Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Canada Moves to Keep Skilled Workers

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Sat Nov 26, 2005 07:22 PM
from the she-followed-me-home-can-I-keep-her dept.
ashitaka writes "Just in time for all those who have vowed to leave the United States in response to government policies and mainstream cultural malaise, the Canadian government is announcing a C$700 million initiative to help skilled workers stay in Canada and become citizens. If you had the choice, would you really uproot to a new country especially one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Lifestyle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by the eric conspiracy (20178) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:24PM (#14120921)
    If you had the choice, would you really uproot to a new country especially one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?

    It seems to me that a lifestyle that includes warm weather would be reason enough.

    • Warm weather (Score:5, Informative)

      by phorm (591458) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:51PM (#14121066) Homepage Journal
      Pick a season then. In the summer it's about 25-30c (77-86f), in the winter I've been as low as -40c/f, but generally we're in the -10 to -20 (14 to -4) range or milder. Right now it's about 4c (39.2f)
    • Re:Lifestyle (Score:5, Interesting)

      by ryanjensen (741218) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:57PM (#14121097) Homepage Journal
      Some parts of Ontario are on the same latitude as northern California ... in fact they have several wineries in that area.
    • by AndroidCat (229562) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:02PM (#14121131) Homepage
      one where the lifestyle isn't that much different than your own?

      Except for that part where we peel our faces off and reveal ourselves to our god. Wait, forget I said that. Everything is fine.

      • Re:Canada vs. USA (Score:5, Insightful)

        by killjoe (766577) on Saturday November 26 2005, @09:30PM (#14121544)
        Also if you are gay or a muslim you are much more likely to be accepted in Canada then the US.
        • by renehollan (138013) <.rhollan. .at. .clearwire.net.> on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:54PM (#14121389) Homepage Journal
          I'll have to followup later, but, having been born in Canada, and lived in Texas, I can assure you that it is much cheaper in Texas, tax-wise. Property is dirt cheap, though property taxes and insurance can be high (the property taxes generally pay for great schools, at least they did in Allen). There is not state income tax.

          At just about any income level, a family with a single income, filing jointly, and owning their home will be much better off just about anywhere in the U.S. compared to Canada: there is no deduction for morgtage interest for non-investment property in Canada, and couples with a single income can't file jointly (and the spousal credit is mediocre, about CA$7-8k at the *lowest* marginal tax rate taken off your gross tax burden).

          I once figured out that for marrieds, taxes in the U.S., in a no-income tax state, are generally lower once income goes above $US15k.

          It's the main reason we left Canada for the U.S. -- we could not afford to live in Canada anymore with the high taxes, and mediocre health care (free, perhaps, but non-existent for the most part).

          • by Jetson (176002) on Sunday November 27 2005, @03:24AM (#14122842) Homepage
            there is no deduction for morgtage interest for non-investment property in Canada

            There's also no taxes owing for capital gains when you sell that non-investment property. My house in Vancouver, BC has gone up in value by more than $125,000 in the last 3 years. Given a choice between a 17% deduction on the interest portion of my mortgage versus $125,000 in tax-free cash I think I'll take the latter....

                • by the eric conspiracy (20178) on Sunday November 27 2005, @10:32AM (#14123798)
                  Except this is unlikely to be the case in the situation the parent described.

                  Nope. 80% of Americans get their health insurance paid for by their employers. It is in fact very likely.

                  Most people employed in the only area of job expansion in the US - the burger flipping.

                  Nope. Here are the fastest growing ocupations in the US over the past 10 years:

                  Health aides 138%
                  Human service workers 136%
                  Personal and home care aids 130%
                  Computer engineers and scientists 112%
                  Systems analysts 110%
                  Physical and corrective therapy assistants and aides 93%
                  Physical therapists 88%
                  Paralegals 86%
                  Teachers, special education 74%
                  Medical assistants 71%

                  In general the top categories are in health care. It seems to me that a nation with the terrible health care problems you claim would not be adding health care workers at that rate.

                  Wal-Mart and other "service" industries do not have any such benefits

                  Wal-Mart does in fact offer health covereage to it's workers. The problem here is that their pay rate is so low that about half of them decline coverage.

                  Such benefits are today restricted mostly to the CEO class.

                  Utter nonsense. My insurance coverage, which I pay $25 a month for includes 100% hospital coverage, free prescriptions and $5 a visit copay to the doctor. Two years ago I needed an MRI for an ankle injury and was able to get an appointment in 3 days. Out of pocket cost was $0. I am definitely NOT a CEO class person.

                  An economist my ass.

                  A Nobel Prize winning economicist, actually.

                  It seems to me that you are living in some sort of weird fantasy world not connected in any way to what the reality is.

              • by IgnoramusMaximus (692000) on Sunday November 27 2005, @04:59PM (#14125385)
                n my case, the cost of our health coverage is more like $1200 a month, but my employer covers all of it,

                There are not many people like you there statistically. You are an elite exception. Also a huge, $1200 a month, tax on an employer is supposedly somehow better then personal taxation how again?

                and it's for far better care than I can get in Canada -

                And that would be how precisely? Blow jobs by nurses? 1400 square feet bed-rooms with French maids? What?

                much of what it covers is not covered by provincial health care programs.

                Ouija boards or Chinese Astrological Brick To The Head Therapy I presume?

                Even then, it's still cheaper

                $1200 a month is cheaper? Does it cover whatever that thing is you are smoking right now too?

            • Re:Canada vs. USA (Score:4, Insightful)

              by Catbeller (118204) on Saturday November 26 2005, @11:37PM (#14122151) Homepage
              They've (the wealthy, like the Waltons ) been spending their no-tax windfall by buying other companies, and buying back their own company's stock to privatize their corporations. What they aren't doing with the money is spending it on new jobs, which is what the putative purpose of the cuts are for; no less authority than the American Enterprise Institute states that, to their surprise, the newly released wealth is not returning to the economy at large, but is "going into the matresses".

              When the economy tanks in the next year or so, all that hoarded wealth will be released to purchase stock and real estate at greatly deflated prices. They'll make a bundle on our economic disaster, eventually, when the US climbs out of its debt hole (by raising taxes and cutting public spending) and the value of the holdings they will purchase at fire-sale prices go back up.

              Supply side economics, as Reagan's budget director David Stockman admitted, is a con to lower taxes on the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. He should know, as he was Reagan's salesman to congress.

              Supply side cuts have failed. Jobs are gone, poverty is up, aid to the poor is going, we're trillions in the hole in debt to China, the wealthy are insanely wealthy and poised to become mega-wealthy after the crash caused by the tax cuts and borrowing. Bush believes in his supply side cuts. But, as we've seen, his beliefs are gut-based, not fact-based, and his gut is unbelieveably incorrect about reality. He simply didn't believe in his own college education, and certainly had his own ideas about economics, his Harvard professor says. Faith-based economics, welfare is communism, government is evil, all that.

              Economic booms are based on the price of oil, not tax cuts. Reagan cut taxes and increased spending, sending us into a spiral that mirrors today's death swirl, but he was saved by one thing: OPEC's pricing discipline collapsed in the early Eighties. So much wealth, which had been hemorraging to the middle eastern princes since 1973, suddenly flooded into the American economy. We sang with power and money and grew, even as the debt ballooned. Reagan was a lucky bugger: his supply side con would have ruined him had OPEC not collapsed.

              Bush the senior had to raise taxes to stop the disaster that supply side created. He paid for it by losing a chance at a second term.

              Bush the junior came into office believing, as all the other conservatives did, in the Reagan Miracle. He was wrong: the miracle was the OPEC collapse that saved the old fool from the folly of believing the pack of thieves that sold him on the supply-side con.

              So, Bush slammed straight into OPEC and the oil companies ascendant, believing that tax cuts were the solution to all, that government was the problem, and that debt would eventually force the death of the New Deal programs the wealthy hated so. It's five years later, and the International Monetary Fund is telling us we can crash hard or crash soft -- but we will crash, when the Chinese and all the others lending us money cut us off. They will dictates terms to US. And Bush will probably react by screaming at his aides and locking himself away from the public, which is pretty much his reponse to every challenge.

              After the crash, the very people who keep selling the supply side con will be flush with offshore cash. They will swoop in and buy cheap, while taxes for the lesser mortals go up 20% to try to stop the bleeding. And oh yep -- they will be the ones who'll be lending us money to shore up the tax base, so they'll make a trillion bucks in interest alone in the next couple of decades -- paid for by tax payers.

              Yup, the money is in the mattress - for now.
  • by MLopat (848735) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:26PM (#14120938) Homepage
    Having done alot of travel to the US, both for business and pleasure, let me assure you Canada's lifestyle is far different. We live in a much more secure, comfortable and friendly environment than most places in the United States. We have very little crime (Toronto, our largest city, has about 70 murders a year), we have the best health care system in the world, we have tonnes of green land, and are well respected by most of the World.
    • by the eric conspiracy (20178) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:28PM (#14120944)
      we have tonnes of green land

      Every time I've been to Canada the land has been white.

    • by DanteLysin (829006) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:33PM (#14120968)
      The US is a large country. The "lifestyle of the US" does differ from region to region. To travel to "most places in the US" and get a good appreciation of each would take years. I'm sure Canada is similar.

      I moved from 1 state to another and life is very different for me. Turns out I like where I live now, I don't ever want to move back. And if I travel to different parts of my state, life is quite different.

    • by Stone316 (629009) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:34PM (#14120972) Journal
      and I don't mean catching a cold or pulling a muscle in your back and having to take a trip to the family doctor. I mean 'sick' and require the attention of specialists.... You can get your dog in for an MRI same day but you'll be waiting months for yours. I believe the average wait for a specialist is about 3 months now... I know I had to wait 6 months (at least, can't remember) to see a specialist last year.

      Well respected? Maybe but I keep sensing that other countries find us about as annoying as a nat flying around your head.

      Saying that, I love this country and would never move.

      • by wizwormathome (760340) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:54PM (#14121083) Journal
        You can get your dog in for an MRI same day but you'll be waiting months for yours.

        For those who are curious, the above is not an exaggeration [onthefencefilms.com], as shown by this film.

        As partially summarized by a Canadian blogger [blogs.com], "When you have finished watching this film several images will remain with you for some time to come. A woman who spent two years waiting for knee surgery and innocently asks the American filmmakers whether the waiting lists are as long there as they are here. The moment when she begins to grasp that a health care waiting list is a concept alien to most sick Americans, though sadly not health care compelled bankruptcy, is something that cannot be explained. More stories follow of addiction to pain killers brought on by wait times, of the suffering families go through, of men and women calmly contemplating death for ailments which medical science long ago conquered, but which government control has placed out of reach."

        • by jd (1658) <[moc.oohay] [ta] [kapimi]> on Saturday November 26 2005, @09:35PM (#14121565) Homepage Journal
          It is true that nationalized healthcare systems, such as the NHS of Britain, and the Canadian system, are slow. That could be fixed by adding more doctors. It's a solvable problem. In the US, insurance costs are through the roof (you could probably rival Bill Gates on wealth just by not getting sick), medicare is rife with fraud by hospitals and not all insurance is even accepted at all hospitals, so you can get turfed out even in life-or-death situations.


          (Actually, in America, you might get turfed out in critical situations anyway. Many hospitals don't have an emergency room, as they cost more than they make and US hospitals are there for profit not care. Those ER rooms that do exist are hopelessly overcrowded, overworked and are considered by the CDC to be extremely high risk areas in the event of an outbreak of a contageous disease. If bird flu ever goes critical, it will likely do so in a US emergency room.)


          The American situation, unlike the British and Canadian counterparts, is not fixable. Because hospitals in the US are profit ventures, not health-care centers, they have no interest in doing anything that will cost more than it will earn. Proper emergency care is expensive and earns little, as most accident and crime victims are uninsured and/or flat broke. They have no interest in lowering prices, because the bulk of "paying" customers have health insurance and so never see the real price tag and therefore have no reason to care what it is.


          Insurance companies in the US are also money-grubbers and they know how to rake the money in. By charging the companies a "reduced rate" for bulk purchases, they can absolutely guarantee that customers never see the real cost to their paychecks. The victim - errr, employee - only sees a given deduction for their deduction. What they don't see is what the company is really paying and therefore what the company is really calculating payscales on. In the end, you pay the full cost but you only see a fraction of it on the pay stub.


          By these accounting tricks and other fraud, the US employees are bilked billions of dollars and somehow consider themselves better off because they don't have the wait. Trust me, if you threw billions of dollars out the window in England, you'd get prompt healthcare too. Well, just as soon as anyone realized that was real money and not something from a Monopoly game.


          (For that matter, there's always BUPA, if you insist on the insurance thing in more civilized lands.)

      • by Valar (167606) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:05PM (#14121143)
        It takes time to see specialists here in America too. Three months would be rare, but it happens. A lot of it just has to do with the supply and demand for people with specialized medical knowledge. Canada is a little bit worse off because lower wages for doctors->lower # of people willing to be doctors.
  • ho (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mr_tommy (619972) * <tom@neowinOPENBSD.net minus bsd> on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:27PM (#14120940) Journal
    Psst... I think the similarity is part of the atraction....
  • Oh, Canada! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Hiro Antagonist (310179) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:30PM (#14120952) Journal
    Given that I travel up to B.C. about twice a year, and that I'm going to be looking for employment up north after I graduate (two years down the road), I say 'Hell, yes!'

    No worries about healthcare, low crime, fantastic local beers, hockey in the winter, Tim Hortons...er, what am I not supposed to like, again?
      • Re:Oh, Canada! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Hiro Antagonist (310179) on Saturday November 26 2005, @09:47PM (#14121644) Journal
        You know, I keep hearing about this, but none of my Canadian friends have ever mentioned it; I mean, I'm not saying it doesn't ever happen, but I don't think it's the big problem that a bunch of Americans make it out to be. Hell, last time my friend Sarah got sick with a nasty cold (!), the local hospital offered to send out an AMBULANCE to pick her up.

        On the flip side, if you're a student in the US, you can shell out $100 a month for CRAP healthcare -- as in, if the Student Heath Center is open and you don't go there first, you can pay your own bills, and unless it's an emergency (life-threatening), you had better not even think of going to see a doctor, because the student insurance won't cover it. Oh, and it won't cover anything out-of-network, so I owe my dentist $150 because the student insurance I forked out about won't cover cleanings with my regular dentist.

        At least I have healthcare; half of the people I go to school with don't, because $100 a month is more than they can afford.

        Now that I'm working 'full time' again, things are better (back to real healthcare), but having experienced 'cheap healthcare' for a year, I'd rather see us Americans with a better system.

        I hate to say it, but I think the Japanese have something going with the way they run things -- even without being on the 'National Insurance', I was able to go to a Japanese clinic and have my cough diagnosed as a really nasty case of pneumonia -- and was out the door after a total of an hour, with a small bag filled with about five different kinds of medication, and all for about $200 (IIRC). I shudder to think of what two sets of chest X-rays and about two weeks of meds would have cost in the U.S. without insurance.
  • Empty promise (Score:5, Informative)

    by uncleO (769165) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:31PM (#14120956)

    For those unaware of Canadian politics, the government faces a non-confidence vote Monday or Tuesday. It is expected to fall and call a December election.

    For campaign reasons, the government has announced a flurry of new spending over the last week, most of which is expected to never materialise, whether the governing party wins again or not.

    • Very true, mod parent up. This is right up there with the cancellation of the gun registry and GST...

      Of course where is the gun registry office? [hint: How do you keep unemployable easterners happy...]

      That said, I'd rather live in Canada than the USA. Mostly because it's so cold the terrorists are few and far between. Who the fuck would bomb an office in -20C weather? :-)

      Tom
  • Nice (Score:5, Interesting)

    by smartin (942) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:34PM (#14120978)
    As a Canadian living and working in the States, I wish the Canadian government would have done more to keep skilled citizens rather than attracting skilled immigrants. Unfortunately it is really just too easy to max out in the Canadian market place and the only option is to move south.
    • Re:Nice (Score:4, Interesting)

      by PygmySurfer (442860) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:29PM (#14121263)
      That was my thoughts exactly upon reading the article. Why is it I had to come work in the US, rather than finding a job in my own country? I make more than twice as much in US dollars than I was making in Canadian dollars. Where's the incentive to stay?
  • Quick question.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Neuracnu Coyote (11764) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:36PM (#14120991) Homepage Journal
    If American citizens are frustrated and annoyed with their government's behavior, can someone please explain how expatriating will do anything but make the problem worse?

    If they have any interest in achieving their goal, shouldn't they be sending a loud message to the rest of the world, inviting like-minded individuals to come live there instead? Or perhaps convince their neighbors to read a newspaper?

    Oh, wait. That would involve effort. Never mind - I forgot who I was talking about.
    • The Real Question (Score:5, Insightful)

      by CyberLife (63954) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:54PM (#14121084)
      What's your feeling about people immigrating TO the United States? If one applies your position equally to all countries of the world, nobody should ever leave their native land. Are you advocating that? This country is largely populated by immigrants and those descended from immigrants. I don't know the details of your family background, but chances are they were immigrants at some point. Should they have stayed in their home country? Should you have instead been born and grown up there instead of here?
    • by miyako (632510) <miyako@[ ]il.com ['gma' in gap]> on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:51PM (#14121376) Homepage Journal
      I've long been considering moving out of the US for Canada or someplace in Europe. My thinking on the issue has generally been that a group of people has the right to generally run themselves the way they want. If I don't like it then, instead of trying to change things more to my liking (and to the chagrin of many others), I may be better served by moving to a location that is more inline with my own views.
      In my case, I would like to move to an area that is much more socially liberal than the US, and has more social services. Personally, I don't mind paying more in taxes if the government is going to use those taxes to help the people of the country.
      Basically, you say, "if you don't like X, why not try to change it, and invite other people to come and help", whereas I say "If most people in the area like X, but I don't, would I not be better served by going to a place where people share my ideas instead inviting fruther fragmentation into the area I am at, and trying to strong arm my own views onto others?"
    • by killjoe (766577) on Saturday November 26 2005, @09:41PM (#14121601)
      It's more about not staying where you are not wanted. Bush sr said that atheists are not real americans and should be allowed to vote for example. The exact quote was " I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."

      This is the president of the USA telling atheist citizens that they don't belong in the country. Other members of this administration have made similar remarks about atheists, collage professors, environmentalists, femminists, homosexuals and other people they hate.

      Why stay in a country that you are not wanted in? Why not move to a place where people don't hate you?
  • It's a cop-out (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sam_handelman (519767) <{skh2003} {at} {columbia.edu}> on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:37PM (#14120999) Homepage Journal
    As an American I am in a better position to fix the problems than anyone. If I move to Canada (and even if I become a Canadian subject, or whatever) I have given up on influencing the course of events because I don't want to deal with some sort of guilt over my failure to do so recently?

    We don't know how much worse things might have been, either. We say, and it's true, that the domestic opposition didn't prevent the administration from invading Iraq. Well, that was a failure. There is literally no way of knowing what else they might have done if given free reign - Miers on the SCOTUS is only the start of it.

    In case you haven't been paying attention - the two last US elections have been very close, and their outcomes (especially in 2000) have had a tremendous impact on the rest of human history. In spite of those election results, public opinion here in the US still plays a big role in determining what the administration can and cannot get away with. If you're really concerned with human civilization, and not with melodrama, you move to a purple state, not to Canada.
      • Re:It's a cop-out (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Sj0 (472011) on Saturday November 26 2005, @11:03PM (#14122023) Homepage Journal
        The current negative savings rates in the US, propped up by incredible debt levels made worse by low interest rates and the housing bubble (allowing people who can't really afford it to have millions in cheap debt), could possibly spell the beginning of an economic holocaust the likes of which the US has never seen.

        Large scale societal dynamics are the things which shape history, not so much the politics of the day. Politics in a vacuum looks very impressive, but you look closer, and you'll often find that it is a mirror which reflects what's actually happening in the world.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:40PM (#14121016)
    Just as I am researching what it takes to immigrate to Canada, job opportunities, quality of life, housing prices, etc.

    I come from Europe and, no offense to our American friends, find Canada a much more appealing choice than the USA - exactly because I perceive Canada and Canadian mentality to be much closer to a European mindset.

    I admit this may just be a whim, but coming from a country where everybody under 40 years of age is suffering from financial rape from the older generation, Canada sure does look appealing.

  • by nxtr (813179) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:41PM (#14121024)
    >>Canada Moves to Keep Skilled Workers

    No one can move an entire country, not even Superman!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:46PM (#14121040)
    I've already uprooted and left the US for another country.
    Japan in this case.
    I just couldn't get past America re-electing the failed
    ideologues in the White House. Pity the people have seen the err of
    their ways all too late. (ref: Bush's declining approval rating)

    Barring stumbling into marriage over here, I can't see myself
    staying forever though. A place like Canada is *extremely* attractive
    to me on a number of levels - it's similarity to America being just one.

    Having spent a bit of time in Toronto and Vancouver, they're both places
    I can easily see myself living in. They're not New York or Tokyo, mind
    you... but they do seem to be everything America believes itself to be -
    with Jesus wonderfully absent.

    The only problem I can see being an issue is that I don't particularly
    care for hockey... Is that a deal-breaker on naturalization?
  • by Jorkapp (684095) <jorkapp@@@hotmail...com> on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:50PM (#14121056) Homepage
    I can see this initiative as targeting the citizenry of the United States. It makes perfect sense to target them, and here's why:

    US citizens already speak english, work with dollars and cents, drive cars on the right, etc. At the core, they're basically the same (less some cultural differences) as Canadians. Less government money spent on teaching them english or how to drive.

    Right now the Canadian dollar is at $0.85USD. The minimum wage in Ontario is at $7.45CDN/hour for an adult (slightly less for people who serve food/beverages and are subject to gratuities), which is more than $6.25USD/hour. Bear in mind too, that minimum wage is typically only paid to entry level jobs, and most other jobs pay more. I've heard horror stories of US Wal-Mart workers making maybe $5/hour - come up here and get a pay raise!

    Come on up boys, We've got plenty of room!
  • by nblender (741424) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:24PM (#14121231)
    I'm a Canadian. You Merkans would hate it here. This place sucks. Don't come here. We regularly eat children and stab puppies for sport. It's cold and everyone has a dog-sled. This is a horrible purgatory. I beg of you, please don't come here.
  • by tv war (727119) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:41PM (#14121321)
    America is just as socialist as Canada or any European country.

    Only difference is that most of the American style "socialism" is more towards the military and defense sector (ie. Halliburton, Bechtel, etc ...). In Canada and most European countries, the socialism is more towards things like a health care system, welfare state, etc ...

    America has all kinds of socialistic institutions like:

    The Federal Reserve Bank,
    Fannie Mae,
    Freddie Mac,
    Social Security,
    The US Postal Service,
    Pension Benefit Guarnaty Corporation,
    Medicare,
    Medicaid,
    Amtrak,
    etc ...
  • Ya don't say! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bitspotter (455598) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:54PM (#14121386) Journal

    I left Arizona for Vancouver BC in Jan 2003. I've been telecommuting with the little web services outfit (still in AZ) ever since. I married a local last June, and she's sponsoring me for Perm Residency soon.

    It was a great relief. My first coherent thought after 9/11 was "This is how tyrants are made". I seem to have been right.

    I have absolutely no regrets. Answer your question?
  • by StandardCell (589682) on Saturday November 26 2005, @10:07PM (#14121741)
    As a Canadian who has worked for years both in Canada and the United States, and having taken the plunge 18 months ago to come back to Canada to work, I can say that it has been an unpleasant experience.

    Healthcare up here is abysmal. Trying to find a family doctor is nearly impossible, and there are long wait times for elective procedures and medical imaging. One of our family friends died of a heart attack after waiting nearly a year for bypass surgery. I'm paying more for health care up here than I ever did in the US due to my premiums.

    Education is a joke up here too. Ontario, for example, passes ALL children unless they basically hand in nothing or choose to do nothing throughout the year. My neighbor's son got straight "R" grades ("F" is no longer politically correct), yet somehow passed to Grade 5 last year. That'll keep happening until he graduates high school, even though this kid still can't read a basic "See Jane Run" type book.

    Daily life is ok, but there are some things you have to be aware of. Although the overall murder rate is lower in Canada, per-capita rates of rape and property crime are all higher than in the United States. I feel less safe here than I did in the San Francisco Bay area and much less safe than in the Lehigh Valley of Pennsylvania. Try rolling through Toronto and see what it's like these days. Forget about the unbelievably bitter cold, excessive snow if you live in Eastern Canada, and generally longer winters. Weather counts for a lot.

    Then there's the financial aspect of it. Sure, people don't get bankrupted here, but if you're not chronically or seriously ill you are better off in the US. I've paid more for health care here since my employer doesn't cover my premiums (yes, we pay premiums, $60/month/person). Auto insurance is 50% more expensive than what I paid for in California, plus I can't remove tickets from my record with traffic school. House prices are insane; I can't buy a fully-detached house with two car garage for under $400k, and I can't deduct my mortgage interest or property taxes from my federal taxes. I get paid less in equivalent dollars than any job in the US, and all of my Canadian friends who have worked both places want to go back south unless they have significant family obligations north of the 49th. I pay more in taxes, especially at the till (15% sales tax on a car is insane!). The government's overly-liberal immigration policies make unemployment consistently 2% higher at a minimum than in the United States so I'm always looking over my shoulder thinking when my time might be next.

    Finally, there's the government. Lots of /.ers think that Canada is some magical place of freedom. It's not. Freedom of speech is curtailed as we have laws against "hate speech" that the US would consider violations of the First Amendment. Freedom of the press is a joke, since several times reporters were spied on, wiretapped or just simply had their personal files confiscated without a warrant by corrupt police who feel that due process is an inconvenience. Our Senate isn't elected nor provides regional representation, but is an expensive rubber stamp with no real power. Heck, we didn't even have our full independence from the United Kingdom until April 19, 1982! We have sexist and racist government departments that purposely exclude white males from positions supposedly in the name of diversity. There are 36,000 deportation orders on illegal immigrants that can't be executed because the government doesn't know where they are. They let the families of Somali warlords and Sikh terrorists stay in this country. And, in general, the majority of people here have been lulled into utter stupidity by the clever social engineering of Pierre Trudeau's liberal party over the last 35 years that has their party about to be voted back into power that has stolen billions of dollars from taxpayers (Adscam, HRDC et al). Not to mention that Canada is the only major industrialized nation in the world to
    • Re:Yes. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mordors9 (665662) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:32PM (#14120959)
      If the US is such a hell hole, why does it have to go to such lengths to keep people out?
    • Re:Yes. (Score:5, Informative)

      by EvilMagnus (32878) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:22PM (#14121222)
      Have you looked at Canada's criteria for admitting skilled professionals? It's remarkably egalitarian and open - much better than the US. You basically fill out a checklist based on things like degrees held, languages spoken ... the higher you score, the easier/faster it is to get in. Canada has a form of 'open' visa, where if you qualify (say, if you have a degree and know a bit of French) you can enter Canada to look for work without actually having a job offer.

      Compare that to the US and the H1-B system, where if you're outside the US you must have an offer letter and apply for the visa from outside the country (3-6 month wait for the visa to be granted, if you're lucky) and your degree has to be directly related to the job you've got the offer for.

      So yeah, the basic criteria to be able to go to Canada and look for a job 'on spec' are; hold an Advanced Degree, speak either English or French fluently, and have a passing familiarity with the other.
    • by JohnWiney (656829) on Saturday November 26 2005, @07:53PM (#14121080)
      Better economy?? The Toronto Stock Exchange index is up 20% so far this year - the Dow Jones is down. The past few years have had similar results - and that is without taking into account the changes in the currencies. The Canadian federal government has posted a surplus each of the past seven years. The US government, uh, has not. Canadian unemployment levels are nearing record low levels....
    • by ergo98 (9391) on Saturday November 26 2005, @08:38PM (#14121306) Homepage Journal
      How about giving up the Socialism, eh?
      People leave Canada for a country with a better economy, and the government's solution is to spend more tax money! Brilliant move, eh?

      I presume you're talking about the US - one of the most socialist countries on the planet (or have you opted out of the endless socialist pork projects, massive socialist war machine, and corporate welfare? Is that a checkbox on your income tax return?). Of course it isn't to benefit the poor, so Americans lift their chins up and talk about their great "capitalism" versus the evil "socialism" (of the REST OF THE 1ST WORLD), strangely imagining some moral high road.

      Absolutely amazing that any American, with the enormous pork and tax-grabbing bloat of its government, can bleat the word socialist in any manner other than humor or self-deprecation.

      What's even more remarkable is the fact that the all-in tax load in the US is, in many cases, similar to or greater than a comparable person in Canada. Don't tell Americans this, though - it might upset their imaginary world.