Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Facebook Widget Installs Zango Spyware

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:16 PM
from the hate-when-that-happens dept.
Security Social Networks The Internet
BaCa writes "A malicious Facebook Widget actively spreading on the social networking site ultimately prompts users to install the infamous "Zango" adware/spyware. The tremendous success and lightning fast expansion of Facebook empowered the social networking giant with an impressive user base. Needless to say, in a digital world where web traffic equals money, such a user base attracts spammers, virus/spyware seeders, and other ethic-less online marketers like honey would attract flies."
+ -
story

Related Stories

Submission: Facebook Widget Installs Zango Spyware by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Facebook Widget Installs Zango Spyware 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • The evolution of facebook took place to fast for the security to catch up.

  • "like honey would attract flies" (Score:5, Funny)

    by John Hasler (414242) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:22PM (#21924170)
    There is something else that attracts flies which it more closely resembles...

  • Without exception... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:26PM (#21924198)
    All the apps are terrible. Asides from their 'myspacesqueness', they also release your entire profile & friends to an unknown entity. Facebooks TOS is bad enough, but atleast you have a sense of who your dropping all thoughts of ownership or privacy too.

    'caring' - imageogram

  • Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)

    by Weaselmancer (533834) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:30PM (#21924234)

    ...such a user base attracts spammers, virus/spyware seeders, and other ethic-less online marketers like honey would attract flies.

    http://xkcd.com/357/ [xkcd.com]

  • Wouldn't install for me (Score:4, Informative)

    by bconway (63464) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:31PM (#21924238) Homepage
    I tried to run it from the Facebook link in my sandbox, it wouldn't take. Looks like admin privileges are a requirement. I guess it's not surprising people aren't following the basic security steps that (even) Microsoft recommends.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by slyn (1111419)
      That's one of the major problems with Window's. The default security settings of a Microsoft product aren't even what Microsoft recommends.

      It's times like this I'm glad I have a Mac, as I can continue to stalk people that barely know me without risk of getting a virus. =P
    • Windows supposedly has the greatest security model in the world, but I don't understand it, I've never understood it, and I've never met anyone who could explain it to me. Occasionally there's ordinary files that aren't open but that I can't modify AND I HAVE NO CLUE WHY THIS HAPPENS. Some hidden attribute, God knows what it is. Etcetera.

      Vista proves what I've always suspected: even Microsoft can't set up a secure, usable Windows system without pissing me off on a continual basis with warnings and prompt

      • Windows supposedly has the greatest security model in the world
        No it doesn't, it has ACLs.
    • That is how they have been trained for years. Part of the TCO i guess.

  • Too late (Score:4, Informative)

    by doofusclam (528746) <slash@seanyseansean.com> on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:41PM (#21924334) Homepage
    Facebook have already blocked it, days ago...
    • that should keep it from spreading further, but the people already infected still have a problem.

    • Re:Too late (Score:5, Interesting)

      by kebes (861706) on Saturday January 05 2008, @02:26PM (#21925396) Journal
      It's good the Facebook is blocking that app, but this points to a deeper problem with Facebook's implementation of third-party applications. This is just the beginning of Facebook being exploited by scammers.

      Whoever injected that spyware application will no doubt create a new developer account, and upload some variant of "Secret Crush". Blocking a particular application or a particular developer account is a short-term solution. I can only guess that more and more people are going to exploit Facebook apps for adware, spyware, phishing, identity theft, etc. Facebook will then be playing yet another game of "Internet whack-a-mole" where they try to block applications based on signatures, block developers based on IP address, and so on (with usual countermeasures of automated code variation, proxies, etc.). As we've seen from spam, viruses, spyware, and phishing, such games reach a stalemate where a certain fraction of users are becoming victims at any given time (typically the less savvy users, I suppose).

      Personally I think Facebook should do a better job making the risks of third-party applications clear. The little "confirm that you want this application" question has already become so routine for most users that it means nothing to them. Moreover, the tight integration of third-party apps into the Facebook environment, though visually pleasing, leads most users to believe that the applications are written by and endorsed by Facebook. In fact, the code runs on third-party servers and those third-parties have access to profile data once you accept the app. Most Facebook users are surprised when you tell them this. And it's not always easy to tell who actually wrote a given application.

      I think we all saw this coming, and I'm surprised Facebook didn't put in more safeguards to curtail the use of the app framework for spamming, phishing, and social engineering.

  • The widget is "Secret Crush" (saving you a click) (Score:5, Informative)

    by stickyc (38756) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:48PM (#21924414) Homepage
    Quick summary:

    The widget in question (according to TFA) is "Secret Crush". The app asks you to complete several steps, including signing up 5 of your friends and installing a tray applet (containing the "infamous "Zango" adware/spyware") from Zango's site.

    • Re:The widget is "Secret Crush" (saving you a clic (Score:4, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 05 2008, @01:03PM (#21924556)
      According to "blog.zango.com" (found by a google search "facebook widget zango") the widget is now called "My Admirer".
      Facebook is going to hell in a handbasket. They should never have opened to "anyone with an email address"; that's just asking for trouble. At least they're making money, right?

  • Am I the only person left? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Joce640k (829181) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:56PM (#21924504) Homepage
    Am I the only person left who doesn't know what facebook is?

    From reading the press it seems to be some sort of web site where you upload all your private stuff for other people to see. I've never seen it though.

    • Don't feel bad, I don't get it either. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by maillemaker (924053) on Saturday January 05 2008, @01:28PM (#21924794)
      If you aren't the last person, you're not by much.

      I only went and checked it out a few weeks ago, after not being able to stand all the hype any longer.

      I can't figure out what it's for. I've said as much here on Slasdot before, and was told that basically it's a mechanism to find/keep in touch with friends.

      It's kind of like "classmates.com", except it's free.

      I went and tried it out. First of all, they want you to use your real name. Like you noted, your "private stuff". Myself, I am seeking to /limit/ my online exposure, not enhance it, so of course I created a fake account.

      Once you have an account, there is very little to actually /do/, that I can see. You are supposed to join "networks", but there weren't any that seemed interesting to me.

      I don't have any long lost friends to look up, and the couple of names I did plug in didn't get any hits. All of the people currently in my life that I want to keep up with I currently keep up with by other means, like email, telephone, or face-to-face.

      I still don't understand the appeal of these "myspace" and "facebook" social web sites. What they really look like to me is an html-based web page creation utility, that allows people to create a personal web page without having to pay a hosting fee.

      Since most ISPs these days give you a 5MB or so space where you can make a little web page if you want, I don't know why people don't just use that, except I guess they don't know how to make web pages. So MySpace, Facebook, etc., are like mini web-page software wizards to help you make a web page. Since all the web pages are centralized on one "server", they are thus also easily searchable / linkable.

      If I wanted a web page to post things about myself, I'd go register a domain and some web hosting services and make one. I guess Facebook and MySpace are for people who don't want to go to the trouble.
      • I created a fake account... I don't have any long lost friends to look up, and the couple of names I did plug in didn't get any hits.

        Hmmm... well, if you used a fake name, then maybe all your former friends did too. The site only works if people use their real names. Facebook is exactly that for most people - kind of like classmates.com and Friends Reunited. It enables the maintenance of casual friendships without having to write/phone explicitly.

        If you think about it, this is how most casual friendships work - I don't specifially talk to John down the hall at work to catch up, I might bump into him in the coffee room, see he's got a new shirt, find out it was his birthday yesterday etc. etc.. Just seeing and bumping into someone lets you stay in touch without it being an effort. Social networking sites let you do this. Email works for people you really want to stay in touch with, and chat forums work for a bunch of people who want to discuss the same topic(s). On Facebook I can find out that Fred who I went to school with is into a particular band too, and if there's a couple of other guys from school 10 years ago maybe a group of us could go to a gig. Nothing serious, nothing important, but if you like to stay loosely in touch with a whole bunch of people then it works really well.
        • >Hmmm... well, if you used a fake name, then maybe all your former friends did too.
          >The site only works if people use their real names.

          I really don't have any former friends. There is one guy I've lost track of over the years, but he never kept a phone (his girlfriends kept calling getting him in trouble with his live-in girlfriend) and he hated computers so I doubt he's on the web anyway. But other than him, I don't have any long-lost buddies I'm trying to keep track of. I never had friends in hig

          • Re:Explicit maintenance of friendship... (Score:4, Insightful)

            by EveLibertine (847955) on Saturday January 05 2008, @05:11PM (#21926922)

            If you are worthy enough of friendship than I will make the effort to maintain that friendship explicitly.
            Well, what the poster before you was trying to say was that social networking sites attempt to lower the amount of effort. You mention an effort, but the idea is that in the glorious future as we develop these tools there will be virtually no effort required. Of course, nothing out there now has fully succeeded, but they are trying. Also, nobody cares about the nonsensical trivia that people enter into their profiles on these sites. It does, however, give that lady at the front desk at your work something to do when there's nobody moving through the lobby.

            Let me give you an example of a "casual friend". You know that guy at the bar who tells you about his band, and it sounds cool, but you don't want to get his phone number or give out yours just so you can check out their next show. The solution here is he can just tell you what his bands myspace is, or facebook, or whatever, and you can get the info there. No need for feigned friendships when you find out his band sucks.
          • >Staying in touch with a bunch of people who you do not care very much for their
            >center of interest is one of the most worthless activity i've ever heard of.

            My sentiments exactly. It also smacks of voyeurism to me. Maybe that is part of the appeal?

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by tapo (855172)
        Actually, the purpose of Facebook is to not only find friends, but to allow you to communicate with them more easily.

        Facebook's core feature is the 'news feed', which basically shows what your friends have been doing on facebook, or what they've set their status to be, a little like twitter. Here's a snippet from mine:

        Guy A started playing a game: Mass Effect
        Girl A misses Guy A.
        Girl B left the group The American Sandwich Society.
        Guy B and Guy C are now friends.
        Girl C is no longer listed as single.

        It also al

      • I went and tried it out.[...] Once you have an account, there is very little to actually /do/, that I can see.

        the way I see it there is all sort of game-like application you can use with your friends. most are about "make believe" that you did something with them. It's good light-hearted fun. now if you'll excuse me I'm just getting my baseball and will be off your lawn in a second.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by aj50 (789101)
        Originally Facebook was designed to appeal to university students (I believe you had to have a uni e-mail address to sign up) and for this target market, it works very well. When you start university, you quickly meet lots of new people who you might not bump into again and whose names you're trying to remember.

        One of it's most useful feature is that you can search through people at your uni who've signed up, you can search for people who are doing the same course as you, you can get enough background infor

      • I can't figure out what it's for.

        It's for organizing parties.

        Since most ISPs these days give you a 5MB or so space where you can make a little web page if you want, I don't know why people don't just use that, except I guess they don't know how to make web pages.

        Because the point is the social network.

        Anecdote: So this girl I know in meatspace asks me if I'm coming to her party, I don't know what party she meant, we discuss the fact that I'm not in her facebook friends, the following day we digitize our friendship, and I finally see the event page (limited to her friends) with all the relevant details and a handy "coming/not/maybe" RSVP system.
        You get to see who's going to the party, who isn't, and the whole thing is done with a nice c

        • You know, youth may actually have a lot to do with it.

          After reading the trivial things you get to keep track of from the post just above yours (I.E., guy B leaves the American Sandwich Society), I gather that this sort of things gives you very trivial data about people - things you just don't really need to know or keep track of.

          When I was younger I had time for such dalliances. But as an adult with a 50+ hour work week, a wife and a child, a house, cars, and the rare time out for hobbies and gaming, I jus
    • Well, you and me both. I never got the appeal of those 'social networking' sites.

      (clicks http://images.slashdot.org/neutral.gif [slashdot.org])
    • Don't worry, there are at least two of us left.

      I don't do facebook, youtube or any RSS. I am too paranoid and just don't trust 'pushy' media.
    • Slow down cowboy! I'm slowly grasping how this blog thing works!

  • Tag issues (Score:4, Insightful)

    by lpangelrob (714473) on Saturday January 05 2008, @01:15PM (#21924660)
    While the tag "shitattractsflies" is somewhat amusing when describing (as an aside, Facebook started exclusively on college campuses some 5 years ago, now), I think the more insightful tag would be "peopleattractshit".
    • Right. The missing noun is "Facebook", as in, "when describing Facebook".

      And yes, I used preview. I think programming in PHP just greatly diminished my grammar this morning.

  • Personal responsibility -- don't install untrusted (Score:4, Insightful)

    by compumike (454538) on Saturday January 05 2008, @01:21PM (#21924718) Homepage
    Don't voluntarily install untrusted executable files! Period! There is no vulnerability without the user thinking that they want what's inside.

    Facebook has nothing to do with the existence of this vulnerability. In fact, the browser-based app model explicitly is nice because of the sandbox effect, where such apps are very limited in what they can touch on your local machine. But when you convince people to break out of that sandbox by installing a local app, you can certainly kiss your computer goodbye.

    --
    Our microcontroller kit. Your gcc compiler. Learn digital electronics. [nerdkits.com]
  • Well, at least Scoble is safe.

    • Re:What is "Facebook"? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by STrinity (723872) on Saturday January 05 2008, @12:55PM (#21924494) Homepage
      Think MySpace only it looks like a corporate website c.1999 instead of a Geocities page c.1996. Oh, and with pointless activities.
    • Basically, what I have concluded is that these "social" websites are basically a free, web-based applications that let people create small personal web pages.

      Since the web pages are on a centralized "server", they are easily indexable and searchable, which is nifty if you want to do things like go looking for long-lost friends or people who share similar interests.

      Myself, I don't get the appeal.

    • Re:why are all facebook widgets so retarded? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by 0100010001010011 (652467) on Saturday January 05 2008, @01:53PM (#21925062)
      They let the highschoolers and world in.

      The reason it's like a second grade class room is because majority of users are of that mentality now. Just look at most of the "groups" now. Maybe they existed and I didn't notice before but all my groups were rather sane, now they're "IF U JOIN THIS GRUP WORLD PEACE WILL START!"

      I've been on facebook since the beginning. And every minor improvement seemed to rock. They added photos. I was able to share photos in one place with most of my friends. I could invite friends over to a party with out having to e-mail every one. Yes, sometimes in college you don't get the opportunity to SEE all your friends every day.

      And then the flood gates opened. The Developer thread was flooded with "HEAY I LOVE FACEBOOK CAN U MKE IT SO MUSIC PLAYS LIKE MYSPACE." People would kindly remind them that the whole thread was FOR developers. People could make 3rd party apps and it seemed pretty good because all the 3rd party apps were external. Then came the day that they let those 3rd party apps on everyones website. Then it just went to hell.

      Thankfully Grease Monkey and scripts like:
      http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/11992 [userscripts.org]
      This exist.

      Which is why I maintain 2 accounts. My 'professional' account. Uses my work address. All my college friends and people I know well. You can't find it anywhere. You can't search for it by name. Even if you know me I have to add you. Then my "Hi I just met you at the bar and I'm going to add you" account. Basic info. Searchable. Etc.
    • First of all, stupidity doesn't mean you deserve what you get. Second of all, using Windows has nothing to do with it. All the smart Windows users are blissfully uninfected, the problem is stupidity, not OS choice.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Bartab (233395)
        First of all, stupidity doesn't mean you deserve what you get.

        Yes it does. It's called life, and we as a society should stop putting so much futile effort into working against it.
        • Thank you. I hope you get modded +5 insightful.
        • No, it doesn't. We may not be able to prevent the consequences of stupidity (nor should we try to baby-sit people in that fashion), but we certainly shouldn't say that stupid people deserve what they get, feeling all smug. We should try to educate them, not finger-point and laugh.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.