Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Sri Lankan Terrorists Hack Satellite

Posted by CowboyNeal on Fri Apr 13, 2007 04:52 AM
from the can't-make-this-stuff-up dept.
SorryTomato writes "The Tamil Tigers Liberation Front a separatist group in Sri Lanka, which has been classified as a terrorist group in 32 countries has moved up from routine sea piracy to a space-based one. They have been accused of illegally using Intelsat satellites to beam radio and television broadcasts internationally. Intelsat says that they will end the transmissions 'within days.' Intelsat has been accused of having business links with Hezbollah before, but claim that they are blameless this time and LTTE was using an empty transponder."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • ... to add 'Tin Foil Hats' to our anti-terrorist kits. At least the duct tape won't be lonely anymore.


    warning: The above content may test positive for sarcasm and/or could be a failed attempt at humor and as such should be taken with a pound of salt.
    • ... to add 'Tin Foil Hats' to our anti-terrorist kits. At least the duct tape won't be lonely anymore.

      Don't forget the Vasoline.

  • No doubt the transmissions are being used to attemp to justify the illegal war being waged. Very Foxey! I wonder where they got that idea from?
              • And you found these numbers where? Is that 900,000 or 200,000?

                650,000. CNN [cnn.com].

                I assume that CNN, being a nationalist propaganda machine is likely to round down. But even assuming the real figure is only as high as 200,000, the situation remains unforgivable and the U.S. is by no means "innocent".

                Also, 'murdered' is an objective term. If someone is shooting at me and I have a gun, guess what: I don't care if it's a police action, declared war, or what ever, I'm shooting back. Is that murder, I supposed it dep
                  • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                    but you can not prove it was illegal (or "criminal"), until you can point to a verdict by a proper court...

                    Wrong, and I can't believe I have to actually point this out. If I go out and shoot my neighbor in cold blood, that is most definitely illegal and criminal. There doesn't have to be a trial and a verdict to determine that. The verdict just allows the State to render punishment for the crime by proving that the defendant actually committed the crime. Just the man's dead body is proof of a crime, wit
  • How? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by wesmills (18791) on Friday April 13 2007, @05:17AM (#18715981) Homepage
    OK, because at least someone on Slashdot knows, I have to ask: how would they do this? Is there some form of access key or security needed to uplink to a transponder, or is it simply a matter of finding the right satellite and frequency? I would hope that the latter is not true, but "security by obscurity" is a well-known (amusingly) procedure in many companies..
    • Re:How? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Frogbert (589961) <frogbert@NOSpAM.gmail.com> on Friday April 13 2007, @05:31AM (#18716041)
      The satellite was configured to retransmit on certain channels, the LTE simply beamed up a signal on a channel that wasn't in use but was configured to retransmit if something was being sent to it.
    • Re:How? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by mangu (126918) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:23AM (#18716307)
      at least someone on Slashdot knows, I have to ask: how would they do this? Is there some form of access key or security needed to uplink to a transponder, or is it simply a matter of finding the right satellite and frequency?


      I know, because I work for a satellite company. Communications satellites normally have no protection at all, if you know the right frequency, have a powerful enough transmitter and antenna, and know where to point your signal, you can do it. And it's *extremely* difficult to avoid, there are very few technical countermeasures. You can beam a more powerful carrier over the pirate, but this means you lose the bandwidth anyhow and, in case of an intentional interference, the pirate can just shift his frequency and start over.


      It happens all the time accidentally. Sometimes amplifiers are defective, or they are inadvertently turned to the wrong frequency. These accidental interferences happen everywhere, and cost millions of dollars per year for every operator in terms of bandwidth that becomes unusable.


      Since a satellite has a wide coverage area, it's very difficult to find the transmitter. There are some very expensive systems to locate interferences, they work based on small shifts in frequency and time that depend on the transmitter location, but these systems cannot locate a transmitter with an accuracy better than tens of miles. After finding the general area where the interference originates, one must sweep the whole region with a helicopter equipped with a directional antenna. Very messy and very expensive.

      • Re:How? (Score:4, Informative)

        by mangu (126918) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:37AM (#18716413)
        Just adding some links to my post, this is one of the systems used to locate interferences [tls2000.com]. Of course, in the marketing they present one of the most accurate results they have, normally the precision is not that good. And that same company also does the final search [tls2000.com] for the interfering transmitter.
      • Re:How? (Score:4, Informative)

        by AK Marc (707885) on Friday April 13 2007, @01:16PM (#18721767)
        Communications satellites normally have no protection at all,

        Yes, I have "hacked" a satellite before. Temporary bandwidth is expensive. Just point to a satellite (not hard to find them), plug in a spectrum analyzer and see where there are blank spaces. Put your carrier up there. Call your friend. Have them set their receive to there. Repeat for the return link. Turn it down within a week. Leave it off for a week. Try again. You will never be found. If you were found, nothing would happen to you. I only used it for a very short-term test when my provider was having trouble finding me test space, and no one ever noticed. If you have the gear for a satellite link and a spectrum analyzer, you can "hack" just about any commercial satellite. It isn't security through obscurity. It's a complete lack of security.
    • There is no access key. The transponder simply takes what comes into the receiver in a specific frequency band, shifts the frequency, and retransmits it. Most of the security is derived from the difficulty and expense of constructing and operating an earth station. One transponder can be shared among many users. Proper operation of the transponder is dependent on the users voluntarily following the rules regarding frequency, bandwidth and power level. An incompetent or hostile user can effectively jam the t
  • Not really suprising (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 13 2007, @05:20AM (#18715995)
    Hacks of satellites have been predicted by experts numerous times before; the older ones were, rather worryingly, designed mostly with security by obscurity. Need uplink codes? Probably not a problem if you can get near to the ground station with appropriate equipment, no radio transmission is 100% directional.

    IIRC it was one of the Blackhat conference speakers who outlined the nasty possibility of a satellite somewhere in a geosynchronous constellation being hijacked and deliberately crashed into another one. Given that this area is fairly densely populated, the debris could start a chain reaction and do a lot of damage.
  • by remmelt (837671) on Friday April 13 2007, @05:21AM (#18715997) Homepage
    What, right after you pick the kids up from school, have a cup of coffee, do the dishes, visit granny, contemplate what to have for dinner?

    We are surrounded by incompetence. Dilbert, save us!
  • Not original.... (Score:5, Informative)

    by afa (801481) on Friday April 13 2007, @05:43AM (#18716097) Homepage
    F@-lun gong hacked SinoSat from Taiwan to broadcast their propaganda program to mainland china.

    To read more:
    http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&q=falun+gong +sinosat+hack [google.com.sg]
    • Presumably you spelled it F@-lun in order to evade the Great Firewall... but then in the URL you link to it's there plain as day. I think some Chinese censorware admin needs to update a little :-)
  • This story (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/ 12/1755218 [slashdot.org]) about a DoD router in space says they're contracting with IntelSat.

    According to this story, they've a) been hacked and b) have links to Hezbolah.

    Why would our government involve a company that's incompetent and has links to terrori...

    ...never mind.

  • by Rik Sweeney (471717) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:22AM (#18716301) Homepage
    That hijacking a satellite is a pretty cool thing to do. Go on, imagine the scenario in a 4 Yorkshire Men style...

    Terrorist 1: We hijacked an armoured vehicle!
    Terrorist 2: That's nothing! We hijacked a boat!
    Terrorist 3: Amateurs! We highjacked a plane!
    Terrorist 4: We highjacked a satellite

    Terrorist 1: And you try to tell the young people about that, they won't believe you!
    Terrorist 3: They won't!
  • Some basic facts: (Score:5, Interesting)

    by 140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:50AM (#18716513) Journal
    The state adjacent to Sri Lanka in India is also populated by Tamils. The State government is very sympathetic to the Tigers in Sri Lanka. Most parties in that state notionally support the Sri Lankan Tamils, even the Congress party whose leader and ex-Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by the Tigers. The current ruling party of that state was a pioneer in using Sattelite TV transmissions and owns many TV channels. When the TV was a Govt of India's monopoly (in the 1990s), that party used to make TV programes in Chennai, India, and send the tape to Phillipines and uplink from that country. That TV network, SunTV, and its sister channels are heavily infiltrated by the Tiger Cadres and sympathizers. I am very sure the hijack is done with active help and collusion of SunTV conglomerate insiders on the technical divistion.

    It might not have been approved by the higher ups either in the family/party. India's Minister for Communication Kalanidhi Maran, is a nephew of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and their family owns the SunTV conglomerate. Tigers are to be feared, their pledge of alligiance to their leader Prabakaran supercedes any other consideration.

    Trying hard to present NPoV without my biases. Hope I succeeded.

  • Hack Arr... (Score:4, Funny)

    by lixee (863589) on Friday April 13 2007, @07:06AM (#18716629)
    These guys ARE pirates and hackers!!!!! I feel membership applications are gonna flow from the /. community...
  • by Eevee (535658) on Friday April 13 2007, @07:16AM (#18716697)

    According to Asian Tribune, the satellite channel [asiantribune.com] was part of the ceasefire agreement between the LTTE and the government of Sri Lanka. Since Ranil Wickremasinghe [wikipedia.org] hasn't been Prime Minister of Sri Lanka since 2004, this agreement that LTTE could broadcast obviously isn't exactly new.

    Speculation time:

    Some people are claiming that the LTTE is paying [wordpress.com] for the broadcasts. It sounds like someone at Intelsat may have accepted a contract based on the ceasefire agreement, only to get burned now that a different political party is in charge in Sri Lanka.

  • Bent pipes... (Score:3, Informative)

    by flyingfsck (986395) on Friday April 13 2007, @09:01AM (#18717755)
    There is little hacking involved. Most older satellites are simple 'bent pipes' which transponds everything it receives on one frequency onto another frequency. So if you are in the antenna footprint of the ground station, you can use that satellite and there is nothing the owners can do to stop you.
  • by ryanhornbeck (946367) on Friday April 13 2007, @09:21AM (#18718031) Homepage
    As a satellite network controller, I disagree with your post: 1) They didn't HACK anything. The obtained ephemeris data from some online website, and pointed an antenna at the satellite. 2) Satellites have predicted channel allocations. There's a huge database containing the predicted signal levels, filtering, datarates and modulation techniques. If an unauthorized access occurs, the satellite network controllers see it instantly. 3) The only thing a satellite controller can do to negate an unauthorized user is reallocate the beamweights of the footprint to exclude the transmission area. Sure, this may work in Sri Lanka (where I've worked, by the by), but if someone in the US wanted to do the same thing, do you really think Intelsat would create 0dB directive gain in Virginia? I don't think so. Read up on satellite operations. It'll amaze you how little control controllers actually have.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 13 2007, @05:26AM (#18716017)
      After taking a look at your past comments, it seems more likely that you just wanted to rationalize the antics of the violent insurgents that are basically destroying my native country, because you like that they're anti-American rebels. (Although they ARE part of the reason I came to the US, I have to thank them for that.)

      Mods- I'm not trolling here-- look at his profile if you don't believe me.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Whatever they say, the large majority of the terrorists cannot be seriously called "freedom fighters".
      People who used terrorism agains nazi occupation in several european countries and to a certain extend some of the intifada fighters may claim that title as long as they only attacked military or police targets of a brutal occupation force or dictatorship in their homeland. Tamil tigers might have fallen in that category, but they really have too much innocent blood on their hands.
      But on the other hand, alt
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          The difference is one of intent. The people in Iraq and many other parts of the world are INTENTIONALLY targeting civilians as a means to an end. They want to get their message out and to terrorize the population. That is NOT the action of freedom fighters, it is the action of brutal thugs. The Mujahidin in Afghanistan were freedom fighters, the American revolutionaries were freedom fighters. When you intentionally target civilians who are not part of the government machine I really don't think you can be c
                    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                      UNSEC 678 authorizes the use of military force to "uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area".

                      UNSEC 687, sections C through H, spelled out exactly what was required of Iraq to restore international peace and security to the area, including: a complete declaration and destruction in the presence of UN observers of their WMD stockpiles, a complete declaration and destruction of their ballistic missile and UA
                    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                      On item (2), I guess some other UN country will need to invade again and kick the US out, unless you are willing to claim that international peace and security to the area has improved. Surely that's not a limb you're willing to crawl out on.

                      The United States current presence in Iraq is at the request of the Iraqi government and under a clear mandate from the Security Council (first from resolution 1546, and most recently from resolution 1723. See Annex 1 in resolution 1723 for the letter from Prime Minist

      • Apparently these Intelsat satellites are already armed.

        Asked whether al-Qaeda could use the same satellite for the purpose of an attack against the United States, Spector said it was only a hypothetical situation. But when pressed for an answer, Spector said it was technically possible.
        • If the positional thrusters are capable of producing enough delta-v for it to come down exactly at the right moment to ram the ascending space shuttle, then I guess yes, the technical possibility to attack the US does exist. Besides that, I can't imagine an attack vector going beyond simply turning the sat OFF, just to piss some US housewifes waiting for their sitcoms to start.
          • It would probably be easier to bring it down on a city rather than try to match vectors with a small, rapidly moving object like the Shuttle. Of course I don't know that much would survive reentry, but it would be an easier thing to do.

            Heck, even just bringing down/disabling them would be considered an attack.
      • May I suggest you look a bit into the history of Ireland?

        The theory how armed resistance can be used to overthrow government is very old and goes along the lines of: provoke the authorities with violence until they start to react as violent, but against their own innocent civilians. Every state action should generate more supporters for your cause until you have a large enough majority to oust the regime, or they just downright give up. If you follow that theory, al-qaida was very successfull with their wtc attack. The US overreacted so violently that they lost all their goodwill in the rest of the world. Indirectly this may lead to the withdrawal of the US from Saudi soil.

        Btw, personally I think all violence is wrong, but neither do I like the Myopic US views on 'terrorism'.
        • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 13 2007, @06:33AM (#18716377)
          Very insightful, it is also exactly what is happening in Sri Lanka. I have personally witnessed a civilian being beaten up by the Sri Lankan army: on the main road connecting the capital to the parliament. People who travel to the war torn east of the country have told me such things happen regularly there. I shudder to think what happens out of sight and in more of the way places.

          The LTTE are very ruthless and achieved their position partly by killing any dissenters. They are also the world leaders in suicide bombings, both in the number of attacks and the technology used. I suspect if the Sri Lankan forces had been more restrained, the LTTE's own brutality would have undermined them.

          They are certainly ingenious and are unique among their peers in operating on land, sea and in the air - they recently used light aircraft to bomb an air force base, and had dropped bombs and got away before the air force get its air craft off the ground.

          In the meantime, Sri Lanka faces horrible side effects from war. Corruption, vote-rigging, suppression of free speech, a rise in Buddhist fundamentalism and huge economic damage.

          On a more cheerful note, its a great time to go to Sri Lanka on holiday. The hotels are dirt cheap. The conflict is localised, foreigners are not targets, and you would be safe from violence as long as you avoid the north and east of the country. The risks from Sri Lankan driving are another matter....

          Posting anonymously for obvious reasons: my profile links to my blog and I do not want to make unnecessarily make enemies in Sri Lanka as I spend a lot of time there. The fact that I feel it necessary to be anonymous should tell you a lot about the state of free speech in Sri Lanka.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          The theory how armed resistance can be used to overthrow government is very old and goes along the lines of: provoke the authorities with violence until they start to react as violent, but against their own innocent civilians.

          That's a very slanted view. It is commonly put about by those keen to portray resistance movements as cruel and callous, and occupiers as mere 'victims of circumstance'.

          In general, the goal of a resistance movement is to weaken and undermine the occupier's rule.

          Increased repression and
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            by Anonymous Coward

            Anti-Americanism in Europe goes back decades and has stayed at generally the same level.

            No, it hasn't. When I was young (eighties), the US was seen as the great superpower protecting us from those evil Soviets. I vividly remember the horror stories told by my parent of desperate people risking their lives trying to get over the Berlin wall to the West, because it was so bad and repressive in those Eastern European states. Stories about secret police abducting you because you dared to criticise the sta

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            [quote]That the U.S. had goodwill before 9/11 and then threw it away with the invasion of Iraq is a myth. [/quote]

            You are the one reciting a myth. After 9-11, Le Monde proclaimed, "We are all Americans". The band outside Buckingham palace played the Star-Spangled Banner. All around the world, vigils were held, marches were held, and US embassies were plastered with flowers. Have you forgotten so soon? Well, perhaps polls [msn.com] will help [bbc.co.uk] remind [telegraph.co.uk] you [pewglobal.org].

            In some countries, positive opinions of America have more tha
      • ... Terrorists have never won ...

        ... Freedom fights have won ...

        Terrorists that "win" get to call themselves freedom fighters because they "won". Terrorists who didn't "win" get called terrorists by the "winners".

        ... The intentional killing of civilians in order to promote a political agenda ...

        That could cover just about any form of violence whether perpetrated by governments or terrorists/freedom fighters, east or west.

      • Yes, exactly like that. In the eyes of the KKK, they are civil rights activitsts. In the eyes of Nazis, they were applied medical researchers. In the eyes of whoever that last one is, they were in their own eyes whatever they wished to be.

        In the eyes of the Britich empire, the freedom fighters of America were terrorists.

        History is always written by those who 'won' the war. (And now war; no history, generalized.)
    • Intelsat has been accused of having business links with Hezbollah before
      This is the company we trust to run one of our most valuable strategic assets?
    • Re:The Best Hackers (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Heembo (916647) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:33AM (#18716375) Journal
      Is it really that hard to hack satellites? Is the security not so great since there are few people who actually have the capacity to try such tricks?
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Is it really that hard to hack satellites? Is the security not so great since there are few people who actually have the capacity to try such tricks?

        Exactly. There is basically no security at all, apart from the requirement to have a big phat (and thus obvious...) transmitter. 30 meter antennae are somewhat hard to procure and hide, so anybody pulling such a stunt from an industrialized country would probably be caught within days. But do it from within a third-world country where nobody gives a damn, and you're free to air.

        • Re:The Best Hackers (Score:5, Informative)

          by frdmfghtr (603968) on Friday April 13 2007, @08:12AM (#18717219)

          Exactly. There is basically no security at all, apart from the requirement to have a big phat (and thus obvious...) transmitter. 30 meter antennae are somewhat hard to procure and hide, so anybody pulling such a stunt from an industrialized country would probably be caught within days. But do it from within a third-world country where nobody gives a damn, and you're free to air.

          You are incorrect regarding antenna size. Satellite communications is possible using COTS equipment such as a Ku-band (about 14 GHz up, 11 GHz down) antenna about 1 m across. If you want to go C-band (6 Ghz/4 GHz), then a dish about 2.5 m across is sufficient. You only need about 100-400 W of power, again available in COTS equipment.

          If you're not concerned with some of the requirements for your transmitted signal (particularly beamwidth), you can use dishes even smaller than these, provided you have sufficient transmitter power.

          Such equipment must be available on the black market; if groups such as the Tamil Tigers can afford to buy black-market weapons, I can easily imagine the black-market availability of such technology for the right price.

    • Re:The Best Hackers (Score:5, Informative)

      by digitalchinky (650880) <dtchky@gmail.com> on Friday April 13 2007, @06:38AM (#18716423) Homepage
      No need for covert hacking, most satellites are little more than expensive dumb repeaters in space, anyone with a few thousand dollars can bounce a signal off one without restriction, sometimes without even being noticed for a good length of time, if at all.

      Given that the best automated methods of scanning and identifying energy spikes is about as good as speech recognition 15 years ago - and don't kid your selves on this point you 3 letter agency drone PHB's :-), it is still vastly quicker to have a human operator run through with a spectrum analyser to figure out what should or should not be there. Back when I was working for the man, the visible part of the clark belt in my section of the sky was filled with satellites having many thousands of transmissions on each polarity in use. Weeding out the pirates is tedious and never ending work for a space based telco.

      I'm certain Intelsat don't want any non-paid for signals period, though the legalities of pirate transmissions are a bit of a grey area depending on which country you are in. I have seen on many occasions a sweeping CW (carrier wave) running back and forth across what I assume are unwanted transmissions. I'd say there's not really much more Intelsat can do except suck it up and try to identify unknowns a tad faster than they have been doing in the past, and then simply try to disrupt the signal - no guarantee this will work though.

      The fine article makes it sound like Intelsat have some sophisticated system that'll let them drop the transmissions with a flick of a few switches - this is an interesting feel good fluff explanation probably more aimed at their investors. What they really mean is that there is sweet FA they can do about it beyond asking nicely for the naughty men to turn off their bad signal, otherwise they'll take their transponder and switch it off for everyone, only for a few minutes though.
    • by SenseiLeNoir (699164) on Friday April 13 2007, @06:28AM (#18716333)
      I am a Tamil, born in Sri Lanka, have lived nearly all my life in the UK, and work in a professional job here, as an IT consultant and am PROUD of it. I have been proud to work for my now native country, the UK, and have worked in BAe, and other companies.

      Yet, because of the fact I am Tamil, you do gooders are supposed to now be looking at everything I do? It doesn't matter the fact that I have lived in the UK for so long, I cannot even speak Tamil properly.

      Its bad enough, going to Sri Lanka, and being sometimes treated like dirt by immigration, customs, and checkpoints, simply because I was born in Jaffna, fearing I would be kidnapped or killed by extra-legal gangs, operating with apparent clandestine approval from authorities.

      Should I expect the same treatment from my "friends"?

      Should I likewise assume that every "white man" is a potential KKK, or BNP member?

      I have many friends who are Singhalese (the 'other side'), who treat me as a brother.
        • by SenseiLeNoir (699164) on Friday April 13 2007, @07:31AM (#18716825)
          Exactly, especially considering in Sri Lanka, since Independance, Tamils have been racially and xenophobically put down, by a a majority ruling party, who just happen to speak a different language.

          See "Black July" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_July [wikipedia.org] and other awful cases of poor human rights and racist actions by a few in power.

          I have seen the problem at face, as I have recently (November 2006) been to Sri Lanka myself: as a tourist, and stayed in a hotel, in Colombo, for only 3 nights, to see my girlfriend who lives in Colombo (she is half Singhalese, half Tamil, by the way) Whenever my hotel car was stopped at numerous checkpoints, and they saw on my BRITISH passport, that I was born in Jaffna, I was given "special treatment". I usually responded with a query of the officers Badge Number, as well as reasons for the delay in letting me through, which usually for me, made them back off.

          But others are not so lucky.

          A friend of mine, was recently spotted as a Tamil at the immigration in Colombo airport, and was kidnapped en route to the capital, and was help, until he paid a ransom of £2000. The kidnapping was done by gangs, supporting the current administration, with the help of the police, and authorities.

          Unfortunately the current administration in Sri Lanka, has a unwritten, but oft repeated view that all Tamils are LTTE. Amnesty International has been recently doing a large campaign highlighting the general lack of human rights in Sri Lanka http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA3701020 07 [amnesty.org].

          No Tamil Sri Lankan wants to separate from the rest of the country, they just desire to live together in harmony. But when the government does not protect, and then attacks members of their own people, of cause people will support the LTTE in desperation.

          It's a really sad tragic situation, and destroying a very beautiful country.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The satellites that carry a lot of the TV and telephone transmissions are decades old. They simply aren't capable of doing any of this, and it's impractical to attempt to upgrade them. You can put measures like this in newer communications satellites that go up, but those old satellites aren't going anywhere, and so long as they're still running, it's not economical to abandon them.

      It's always been assumed that it would be cost-prohibitive for random malcontents to obtain access to the hardware needed to