Slashdot Log In
Ohio Official Docked Vacation Time For Stolen Tape
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Oct 11, 2007 04:00 AM
from the no-beach-for-you dept.
from the no-beach-for-you dept.
Lucas123 writes "The missing tape, stolen from an intern's car, contained data on all 64,467 state employees, 19,388 former employees and 47,245 Ohio taxpayers. The state believes the incident will cost them $3 million. So after four months of deliberation, the Ohio Department of Administrative Services
announced today that they decided to take a week's vacation away from Jerry Miller, their payroll team leader and the guy in charge of the missing data."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
So his salary must be... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I wouldn't be so sure. It took them four months of deliberation to make that determination. From that, I'm guessing they're using some kind of magic-8-ball-fueled-fractal-algorithm to come up with these figures, which means you very well could end up earning a salary in turkish lire, if you're not careful.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?amt=3000000&from=TRY&to=USD&submit=Convert [yahoo.com]
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Turkish Millionaire (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So his salary must be... (Score:5, Funny)
Or worse, US Dollars...
Parent
Isn't.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Isn't.. (Score:5, Informative)
Yes they are
Even though the company is liable for any negligence, they have the option of internal sanctions against any negligent employee.
That's why he only got docked 1 weeks holiday, not the entire $3M
Parent
The guy's damn lucky. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The guy's damn lucky. (Score:5, Insightful)
Allow personal information on tens of thousands of people to get out due to massive incompetence, costing the state millions and potentially ruining the credit of everyone whose info was on the tape, lose a weeks' vacation.
Share music online at no cost of any sort to the copyright holders, and then get railroaded through an ignorant and corrupt legal system, and get fined several times your yearly salary.
Is Canada hiring?
Parent
Is that all they are going to do? (Score:5, Insightful)
If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd be facing a discharge...
Re:Is that all they are going to do? (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds like the guy's a long timer who was doing his job and now has to carry the can to protect his pension.
From the article: "The tape was pilfered in June from the car of an intern responsible for carrying data used by the Ohio state government's computer systems...described Miller as a "stellar longtime DAS employee" and said he has been forthright in acknowledging his role in the "management glitch" pertaining to the stolen backup tape."
This wasn't some guy who took a company laptop home to play games, it was his responsibility and no extra security was provided for him to do his job. Would you like everyone else robbed at work to forfeit leave or be sacked? The "management glitch" is probably that his bosses wouldn't stump up for secure transport of the tapes.
Parent
Re:Is that all they are going to do? (Score:5, Interesting)
So, in 1998 with backs up against the wall and through some heroic effort on the part of Bob Cruse's staff, the cobol system was given enough resources including myself to remediate the system.
You would think that in 2000 they would have pulled the plug; nope, and that's a reason I left. Instead it was 2001 or 2002 that they finally called HRMS suck cost. Jerry had fewer options being a state life'r; to get his pension he needed to stay for 30 yrs.
Immediately following the disolution of HRMS, they took the same architects involved in HRMS and tossed in additional incompitent pointy hairs and created the OAKS project.
My former boss was added to the group and one of his backup strategies was to take our network backs home on tape. Sound familiar? We secretly revolted and instead sent them to another state office.
That is what I know about Jerry and now I'm going to guess and say this went above Jerry and he's taking the fall.
Parent
Re:Is that all they are going to do? (Score:4, Interesting)
--> (Was a State employee for 10 years; knew 2 people who were fired in that time.)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But hey, that guy just lost data, not something important. Considering the way our other officials hand out our data like candy, that blunder is just a nuisance because, well, the general population got to know about it. So they had to do something about it.
Think Sony and rootkit.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, that's probably the usual case.
But you're thinking in terms of an employee. Imagine you're a manager (I mean Jerry Miller's boss, not Jerry Miller the manager of the intern). One of your people just did something horribly destructive. Something has to be done, but think: what is there to gain by firing him? Miller has already soiled his pants and he's probably not going to make the same mistake again.
The question you face is, was
I bet those judging him (Score:5, Insightful)
Wrong punishment (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Wrong punishment (Score:5, Funny)
It's okay. He's from the government.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This is a joke, and a big problem in our society. Incompetence is rarely punished, something that you see all the time in the political world.
Re:Wrong punishment (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Wrong punishment (Score:5, Insightful)
I could REALLY see how if I, say, stopped at a gas station on the way between the two to get gas and a galon of milk as I do sometimes on my way home. I leave the truck locked even when walking into the quick-e-mart for a minute to get the milk and pay for the gas, but even with that it's possible someone could break into my truck and steal anything that was convenient for a "smash and grab". There's nothing else in my truck that's not nailed down that would make an attractive item to quick grab, so those tapes would probably get snatched for lack of anything else to show for the theft.
I would not want major sanctions for being a victim of that theft, and arguably there's not much more you could have expected of me.
Do not hold the peon responsible for the company's unwillingness to provide appropriate security and to place a potentially very big onus on one lone employee, in the interest of saving a few bucks. VERY few businesses are willing to provide adequate protection under such circumstances. Mostly only those that are required to do so by law or agreement. (banks, companies handling credit card numbers, etc)
Now in such a situation, had I not even bothred to lock the truck, that doesn't make the theft any more legal, and unless there were some company policies in place saying "employees transporting backup tapes must leave their vehicle secured whenever unattended" (which until this happens once, you can bet the policy does not exist) then even in that case the employee should bear no additional responsibility,
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
If he screws up this badly, more work (and more opportunities to screw up) is the last thing you wanna give him IMHO...
Let's torture him next! (Score:3, Insightful)
From personal experience, trying to do more work and cut off your vacation is the most sure-fire way to bring your work quality and productivity down.
Are they trying to set him up to lose another tape?
Gee. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them.
Probably not very much.
If you've any experience with bureaucracy, when they say stuff like "4 months" they really mean "we took 4 months to schedule the 1~3 meetings required to reach a decision."
All that work just for some petty punishment.
Like I said, they probably didn't do much work. For all you know, they took 4 months just to let the original issue fade so that their 'punishment' wouldn't get pulled into the national news.
I'd look at the "petty punishment" as something they felt compelled to do, because to do otherwise would be to admit outrig
$3 million? (Score:4, Interesting)
We're talking about personal information for 131,100 people here. ID theft being all the rage these days, and assuming that all these people are screwed, $3,000,000 comes out to just over $22 a person.
I doubt that every last person getting targetted will be the case... And I have no idea what the average ID theft victim ends up losing (I imagine that's hard to quantify - with direct losses, the time and money spent repairing the damage, and the impact on your credit history). Even so, I think a lowball estimate would be 25% of these people getting cheated out of an average of $3,000 or so. That right there is a little over $98 million.
Now then, I'm the first to admit that I could very well be grossly overestimating things... But really, come on now - a weeks vacation for what could potentially cost the state and it's citizens over a hundred million dollars? Hell, if I could get away with that kind of misconduct with penalties like that, I might just "steal" that tape from myself.
A week? (Score:2)
Re:A week? (Score:5, Interesting)
How frequently do your vacations include flying across an ocean? If your trip is any shorter, it isn't at all equivalent to leaving the US.
The real reason many people never leave the USA is because it's simply a huge place, spanning a large continent. Also, everything most people could want to see in their lifetime can be found inside the US. Here in the west, in a day I can drive from my house, to the tallest mountain in the contiguous US (4421m, Mt Whitney), past the oldest living organism (Methuselah tree) on earth, through a forest with the tallest trees on earth (Sequoia), to the lowest point on the content, right through the area with the highest recorded temperature on the planet, then, for good measure, round off the day by visiting The Grand Canyon.
Parent
Re:A week? (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And where did Spring Break and wet t-shirt contests come i
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Encryption, encryption, encryption... (Score:2)
Some quick considerations... (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, it's evident it wasn't 100% on him. The data was stolen from an intern's car. He bears the indirect culpability of not encrypting it, not backing it, trusting the intern, whatever. It's natural to feel that "heads should roll" but why should the onus of all this fall necessarily on him? (Well, maybe it all should--I'm just going off the blurb in the summary.)
On the other side of it, a week's vacation time is ridiculous, whether or not he's at fault. If he is, well, there should be a real punishment. If he's not, it's fairly idiotic to slap him around just for the show of doing so.
And how much did the four-month long investigation cost? If it was more than a week of this guy's vacation time... yeah, well, that was another win for the taxpayers, wasn't it?
The way it should have worked is that there should have been a clearly defined set of rules, a clearly defined set of responsibilities, and a clearly defined set of repercussions. When employee X neglected responsibility Y, he should have already been aware that Z would be the punishment, and Z should have been what happened immediately afterward. You might need a four month investigation to find the harddrive thief, but you shouldn't need more than a week to handle violations of internal policies.
Smells bad (Score:3, Insightful)
On the other hand, maybe the organization subscribes to the principle of giving people a second chance.
Mistake (Score:5, Insightful)
What's all this crap about his punishment should match the cost of the mistake rubbish?
If a doctor makes a mistake and a patient dies, do we kill the doctor?
After 4 hours of deliberation... (Score:3, Funny)
On a more serious note.... what happened to the intern?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
What are you going to do next... (Score:5, Funny)
Miller: "I am apparently NOT going to Disney World."
I'm Impressed (Score:3, Insightful)
You are an outlier (Score:3, Insightful)
The real issue is that the perception the public has isn't drawn from the class of "all government workers.". The public's perception is based on things like the California DMV offices, where dozens of citizens stan
Re:What's that in private sector terms? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
But (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re:But (Score:4, Insightful)
peons does nothing good for the company. The problem still
exists. And the health of the company took a dip, potentially,
as the workers fired might have been competent, the incompetent
is still there, and the remaining workers will see this, and
they usually are not fooled, and will be demoralized, lowering
their productivity temporarily, and the best of the people there
will be more likely to move to another company.
Has nothing to do with hating managers "on principal". Has nothing
to do with fair.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That will teach him next time.
Re: (Score:2)
They took the vacation time from the team leader of the person who lost the data. He may well be the person who writes the procedures. I know that I do in my team, and I have a mix of interns and experienced staff. Jobs with a heavy security implication I will give to the more experienced workers.
Re:The guy's Union Boss says... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent