Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Gates 'World's Most-Spammed Man'

Posted by CmdrTaco on Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:44 AM
from the and-you-thought-you-had-it-rought dept.
acehole writes "Bill Gates receives up to four million emails a day, and is probably the most spammed person in the world. But unlike ordinary users, he has an entire department to filter unsolicited " At least now I know why he never replies to my requests for an interview ;)
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by FortKnox (169099) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:45AM (#10854193) Homepage Journal
    Since he DOES have an entire department creating software to filter out spam, why doesn't he RELEASE said filters and help the rest of the world out? Hell, its MS... why not at least sell it and try to make that department profitable??
    • by RazzleFrog (537054) <mike AT thinckaloud DOT com> on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:47AM (#10854232)
      Probably because it is based on something open-source like SpamAssassin.
          • by joto (134244) on Thursday November 18 2004, @04:51PM (#10859087)
            Well, in a manner of speaking the human species is open-source.

            Yeah, in the same manner of speaking that Microsoft Word is open source. Let's face it, raw DNA is not the preferred way to modify the human genome. Neither is a binary executable the preferred way to modify a word-processor.

            It's just that reading the source (i.e. the DNA) is something we haven't quite mastered yet.

            Ok, that's a possibility too. But I can't really see any plausible reason for nature to make it easy for us to decode DNA. It's meant for execution by cells, not for easy comprehension (or modification) by genetic engineers.

            And just like open-source software the human being is constantly being developed upon, albeit so very slowly that we cannot see it for ourselves. But each new baby that's born (the nightlies, hahaha) is a little different than the previous generation. Sometimes this backfires on the whole community *cough*georgewbush*cough* but in general there's improvement.

            Actually, there's no good reason to believe human evolution is for the better. Ever since humans discovered farming, we no longer need to be intelligent enough to outwit our prey, or strong enough to kill it, or fast enough to catch it, or having a good enough immune system to eat rotten food, or being able to care for our children in this environment for umpteen years, etc...

            In fact, in modern society it's even worse. Due to the fact that the state will take care of you and your children even if you can't do it yourself, the only skill you need to create surviving offspring is to have low enough demands to get laid by someone (no matter how stupid, annoying, ugly, etc), and to be stupid enough not to wear condoms.

            Humans have probably "devolved" ever since the neanderthals, and as the society gets "better", the individuals detoriate at an ever increasing rate.

            An interesting side-note (just to be politically correct), is that those who advocate racial purity (e.g. nazis), seems to prefer those who have lived in modern society for the longest period of time. They probably should prefer bushmen instead.

    • by daves (23318) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:48AM (#10854246) Journal
      Since he DOES have an entire department creating software to filter out spam, why doesn't he RELEASE said filters and help the rest of the world out?

      In his case, I suspect the filters are human.
    • by yog (19073) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:55AM (#10854369) Homepage Journal
      Undoubtedly Gates is just like thousands of other executives; he has assistants who read his email for him. An executive of a company as large and powerful as Microsoft hardly would have time to read and respond to the typical 300-500 emails one gets in a day, let alone the thousands or millions he gets from being famous. I feel sorry for the guy, in a way; he used to be a computer geek just like so many others and he's cut off from part of the internet just by virtue of his success.

      It does sound like an excellent opportunity to leverage some of that computer brainpower they have and create some first class spam filtering technology. With a test base of 4 million spams a day they have all the sample data they will ever need.

      • I feel sorry for the guy, in a way; he used to be a computer geek just like so many others and he's cut off from part of the internet just by virtue of his success.

        He'll have any number of different e-mail addresses for different purposes, inluding ones that only friends and family know - I'm sure he's not shut off from a part of the internet just because every idiot puts billg@microsoft.com in forms when they don't want to give their own address.

    • by Singletoned (619322) <singletoned@gmail.com> on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:11AM (#10854585) Homepage
      He should get a GMail account and scrap the department.
      • by frugle (769095) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:57AM (#10854382) Homepage

        Of over 30 billion e-mails being sent daily, some experts estimate that over 40% is Spam.

        Google informs me that 40% of 30 billion = 12 000 000 000

        and (4 000 000 / 12 000 000 000) * 100 = 0.0333333333

        That gives Bill Gates a measly 0.03% Market share of Spam. I think we should help Microsoft grow by forwarding all our unwanted spam to Bill.

  • by MoxCamel (20484) * on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:45AM (#10854195)
    At least now I know why he never replies to my requests for an interview ;)

    Here's a tip:

    When asking for an interview, do not also offer to enlarge his penis. Mox

  • by kb0pin (599482) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:46AM (#10854214) Homepage
    I'm comforted to know that when I use billgates@microsoft.com when signing up for something stupid, or for those sites that require an email for download, he actually gets those emails.
  • by lukateake (619282) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:46AM (#10854218)
    Hmmm, I would have thought more considering all the unpatched Windows boxes out there.
  • by RyanP (8861) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:47AM (#10854229) Homepage
    I wonder if he gets spam about discounted copies of XP?
  • Well.. (Score:3, Funny)

    by Savant-Ben (829204) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:47AM (#10854234)
    I can't say that it breaks my heart.. Maybe Bill should get a gmail account. what is his email anyway, I heard it was billg@microsoft.com..
  • by GillBates0 (664202) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:47AM (#10854238) Homepage Journal
    Bill Gates world's most spammed man
    CNN [cnn.com] and Rediff [rediff.com] are reporting that Bill Gates [mailto] gets 4 million e-mails a day, making him world's most spammed person. However, unlike lesser mortals, he has an entire department dedicated to filter unsolicited e-mails and only a few of them actually get through to his inbox, said Steve Ballmer [mailto] at a Microsoft Research event in Singapore. Other sources are also reporting [google.com] the breaking news story.
    • by Peyna (14792) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:55AM (#10854358) Homepage
      The "entire department" thing sounded quite a bit like an exageration, especially since he said, "Literally, there's a whole department, almost, that takes care of it."

      In other words, "We pay two kids $5/hr to sit in the basement and sift through this crap."

      Or more likely, "We've got a couple network admins that implemented SpamAssassin for us."
  • by digitalgimpus (468277) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:48AM (#10854254) Homepage
    For *once* I have to thank spammers for a job well done.

    Now any chance on taking on SCO?
  • Exchange (Score:5, Funny)

    by peterprior (319967) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:48AM (#10854257)
    Hmm.. 4,000,000 / 86400 (seconds in a day) = ~ 46 emails a second.

    I didn't even know exchange could handle that amount of traffic. And thats just for him..
  • Hotmail (Score:3, Funny)

    by The_Rippa (181699) * on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:49AM (#10854260)
    Well, ever since hotmail upped it's space to 250mb I've been getting the same amount too.
  • Huh... (Score:3, Funny)

    by z1d0v (789072) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:49AM (#10854266)
    Aren't these just angry clients? :P
  • by Washizu (220337) <[ten.tsacmoc] [ta] [yevragneb]> on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:50AM (#10854286) Homepage
    What does he expect when he keeps sending out those email tracking programs?

  • by gmuslera (3436) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:51AM (#10854294) Homepage Journal
    he could try to forward his daily mail to a gmail account to really test spam/virus protection, label classification and how much space is 1gb for that kind of traffic. Even if it works, a good promotion of whatever future service of hotmail is "it performed better than gmail with my mail".
  • Story a weak troll. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Saeed al-Sahaf (665390) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:52AM (#10854312) Homepage
    Nowhere does it say Bill Gates has an entire department to filter his email (though I don't see why he should not, considering he can afford it). It says they have "special technology", and "almost" a whole department (which probably means two or three secretarial types vetting the junk that doesn't get filtered with the "special technology".

    And to all of this, I say "big deal". I would say "nice M$ troll" but it's actually kind of weak.

  • Hate Mail (Score:4, Funny)

    by datadriven (699893) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:53AM (#10854325) Homepage
    They must have hate mail confused with spam.
  • by lottameez (816335) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:54AM (#10854333)
    I know I was wondering just this morning, just after breakfast, how much spam Bill Gates was getting. "Self", I said, "How many unsolicited emails does Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, get, do you think? Two hundred fifty thousand? A million? What DO you think?"

    I had no answer.
    Until now.

    Thank you slashdot.
  • by nuintari (47926) on Thursday November 18 2004, @10:58AM (#10854393) Homepage
    Your job must suck ass if it, in its entirety, involves sorting through another man's porn/real estate/penis enlargment/cum filled panty spam.

    I can see it now, job description:

    Must be able to sort legitimate email from mass unsolicited email. Ability to tolerate apes a plus, as you will be working a team of them. In fact, your department manager is a chimp. Requires opposable thumbs and general image recognition abilities.
  • by underworld (135618) on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:00AM (#10854434)
    ....ought to be about enough for anyone. ;-)
  • Somebody should tell him to install Thunderbird.
  • Unfiltered (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Flamesplash (469287) on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:08AM (#10854557) Homepage Journal
    It's rumoured that if you email billg from inside MS it goes directly to him, the idea being if you're stupid enough to send him a stupid email directly then maybe you should be fired for wasting his time.

    That said, after going to an intern dinner at his house I wrote him afterwards asking a question I was sure no one else care about if I acked it at the dinner, I got a relatively quick if not short response.

    Another intern friend of mine emailed him asking if he wanted to go to lunch sometime and never got a response.

    I've also had some other funny run ins with Bill Gates while interning at MS that I wrote up a while ago in my journal [slashdot.org]
    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:29AM (#10854840)
      I used to work for Oracle. I once sent Larry a rather critical email. I didn;t get sacked or a reply, either, so I don't know if he got it.

      Oracle internal email system used to be so crap that it got confused if people had the same first name and sent them each others email. I shared the same first name with the VP of Consulting for EMEA (I was working in Hamburg at the time). I once received an email from Big Man's secretary to him asking if he wanted to confirm his meeting with some IBM execs. I replied to her saying that she should tell IBM to Bugger Off and to get on the phone to the head of consulting in Hamburg and to give that Phil guy a large pay rise.

      A couple of days later my boss called me into his office and told me "Please don't do that again"
  • by mysticgoat (582871) on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:20AM (#10854700) Journal

    This is so sad.

    I thought I'd send Mr William Gates a brief cheer-up note:

    Dear Bill,
    I just heard that you are the most spammed person in the world and I thought I'd send you a cheering-up note. Since that must really suck.

    I mean I know he's rich and everything, but even rich guys must get the blues sometimes over things like spam. I'm sure he'd appreciate it if a few of us sent him our condolences.

    Does anybody know his address?

  • Back in 1994... (Score:4, Informative)

    by dapyx (665882) on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:21AM (#10854714) Homepage
  • by robnauta (716284) on Thursday November 18 2004, @11:23AM (#10854761)
    See this article [google.com], billg@microsoft.com did exist and in 1993 you could email him and get a reply, but even back then it wasn't Bill Gates.
    • I thought president@whitehouse.gov was just an alias to vice-president@whitehouse.gov :)

      Anyone else having a problem imagining Little Bush actually using a computer?