Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Rio Carbon MP3 Has A 5G CF To Be Cannibalized

Posted by timothy on Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:31 PM
from the one-way-to-price-shop dept.
GlucoPilot writes "This guy bought a Rio Carbon Mp3 player because he figured he could rip the 5GB CF Card out of it. He did, and put it in his prosumer 6MP digital camera. Now he can take 1,500 six-megapixel pics in one sitting. Oy." The card is apparently a 5GB Microdrive, note, not 5GB of Flash memory.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Wow, (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:32PM (#10221439)
    that's a lot of porn
    • Re:Wow, by Gentlewhisper (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @05:10PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Be nice to Rio (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:33PM (#10221443)
    They've always been nice to us, supporting open standards like Ogg Vorbis and FLAC.
    • How is this not nice? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by k98sven (324383) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:57PM (#10221570)
      (Last Journal: Monday December 06 2004, @10:11AM)
      Ok.. maybe I'm missing something here.. Are these things sold with a mandatory music-download-service subscription or something like that, in order to subsidize the price of the hardware? Or what?

      Because if they make their money off selling the things.. that doesn't make sense. Why should they care what you do with their product once they've sold it? This could leads to them selling more units.

      (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by EvilFrog (559066) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:07PM (#10221629)
        Well, ignoring the fact that a corporation is legally a person, businesses do not run themselves. Behind every business there are people making the decisions, and a business is as "nice", "ethical", or "trustworthy" as the people who run it.

        The fact of the matter is that there are some companies I prefer supporting over others, because I know what sort of people are behind them.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by loyalsonofrutgers (736778) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:38PM (#10222147)
          That's just not true. Bureaucracies are much more than the sum of the people that combine to form them. This is the "I was just following orders" phenomenon. There's a lot of sociological literature about how bureaucracies and corporations are not merely the culmination of the personalities of its constituent parts. Fact of the matter is that fairly good people, when part of such an organizational structure, can do very bad things. And, furthermore, the organization in this case exists to make money, so fairly good people can do very bad things in order to make money. The organization becomes a creature unto itself.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:How is this not nice? by myowntrueself (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @04:04PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? by 10scjed (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @06:06PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? by sixteenraisins (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @08:18PM
      • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:5, Funny)

        by deacon (40533) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:17PM (#10221691)
        (Last Journal: Wednesday July 07 2004, @10:51PM)
        (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

        AOOOGHAAA!

        AOOOGHAAA!

        ATTENTION!

        ATTENTION!

        An Apple Reality Distortion Engineering team has been dispatched to re-educate you in proper company loyalty pavlovian responses.

        Please Stand By!

        In a hurry?

        Shaving your scalp for the electrodes will save time and fuss later.

        That is all.

        Yeah, yeah, I dissed apple, mod me down, whatever...

        [ Parent ]
      • You can't see? by 2nd Post! (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:24PM
      • Re:How is this not nice? by AnyoneEB (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:24PM
      • Re:How is this not nice? by Reverant (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:42PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? by CoolVibe (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:56PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Oliver Defacszio (550941) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:19PM (#10222044)
          all this free advertising goes to, well, the trash

          What? After having given Rio roughly two hundred and fifty bucks, I'm ALSO supposed to advertise for them at no charge? I don't think so. It's like the dealership sticker on the back of cars. My buddy used to tell them that either they knock off, say, a thousand bucks off the cost of the car in exchange for advertising, or lose the sticker before the deal closed (properly... no razor blades). Stunningly, he never drove cars with dealership stickers.

          Sure, he was being petty, but I completely agree with the point he made. Why would I advertise for Rio or their ilk? It's not as though they've done me any unilateral favours.

          [ Parent ]
        • Re:How is this not nice? by babyrat (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:32PM
        • Come on... by Archimonde (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @04:56PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? by 1u3hr (Score:2) Sunday September 12 2004, @03:19AM
      • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:5, Informative)

        by mikael (484) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:59PM (#10221910)
        Ok.. maybe I'm missing something here.. Are these things sold with a mandatory music-download-service subscription or something like that, in order to subsidize the price of the hardware? Or what?

        A quick google search reveals that a professional camera shop/mail order company sells a 4 GByte microdrive for $370-$500, while the MP3 player is expected to retail for $250. The difference is due to market pricing, as professional photographers are used to paying thousands for a professional camera, while the average consumer is used to paying hundreds for a portable digital product. The casing of the product hides the fact that both products used the same core component. Eventually the market will realize this and take action- perhaps choosing MP3 players with removable microdrives

        This isn't any different from Amazon's price discrimination [kdnuggets.com] for books.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:How is this not nice? by Martigan80 (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:10PM
        • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by jhoffoss (73895) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:41PM (#10222161)
          (Last Journal: Wednesday October 09 2002, @04:20PM)
          Hello, how is paying the set $250 price for merchandise, then canabilizing YOUR property, not nice? I fail to see the point of this entire thread.

          I buy a product from Rio, that's that. If they're selling these at a loss, (which I guarantee you they're not) then they're losing money whether I use it, advertise, etc. or not.

          If this were not the case, and they are selling it at a loss to increase sales, as someone suggested, then wouldn't their losses increase due to additional sales? What fruity business consultant would come up with that idea?

          [ Parent ]
      • Re:How is this not nice? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Surur (694693) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:24PM (#10222075)
        (Last Journal: Sunday August 14 2005, @06:13AM)
        Its called recognising the second order effects of one's actions. Sure cannibalising the micro-drives are good for you in the short term, but the Seagate makes a big profit margin selling these at a premium to photographers, and probably sells them to Rio at a steep discount. They dont want to lose that premium to the buyers of the Rio unit. They will therefore either stop selling to Rio (to protect their larger profit from photographers) or change the spec in some way to make that unintended use of the drive impossible.

        Either way it will drive up the costs for Rio, and damage them as a company. They will be forced to become less hacker friendly, and everyone will end up hating them.

        Its called thinking more than one step ahead, and this exact same scenario has already occurred to other HDD music player makers.
        [ Parent ]
      • Good v Bad by siskbc (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:29PM
      • Re:How is this not nice? by Geoff-with-a-G (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:51PM
    • Re:Be nice to Rio by MarkByers (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:58PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Be nice to Rio by Nichotin (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:43PM
    • Re:Be nice to Rio by timts (Score:1) Monday September 13 2004, @09:21AM
    • Re:Be nice to Rio by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:46PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Speaking of cameras... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mrchaotica (681592) <mrchaotica AT yahoo DOT com> on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:34PM (#10221452)
    I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?

    Also, I'm glad they didn't copy Apple in this respect -- after all, if I were Rio I wouldn't care what my customers did after I bought it, since I would have already been paid.
    • Re:Speaking of cameras... (Score:5, Informative)

      by CdBee (742846) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:37PM (#10221461)
      " I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?"

      Not suitable for continuous r/w operations! Mp3 player/Camera use is a single file being written then the drive is stopped again....
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Speaking of cameras... (Score:5, Informative)

      by selderrr (523988) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:38PM (#10221471)
      (Last Journal: Tuesday May 20 2003, @04:00PM)
      I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?

      A full miniDV tape is 30GB worth. Microdrives are still stuck at 6GB. Additionally, an mp3 player has a very low disk access frequency, which reduces the risks of physical damage while reading/writing. A camcorder on the other hand, is CONSTANTLY accessing the disk.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Speaking of cameras... (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:40PM (#10221484)
        Actually, a MiniDV tape is more in the 13 gig neighborhood. But yeah, other than that, you're spot on.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Speaking of cameras... by the_2nd_coming (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:55PM
        • Re:Speaking of cameras... by selderrr (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:09PM
          • Varying DV formats (Score:4, Interesting)

            by Andy Dodd (701) <atd7.cornell@edu> on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:37PM (#10221801)
            (http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/atd7/)
            Raw DV has the video and audio streams interleaved.

            Some of the DV "container" formats used on PCs (such as one of the two DV-AVI types) duplicate the audio stream, with the "video" stream actually being the original raw DV (which has both video and audio)

            Also, longer tapes might exist now. The typical 60-minute-standard-play tapes are 13 GB. I think that tapes exist that are 75 and even 90 minutes in standard mode now though, although last time I went miniDV shopping they were hard to find and VERY expensive. (Compared to 6-packs of 60s relatively cheap at Costco.)

            See above regarding extended play tapes, which I think are 18-20 GB or so (but with a MUCH higher risk of errors) on a 60 minute tape.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Speaking of cameras... by mattyrobinson69 (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:38PM
          • Re:Speaking of cameras... by martinX (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:57PM
      • Re:Speaking of cameras... by Guspaz (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:37PM
    • Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:38PM
    • Re:Speaking of cameras... by Refrag (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:06PM
      • Re:Speaking of cameras... by mrchaotica (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:16PM
      • Re:Speaking of cameras... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by GoRK (10018) <johnlNO@SPAMblurbco.com> on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:31PM (#10221764)
        (http://www.blurbco.com/~gork/ | Last Journal: Friday February 13 2004, @01:34PM)
        Apple ipod drives are 'dumber' than your normal 1" microdrive or 1.6" mini-drive. They lack a lot of the logic IC's and firmware that allows them to be used with standard IDE interfaces. Instead, the ipod controlls the drive electronics directly. This essentially does a few things: 1) it makes the drives cheaper for apple, 2) it makes refurbishing/upgrading/recycling/repairing faulty iPods a lot cheaper since you dont have to replace the drive's control electronics when you replace the drive, and 3) it makes the drives unusable in anything other than an ipod.

        While reason #3 is often cited by conspiracy theorists to be some kind of plot to prevent people from canibalizing drives out of the ipod to prevent potential loss of iTunes revenue, it is really only a side effect of reasona #1 and #2. If running full-fledged drives in the iPod were actually cheaper or the same price as running drives with reduced integrated electronics, rest assured Apple would do it. It's got to be a fairly difficult/expensive/unnecessary engineering process to integrate drive electronics into your design simply to keep people from buying your product to take it apart.
        [ Parent ]
  • 1500? (Score:5, Funny)

    by LurkerXXX (667952) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:37PM (#10221458)
    1,500 pictures in one sitting? I hope he cannibalized the battery too!
    • Re:1500? (Score:5, Funny)

      by arose (644256) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:40PM (#10221486)
      From a car...
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:1500? (Score:5, Informative)

      by SuperBanana (662181) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:02PM (#10221598)
      I hope he cannibalized the battery too!

      Not really. The Digital Rebel and 10D both get about 500-600 shots out of the battery if you don't use the flash, AF in servo mode(ie continuous refocusing) or use a lens with image stabilization a lot. Canon and Nikon both make vertical grips for their cameras which hold two standard battery packs.

      I've gone to motorsport events and taken 2-3GB of RAW photos on one battery pack, and I use both image stabilization and AI servo focus mode. I have two packs, and I've almost never needed the second one in my year of ownership thus far.

      I have an older 330MB microdrive. It's slow as shit. CF cards used to be slower, now it's completely the opposite. Compared to my Sandisk Extreme and Ultra II cards, the microdrive takes 4x longer to offload photos from the buffer.

      When you've been shooting pictures of every 4th car going by you and then one of them locks up the rear and starts to spin, you want as many shots out of the 9-shot camera buffer as possible. Shoot continuous at 3fps for 3 seconds and sort the good from the bad on the laptop later.

      Most pros don't use anything over 1GB. Why? Because 1GB is almost 120 photos for a 10D- a shitload. So you're not swapping that often. By using 4 1GB cards- if one gets erased, stepped on, lost, or dies on you- you're only out 1/4 of your photos, instead of ALL of them. Furthermore- 1 can be in your 'digital wallet' widget or laptop, while the other is in your camera. Oh, and it's hideously expensive for a 4GB card versus a 1GB card or a bunch of 512's, just like those super-huge memory dimms cost much more per MB than a 512 or 1GB stick.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:1500? (Score:5, Funny)

        by tktk (540564) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:53PM (#10221887)
        It's slow as shit.

        You just need more fiber in your diet.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:1500? by I7D (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:17PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:1500? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:18PM
      • Re:1500? by Justin205 (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:46PM
      • Re:1500? by sejanus (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @08:42PM
    • Re:1500? by Lord Apathy (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:07PM
      • Re:1500? by Fweeky (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:07PM
    • Re:1500? by Lord Apathy (Score:3) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:11PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • No News Here (Score:4, Informative)

    by Lord Apathy (584315) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:37PM (#10221467)

    I don't see why this is making news now. Those of us with the high end digital SLR and such have been doing this since we first found out you could get these CF cards in these players. It's cheaper to buy the player and canblize it for the CF than to buy the CF.

    Waste of a good player if you ask me.

  • Cannibalized? (Score:5, Funny)

    by DoctorHibbert (610548) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:38PM (#10221470)
    Was the guy himself a microdrive? Has the microdrive robot takeover begun?
    • Re:Cannibalized? by TrevX (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:03PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:40PM (#10221483)
    If you search completed items on eBay, a 5GB microdrive went for $96 recently. So this guy wasted $150. The days of buying MP3 players and selling them for their parts are over.
    • Re:5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 (Score:5, Informative)

      by sigma (53086) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:46PM (#10221845)
      I would assume you were looking at this auction: here [ebay.com].

      This drive is PC Card sized, which is not usable in any modern consumer digital camera. The seller was simply keyword spamming. "Microdrive" is actually a marketing name created by IBM (and then sold to Hitachi) for a hard drive with a CompactFlash interface, so neither this auction nor the Seagate drive can be legally called a Microdrive.

      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:So microdrives are dying? by mrchaotica (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:09PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Article Text - Server Super Slow (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lord Haha (753617) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:40PM (#10221485)
    (http://doxsquared.blogspot.com/)
    Carbon Cannibal: Breaking it down for the hard drive

    As I described yesterday, I bought a very nice MP3 player, the new Rio Carbon 5GB model. It's awesome, and I already like it a lot. My original intent, though, was not to buy an MP3 player to listen to music, but instead to rip apart for its 5GB hard drive, for use in my Nikon D70 digital camera. But once I saw the Carbon, I decided it was time to own an MP3 player, so I got two.

    Rather than eating lunch today, I decided I would share my story of destruction. In part two of our saga, I tear into the second of the two Carbons I bought, pictures included.

    Note: If you decide to spend $249 on one of these things and tear it apart yourself, you do so at your own risk. It's value to Rio and the store you bought it at will instantly become $0, and your warranty will be a thing of the past. At your own risk, your mileage may vary, do not pass go, please tip your waitress. Oh, and whatever you do, don't come yelling at me. It's your own damn fault. In fact, you will probably end up with $249 worth of useless junk. You have been warned.

    Okay, so first of all let me tell you right up front that I broke the thing to the point where I will have to use a little glue to put it back together. The Carbon has a metal back plate, and a plastic front plate, with a rubber surround. What I did not realize is that the front plate is in sections, as well. Not realizing this, I didn't remove the front plastic facing (the silver plastic with the LCD window and the Rio logo) from the body of the MP3 player. It is held in place with some adhesive. Just be careful while you remove it and it will come right off. Once off, it may be that there is a better way to get this thing apart than the method I used. If I will have to use some glue inside where it used to have screws holding things together, because I broke a few plastic threads on the plastic case where the screws were attached as I pried it apart.

    While it looks from the outside like the rubber portion is a section all on it's own, it in fact is not. The rubber part is just glued to the plastic front plate, which is under the silver plastic front cover just mentioned.

    How I got it apart (your mileage may vary, be careful): I started by working a small screwdriver around the case, prying very gently between the metal back plate and the rubberized section. There are a number of metal tabs that you will see inside as you go. Those hod the drive in place. Be careful and don't go too deep or apply too much pressure inside with your screwdriver, you will break things if you do, or you might crack the case. If you don't care about reusing the Carbon, you can afford to be a little more indiscriminate, but things are packed together pretty tight in the small case, so caution and taking one's time is warranted.

    Once I worked all the way around with the small screwdrivers (I used 2, it helped keep things working along), I peeked inside to become a little bit familiar (there's a lot you just cannot see, though). Then I used a screwdriver inserted from the bottom of the case to get good leverage as pictured below, and worked the case looser.

    In the end, I used my fingers, after loosening with the screwdriver, to take the case apart. Again, note that I broke the plastic threaded screw posts in the process. The end result was a front plate, a loose power button (just insert it back in place later), the top chrome-like trim plate (that has the holes in it for USB, earphones, etc), and the back plate with all the electronics attached. The front panel navigation button is loose when you disassemble it - it's held in place by the front plate.

    There are two screws that you will need to remove from the face of the circuit board (the side with the LCD screen), and then you can start to swing the circuit board away from the hard drive. Below is the view from the side, pulling the circuit board up and away from the battery (lower left) and hard drive (in the lower center of the picture under t
  • Nit picking (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jmorris42 (1458) * <jmorris.beau@org> on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:42PM (#10221495)
    (http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/)
    Don't really buy that 1,500 picture number, but it is in the right range. I have a 2.2GB Microdrive in my 5 Megapixel camera and can only shoot 550-600 pics. But really, how often do you need that many pics? I have shot a couple hundred when using the autodrive a lot, but I could cull those down in the field if I started running short on space. The problem with CF hard drives is they are a LOT slower than flash on playback, so wading through the contents is not fun.
    • Re:Nit picking by Xshare (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:47PM
    • Re:Nit picking by imsabbel (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:48PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Nit picking by the_2nd_coming (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:57PM
    • Re:Nit picking by the_2nd_coming (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @12:59PM
    • Re:Nit picking by Charcharodon (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:03PM
    • Re:Nit picking by pedestrian crossing (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:42PM
    • Re:Nit picking by dhalgren99 (Score:1) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:48PM
    • Re:Nit picking by m.dillon (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:33PM
    • Re:Nit picking by m.dillon (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @03:17PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • this is kind of cool but ... (Score:2, Informative)

    by mAIsE (548) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:43PM (#10221500)
    (http://www.macosxhints.com/)
    http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=5gb+microdrive &btnG=Search+Froogle

    its about $180 for a 5G drive with some sort of warranty
  • Energy consumption (Score:5, Interesting)

    by hernyo (770695) <laszlo.hermann@gmail.com> on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:44PM (#10221505)
    It's nice to get a 5G 'memory card' for just $250. But does this microdrive suck the battery faster than regular flash memory card? This is quite an important issue because - as far as I know - digicams and batteries 'hate each other'.

    -- yeah, i know, my english sucks
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:44PM (#10221506)
    ... Blame it on Rio!
  • by adzoox (615327) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:47PM (#10221524)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday February 01 2006, @08:39AM)
    I wish anyone that has tried this with a Rio Carbon or more specifically the iPod mini - do you get better battery life with a compact flash card in these things?

    And to note... I recently spoke with someone at Hitachi. They said the MAIN reason the iPod mini is a closed device where you can't just remove the drive easily is solely to protect it's market for the drives otherwise.

  • my wish list... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by John Seminal (698722) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:47PM (#10221529)
    (Last Journal: Saturday February 21 2004, @08:07PM)
    i wonder why digital camera's don't come with internal hard drives, and better battery packs. size could be an issue, but if they can make 512 meg usb keychain drives (imagine it without the plastic casing and it is even smaller), i am sure they can put a gigabyte on a camera and still leave a slot for a memory card. also, why not have better batteries? if my laptop can get 4 hours, with a 14.1 screen, then on scale a camera should be able to do better with a much smaller battery. even if they expand the battery pack on camera's by 50%, that would be that many more pictures i could take. and one last thing, add on a better optical zoom, and get rid of the digital zoom.

    since we are talking cameras, i might as well ask. i have a 2mp camera which takes good pictures, but i am thinking about getting a 3 or 4mp as prices have fallen (paid over $250 for my 2mp 18 months ago). what digi camera's do people have, and how do they like them? my 2mp is fuji, and i have been happy with them. the 2mp takes nice pictures, but a guy at the photohut told me that for anything larger than 4x6, i should get a better camera.

  • Are Slashdotters retarded (Score:4, Insightful)

    by be-fan (61476) on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:57PM (#10221571)
    Why else would they always put the link in the most useless part of the text? To keep me on my toes? The link does not point to 1,500 six-megapixel pics, so the link text should not be "1,500 six-megapixel pics." The link text should be the "rip the 5GB CF Card out of it."
  • by cflorio (604840) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:04PM (#10221611)
    (http://www.floriopics.com/)
    The price of Compact Flash really took a nose dive in the last month. You can now get a Sandisk Ultra II 1 GB solid state card for under $100. [jr.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:05PM (#10221616)
    You think he might have put some larger images on the site so that people could follow along with his mod...
  • Batteries? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by autopr0n (534291) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:07PM (#10221623)
    (http://autopr0n.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 06 2005, @01:30AM)
    What kind of camera can take 1,500 6 mega pixel pictures without a change of batteries? If you can change batteries, you can change media as well.

    I've got a Sony DSC-V1, and I love it. But getting a > 256mb memory stick won't do me too much good without extra batteries.
  • Lifespan (Score:1)

    by dioxide (149116) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:08PM (#10221633)
    Does anyone know much about how long these drives are supposed to last? Is there a maximum number of writes, like flash memory, or is it equivalent to a 2.5" hard drive?

    I've got a few i-openers and I also want to build a small router type machine out of a soekris board, these drives would be ideal, as long as they aren't going to stop working after a month of writing logs.
    Read and write speed is not an issue with what I have in mind.
    • Re:Lifespan by quintessent (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @01:44PM
  • by Techie2000 (517233) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:25PM (#10221740)
    http://www.seagate.com/cda/newsinfo/newsroom/cover age/article/1,1113,2320,00.html Soon you won't have to buy the MP3 player to get the drive.
  • by Animats (122034) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:33PM (#10221776)
    (http://www.animats.com)
    Seagate is backlogged a bit, but they're increasing capacity and these drives should be available shortly. "We're a bit oversubscribed. We're looking at ways of increasing capacity." -- Rob Pait, Seagate's director of global consumer electronics marketing. Pulling these things from consumer products will be unnecessary very shortly. After all, the version they put in the Rio Carbon was packaged for retail sale. A USB-keychain format is coming. There's also an ATA version for OEMs.

    The drive was designed in Singapore and manufactured in China. Seagate, once a California company, is now so multinational they barely have US operations. They've closed plants in Ireland, Mexico, Mayalasia, and Singapore because those places weren't low-cost enough.

    Here's the ST1 drive manual [seagate.com]. Expect a glut of these things in January, once the holiday season business has been fulfilled and the production lines are running at full speed.

  • Priceless ! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Nom du Keyboard (633989) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:49PM (#10221858)
    Cost of Rio MP3 player: $249
    Cost of trip to buy Rio: $5
    Value of your time to disassemble Rio: $50
    Having your hack featured on Slashdot: PRICELESS!
  • But (Score:1, Redundant)

    by Bruha (412869) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:56PM (#10221901)
    (http://www.silentbrouhaha.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 31 2004, @07:42AM)
    Does it run Linux?
    • yes by twitter (Score:2) Saturday September 11 2004, @02:12PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The Next DIY Project (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Nom du Keyboard (633989) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:57PM (#10221905)
    Your next project is to do something useful with the remaining Rio parts. W.A.S.T.E. not, want not.

    After all, if people are cannibalizing OnStar systems after the subscription runs out just to get the GPS components, someone ought to be able to suggest a use for the rest of your Rio.

  • Low cost mp3 players without drm? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:00PM (#10221917)
    From what I previously knew, the Rio lost the battle to the entertainment cartel, so it was encumbered with digital restrictions management. I've been holding off buying a portable mp3 player because of the fear of buying one, and then finding out it was useless to play mp3s from my own music collection.

    I know that I can take a cd with mp3s on it to a electronics outlet to check if car stereos work or not with non-drm'd mp3s, but the few places I've been to (including circuit city, best buy, and a few other large stores) don't make it possible to check this on portable players, everything is boxed up when you buy it, and the samples are a mess (and I doubt they'd let me make the transfers to the device to see if it worked, though I must admit I haven't tried, haven't been to one of the stores lately).

    An ipod is far too expensive for my budget. Can someone name some lower priced mp3 players (ogg is ok too) that can hold a decent amount of songs (at least a hundred), and can play them, and transfer others in and out for variety, without drm restrictions? I'm looking for something hopefully under $100, the lower the better. I'm interested in two types, one that plays a cd of mp3 recorded songs, and one that isn't a cd player. If the second one can use usb drives as the medium for storing music, that would be even better, so I can mix up the music from time to time for my disabled relative who lives 3000 miles away, and doesn't own a computer.

    Any ideas, recommendations, suggestions would be deeply appreciated. Thanks!
  • by zogger (617870) on Saturday September 11 2004, @08:31PM (#10224082)
    (http://technocrat.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday November 15, @03:58PM)
    Being an outside maintenance dude, I see this sort of weird pricing with small engines. Say you got a small riding mower needs a new engine. You can get mowers on sale for as little as 600 clams. Want just the engine? 599$. Guess what most guys do....

    I say go for it before RIO won't care, they sell more gadgets, they are happy, you get a microdrive and the leftovers for your junk hardware box (or storage unit or whatever), and that's a geek +1 cool factor, because you can never have enough hardware junk. Evah. That's the rules and stuff.
  • by ksp (203038) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:22AM (#10226676)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I have several boxes of Microdrives that I never use any more. The main reason is that they only fit in this computer [m.nu]!
    ;-)
  • You can use an adaptor

    http://www.glasslantern.com/articles/PocketPCDri ve s/
  • Re:Time for a redesign (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mrchaotica (681592) <mrchaotica AT yahoo DOT com> on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:42PM (#10221493)
    But I don't get it. Why would they want to redesign it? Won't they sell more the way it is now, since both the people that want to play music and the people who want the hard drive are buying?

    Also, there's the other side of it: what if somebody wanted the shell? The thing that upsets me about the iPod Mini is that I want an iPod (to sync with my iBook), but I want a flash-based player. I would have loved to buy an iPod Mini shell off Ebay after somebody else took the hard drive, but NOOOO, Apple had to go screw it up!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Er, Duplicate Article (Score:3, Informative)

    by mrchaotica (681592) <mrchaotica AT yahoo DOT com> on Saturday September 11 2004, @12:45PM (#10221509)
    No, that was the Creative Muvo something-or-other, and it was a 4GB drive, not 5.
    [ Parent ]
  • by cflorio (604840) on Saturday September 11 2004, @01:54PM (#10221891)
    (http://www.floriopics.com/)
    I don't know, maybe Morals?
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Rio Return Scam? (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by Juggle (9908) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:16PM (#10222025)
    (http://www.hitesman.com/jason/)
    I had a friend who worked at a Best Buy....he noticed one customer was buying a returning 2-3 hard drives a week complaining about them not working.

    Being a tech guy (he worked in their "upgrade department") he popped one of the returned drives into a system and checked it out...worked fine...but was WAY lower capacity than what it was labled.

    Turned out the guy was buying the largest drives on the market....then pulling the labels off and putting them back on small drives which he'd return.

    Next time he came in the "yellow shirts" where waiting for him and gave a ring to the local police pretty quick.

    Now if you paid cash and didn't leave any personal info, only did it once and never returned to the store again....you could probably get away with it...but whether or not you should try that is between you and your deity.

    The problem is the kind of greed that makes someone try that kind of scam in the first place almost always assures they won't do it just once - and that's when they get caught.

    [ Parent ]
  • by Sancho (17056) on Saturday September 11 2004, @02:21PM (#10222059)
    (http://127.0.0.1/)
    On the other hand, you really can't blame them for assuming that you were trying to defraud them. I bet they get this sort of thing a lot, and it's a damn shame that they don't check the returns more carefully.
    Of course, that's why I like tamper-proof seals on things. That way you can be relatively sure that no one has had the device before you. I never by "open box" electronics for this very reason--the stores just can't test everything and often are so swamped that they overlook little things, and it's very easy to get screwed.
    [ Parent ]
  • 15 replies beneath your current threshold.