Slashdot Log In
Nullsoft's Waste: Encrypted, Distributed, Mesh Net
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Thu May 29, 2003 02:32 AM
from the p2p-gets-more-and-more dept.
from the p2p-gets-more-and-more dept.
Myriad writes "Nullsoft, makers of the venerable Winamp MP3 player, released today a secure, distributed mesh-like networking protocal and platform called Waste. This v1.0 beta release uses RSA (key based) and Blowfish encryption for security, and features Instant Messanging and group chat, along with file browsing, searching, and transfer. Waste has been released under the GPL, with source and binaries available here."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Hmmm.... (Score:4, Insightful)
AOL Time Warner (IIRC, owners of the second biggest recording company, not to mention one of the major recording studios) owns Nullsoft, which releases a program that the RIAA and MPAA will undoubtedly call a tool whose sole purpose is to illicitly distribute copyrighted works....
A cliche regarding:
...comes to mind.
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Informative)
uhh, waste is for small workgroups only ..
it's not about p2p file sharing, rather it's a colaborative tool.sure, you could use to to share illegal stuff, but it's really no different in that respect to email, icq, whatever.
Parent
By their calculations (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Insightful)
That was a joke right? And the moderators who marked it "interesting" and "insightful" really meant to mark it "funny", they just hit the wrong button, right?
In fact what we have here is a first cut at a secure distributed network presence system, something that would allow you to run an icq-like network between people you trust without being spied on by a central server. There are many reasons why one would want this: maybe *you* just want to trade copyrighted files, but *I* want to communicate securely and efficiently with my associates.
As for why AOL lets Nullsoft do things like this, I suppose the choice is either to let them work on what they want to or lose the talent. What Nullsoft is doing is the best thing for the net, and so is the best thing for AOL in the end.
Parent
The Right Hand Knows (Score:5, Informative)
Also, this is technology that might be very useful to AOL. AIM's big drawback is that it's not very secure, and really shouldn't be used for sensitive corporate communication. (Though the engineers at my last employer used it anyway.) AOL could persuade people that are already using AIM for free to upgrade to WASTE in order to secure their communications. Not to mention the other features.
We Await Silent Trystero's Empire!
Parent
Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
Going through the documentation, I found this:
From here [nullsoft.com]
Note: It might be worth implementing WASTE using a subset of SSL, to avoid any concern of flaws in this protocol. Feedback is gladly accepted on any potential weaknesses of the negotiation. We have spent a decent amount of time analyzing this, and although we have found a few things that are not ideal (i.e. if you know public keys from a network, you can sniff some traffic and do an offline dictionary attack on the network name/ID), but overall it seems decent. The current implementation probably needs work, too.
Which suggests to me that it isn't worth rushing out and developing application with *just* yet, until further reviews have occured (and the protocol has matured/evolved).
Five minutes later (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Five minutes later (Score:5, Interesting)
Once you've set it up for a firewall, the f/w effectively vanishes inside the VPN. A friend and I struggled with firewall configs for years tweaking for the game of the day. Enter VPN, and now we have a private TCP network without firewalls. Any game supports that, no reconfiguration required.
The other thing is that it is built into w2k (my gaming platform of choice) and XP (friends platform). This means you can be up and running after reading some quick instructions on setting up the server, your shares (properly!), forward one TCP port (yes, only one) from your firewall to desktop, and that's it forever.
Add an uber-IM like Trillian, and that's all you will ever need.
Parent
Interesting, not your usual peer to peer app. (Score:5, Informative)
Designed for small groups of people (up to 50)
It allows easy colloboration across firewalls, and only one user inside the firewall is required to allow all users inside access to the mesh.
Each link is encrypted, but each message is decrypted and re-encrypted at each hop of the mesh, so you have to trust all of the nodes. It's also very hard to drop a node onc it is trusted, as each node shares public keys around to make sure all nodes have all public keys. Initial connection to the mesh requires manual key exchange. PITA, but moderatley secure.
All network traffic is encrypted, it will flood each mesh link with a minimum amount of bandwidth to foil traffic analysis.
Key exchange (Score:5, Interesting)
"Initial connection to the mesh requires manual key exchange. PITA, but moderatley secure."
IIRC, key exchange is where most encryption schemes fall down. If this ever takes off I'd guess 99% of users will trade keys over plain ol unencrypted SMTP.
Nice summary though - this really does look interesting.
Parent
For readers of Pynchon. . . (Score:5, Informative)
Re:For readers of Pynchon. . . (Score:5, Informative)
In the book, W.A.S.T.E is an underground postal system that allowed people to exchange messages without the authorities finding out.
Parent
Re:For readers of Pynchon. . . (Score:5, Interesting)
Now I've never read the book, but I'd say in an underground postal system every person in the system has to be trusted. Much like this protocol -- each node in the network needs to be trusted.
You have to build your own little underground network with a few trusted friends. This reminds me a lot of the pirate BBS days
This system allowed for only quality 'warez' files because everyone who was allowed to trade files had to be trusted, and therefore they weren't going to damage their reputation by sending crap like you get on P2P nowadays like incomplete packages or stuff that said it was one thing, but really was another thing. Back when trading pirated software was more like a gentlemen's agreement and not the 'o-D4Y \/\/4R3Z!!!!' crap pimply-faced teenagers with nothing better to do do today.
On the other hand, one has to think, 'Who needs it?' Most of us who were in that community back then have merged in with the Open Source community today and if we trade software at all it's with a CD burner over a cup of coffee.
Just a thought...
Parent
Is Groove doomed? (Score:4, Interesting)
Discuss.
Re:Is Groove doomed? (Score:5, Funny)
a) Groove was actually used by anybody and
b) It wasn't such horrible software
then I would say yes. Unfortunately Groove is a solution looking for a problem, and how many people get excited when you hear "designed by the guy that designed Notes."
Parent
1337 (Score:5, Funny)
Listening on port 1337
Somehow I think this is a very well chosen port...
4 years later May 28th (Score:5, Interesting)
As for the "What's the point" question... (Score:5, Interesting)
Think of it this way, these guys know probably better than anyone else NOT on the AOL IM team, just how much of IM conversations are monitored, logged, mined for information, media metrics...etc.
Not to mention, they work in that environment, they prolly want to be able to say "god damn, our executive VP is a bitch" and not have some network engineer provide a log documenting that conversation later.
Yeah, i wish it scalled, but wtf, its opensource. Go make it scale. For now, 10-50 is plenty for most groups of online friends.
Personally, I'd loved to see technology like Pastry [microsoft.com] get hacked into it.
-malakai
Linux port ? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Linux port ? (Score:5, Interesting)
I haven't used C in 3 years and I managed to get it to compile with a bit of hacking. As for stability, your guess is as good as mine...
diff -r waste/Makefile.posix waste_port/Makefile.posix
4c4
< RSAOBJS = md5c.o nn.o prime.o r_random.o rsa.o
---
> RSAOBJS = rsa/md5c.o rsa/nn.o rsa/prime.o rsa/r_random.o rsa/rsa.o
7,8c7,8
< CXXFLAGS = -O2 $(DEBUGFLAG) -pipe -march=pentiumpro
< CFLAGS = -O2 $(DEBUGFLAG) -pipe -march=pentiumpro
---
> CXXFLAGS = -O2 $(DEBUGFLAG) -pipe
> CFLAGS = -O2 $(DEBUGFLAG) -pipe
diff -r waste/connection.cpp waste_port/connection.cpp
771c771
< if (::getsockname(m_socket,(struct sockaddr *)&sin,(socklen_t *)&len)) return 0;
---
> if (::getsockname(m_socket,(struct sockaddr *)&sin,(unsigned socklen_t *)&len)) return 0;
diff -r waste/listen.cpp waste_port/listen.cpp
85c85
< int s = accept(m_socket, (struct sockaddr *) &saddr, (socklen_t *)&length);
---
> int s = accept(m_socket, (struct sockaddr *) &saddr, (unsigned socklen_t *)&length);
diff -r waste/srvmain.cpp waste_port/srvmain.cpp
31c31
< #include "md5.h"
---
> #include "rsa/md5.h"
diff -r waste/xfers.cpp waste_port/xfers.cpp
812c812,814
< if (!RemoveDirectory(s)) break;
---
>
>
>
Parent
AOL Time Warner... (Score:4, Interesting)
Revolution of Filesharing? (Score:5, Interesting)
There are two uses I see for this:
There are going to be groups of people dedicated to one theme, for example, Horror Movies, or Horror Movies with mutant bees, sharing all their Horror Movies, you will need a certain ammount of Horror Movie Uploads for Downloads and noone will ever be to know you had Queen Bee 1-3.
If you replace Horror with new release you get lots of small miniDonkeys, many interconnected and unstoppable.
I'm convinced this is a revolution in filesharing because it solves the two biggest Problems filesharing has, crappy downloads and getting sued.
The downloads will be of really good quality beacause you will be sharing with friends of people you know from chatting and if the put crap in their upload directory they won't be one of your cirle of friends much longer.
Getting sued is obvious, noone will be able to tell what you are doing (the might be able to guess that all those people on cable are not running a vpn yet) as just your circle of friends know. There is still the possibility that one of your friends is a traitor but i would call that a rare chance.
daemons name (Score:5, Funny)
It's a really useful tool for business too (Score:5, Interesting)
WASTE is something that is indeed very useful for small company or teams (especially dispersed teams) in larger organizations. In many places one or another IM system is being used to communicate with team members. Over ICQ or AOL contracts and employment conditions are discussed, remarks about contractors and clients are passed etc. That is a huge security leak if you look at it from a certain prospective, especially for some profiles of companies like small consulting firms with employees regularly using clients networks. WASTE is a simple to use and free method of closing that leak.
I know at least two small companies that should adopt WASTE immediately and I would advise them to do so. One is a PR company with 2-10 people offices around Europe, where ICQ is frequently used as a discussion medium. Other is a small consulting company. Someone eavesdropping on their ICQ chats could seriously damage both of them.
What no LibTomMath for bignum RSA? (Score:4, Informative)
Common LibTomMath is like a billion times faster [not to mention very well tested]....
Plug plug plug!
http://math.libtomcrypt.org
Tom
The good, and the bad.... (Score:5, Insightful)
While on the surface, this might seem like a reinvention of IP tunnelling and VPN's, there are a couple of important features bundled in that set it apart:
1. It turns each node into a router. While you can establish a VPN with other tool kits, you still have to enable and configure the routing manually.
2. It's entirely user-land - it's a standalone program that a user can plop on their machine and be on their way.
The best part about it is that you can get through firewalls. The worst part about it is that you can get through firewalls.
Most people are pretty polar in their opinions of firewalls, with most of those people seeing them a fascist mechanism to control what they can see. In some (perhaps most) cases, that can be true. However, firewalls are much more than that: They can (and often are) used to protect YOU, the clueless end-user, from the other bad people on the Internet.
After I clear out counters on firewall rules, it's not uncommon to see 10-20 (sometimes more) incoming attacks within 5 seconds.
So, this will be great for letting people browse the web from work. On the other hand, it will expose them to propagation of worms and attacks which would have otherwise been caught by the firewall.
Is this a good program? Overall, I think that it's a good thing that NullSoft created it. We simply need to realize that with all of the benefits it brings, it will also bring a few negatvies with it.
steve
Found a Mirror (Score:5, Informative)
waste installer [blueyonder.co.uk]
waste source [blueyonder.co.uk]
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:5, Insightful)
The next time you want to have a chat with a friend, but you don't exactly want the contents bouncing all over the internet in plaintext, this looks like the perfect application. Reminds me somewhat of a program called SIMP [winfosec.com], which is a minimalistic Blowfish-ized IM program.
Parent
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:4, Informative)
It's KVirc 3 over at www.kvirc.net [kvirc.net].
It's primarily writen for KDE/Linux but they also have a pre-compiled Win32 stand-alone.
Parent
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:5, Informative)
I bet the other networks are the same. MSN, Yahoo, etc. Direct connections are a bit slower to start up, and a bit more of a security risk, since you now know the other person's IP address.
Parent
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:I have to ask.. (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:Gnutella (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:Gnutella (Score:5, Informative)
/joeyo
Parent
Re:Gnutella (Score:5, Interesting)
the reason why winamp 3 sucks so much, is because it's written by some other guy. justin isn't even in the credits of winamp3
Parent
Re:Gnutella (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Everyone invented Gnutella (Score:5, Interesting)
I personally came across it when removing a section of my P2P anti hacking designed for Diablo 1 to be secure even without a central server.
Interestingly enough, I was going to call my Gnutella: Dumpster
Which is cool they're naming their software: Waste
Lets see how it turns out
Parent
Re:name "Waste" -- Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49 (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:fix what needs fixing (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:They already fixed Winamp, whiner (Score:4, Interesting)
I know many people do feel the way I do, talk to most people who have tried 3.0 or even go to their website and see people bitching about it. Winamp is the most used player in windows, second only to WMP, though I wouldn't be surprised if more used. To stop trying to make a decent product and ignore the problems will cause them to loose their marketshare and thus make them worthless, not a very good business model if you want to be around to do other things like protocols.
Also I don't think many people care about this protocol, sure the paranoid types might, but this is very much something most people could care less about.
Also I in no way have said they are obligated to do anything. I was just pointing out how they have gone from something good to complete crap. I don't belive companies own anyone anything unless there was some deal which requires them to.
I doubt it was done in spare time, if it was employees doing something it was during work time, and if there are things that need to be done to your product you don't have "free time" . Free time is when there is nothing you should be doing.
Nullsoft is a company. Time is money for them. Users are money for them. Being a company that gives product away for free, the balance of keaping them is huge. If no one goes to your sight and clicks on ads and so forth they are done.
One last thing, they haven't fixed jake shit. winamp 3 is broken, go to their sight, winamp 3 is what they are advertising. Making updates to an older product is not fixing. To be fixed means they got all the issues sorta out with 3.0 .
Parent
Re:Beep! (Score:4, Funny)
"[...] It makes noises on keyboard/mouse input :-) [...] it is 'cute' enough to impress my girlfriend."
Where do you find a girl that could be impressed that easily? No need for fancy restaurants or expensive gifts, just type on your keyboard and she goes mental.... nice!Parent
Re:Download and mirror this (Score:5, Interesting)
+4 RTFA [nullsoft.com]! more like it.
And I blockquote:
So this isn't really a thing like gnutella. It's an enterprise product. As other posters have noted, it could conceivably be used to share (AOL-TW) copyrighted works, but that doesn't seem to be anywhere near it's main purpose. Heck, AOL is probably releasing the core technology as OSS to get the community to shake it down for bugs, in anticipation of releasing a commercial product built on top of the protocol. Kinda like how Apple has worked on open source technologies like zeroconf, and released commercial products like rendezvous built on the technology.Parent
Re:Download and mirror this (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Yes, it's GPL and it says so... (Score:5, Informative)
Try searching on 'GNU General Public License' Einstein.
Parent
Re:Why didn't they call it "Idiot"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:JabberIM does this (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:downloaded, now what? (Score:5, Funny)
You need to have friends, dude! :-)
zParent
Re:Looks great but... (Score:4, Informative)
You both need to enter each other's public key into your client to get started. This step shows that you "trust" one another.
Anyone else who wants to join your "network" must also enter one of your existing network members' public key into their client and have that existing member enter the new user's public key into *their* client. This step automatically makes the new person "trusted" by all the other members of the network - the important part is that you don't have to explicitly swap public keys with EVERYONE - just with one member of the network. The client does the rest once you connect to the network - see below.
Now, to get started and initially connect to someone's machine, enter their hostname or IP address (not their "username") into the "Network" window. This primes your client - it will then discover all it needs to know about the other members of the network, since by default, each client will be broadcasting discovery information (usernames, hostnames, public keys).
The "Browser" window shows all the users in the network, but currently ONLY if they are sharing one or more files. So, get each person who joins the network to share at least a test file so that they will always appear in everyone's "Browser" window.
Right-click on any names in the browser window to start interacting with them.
HTH
Parent