some IBM execs. I replied to her saying that she should tell IBM to Bugger Off and to get on the phone to the head of consulting in Hamburg and to give that Phil guy a large pay rise.
A couple of days later my boss called me into his office and told me "Please don't do that again"
Good. (Score:3, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday July 31, @03:01PM)
Condolences Card (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday September 26, @09:43PM)
This is so sad.
I thought I'd send Mr William Gates a brief cheer-up note:
I mean I know he's rich and everything, but even rich guys must get the blues sometimes over things like spam. I'm sure he'd appreciate it if a few of us sent him our condolences.
Does anybody know his address?
Back in 1994... (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.blogstheme.com/)
It's not billg@microsoft.com (Score:5, Interesting)
Sure, make me feel bad for him... (Score:3, Funny)
(Last Journal: Monday April 03 2006, @07:23PM)
Probably not his real email address, but still, he apparently doesn't need any more help.
Bill Gs outlook rule (Score:3, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday August 17 2004, @02:46PM)