Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Widespread Keyboard Failures on OLPC's XO-1

Posted by timothy on Sun Apr 20, 2008 01:30 PM
from the gift-horse-dental-work dept.
otakuj462 writes "Many participants in OLPC's 'Give 1 Get 1' program of last November are now encountering what has come to be known as the 'stuck key' problem, in which one or more of the keys on their XO-1 laptop's built-in keyboard become stuck in an activated position, or are activated when adjacent keys are pressed. As of January 30th, the official word from OLPC is that the root cause of this problem is unknown because '[t]here are several manufacturers of the keyboards.' ('So far we don't know of any _reliable_ method of fixing the keyboard or the exact root cause.') It is unknown just how widespread this problem currently is, as the 30-day manufacturer's warranty has already expired for most G1G1 participants. However, the OLPC forums are full of reports. OLPC is currently deploying the XO-1 to children in Mongolia and Peru, as well as other developing nations. If OLPC is actively deploying units with known, critical hardware bugs, without a dedicated support infrastructure in place, to children who have never seen a computer before, should they still be considered to be a responsible organization? Did OLPC deploy their hardware too soon?"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • First post? (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:33PM (#23135644)
    Amazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzing!
  • by raving griff (1157645) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:35PM (#23135652)
    I don't think that it is so much a problem with not testing the hardware enough as it is a problem with how OLPC designed the laptops. These are computers that are being used widely by children all over the world, and, regardless of how you look at it, kids have a tendency to break things. Now, it is obvious that the XO-1 is designed to be a sturdy piece of equipment, but I find it downright silly that the keyboard is non-replaceable. The keyboard, of all things, should be easy to swap out for a new one--it is after all the primary input device on the computer, and if you lose that, you lose the computer. OLPC should have thought ahead to possible broken parts and made everything--from the touchpad to the keyboard to the LCD to the hard drive--removable and replaceable.
    • by acidrain (35064) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:43PM (#23135724)

      Agreed. And the competition is going to make as much hay with this as possible.

      While this kind of thing happens to the major manufactures, having had this happen right out the gate is going to be a permanent black mark that intel, asus and the rest are going to use in their advertising. OLPC should have been more careful to ensure that faults could be repaired. After all, these are going to the third world, and over there they fix all kinds of things we would throw away.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Well, it is easy to guess why it is not replaceable. It is designed predominantly for markets which require nationalisation of the keyboard which is usually country specific. If the keyboard is non-replaceable this goes a long way towards guaranteeing that they are used wherever they have been shipped and not reimported into the "Developed World".
      • by arth1 (260657) on Sunday April 20 2008, @03:46PM (#23136496) Homepage Journal
        That's an easy guess, yes, and one I think is far from insightful.

        The places which need these devices the most won't necessarily even have a national keyboard layout, and often multiple languages, so where there's different keyboards, being able to switch key caps becomes more important, not less.

        Anyhow, changing key caps is one thing, but changing a keyboard another.
        Easy replacement of keycaps and locale settings on a device doesn't help much if the problem is with the underlying keyboard mechanisms. Then you need to repair or replace the keyboard, which has diddley squat to do with the legend on the caps.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          In places where they are being deployed, a localized keyboard layout is developed and provided. Go read wiki.laptop.org for more information.

          The XO uses a gel-type keyboard. Individual keycaps are not replaceable. The entire keyboard, however, is easily replaceable.
    • by metasj (815368) on Monday April 21 2008, @12:05AM (#23139138) Journal
      The keyboard is designed to be replaceable at home (as is the touchpad, the LCD, just the LCD lightbar, and even the bumpers...). Sophie & Philip demonstrate [youtube.com] separating the display an motherboard (similar disassembly [laptop.org] of the bottom half allows for replacing the keyboard and touchpad).

      At the moment, the bottleneck for people in the US is getting replacement parts -- in the meantime, you can install an ASK-3100 keyboard [instructables.com] instead (for +clickiness and -waterproofing).
      • by fyoder (857358) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:27PM (#23136004) Homepage Journal

        Perhaps in consumerist societies, but I bet they take more care of stuff when they know it can't/won't be replaced.

        The summary does read like something out of a consumerist society -- "Product break, what we do now?" Well, you fix it [olpcnews.com].

        I wonder if OLPC is regretting G1G1 at all, putting thousands of XO's into the hands of people for whom it was never intended. The XO is for children and geeks, and if they ever plan to release one to the general North American consumer public, yes, they've got a lot of work to do. In fact, I'm not even sure it would be possible in the near future at the price point they're aiming at.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          To be honest, I think it was their blind loyalty to the "vision of purpose" that's done more damage to the project than anything else.

          By not offering the product to the general public, they not only screwed themselves at the start trying to meet minimum production numbers, but also a source of income (non-profit doesn't mean they can't make money at all...) - they G1G1 program should have been a long-term strategy starting at day one.

          It's quite a noble cause but that cause does not benefit at all from restr
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            Get real, the only damage done to the project was via corporate marketdroids. As soon as it was obvious that the OLPC was a threat to corporate profits in school computer sales and overt attack campaign was launched via web trolls.

            The underlying reality is the OPLC had to get out there as soon as it good, so that it be refined, and continue to develop, a continuing process. Along the way, there will always be for profit corporations who see the OLPC as nothing more but a source of profits and seek to take

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          The summary does read like something out of a consumerist society -- "Product break, what we do now?" Well, you fix it [olpcnews.com].

          I own a problem XO with a stuck keyboard, and although the fix in the link you provided has provided temporary relief on occasion, it has never been a permanent fix, and the problem recurs in a very unpredictable manner. The link to the OLPC Wiki provided in the original news story above does provide instructions that an experienced UNIX user can use to re-map the alt and control keys for a more lasting fix. Unfortunately, I have also experienced sticking in other keys (including space) that cannot be ea

      • by SuperKendall (25149) on Sunday April 20 2008, @03:02PM (#23136262)
        Perhaps in consumerist societies, but I bet they take more care of stuff when they know it can't/won't be replaced.

        In "non-consumerist" societies, kids are equally rambunctious and can easily drop or knock things over.

        Long before I was a "consumerist" to use your venom-dripping terminology, I was breaking stuff. Haven't you ever heard a parent complain that kinds understand the value of nothing?

        If a kid has no real concept of value anyway, what on earth would motivate him to be more careful than with anything else they are used to playing with?

        • by grcumb (781340) on Sunday April 20 2008, @03:25PM (#23136386) Homepage Journal

          If a kid has no real concept of value anyway, what on earth would motivate him to be more careful than with anything else they are used to playing with?

          I don't want to be seen to be defending your snarky reply, but it's relevant to note that the issue of caring for the XO laptop is a real one.

          It is not, however, because of children's inability to see the value of such a device. I work in development, and I've tested the XO. I've also written about it [imagicity.com] a fair bit. The big challenge for children using this device will be the lack of ready infrastructure in the village.

          When you have to walk several miles to school in the rain with nothing more than a banana or a taro leaf to cover you, the XO is vulnerable. When you have to wade across one or more small rivers on your way to school, the XO is vulnerable. When you live in a house with dirt floors, the XO is vulnerable. When you have to contend with the fact that your many siblings might well want to share the laptop, the XO is vulnerable.

          BUT... I've tested a late prototype and seen for myself that, whatever its faults, there is nothing else available that even begins to approach the XO for robust construction. Try to imagine any other computing device surviving what I've described above. The XO laptop is the best available technology today, and that's why we'll shortly be deploying our first pilot project.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            I'm not saying it's weak, and I think it's probably about the best possible solution that could be made, when you vector in strength and cost... like you say, these laptops are way more robust than any other practical option (you can't afford Toughbooks for all those kids after all).

            My entire snark was directed at the notion that these kids would be any more careful than kids would be with equipment here - kids are kids was the point I was really trying to get across, and you need something that can wear we
          • When you have to walk several miles to school in the rain with nothing more than a banana or a taro leaf to cover you,
            Who's idea was it to use a bannana as an umbrella?
      • by Cal Paterson (881180) * on Sunday April 20 2008, @04:52PM (#23136928)

        consumerist societies
        That is a ridiculous term: humans consume resources in every society. We're not "consumerist", we're just rich, and we can afford to consume more.
  • XO review (Score:3, Funny)

    by sakdoctor (1087155) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:39PM (#23135692)
    Dodgy keyboard. Less space than an Eeepc. Lame
    • Re:XO review (Score:5, Informative)

      by orasio (188021) <orasio@internet.[ ].uy ['com' in gap]> on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:24PM (#23135988) Homepage
      Better text resolution, if you need to use it to read actual books.
      Better battery life (3x) to read books.
      Networking capabilities that the EEE doesn't have.
      Preinstalled software suitable for learning, teaching and collaborating.
      Available quality support in your country.

      Aside from that, EEE would not even exist without the OLPC project. Laptops exist since the eighties.

      The OLPC was needed for this kind of machine to even exist. Even if their machine wasn't the best, their objective would be accomplished.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Aside from that, EEE would not even exist without the OLPC project. Laptops exist since the eighties.

        Ridiculous statement. The Sony VAIO Picturebook (PCG series) precedes both the OLPC and the EEE by a full decade. The EEE is the next gen of truly useful fully-functioned ultraportables like the Picturebook, et.al. On the other hand (and on the opposite of the spectrum from the EEE and the PCG), the OLPC is --- despite its noble aspirations--- merely a glorified toy, and is performing as such.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:44PM (#23135728)
    M kybr wrk fn
  • Fix it yourself (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Marcion (876801) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:48PM (#23135750) Homepage Journal
    The idea of the laptop is to make schools and children responsible for and in control of their own technology, rather than being passively spoon fed technology.

    Therefore the idea is that people fix things themselves. This is a good thing if things are built with this in mind. Repair your own thinkpad (no problem), repair your own ipod (no chance).

    If we have any hope of saving the planet from being one giant landfill dump, then we really need to learn to fix electronic devices ourselves.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        In Uruguay, the first country where they are deploying, there are electronic stores as close to home as in any US town. I don't know about Europe.

        Electronic technicians are very easy to find there.

        Anyhow, I don't think they could be of much help.
        The computers come with a very reasonable support contract with Brightstar, and they should be taking care of the repairs.
      • Re:Fix it yourself (Score:5, Insightful)

        by mellon (7048) on Sunday April 20 2008, @04:08PM (#23136694) Homepage

        Face it. It looks like the OLPC didn't have enough testing at the manufacturing level before settling on the cheapest keyboard supplier. The other strange thing about this is that despite the laptop's intended market being people who would normally not have access to computers because of cost or location they only provide a 30 day warranty.


        The ignorance of this statement is astonishing. There have been reports of a problem with OLPC keyboards. People have had success repairing the problem. You don't know anything about the service strategy of the OLPC (as witness your statement about the 30-day warranty, which is for G1G1 OLPCs, not end-user OLPCs).

        And yet, you're fully prepared to make a harshly critical and categoric statement about the failings of the project, as if it were proven fact, not your completely ignorant conjecture.

        Sorry if this sounds a bit harsh, but really, "face it?" Face what? A completely random statement from a random person? Why should we "face it?"

  • by fyoder (857358) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:55PM (#23135796) Homepage Journal

    Not quite sure what is meant by "we don't know of any _reliable_ method", unless perhaps it means something that works for everyone the same way 100% of the time, and there's some small number of units that can't be fixed by disassembly and wiping the area under the affected key with isopropyl alcohol. I didn't even go that far with mine, I just pried up the edge of the keyboard mat near my stuck alt key just enough to get the q-tip in.

    The XO is designed to be like the old Volkswagen Beetle -- cheap and easily fixable by non-experts in the field. Yes, it would have been nice if they weren't prone to stuck key syndrome, but it's not the end of the world, and these are fricken amazing devices at twice the price.

  • Be realistic. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bcrowell (177657) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:01PM (#23135838) Homepage
    Let's be realistic. First off, there is no information to show how common the problem is: 1 in 100, 1 in 1000, 1 in 10,000? Also, note that it appears that everyone on the forums complaining about this is someone in a developed country who bought one via give-one-get-one. The blog at olpcnews.com linked to in the slashdot summary seems to be saying that there needs to be a system for distributing spare parts. Well, actually that wouldn't do any good with the stuck key problem, because the OLPC folks don't have enough information yet to know which keyboard supplier or suppliers are causing the problem. They could ship spare keyboards to Mongolia, but there's no way to know yet whether the replacements would have the same problem. OLPC does have a plan for dealing with hardware breakage. The plan is that they're trying to get the defect rate very low, and then have people in the communities receiving the laptops take care of the small number of defects by cannibalizing machines. That seems like a very reasonable plan for a village in Mongolia where 100 kids have 100 laptops. No, it's not a very reasonable plan for an affluent adult in the U.S. who isn't part of a community that has received a pile of these laptops -- but, uh, sorry, that isn't the main mission of OLPC. Some of the buyers in developed countries seem upset that the warranty period is only 30 days, and that they have to pay for shipping. Yeah, sure, OLPC could extend the warranty to a year, and pay for shipping, but that would cost money, and they'd have to pass on those costs, driving up the cost of the laptops. The goal right now is to continue decreasing the cost of the laptops.
    • by zenyu (248067) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:41PM (#23136120)
      Some of the buyers in developed countries seem upset that the warranty period is only 30 days, and that they have to pay for shipping.

      Some people are simply delusional. When I participated in G1G1 I assumed there was no warranty. My guess is the 30 day warranty is only there because of some stupid law. The way I see it, I made a donation to the OLPC Foundation, and got a neat little example of the technology I was funding. If mine had experienced any problems I would never have dreamed of draining OLPC's resources by returning it for replacement. I would have attempted a repair and reported on the success or failure of my repair, so that the knowledge could be disseminated to the children using the laptops.

      I haven't experienced any problems, and I really wish commercial companies would adopt a technology like its screen or its ability to take falls and keep on ticking, and especially the power-saving technologies which makes this thing the only laptop that has never run out of juice one me; I carry around three heavy batteries with my regular laptop and run it in its maximal power saving mode and it still doesn't hold a candle to the OLPC.

      The keyboard doesn't have the best feel, and I would only want commercial companies to copy it when making a keyboard for children. It is spill-proof. When I've spilled hot coffee and cold soda on it, I just had to wipe it off. Again, this is unlike my Sony Vaio and Lenovo T-61 keyboards which I've had to replace when even take-it-apart-deep-cleaning did not restore functionality post spill.

      From what I've read, it appears the stuck key problem is fixable with a cleaning. Taking apart an OLPC is _much_easier_ than taking apart a commercial laptop, so I think this whole complaint is completely overblown. I'm not going to go so far as to say the article poster is an Intel sock puppet. I've seen they crazies who talk about having "bought" an OLPC right here on slashdot. Since the OLPC has never been on sale to individuals, you know these people are delusional right off the bat. The apparently large number of these folks either speaks to the success of the G1G1 program at reaching many many people, or it speaks to the sorry state of the war on drugs at it's goal of combating the crack epidemic. Either way, these idiots should be ignored, and I hope the folks at OLPC do not take these jokers seriously.

      My only disappointment with the G1G1 program is that it wasn't G2G1, Give 2 Get 1. That could have resulted in more laptops in the hands of children, and fewer laptops in the hands of these complainers.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        The way I see it, I made a donation to the OLPC Foundation, and got a neat little example of the technology I was funding.

        OLPC won't find it so easy to extract a second check from donors whose laptops fail prematurely.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:10PM (#23135890)
    Amazingly, there IS a support mechanism in place for the target countries. There isn't one for the people who received laptops in return for a charitable donation. Support for the G1G1 program is volunteer-based. Sorry we're not as quick to fix everything as the billion-dollar companies you morons keep comparing us to. The manpower we have is being devoted to target countries, so forgive us if we seem to be neglecting the rich white demographic who has time to harass us on Slashdot. Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.
        • we feel accountable to our target nations, and we behave accordingly. We don't feel particularly accountable to Slashdot. Sorry.
          If you can't fix the problem for Mr. Rich White Dude in America, why the fuck should I believe you can fix it for some ten year black boy in Africa that speaks a langauge you couldn't even ever hope to speak?

          No donation for you! ;D
  • Who cares?! (Score:3, Funny)

    by urcreepyneighbor (1171755) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:31PM (#23136034)
    <sarcasm>At least they are trying to make the world a better place! Results don't matter!

    Now, let's all drop our pants and have a circle jerk to the Powa of Da Collective! w00t!</sarcasm>

    Of course, right now, some poor little kid in the middle of some hellhole is cursing his America POS computer. :)
  • New Rule! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pembo13 (770295) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:37PM (#23136082) Homepage
    Stop pointless speculation in the summary. This isn't CNN or Fox news. Just give us a summary of what the topic is about, give relevant links, and allow us to form opinions. Thank you.
  • by poetmatt (793785) on Sunday April 20 2008, @03:14PM (#23136326)
    Okay, there were some problems. NOTE THE DATE: As of January 30th. Nothing has been posted since March in there. I think it's safe to say the situation may have changed since january, seriously thats almost 4 months ago.

    Really why is this even a post today that far back?
  • by davidpfarrell (562876) on Sunday April 20 2008, @04:28PM (#23136804) Homepage
    I was the first one to report the bug here:

    http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5658 [laptop.org]

    Although the cause is still unknown, I do believe that the way I was holding mine could have accelerated the issue in my case:

    I held it in my left hand with the lower left corner of the base in my palm - My fingers being under the base and my thumb being over the base in the left corner. I would then type and scroll with my right hand, so the entire weight of the laptop was being held at the point where my thumb was pressing on the lower corner - The laptop would essentially flex down and to the right.

    The problem presented within 4 days of receiving the laptop.

    Since I have received my replacement, I have not held the laptop in same fashion - not even once - and will not.

    And luckily, so far so good - I've not experienced any problems with it.

      -- start rant ---
    I was also the first person to send mine back based on the bug, *BUT* I wasn't the first to be mailed a replacement.

    If you read the threads on the bug you'll one of the tech guys next-day-aired some other dude a laptop after his was returned for testing - I was a little bummed!

    All of the official messaging from OLPC says that a replacement cant take as long as 30 days. I waited for 30 days and then called support.

    They informed me that it would be several more weeks before they shipped my replacement.

    Actually, I received it less than 48 hours after getting off the phone with them.

    By the way, the support staff are incredibly nice!

    -- end rant --
  • by fhage (596871) on Sunday April 20 2008, @10:00PM (#23138532)
    I'm a day 1 G1G1 donor and my XO had the dreaded sticky control key about 45 days after purchase. I tried cleaning underneath the membrane with no luck, so I remapped the sticky key, but soon other keys started to stick. One of the ideas presented on the olpc wiki was to replace the original keyboard with an ultra-mini, after-market USB keyboard [http://www.instructables.com] mounted internally.

    Since I have basic shop skills and know how to solder I did just that, spending about $35 for the keyboard and about 4 hours making the modifications. I couldn't be happier with this modification. The action of real keys doubles the usability of the XO, especially for people like me who have big, clumsy hands. I used to dread having to enter enter text on the old keyboard. The new mini keyboard is a joy to use and I can type in my normal style and rate. Highly recommended if you are up to the task.

    I'm personally quite disappointed in both the OLPC manufacturers as well as the response by some of the G1G1 donors. The faulty XO-1 keyboard may be the downfall of the whole project and all we in the US can do is whine, and hope a factory in China can fix the problem.

    I fully disassembled my original XO keyboard and found the sticky key problem is clearly a design flaw in the way the two membranes are held apart. The bottom membrane has a serpentine array of traces which are exposed to contacts attached to the upper membrane and are arranged in small groups under each key. The top membrane has small circular contacts, with clusters of 2 -17 contacts under each key Separating the membranes, and holding the contacts apart from the traces below, is a pattern of rubbery glue, printed into linear traces between key rows and small diamond shaped dots internal to the rectangular groupings of contacts above. Most keys have an array of 4 contact dots with a 2mm, diamond shaped spot of glue directly between all 4 contacts. However the Ctrl, both Hand and Alt keys as well as the ] key have 6 contact dots with only 2 super tiny dots of glue to hold the membranes apart. Apparently these keys are the ones which stick the most often. For these keys, the designer placed the center pair of contacts in the group of 6, directly over a trace below with little separating glue. The only possible repair would be to separate the membranes and place additional dots of glue over the traces on the sticky keys. OLPC need to come clean about this mistake and build a better, more robust keyboard and make them available to all XO-1 owners.

    (PS. This message was entered on my hacked XO, under Opera)

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      "$100 doesnt buy much these days...there is a reason that laptops dont sell for under $450...they cost money" My 4gb Asus Eee cost me £240 (about $490), I've been using it regularly for over 5 months now and it's still going strong, several scratches on the outside because I've not felt the need to be gentle with it because there's no spinning disc inside that's suseptable to shock damage, I find the keyboard absolutely fine to touch-type with and some of the keys are getting more shiny as they're us
      • "$100 doesnt buy much these days...there is a reason that laptops dont sell for under $450...they cost money"

        My 4gb Asus Eee cost me ...about $490...still going strong
        ...
    • by Lemmy Caution (8378) on Sunday April 20 2008, @05:41PM (#23137216) Homepage

      $100 doesnt buy much these days...there is a reason that laptops dont sell for under $450...they cost money
      One problem is it that $100 buys plenty in the places that a lot of these laptops are supposed to be going.
    • Re:30 days warrenty? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by schnikies79 (788746) on Sunday April 20 2008, @01:44PM (#23135730)
      No it's not normal. Almost everything here comes with at least a one year warranty. A lot of computers and computer parts come with a three year warranty.

      They are not required by law to have a three year warranty here or even a one year but I have never seen a new computer have under a one year warranty.
      • They are not required by law to have a three year warranty here or even a one year but I have never seen a new computer have under a one year warranty.

        Actually in Europe consumer goods are required to last for a reasonable length of time. Two years is the minimum period mentioned in the consumer sales directive [europa.eu] but member states are free to institute their own (longer) periods and higher consumer standards.

        Perhaps this is the reason why the OLPC wasn't sold in Europe ...

        Rich.

        • (Replying to my own posting ...)

          Actually in Europe consumer goods are required to last for a reasonable length of time. Two years is the minimum period mentioned in the consumer sales directive but member states are free to institute their own (longer) periods and higher consumer standards.

          In the UK, the period is six years, under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 [bbc.co.uk]

          Rich.

        • It is.
          http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Giving/Europe [laptop.org]

          The OLPC is not a consumer product. They don't have the infrastructure to sell it as such. If you buy millions, they can sell support, including hardware, and warranties.

          They are not iXO's. Their goal is not to sell laptops for everybody. They are making this for kids who might use them to learn. Both objectives don't have to be acheived together, and don't even need to be compatible.
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              This is not a charity.

              Uruguayan kids have their laptops without _any_ help from the G1G1 program. We have the money to buy them, and to pay for support. We just don't have the infrastructure or influence to build them that cheap, or to even embark on our own on a project like this. That is the help we needed, and it's appreciated.

              The G1G1 program is nice, esp. for testing. But it's just another part, even if you yell that it's a CRITICAL part. Real kids have tested them in proyecto CEIBAL, in Cardal, Urugua
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I'm not sure what the letter of the law is in the UK, but the state-of-play is that warranties on laptops last for a single year, and the retailer normally offers a 30 day return policy. Only hardware faults are covered: software fault, accidental damage, theft, acts of war and god are all excluded. The only exception to this is if you are able to prove that you are mis-sold. If you don't produce a receipt (other other proof of sale) then there is no obligation for anyone to do anything.

      In short, if th
    • Re:Clean keyboards (Score:5, Interesting)

      by roto3 (1160113) on Sunday April 20 2008, @02:17PM (#23135940)

      The whole point of having the sealed membrane keyboard design is that it's a lot harder for dirt to get into it. The whole top of the keyboard is a rubber membrane with no openings, so there's nowhere for dirt to get in. Also, unlike other membrane keypad designs, the membrane itself does not provide one of the contacts for the key. It merely applies pressure to the underlying plastic layers that actually have the contacts. The top plastic layer also has very few openings. It would be very difficult to get enough dirt into the keyboard through normal use (even in dirty conditions) to cause the keys to stick.

      Mine developed a sticky control key after a few months. Opening up the laptop (compared to most laptops, it's easy to get into) and peeling back the top rubber membrane (it's lightly glued down to the plastic layers), rubbing the affected area to make sure the contacts were not sticking together, and reassembling the laptop seems to solve the issue; I haven't seen the control key stick since.

    • If you received an email confirming your order, and you have not received a Fedex Tracking Number, we recommend:

      1) Try the Order Tracker at http://laptopgiving.org/ [laptopgiving.org] using your original email address, OR your 10-digit reference number.

      2) If that fails to clarify, please send:

      * Your 10-digit Reference / Order Number

      (or PayPal confirmation number if you have no such records)

      * Order Date
      * Order Method (PayPal/Phone)
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I don't understand how you are looking at it.

      When Negroponte talked about a 100 dollar laptop, everybody was laughing at him, saying it could not be done.

      They are selling under 200 dollar laptops, with a good chance of making them for 100 dollars in one year or two, or at least for the equivalent to that amount, taking into account currency devaluation.

      Other people are selling cheap, good laptops now, and a new market has emerged. Their vision, that was far fetched, is now very close. I think the OLPC is al