Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

DVD Porn Viruses Ravage US Soldiers' Computers

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon May 12, 2008 07:48 AM
from the oh-the-humanity dept.
stevegee58 writes "Tom Ricks' Inbox in the Sunday Washington Post reported that bootleg DVDs purchased in Iraqi markets ('souks') are frequently infected with viruses. Iraqi soldiers were affected as well; electronic interaction between Iraqi and US soldiers frequently resulted in a corresponding exchange of viruses from these infected DVDs."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Interviews: Ask Lt. Col. John Bircher About Cyber Warfare Concepts 236 comments
The Air Force is not the only U.S. military branch trying to come to grips with the electronic side of warfare, both current and future. The U.S. Army Computer Network Operations (CNO)-Electronic Warfare (EW) Proponent (USACEWP), located at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas — home to the U.S. Army's Combined Arms Center — serves as the Army's hub for cyber-electronic concepts and capabilities. This is the organization responsible for developing doctrine, materiel and training to prepare the Army for cyber-electronic engagements. For example, USACEWP has developed training teams to ensure that U.S. commanders and soldiers around the world are fully informed of cyber-electronic capabilities at their disposal. Leading the Proponent's Futures branch is Lt. Col John "Chip" Bircher; Bircher entered the Army in 1989 as an Infantry officer, then served in various command and staff positions, most recently Information Operations (IO). He was the IO Chief for the 25th Infantry Division (Light), Hawaii, and Director of IO for Combined Joint Task Force -76, Bagram, Afghanistan. If you want to know more about the realities and challenges that face an armed, global IT department in a time when electronic warfare is ever more important and dangerous, now's your chance to ask Lt. Col. Bircher some questions. We'll pass on the highest-moderated questions for Lt. Col. Bircher to answer. Usual Slashdot interview rules apply.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Thalagyrt (851883) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:50AM (#23376692)
    Gets a whole new meaning now.
    • But seriously, what is the world coming to?

      Previously, at least soldiers could count on running around, meeting interesting people, shooting them and raping their women.
      Of course, often that also meant some kind of medical treatment afterwards, usually including some nasty shots of penicillin, but that was a small price to pay for the vast spread of one's genetic material.

      Nowadays, the only virus you can get as a soldier infects your computer while you jack off to porn?
      Really, they shouldn't have gone all the way to Iraq for that.

      • by Opportunist (166417) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:13AM (#23376942)
        You wanna say the whole war in Iraq was just a lot of dick waving and mostly a masturbatory experience for a couple people?
      • by Binkleyz (175773) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:21AM (#23377040)
        You know, I'm fairly certain (at least I hope so) that you're either joking or just being a troll (in which case, I'm falling directly into your trap), but as (maybe one of the few) people on this site that were also previously in the military, I'm just about as offended as humanly possible at your comment above.

        Not everyone that goes into the military is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal, and quite a few of us are above average in terms of intelligence. I spent 6 years in the Navy, and I (nor anyone I knew) didn't shoot, rape OR pillage anyone.

        On a site like this one, where people from the outside would presume everyone is a pasty and pimply 34 year old living in their parent's basement, I really would expect (just a little) a little more tolerance and less assumption from the people involved.
        • by zacronos (937891) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:33AM (#23377180)

          On a site like this one, where people from the outside would presume everyone is a pasty and pimply 34 year old living in their parent's basement, I really would expect (just a little) a little more tolerance and less assumption from the people involved.
          You must be new here!
        • You know, I'm fairly certain (at least I hope so) that you're either joking or just being a troll (in which case, I'm falling directly into your trap),

          FWIW, the part that offended you was mostly a joke.

          but as (maybe one of the few) people on this site that were also previously in the military, I'm just about as offended as humanly possible at your comment above.

          Now you just flatter me. I didn't even mention many things that would offend a much greater number of people, but which would not be funny in the least.

          Not everyone that goes into the military is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal, and quite a few of us are above average in terms of intelligence.

          I know quite a number of people of various IQ levels who've been to war. IQ and the ability to commit a war crime are not that related that I'd consider that comment as any kind of explanation.
          And their war was much closer to home than yours.

          I spent 6 years in the Navy, and I (nor anyone I knew) didn't shoot, rape OR pillage anyone.

          Yeah, I've heard quite a lot about seamen.

          Sorry, but you really walked into that one. ;)

          On a site like this one, where people from the outside would presume everyone is a pasty and pimply 34 year old living in their parent's basement, I really would expect (just a little) a little more tolerance and less assumption from the people involved.

          Don't take it all so seriously; beneath the irritating tone of my post there is some relatively sound biology.

        • by phulegart (997083) on Monday May 12 2008, @09:07AM (#23377554)
          Well, I'm not a pimply-faced anything. In fact, I work in the busiest computer repair shop near Camp Lejune (see Marine Boot Camp). I repair laptops (and desktops) all day long that belong to soldiers. I'm regularly cleaning Iraq out of the laptops, and I'm just talking dirt and grime. However, all of them... and I do mean all of them, come in infected with malware, spyware, and viruses. Not only your Smitfraud.C based infections (Smitfraud, virus heat, etc.) but porn dialers, porn redirects and browser hijacks... you name it.

          As far as tolerance is concerned, I'm glad that all these marines appear to know absolutely nothing about keeping their machines clean. It keeps me in a paycheck. However, I don't have much tolerance for people who insist that this might be an overblown story. As far as the Parent comment about rape and pillaging... our armed forces have changed radically since the Vietnam days. You can't necessarily blame the guy for his comment though. If what I'm cleaning off these machines is any indication... even if our armed forces aren't raping and pillaging, they sure are thinking of it. Where they are going on the web to screw up their machines like they are points to that conclusion.
          • by Jumperalex (185007) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:47AM (#23377316)
            Please do everyone a favor and learn the difference between the military, an instrument of national power, and the GOVERNMENT that wields it. If you want to meet a person who abhors war, talk to a soldier. If you want to judge someone for wanting to "kill people after the Cold War finished" I suggest you look at the people who decide when and where to send the military. I'll give you a hint, they don't wear uniforms.
              • by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday May 12 2008, @09:22AM (#23377764) Journal

                If they abhor it so much, why the HELL did they VOLUNTEER to do it?

                Well, first of all, you only get to abhor the war as much when you've actually participated in one. Or four.

                Furthermore, some people join up in order to finance their education, hoping to hell there would never be a war they would have to fight in.

                Then again, as a Croatian citizen, I know fairly well what kind of people also joins the military and fights in wars.
                You get all kinds, and thus all generalizations are false.

                • by jhol13 (1087781) on Monday May 12 2008, @09:57AM (#23378212)

                  you only get to abhor the war as much when you've actually participated in one.
                  Are you claiming it is not enough that my parents had to live in one? Or to know how the war "works"?

                  Am I not allowed to abhor natural disasters as I have not been in any?

                  If they are stupid enough to enlist just to finance, well they do not deserve my "tolerance".
                  • by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday May 12 2008, @10:08AM (#23378380) Journal

                    I lived through a war.
                    However, I lived in the capital, which was only a target of several air raids.
                    Some of my friends survived regular bombings day after day, night after night; some of them had their parents and other relatives killed; some were re-settled or lived in camps.

                    Do you think my feelings about the war are as deep and as strong as theirs?
                    I'm pretty anti-war and anti-military myself, for various reasons, but I will never ever try to imagine I can feel as deeply about it as they do.

                    As for financing your education... people do what they can. Or what they have to. I refuse to judge their choices as long as they act humane.

            • Any one of the geeks here could pass it with one hand tied under the desk.

              Yes, but we geeks have had lots of practice doing things one-handed, with the other hand tied up with something else under the desk.
              Really, it would almost be unfair advantage.

              • by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday May 12 2008, @09:57AM (#23378222) Journal

                In Yugoslavia there used to be something called ORA(s), which is an acronym I can't readily translate, but which included very large groups of young people doing some pretty hard jobs for a period of time, e.g. (rail)roadbuilding.
                This is a form of service I can subscribe to and would actually like to see re-instated in Croatia. For one, if high-school kids today just picked up the trash arund their schools and rebuilt the demolished bus stops, they would be less prone to littering and demolishing them all over again. IMO, of course.

                • Re:Pacifism (Score:5, Insightful)

                  by steelfood (895457) on Monday May 12 2008, @02:03PM (#23382078)
                  You know, GP can drop the "Christian" part and still make perfect sense. It's against GP's morality to kill other human beings, probably in any situation other than in self-defense (but I cannot truly speak for the GP on this matter). The military exists to do just that. Killing another person isn't a requisite to being in the military, but it is an expectation. And the other side has the same expectations as well. And if killing another person is against someone's morals (like GP's) regardless of whatever logical or illogical basis, then that's that.

                  Oh, and a soldier is NOT like a policeman. Police exist to keep the peace by enforcing the laws, and provide assistance to citizens in need. In an ideal situation, police serve the public, though that isn't always true. But generally speaking, they serve the law, whatever the law might be. They are not trained to kill, and certainly not trained to survive. To claim that police and military are the same means you either have a warped sense of the place and purpose of soldiers, the place and purpose of law enforcement, or both.

                  Finally, stop being pedantic. Firearms are designed for maiming and killing, be it human or any other animal. GP is not talking about other "guns". Glue guns have the word "gun" in the name too, but I'm pretty sure when someone puts military and gun together, they don't think about a nozzle that ejects a hot, sticky substance. Have you any other uses for a firearm (not explosives or some other appratus that otherwise uses explosives to propelled projectiles) besides killing or maiming? And don't tell me target practice.

                  Seesh...I don't know if it's Monday or what, but the mods need to get their shit together.
            • by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday May 12 2008, @09:15AM (#23377674) Journal

              Humor of all kinds (satire included) needs to have an element of truth in it to be funny. In other words, in order to find his "joke" funny, you would have to believe (on some level) that the US military really DOES go out and commit atrocities on a regular basis.

              Actually, no, you would not.

              You would merely have to know enough history to know that the modus operandi described in my post has been characteristic for invading armies since the invention of armies.
              Then you would have to notice that I actually implied that American soldiers were kind of wusses for not raping and pillaging, since all they really do is jack off to porn.

              The rest of your post I would rather not comment on in great detail; let it suffice to say that the rest of the world has a bit different view of your army. And of your country.

    • I think they call it STDVD.
  • Rootkits (Score:5, Funny)

    by adpsimpson (956630) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:50AM (#23376700)

    Are these the old Sony disks they're talking about?

  • by Hyppy (74366) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:51AM (#23376706)
    From personal experience, believe me, Iraqi porn isn't worth it.
    • by gwayne (306174) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:30AM (#23377140)
      Dhakmi does Mosel!

      Iraqi Man 1: Would you get a load of the slit in her burka! I think I saw an eye!

      Iraqi Man 2: Oh yeah, baby, put it on! More burka!

      Iraqi Man 3: Halalalalalalalala...BOOM!

  • Support Our troops (Score:5, Interesting)

    by brewstate (1018558) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:53AM (#23376732)
    We need to send them virus free porn. Gentlemen time to dump your hard drives to DVD.
    • by neokushan (932374) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:56AM (#23376760)
      This is going to take a while...
    • Because as we all know Internet is for porn [youtube.com].
    • by Nimey (114278) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:11AM (#23376926) Homepage Journal
      Send them individual socks, too. Keeps things tidy.
    • by oodaloop (1229816) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:22AM (#23377044) Homepage
      After having been there a few times, I'll just point out that it is 100% illegal to have any kind of pr0n in country. No DVDs, no Playboys, no nothin, so don't mail it (I realize you made the above statement in jest, but someone reading it may think it's a good idea).

      That being said, I've seen more pr0n on classified servers than I've seen in the rest of my previous life. We had to remove about 3 or 4 TB off of one server so the map server could run properly. That and it was slowing down Call of Duty. Mind you, it wasn't all of it, just a couple of TB.
      • by jtev (133871) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:18AM (#23377004) Journal
        It means that some in the slashdot community already have. It's not allowed to be talked about, but one of the comfort items most desired in theater is porn. They aren't supposed to have it, and they can't get it in the PX, so they get it in letters from home, in nice little optical shiny packages, or they download it from FTP sites set up by their families, that don't get on the blacklist. Those who aren't so lucky, purchase it in theater, which apparently is a less than stellar option.
        • by d3ac0n (715594) on Monday May 12 2008, @09:22AM (#23377770)
          Sounds like someone in the Porn community that supports the troops could set up a very interesting charity.

          I can see it now: "Support the troops, send them quality American porn!"

          There could be shots of porn stars dressed like 1940's pinup stars in the ads for the charity.

          The name might be tough though... "Skin for the Soldiers", "Tits for the Troops"? I'm sure we could come up with something interesting.

          Anyone here have contacts at Vivid Entertainment? Let's get this baby rolling!

          • by jtev (133871) on Monday May 12 2008, @09:32AM (#23377912) Journal
            This becomes far less of an issue if you are willing to share with your squad mates. All of a sudden things like rotations apear out of nowhere. Just because it's not an officaly army sanctioned activity doesn't mean there's not an army way of doing things.
            • by Chris Burke (6130) on Monday May 12 2008, @11:57AM (#23379996) Homepage
              Just because it's not an officaly army sanctioned activity doesn't mean there's not an army way of doing things.

              Mental Image You Didn't Need For Today: A bunch of Privates standing around in a circle-jerk, with their Sargent calling out a cadence.
  • Protection (Score:5, Funny)

    by jspenguin1 (883588) <jspenguin@gmail.com> on Monday May 12 2008, @07:54AM (#23376734) Homepage
    The shift key: the condom of the Windows world.
  • by Gothmolly (148874) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:55AM (#23376746)
    "Iraqi soldiers are affected as well."

    Wow, a porn virus that can make the jump from DVD to human?
  • Good old days! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sm62704 (957197) on Monday May 12 2008, @07:57AM (#23376782) Journal
    When I was in Thailand in 1974, htere were only three places to get cassettes: The Base Exchange (other brances called it the Post Exchange), there there were practically no tapes I wanted to hear, but there were blanks; a government-provided tape center with a library of high quality reel to reels with a good selection that you could copy to cassette; or the local market, where you could get poor-quality copies of damned ner anything.

    Tha bad part about the bootlegs from town was the fact that they were analog - the quality left much to be desired. Some had skips that came from the LPs they were recorded from.

    The good part about the bootlegs from town was the fact that they were analog - you weren't going to infect your cassette player with XCP or some other virus.

    -mcgrew
  • Wowzers... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BobMcD (601576) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:06AM (#23376884)
    This sounds like a fairly big national security issue to me...

    Now, I do realize that these computers operate on separate networks, but traveling disks that are frequently infected presents an issue. Or, put another way, a tempting target for foreign intelligence.

    And before you jump to the 'impossible' conclusion, consider this: What are those Iraqi officers trading with our soldiers by thumb drive? Is it ALL unsec material? NONE of it is of ANY operational importance? Really? Really, really?

    That strains disbelief...

    And consider this: If the portable drives were intentionally infected by a custom virus designed by, oh say, a super power, would the sec networks have a chance to detect it?

    My network would not. I'm certain of that. And I'm also fairly certain that I have far less BillyWare than they do in their deployment.
  • by Lincolnshire Poacher (1205798) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:22AM (#23377048)
    • +10 points for clever attack vector.
    • +10 points for using a vector which is deeply embarrassing to the target.
    • +10 points for SELLING a virus to the target.
  • Misleading title (Score:5, Informative)

    by greyhueofdoubt (1159527) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:27AM (#23377106) Homepage Journal
    I have spent a good deal of time at these markets, and I can testify that I saw no porn. Ever. I never saw porn, alcohol, or drugs at these markets. Maybe these porn DVDs were passed around sub rosa or something.

    Here is what you CAN find in the markets (even on base): Fake cigarettes, fake cigars, fake Rolexes, fake Nikes, fake anything. Imitation Apple products- headphones, iPod cases, even fake iPods. No fake zunes, though...
    In an area about the size of a high school gymnasium, about 80% of the space was filled with bootleg DVDs and software. I don't mean bootleg like the MPAA wants you think bootleg; I mean actual printed DVDs out of japan or taiwan. Some were really crappy theater-cams but many were very good copies of promos and the like. I watch 300, letters from Iwo Jima, Black Snake Moan, and many others before or very shortly after theater release. It was awesome :)

    I also got all ten (at the time) seasons of south park on 4 DVDs for $25. Sweet.

    So, here we have this article that, while it may be true, seems to completely miss the point. It's like saying that, "Magazines such as hustler are causing massive deforestation and are filling our landfills." It is just trying to sensationalize the situation. Which is weird, since there are so many other, BIGGER things out there to write about. Try this, RIAA: The base media server, loaded with ~180 GB of music, is free to anyone who wants to download from it. You can get 180 GB hdds at the BX. Oh and there is the movie server, loaded with hundreds of titles. All free for the taking. And this author chose to write about porn? Whatever. Iraq is the wild, wild middle east. Everything goes.

    -b
  • by Dystopian Rebel (714995) * on Monday May 12 2008, @08:29AM (#23377128) Journal
    "You don't win a war by jacking off for your country. You win a war by making the other bastard jack off for ~his~ country!"
  • We build UAV systems for the US military. Widely used ones. Lately one of the branch's weapons labs has been coming to us and saying "we need a ground system that will operate any UAV or UGV. Why don't you use a computer?"

    So the R&D chief goes on a rant (to me, in private): "We've tried sending PCs into deployment, and they come back filthy with 'family videos' and viruses. We try sealing up and enclosing the USB/FW ports and DVD slots, and they come back pried open. No computers."

    Customer (to me, during requirements review): "The soldiers get issued WinXP notebooks anyhow. Utilize them."

    So I was handed the task of managing the resolution to this showdown. My first thought was, "Porn is not my problem." Second thought, "Hell, give them some clean porn ferchrissakes." Third thought, "oh crap -- we can't certify our product if it is a) in the decision making loop for a certain class of UAV, and b) can run any old crapware, including family videos."

    So it's not just a porn problem, but a problem with the inadequacy of the Windows OS itself. I know that this is potential flamebait moderation material, but it's a major thorn in our side: it's not a realtime OS, and even the embedded version of XP isn' real time. And it's susceptibility to viruses and hackers really makes it unsuitable for much more than family photos, letters to Jane, and facebook.

    Solution: Give them what they want, on their dime, while spending R&D money to prototype what they need. (Sorry - can't describe it.) Then when the inadequacies become painfully apparent, offer them the alternative, ready for development testing.

  • A lost cause, I suppose, but it seems to me that the root cause of this is a series of insanely bad decisions made by the industry as a whole and by Microsoft in particular, in blurring the line between data and programs in viewable media.

    There is no good reason why an email program should willy-nilly try to execute any attachment it sees, and no good reason why a computer should execute stuff on a DVD.

    99.99% of the time, the end-user thinks of a .jpg or a DVD as passively viewed content.

    An unholy alliance between technical sweetness (oooh, generality), possibilities for commercial exploitation (this DVD could display ads with a "buy" button on them), and DRM, has created a terrible situation.

    The mischief comes in when there are so many parties that have an interest in creating media that are not what they appear to be to the end-user.

    When the end-user thinks he's just watching something, the system should enforce the will of the user... not the will of the media provider. If the media does what the vendor wants and not what the user wants, that's a bad capability in itself--but it also is a gaping whole for malware which can subvert that capability to purposes neither user nor vendor want.
    • Re:How? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Bert64 (520050) <bert@@@slashdot...firenzee...com> on Monday May 12 2008, @08:16AM (#23376988) Homepage
      Windows likes to automatically execute programs on media you insert... Never heard of autorun?
      Yes, it's a ridiculously insecure idea, most people wouldn't even have considered the possibility of automatically executing programs on inserted media, but microsoft did for some reason.
    • by Dancindan84 (1056246) on Monday May 12 2008, @08:46AM (#23377312)
      If that's the case, they've (The armed forces) brought this on themselves. Porn isn't illegal, the soldiers are adults and they're away from their significant others (if they have one). Denying it to them in that situation is just asking for them to go underground for it.
    • by Shoeler (180797) on Monday May 12 2008, @09:04AM (#23377526)
      I have quite a few friends deployed. What you speak of does not happen. The military networks are locked down and virus-checked, etc.

      The problem is the soldiers have their personal laptops on unsecured wireless networks they pay for from local providers so they can do what they *WANT* to do, which is surf porn, play MMORPGS (WoW is hugely popular) and other games that allow them to interact with "normal" people from back home. As is usually the case, the pure security concept pushes people to their own solutions which creates huge security issues. You're talking about brave, courageous, amazingly talented strong young men and women who are amazingly stupid about technology. They use Windows because everyone uses it and the guy down the way can help them load their Iraqi porn.

      The only way to address this is to accept their habits (porn, games) and address it in a secure way.

      In this Army/Navy/AF/etc, that ain't gonna happen.

      Let's just say that I may be employed at (but not by) a US Government organization but I use my personal Mac and a personal wireless solution where neither the Mac nor the wireless ever touches their network, just so that I can do simple stuff like research current technology. Happens that some of this research tends to be on sites they consider "gaming" or "non business related" so they filter it. GFY, censors.